2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Clinton is just as progressive as Bernie". Not true.
Today we take a look at Myth #17 from the Daily Kos article "25 Unfounded Myths Being Spread About Bernie by The Clinton Machine" http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/30/1442863/-25-Unfounded-Myths-Being-Spread-About-Bernie-by-The-Clinton-Machine
We hear this a lot and well, besides the whole minimum wage issue with Bernie advocating for a $15/hr minimum wage and Hillary at $12, there's a whole lot of other things to be taken into consideration.
Not true by a long shot. Bernie calls for Medicare For All, tuition free public universities, reinstating Glass Steagall, a $15 minimum wage, ending "Citizens" United any way possible (including a SCOTUS litmus test), ending deregulated trade pacts that outsource good American jobs overseas, a $1 trillion public jobs program to repair America's crumbling infrastructure, ending KGB-style domestic espionage, protecting Net Neutrality, 12 weeks of paid maternity leave, higher union rates, a clear and quick path to citizenship, shutting down for-profit private prisons, universal Kindergarten, passing the ERA, expanding social security, ending institutional racism, stopping Climate Change, not letting the war machine embroil us in more overseas quagmires, protecting our veterans, and breaking up the big banks on Wall Street. Clinton does have some suddenly new found progressive stances, but seriously, does anyone really believe she is against the TPP after she praised it for years? Does anyone think she will actually take on Wall Street after she represented them in Congress and they are by far he biggest campaign financiers? Its faux-progressivism being used to dishonestly trick progressives into not supporting Bernie.
45 times Secretary Clinton pushed the trade bill she now opposes
Hillary Clinton's Goldman Sachs Problem
Sorry, Democrats, Hillary Clinton is Not a Progressive
Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush Still Favorites of Wall Street Banks
And lastly;
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)"Does anyone really believe she will...." (Fill in the blank).
We get it!
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Thank you.
And in case you're wondering, Bernie is very electable. We hear a lot from Hillary supporters that he isn't....however.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)I'm not entirely sure to be honest.
I can hope so but I'm not really sure, especially if Hillary is the nominee. Dems will lose a LOT of crossover votes.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)There's a thread currently on DU, in GD-P somewhere that I can't find that explains this and most the people posting in the thread are from the indy camp, green party and Justice Party who came under the Dem umbrella because Bernie is running.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Can you imagine an open stage with the top 10 candidates from the top 10 political parties all debating? Now THAT I would get the popcorn for! Gary Johnson vs Donald Trump? That would be solid gold!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Better than one written in the age of muskets and powder horns.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)pleads guilty to being a moderate.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/10/1420204/-Hillary-I-plead-guilty-to-being-a-moderate
"You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center," Clinton told the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. "I plead guilty."
of course back in July it was
The answer my friend is Blowing in the Wind. Who you going to believe? Hillary Hillary or Bernie?
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Coming from "what we call the reality-based community,"!
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)It just comes off as calculating to a lot of us, expedient.
Not so with Bernie, he has held the same view for years other than with guns.
He is taking no super pac cash from Wall Street. Hillary is taking oodles of it. So why would a rational person believe she would do anything to reign them in? Or maybe her minions don't care if the Banksters still takes huge risks just to further enrich themselves at the expense of the rest of us.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Maybe you're coming around.
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Clinton made one claim to be a progressive, and that was qualified as "progressive Democrat." I haven't heard any similar claims lately, so I don't think she's making that claim. And I don't see very much "She's a progressive!" from her supporters here on DU, at least not lately. It appears to me her campaign flirted with the progressive notion, and then decided it wasn't such a good idea. If it's a myth, it's a myth nobody is pushing.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)apparently is proud of it and has proved by her support for policies that are in no way progressive.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)By ANY measure.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)I'm a progressive that can get things done, translation: I'm going to appease the Republicans and my Wall Street/corporate owners.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Read her supporters' posts carefully. They don't say she's as progressive as Sanders. They say she's progressive enough, progressive on the critical issues, 93 percent as progressive as Sanders, and so on. I don't think Clinton is trying to compete with Sanders in this arena. I don't think she wants to. Her argument seems to be, "I'm progressive enough."