2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Bernie Bros vs. the Hillarybots
Bubbling intra-left conflict over Hillary Clinton has washed over the internet, with the most recent fracas concerning the cover art for a new anti-Hillary book by left-wing writer Doug Henwood. The book, which will be published in January, is an expansion of Henwoods anti-Hillary broadside for Harper's in 2014. Its cover is a noirish painting of Hillary, arm raised, gun pointed at readers, under the title My Turn: Hillary Clinton Targets the Presidency.
Heres the cover in question.
From one angle, the image is a hilariously kitschy take on an ambitious, tenacious politician long bedeviled by an American reluctance to admire tenacity and ambition in women. Painted by a Hillary superfan who describes her depictions of the candidate as libidinal, it works as an over-the-top riff on the way Hillary (and other powerful women) are seen as emasculating and dangerous. The painting recalls the Texts from Hillary meme that made Clinton briefly cool, as well as Notorious RBG iconography that resonates around fiercely brilliant bubbe Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In other words, it kind of makes Hillary look like a badass.
But since the book is far from an ode to Clintons moxie, the image takes on a different cast, conveying the grotesque degree to which a competent professional woman, history-making presidential candidate, policy nerd, and grandmother can be so intimidating that her menace is best portrayed as violent threat. Its imagery that mirrors right-wing conspiracy theories about Hillary as a murderous Lady Macbeth. But remember, this book comes not from the right but from the left. Henwood goes after Clinton as a hawkish corporatist, beholden to Wall Street; he includes Clintons feminist shortcomings in his critique.
More here: http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/11/bernie-sanders-bros-are-coming-for-the-hillary-clinton-bots.html#
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
tblue
(16,350 posts)I wouldn't like that kind of pic posted about my guy, so this feels wrong to me. It's inflammatory and not necessary. Stick to policy and we will win.
Autumn
(45,098 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)Thanks for the explanation. 🙂
Autumn
(45,098 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)"This is the fractured, maddening dynamic in play in a far corner of the American left, as Hillary Clinton continues to square off against her progressive challenger, Bernie Sanders. Her critics, some of the loudest of them progressive men, are struggling to communicate the intensity of their distaste for her and for her supporters. But in their efforts, a few are reaching for the communicative weapons usually wielded by their ideological foes those who diminish, demean, and infantalize women. These lefty guys are reminding their feminist peers that misogyny and bitter gender resentments are not as they have never been the sole province of the American right. As Michelle Goldberg points out in her piece about these tensions, "as long as feminism has existed, left-wing men have dismissed it as a bourgeois triviality. Now we know how little things have changed."
betsuni
(25,537 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)I cannot say anything about its content.
The cover, however, is atrocious, and definitely
looks more like hatred than like fair criticism.
And, sorry, but I don't like hatred.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Apparently she was going for a "Notorious RBG" thing.
Autumn
(45,098 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Strangely though, this image matches the malevolent vibe of some of her most strident supporters.
Autumn
(45,098 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)What do you mean?