2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDuring the forum Hillary told rachel
She could think of a couple of Republicans to be her VP
Discuss
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,806 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)In reply to the question which of the Republicans onstage during their debate which one would she choose as VP she replied none on the debate stage but she could think of a couple she would run with
Paraphrased
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Cause I can indeed link to it
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Including g what I imagine is the focus group approved reply
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)then your OP is a total joke based on a lie.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Darn my lying eyes and ears
Sure sounded go me like she said she could think of a couple.of Republicans as her running mate
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The Republicans would throw her in prison for life if they could. Why would she play nice with them? They screwed everything up in the first place. The Democratic party needs to take the gloves off when dealing with the GOP. There is no need to include their ruinous input on anything.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)So. Which Republicans do you think she might consider?
Which Republican would you consider?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)of a republican she'd actually would want to run with so she answered "generic republican"?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)question posed as a unity ticket needed because of a national crisis? "Fuck the national crisis,Rachel"?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Thank you but I'll pick a Democrat to help me fix the national crises" Sometimes nothing but the truth is needed.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)but when Bernie reaches across the aisle, you all act like it is stink on shit.
Hypocritical much? Unbelievable!
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)And it comes.with a ready made excuse
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,806 posts)The fact that she would even consider a GOPer running mate - even though it would never actually happen - is absurd.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)You don't even have the tiniest bit of curiosity of which Republican she COULD consider?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,806 posts)But all of them are awful...
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)run on a "unity" ticket. Any Democrat worth their salt would flat out say that a united Democratic ticket is more than capable of addressing a crisis.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)not accepting Bernie, but Hillary accepting a REPUBLICAN.
I'm simply stunned.
artislife
(9,497 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Little family breakfasts
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)What is to discuss?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)It's what she said
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)currently running. Would you?
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)I pick him. Or Garfield, Hays, or one of the othe progressive era/good government republicans.
If you want to move to the modern era, the Tom McCall governor of Oregon.Maybe Nelson Rockefeller jr.
Living republicans? Well Jim Webb, or Lincoln Chafee.
How would you have answered the question; "F-off b!tch that's an unfair question"?
That last line is sarcasm. Sad that I have to say that.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)If there was a national crisis, she asked, and there had to be a unity ticket and it was for the good of the nation and those were your choices, those 15 men and women, who would you choose?
Neither did Clinton of course, but at least in her reply she called all the republican candidates shit heads, while at the same time not alienating any fence sitters.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)You should rid yourself of that avatar. You shame her memory and every thing she was about.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Rachel Maddow put Hillary Clinton on the hot seat tonight about which Republican she would most likely pick as her VP in a hypothetical scenario.
If there was a national crisis, she asked, and there had to be a unity ticket and it was for the good of the nation and those were your choices, those 15 men and women, who would you choose?
The answer:
Clinton had to mull over that a bit before admitting, There are Republicans I could pick. Just none of them.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)I guess she was being unusually truthful... can happen in unscripted moments I suppose.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)You said it
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I have seen yet.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)that the Bernie gang was going to try to twist her answer into an another asinine attack.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Should have named someone.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She said she could think of a couple of goppers.to run with
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She was discussing living Republicans
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)this entire election cycle.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)Hillary didn't fall for the trap. She answered perfectly.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Lol
moobu2
(4,822 posts)Put it into context or else your just spreading misinformation.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)She said no. BUT she said that
QUOTE
There are Republicans I could pick."
Which Republican would you pick.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)and she WAS TOLD she couldn't back out of the question so she very intelligently gave a perfect answer under those circumstances. Go back and watch the video.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)And said none of.those running but she could think of some she could run with
So which ones?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)So. Apparently, Clinton COULD pick a Republican. Can you?
moobu2
(4,822 posts)Go back and watch the video if you care about what you post being true.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)And then volunteered that their were Republicans she would consider running with
It was almost " as far as I know" all over again
She had no reason or need to toss that out there but she can't stop herself
LuvLoogie
(7,020 posts)It might turn to gold.
LuvLoogie
(7,020 posts)Elizabeth Warren
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)but you are headed in the wrong direction here.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)But that she could think.of a.couple she could run with just none of those
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)but she would consider another?
Arrgh.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She then said there were some she could consider.
Renew Deal
(81,869 posts)She said she could think of another if she had to. The OP is stirring.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)candidates currently running.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)This is a non-issue.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Hillary thinks that there are some Republicans worthwhile to run on a unity ticket. Just not the Republicans that are currently running for President.
Which republican not currently running for President would you choose?
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Which one I wonder
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)I had to bury my dad yesterday and I haven't slept since Thursday
And I drove ten hours today
BTW your I love you swampg8r is about the best thing in a.week
Bless you
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)The words kind and humble.were the most common used to describe him.
He was a non judgemental man who treated everyone like they hoped they would be treated.
He fought in Korea and built the lunar lander
He put his feet on every continent and took only memories
He was loving and loved
If I could do one thing to make America better it wod be to make him everyone's.dad.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)What a terrible week for you.
redwitch
(14,946 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She did endorse.McCain in 08/ too
Or rather she Implied McCain would be a better çhoice than obama
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)a national crisis? Apparently, Hillary can. And if you can, name them.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Sure, he calls himself a Dem now, but he used to be a Republican.
Kind of like a certain Independent, who now calls himself a Dem.
I win.
In all seriousness, if this is the nonsense you guys want to run around screaming about, have at it.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Did you see the article they dredged up from 20 years ago about Bill Clinton and school uniforms?
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,136 posts)Try again
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Just not the current candidates.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)He started babbling about McCain.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Should I or anyone forget that?
Hillary thought he would be a better President than Obama.
Obama made Hillary part of his Cabinet. Her performance wasn't exactly stellar.
What's your problem?
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Bernie got the cabinet question. Both ducked the answer and said they could work with the GOP
What's your problem. They answered the same way.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Reverse the question. It's not that hard.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)the conditional tense. I realize from experience that many US English speakers are unfamiliar with the conditional, but a conditional question is not the same as a present tense interrogatory.
"Would you ever eat chili?" is a question using the conditional. "How often do you eat chili" is present interrogatory.
The two questions are not at all the same.
If people wish to criticize a candidate, at least understand what the candidate actually said.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Me if you say you can think of a Republican to run with then you can think of a Republican to run with.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)"would you ever eat alligator?", is that the same as asking "how often do you eat alligator?"
No. (If you do not eat or would never eat alligator please feel free to substitute another source of animal protein.)
Maddow did not ask HRC if she would run with a member of the GOP. She asked if there were a national crisis that required party unity, would she pick any particular GOP politician. If my memory serves me.
The question was a hypothetical and was posed as a conditional.
"If I were a rich man" does not imply that I am rich.
That aside, do you truly feel that all Republicans are evil, or that there are no good Republicans?
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)And then volunteered the fact that there were some she would feel comfortable running with so your analogy is flawed
It's more like she was asked " do you eat alligator?" And then answered " no but there are some I would eat"
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)Since The Swarm isn't helping at all here, my guess is that none of the Republicans she could have named would have any name recognition. They're probably Goldman-Sachs board members, or other banksters. It's easy for me to believe both that there are no Republican *politicians* she would run with AND that there are plenty of Republicans she would run with.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Give me a meat mallet and I will make it soft.and flaky
You need a recipe for the best damn hush puppies.since Jesus had a fish fry?
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)Been here in the South a few years now, but I still think of myself as a novice!
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)My 14-year-old kid laughed too.... and is stoked for the hush puppies!
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Where's the buttermilk?
I know that recipe.don't look like.it will work but this.time.you need to trust me
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)Gotta say though, it's pretty easy to be trusting when deep frying is involved, hahaha!
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I used to hang with a bunch who did big NFL weekend get togethers. There was this one Cajun guy who made the best melt in your mouth hush puppies I ever had. He did vegetarian ones just for me. I still love that man.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)That is a stupid question.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)How bad the GOP is
Instead she lends them credibility and a great sound bite for an ad
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)The Swarm manages to ALMOST say the same thing but sound almost as petulant as Carly Firoina and Ted Cruz whining about how Fox is too liberal.
Rachel fucking Maddow and her mean, mean gotcha questions?? Puh-leeze.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)and when you get one you tell the person asking it that it is and don't let them railroad you into a stupid answer.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)that Rachel Maddow is as big a sellout as Hillary Clinton isn't paying attention.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Hillary answered it exactly right
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Both self-centric, fuck all individuals.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I saw a whole thread the other day on "Republicans for Bernie" it seems odd to make this an issue?
Maybe I missed something?
moobu2
(4,822 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Makes a whole lot of sense...
merrily
(45,251 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Me and you supporting the same person, I know it's mind blowing for some to think that.
And not its not really all that different between voters and candidates. The Bernie equation is based on gathering votes from democrats, independents, and yes even some republicans. I don't see a big difference there.
This isn't an attack against anyone, just a point of information.
merrily
(45,251 posts)discusdsing this with you, except to agree with you that, yes, you and I supporting the same candidate will be a new experience.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)He's a great guy, and awesome senator.
He just isn't who I'm voting for.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)It's very weird that so many here on DU won't except Bernie Sanders as a Democratic candidate but have no problem with Hillary Clinton's acceptance of a possible Republican running mate.
How far in the sludge can the party (and DU) go?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Hi. Haven't seen you in a while. Hope you are well.
Renew Deal
(81,869 posts)She wouldn't answer it, but we all know the answer.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Indeed we do.
No.
But it helps the country and Dems to move back away from Repug Lite 3rd Way!
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She said what she said
Please educate me in this truth that my ears and eyes hide from me
Oh damn you hearing and sight if you didn't confuse me with your illusions I too could see truth
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)than the Hillary campaign. Truth went out the window a long time ago.
Hekate
(90,769 posts)....how stupid this topic is.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Oh well then
Carry on
Hekate
(90,769 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Which was "There are Republicans I could pick. Just none of them".
Once again, another Sanders supporters who falls well, well below the standards of the candidate they profess to support.
Going by your assertion, she could pick a Republican but none of them. ????
What the hell Republican could she pick? How obtuse can you get?
Thankfully Bernie Sanders has standards, that we as supporters might fall short of.
Shameful that neither Hillary or her supporters have any standards at all.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)But that is beyond the ability of DU'ers to rectify for you.
ecstatic
(32,727 posts)truly republican in name only. Perhaps, if forced into a unity ticket, she would pick one of them? Why over think something that won't happen anyway? She stated clearly in the last debate that repubs are her enemy, and I agree. Were you outraged when Kucinich said he wanted racist ass Ron Paul as his VP?
George II
(67,782 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)She did its a fact
George II
(67,782 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Get the quotes that show me as.wrong
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)McCain declined. But Joe Biden supported the idea:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/4542473/