Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
145 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Bernie is not accepted here as a Democrat (Original Post) UglyGreed Nov 2015 OP
don't be ridiculous! marym625 Nov 2015 #1
Silly me UglyGreed Nov 2015 #45
haha! marym625 Nov 2015 #47
Aside from Bernie voting Democrat from one side Hortensis Nov 2015 #89
Apparently, only till the people put the "Big tent" to the big test demwing Nov 2015 #91
Sorry. Sounds like you're having a bad election season. Hortensis Nov 2015 #95
Why's that? My candidate kicks butt! demwing Nov 2015 #102
We are together in that. I'm very glad Bernie Hortensis Nov 2015 #103
So vote for the workers of the party demwing Nov 2015 #105
I've said before I will IF he becomes the best candidate Hortensis Nov 2015 #108
Which ever candidate we send to the GE is going to win demwing Nov 2015 #109
All our candidates believe in tacking our national problems in a big Hortensis Nov 2015 #113
Do you think Hillary will have an easier time working with the GOP demwing Nov 2015 #117
We see no signs that the GOP will not be as committed to Hortensis Nov 2015 #119
Lol..."tedious yada over Hillary" - I agree! demwing Nov 2015 #120
What qualifies someone to be a Democrat? sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #100
You register with the party. Same as being a Republican. Hortensis Nov 2015 #101
I hope it does become an issue in NH. I can't think of anything that would be more foolish sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #104
Frivolous imaginary battles, to my mind. If the attorneys Hortensis Nov 2015 #112
“I’m a Democrat and should be on the ballot, I don’t think I need to say too much more,” ... Kalidurga Nov 2015 #128
Oh, he did file. No surprise, of course. Thanks, Kalidurga. Hortensis Nov 2015 #139
This message was self-deleted by its author William769 Nov 2015 #75
Bernie is accepted everywhere as a Democrat, no problem...but on the issues, which is what Fred Sanders Nov 2015 #2
He is absolutely accepted by the majority of Americans. It's DU Hillary supporters that won't accept cui bono Nov 2015 #5
Running as a Democrat does not make him one. He'd be the first to tell you that. BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #22
It does in this primary. cui bono Nov 2015 #29
He's running AS a Democrat. He's not one. That's pretty simple, too. BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #49
I vote AS a Democrat every election. blackspade Nov 2015 #53
Are you registered as a Democrat? BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #65
What about Jessie Jackson? bobbobbins01 Nov 2015 #69
Is he running for president? BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #70
He was at the time. bobbobbins01 Nov 2015 #73
I noted DemocratS not "a Democrat". BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #86
Ah, I get it. Labels are what concern you. blackspade Nov 2015 #79
You *can* see it that way - OR - you can say that you have enough BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #83
That's a lie that BS has never stumped for anyone. Chuy Garcia riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #106
So then explain to me how he goes about registering as a Democrat in Vermont. cui bono Nov 2015 #55
It's not that he hasn't registered as a Democrat. It's that he's SAID, again and again, BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #66
“I am running as a Democrat, obviously,” Sanders told reporters. “I am a Democrat now.” Live and Learn Nov 2015 #71
Political expediency? That's how I see it. BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #84
The post is still false. Live and Learn Nov 2015 #88
Opinion isn't fact. But thanks for opining. BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #93
It wasn't an opinion. It is a fact. Live and Learn Nov 2015 #97
So you choose to ignore that he SAID he's running as a Democrat. Which makes it so. cui bono Nov 2015 #77
Browbeating a registered Democratic voter into believing that Sanders has become BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #85
So now presenting facts is browbeating. cui bono Nov 2015 #115
What, praytell, IS a Democrat? Armstead Nov 2015 #58
That's an amazing take and a great fucking question. Capn Sunshine Nov 2015 #68
When will be "the right time"? nt TBF Nov 2015 #90
The data do not support this conclusion Android3.14 Nov 2015 #130
W has one as well. trumad Nov 2015 #3
Such a flattering one to UglyGreed Nov 2015 #6
The point is--- trumad Nov 2015 #11
Then why do you have UglyGreed Nov 2015 #12
To fuck with the BS'ers. trumad Nov 2015 #13
LOL UglyGreed Nov 2015 #15
Good Idea bravenak Nov 2015 #51
Choosing a particular avatar and the site having the avatar are different things. cui bono Nov 2015 #32
Here's one for you since UglyGreed Nov 2015 #14
If avatars don't mean shit then why are you posting about them? leftofcool Nov 2015 #16
Follow the thread please UglyGreed Nov 2015 #18
I agree with you on this, the site has sports team avatars as well and that doesn't mean anything cui bono Nov 2015 #34
deep acceptance and meaning to avatars and icons? Sheepshank Nov 2015 #4
Well many people UglyGreed Nov 2015 #9
but because it's an avatar option on DU, it means something significant? Sheepshank Nov 2015 #25
don't get me started on whether you thunked demwing Nov 2015 #92
deep acceptance of labels over meanings? senz Nov 2015 #99
Please show me where you and I have not accepted him as a democrat. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #7
He wasn't until yesterday.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #8
Socialist and Democrat are not mutually exclusive. blackspade Nov 2015 #80
There are Socialist Democrats and Democratic Socialists VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #107
Again, you are mixing a political party with economic theory. blackspade Nov 2015 #123
No I am not VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #124
You can still be a Democratic Socialist and a Democrat. blackspade Nov 2015 #129
No you cannot VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #134
If Sanders had not run as a Democrat he would have run as an independent, and then what? Fred Sanders Nov 2015 #135
Now we dont have to worry about that VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #137
But then again Democrats would have struggled much more to win back the WH. Fred Sanders Nov 2015 #140
No sir..disagree.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #145
What are you talking about? blackspade Nov 2015 #143
Did he or did he not have to SAY he is now a VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #144
This message was self-deleted by its author Kentonio Nov 2015 #133
Sanders is now a Democrat, having beocme a Democrat when decided to run for the Democratic Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #10
And just 6 yrs ago he called himself a flat out Socialist....no couching it with the word Democrat VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #19
Yes, you are right. But the rules of the Democratic Party are fine with it. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #59
NO they weren't UNTIL yesterday when he was FORCED to become one of us... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #61
It was New Hampshire state law that had the problem, not the Democratic Party. See the relevant link Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #63
I am right and now VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #74
The states have the constitutional power to manage elections. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #121
Exactly....that is what I said VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #122
And Hillary use to be a Republican. Which is worse? Live and Learn Nov 2015 #72
When was she a republican, before she was eligible to vote? Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #131
That is news to me...gonna have to back that up...or change the laughing emoticon. Fred Sanders Nov 2015 #136
Bernie announced **yesterday** while registering in NH that he was now a Democrat Sheepshank Nov 2015 #52
You are right, but the Democratic Party rules do not require him to be a Democrat. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #60
Yes, he could have joined any time. This recent capitulationis not genuine imho Sheepshank Nov 2015 #62
I agree. I suspect the will retun to indepedance if and when he looses. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #64
Holy shit! Avatargate! leftofcool Nov 2015 #17
IMO it's better than UglyGreed Nov 2015 #33
Can Bernie Sanders Win the Love of a Party He Scorns? workinclasszero Nov 2015 #20
I don't feel scorned. blackspade Nov 2015 #81
"I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat". Bernie Sanders workinclasszero Nov 2015 #21
He is represented here UglyGreed Nov 2015 #24
That doesn't change the fact that Bernie has held the democratic party workinclasszero Nov 2015 #26
He is a better representative of UglyGreed Nov 2015 #31
As soon as Bernie loses the democratic party nomination workinclasszero Nov 2015 #36
If you were an informed Democrat you would be aware that Bernie is one of 5 co-founders of Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #41
Bernie Sanders quotes: workinclasszero Nov 2015 #44
How is that hate? I'm a second generation Democrat and I think the Party is ideologically bankrupt Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #46
No. The Democratic Party doesn't subscribe to straight socialism. Bernie does. That's why he calls BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #48
True. He's a democratic socialist. That should surprise no one. Avalux Nov 2015 #67
You can also get a Lincoln avatar... SidDithers Nov 2015 #23
Really stretching it UglyGreed Nov 2015 #27
Nelson Mandela?... SidDithers Nov 2015 #28
DU under 'Topics' has 'Democrats' and under 'Democrats' comes 'Bernie Sanders' and always Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #38
Incorrect Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #50
The 'not a Democrat' routine is a handful of cranks who take issue with the opinion of the DNC Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #30
The DNC and the Democratic Party has accepted Sanders as a Dem. BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #35
Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #37
No response from BlueCaliDem and not a peep from her cohort which lends silent approval Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #40
In other words, Bernie thinks for himself and not as part of a herd. -none Nov 2015 #138
President Obama doesn't think for himself? Nancy Pelosi doesn't think for herself? BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #142
Bernie just wants to be a Democrat when it's convenient to him moobu2 Nov 2015 #39
And as soon as he is done using the party for his own ends workinclasszero Nov 2015 #42
OMG... you guys get more and more hilarious. cui bono Nov 2015 #78
That is some shit there... blackspade Nov 2015 #82
Party over policy! pinebox Nov 2015 #43
Truth, truth, truth and truth! senz Nov 2015 #96
I'd like to bookmark your comment here on DU senz Nov 2015 #110
Interesting, it seems to be gone pinebox Nov 2015 #111
And yet my bookmarks are intact. senz Nov 2015 #118
+ all. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #132
Because he is a small d democrat AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #54
I hope you are UglyGreed Nov 2015 #56
Which is why they want to shield the public from his message AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #57
This is why the "Third Way" is a new and different party. senz Nov 2015 #98
Bush's Icon has been here for years and he's not in the Democratic party. William769 Nov 2015 #76
1000 views UglyGreed Nov 2015 #87
How much is that worth? JTFrog Nov 2015 #141
Under Vermont law, Bernie is a Democrat. That is dispositive and all that is relevant. merrily Nov 2015 #94
... Skidmore Nov 2015 #114
It may be a bit peculiar to run for the nomination as an Independent Tarc Nov 2015 #116
It's one of the ugly bullshit lies that some Clinton supporters peddle on DU davidpdx Nov 2015 #125
Personally... 99Forever Nov 2015 #126
He has voted as a Democrat more than Hillary sellitman Nov 2015 #127

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
89. Aside from Bernie voting Democrat from one side
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:09 PM
Nov 2015

of his face while badmouthing the party from the other for years? Because he is on the left, like we are, and we are the genuine Big Tent, and proudly.

In all this silly discussion, please note that Bernie is proudly and insistently NOT a Democrat. He never has been a registered Democrat. We still don't know if he'll qualify to be on the New Hampshire primary ballot as a Democrat.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
91. Apparently, only till the people put the "Big tent" to the big test
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:14 PM
Nov 2015

then we're revealed as just another umbrella corporation.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
102. Why's that? My candidate kicks butt!
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 03:57 PM
Nov 2015

Even if he doesn't win the nomination, he has forced your candidate to act like a Democrat. That must Bern for you.. Being taught how to be a Democrat by an Independent!

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
103. We are together in that. I'm very glad Bernie
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:00 PM
Nov 2015

entered the race and would be surprised if he didn't feel he's won what he initially intended to and then some. The Democratic Party and the nation are winners thanks to him.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
108. I've said before I will IF he becomes the best candidate
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:19 PM
Nov 2015

to take on the GOP in the general, Demwing.

The next president will elect at least 2 (two!!) and as many as 4 (four!!!!) supreme court justices. The next president must NOT be any of the GOP candidates -- not if you want to see your dreams for your country achieved in your lifetime.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
109. Which ever candidate we send to the GE is going to win
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:37 PM
Nov 2015

So concentrate on which candidate is more progressive. That should be an easy choice...

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
113. All our candidates believe in tacking our national problems in a big
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:13 PM
Nov 2015

way with big solutions and using government to advance our nation. I.e., are "progressive." The question is more how incremental and conventional or bold and experimental we want the solutions to be.

You may or may not realize it, but many experts feel some of Bernie's "solutions" are not doable or just plain wouldn't work as stated. Even if he were elected he'd have to retrench to what was achievable. Presidents have real limitations to their power. The more ambitious the promises and the bigger the change required, the less likely they are be able to fulfill them.

Remember, FDR and Truman enacted their reforms with support from both GOP progressives and Democratic Party progressives. Our next president will be facing mostly the same GOP this one did.

I wish that Hillary Clinton at least got more credit for the realism of the reforms she intends to implement. They may be less exciting in scope than Bernie's, but we're also more likely to see them realized in some form not too different from what she's describing.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
117. Do you think Hillary will have an easier time working with the GOP
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:40 PM
Nov 2015

She is hated by the GOP. And no we don't pick our candidates according to the GOP whim, but we are discussing whether Hillary would be more or less effective than Bernie.

Her ideas are tepid, and when you don't try for big reforms, you don't end up with big reforms. Your goal defines your negotiating starting pint, and your starting point often determines your ending point.

Hillary will start in the middle and negotiate to the right, ending up to the right of middle.

Bernie will start with Socialism, negotiate to the right, and end up with the whole damned Democratic Party platform in legislation.

And don't get me started on coat tails, Hillary has none. Our best bet for changing the dynamic in Congress is by sending Bernie to the GE, not Hillary.

Bernie gets a million donations, Hillary gets a millionaire's donation. Major difference.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
119. We see no signs that the GOP will not be as committed to
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:55 PM
Nov 2015

opposing our next president as Obama. Is Obama so hatable or so radical that they couldn't work with him? No, and it made absolutely no difference at all.

And the same, tedious yada over Hillary. I don't expect you to support her, but you and the GOP, especially the TP "ReThugs," are so constantly and intractably opposed to her that, frankly, I see no difference between you on that topic. What's the difference between 100% and 100% knee-jerk oppositional at every opportunity?

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
120. Lol..."tedious yada over Hillary" - I agree!
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 07:08 PM
Nov 2015

Every post I read from her followers offers the same sleep enducing tedium. I'm sorry your candidate is the way she is. I wish that she were inspirational, I really want the US to elect a woman POTUS, but though Clinton may win, she won't win my support.

She has small ideas, everything is taste tested, and there's no sense that she'll do jack shit about Wall Street.

I want the establishment to change, why in the name of God should I vote or support a candidate that is running as the insider?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
101. You register with the party. Same as being a Republican.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 03:47 PM
Nov 2015

Bernie knows how to register if it becomes an issue in New Hampshire.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
104. I hope it does become an issue in NH. I can't think of anything that would be more foolish
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:04 PM
Nov 2015

than to try to stop the people from being able to vote for their choice of Democratic Candidate for the WH.

It would show, eg, that Bernie is doing so well that they can't stop him other than to try to deprive his supporters of voting for him.

We need to have all these dirty tricks that have been suppressing the vote for so long, exposed thoroughly.

Even some of my friends who still support Hillary are disgusted by even the thought of that happening.

I imagine if it does, since their support is more sentimental than anything else, I will be able to sign them up for Bernie.

Do you know anything about Vt and registering as a Democrat?

Has Bernie broken any rules, done anything illegal, anything that prevents anyone else from voting, anything unconstitutional in any way?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
112. Frivolous imaginary battles, to my mind. If the attorneys
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:00 PM
Nov 2015

say Bernie has register as a Democrat to be in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY, he can do that. Big deal. Or he can just continue as an independent. Bernie made this situation, not the Democratic Party he does not belong to. And he's had months to decide what he'll do.

As for me, I'm not into petty family squabbles. The real wars get my guts in enough of a twist when I imagine losing them.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
128. “I’m a Democrat and should be on the ballot, I don’t think I need to say too much more,” ...
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:49 AM
Nov 2015

Sanders said.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-files-new-hampshire-state-ballot

He filed on Thursday. There were numerous threads, you probably missed them though, I get it people are busy and don't read DU every single day.

Response to marym625 (Reply #1)

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
2. Bernie is accepted everywhere as a Democrat, no problem...but on the issues, which is what
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:25 PM
Nov 2015

everyone wants to discuss and his electability facing the propaganda machine of the GOP corporate media, he is not accepted* by the majority....no need to guild the Lilly.

I like Bernie, I do not like his odds with little money against the unlimited money and controlled media of the other side. Passion will beat money?..maybe...but is 2016 the right time to roll the dice just to answer that question?

*as in not the number 1 preferred candidate

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
5. He is absolutely accepted by the majority of Americans. It's DU Hillary supporters that won't accept
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:30 PM
Nov 2015

that he is running as a Democrat. You see it over and over again, "he's not a Dem", I just had someone say that to me a day or two ago.

Polling shows he beats every GOP candidate by a larger margin than Hillary. And there was just a poll showing that Dems favor Socialism over Capitalism. So I don't know what you can possibly think is an issue with his policies. He is NOT fringe. He is an FDR Democrat. He is what the Dem Party is supposed to be.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
22. Running as a Democrat does not make him one. He'd be the first to tell you that.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:09 PM
Nov 2015

[center][/center]

[center][font color="green" size="14" face="face"]And in 1985:[/font]
[/center]

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
29. It does in this primary.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:19 PM
Nov 2015

He is running "as a Democrat". It's very simple.

Claiming he is not a Dem is the equivalent to bringing up Benghazi. There's no there there.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
49. He's running AS a Democrat. He's not one. That's pretty simple, too.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:17 PM
Nov 2015

I've even added images with his quotes to make it easier for people to understand.

Once again...Bernie Sanders is running AS a Democrat, but he's NOT a Democrat, and his supporters need to stop trying to browbeat people into believing otherwise.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
53. I vote AS a Democrat every election.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:33 PM
Nov 2015

But, I'm a Marxist who thinks that the Capitalist system is broken beyond repair and that our government has been overrun by corrupt politicians that have been bought off by Wall Street and Energy corporations....
So, I guess I'm NOT a Democrat in your perception.
Interesting.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
65. Are you registered as a Democrat?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:49 PM
Nov 2015

If yes, then you're a Democrat, no matter your personal political philosophy.

I'm a Social Democrat, but I'm a registered Democrat, canvassed for and donated to Democrats, and vote straight Democratic ticket.

Bernie Sanders has never registered as a Democrat, has never campaigned for Democrats, and has maintained, again and again, that he's a Democratic Socialist not a Democrat. I'll take his word on it.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
73. He was at the time.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 01:01 AM
Nov 2015

You said he didn't campaign for any democrats. He delivered the Vermont caucus for Jessie Jackson when he was running for president.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
86. I noted DemocratS not "a Democrat".
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 11:49 AM
Nov 2015

He's supported and endorsed Jesse Jackson twice - in '84 and '88 - the same Rev. Jesse Jackson who said about Senator Obama that he wanted to "cut his nuts off", by the way, and has, since his off-air remarks had come to light, had to apologize to the Obama family profusely. But he hasn't endeared himself to the African American community who love President Obama, so I wouldn't mention the Rev's name in connection with Sanders as a plus if I were you, considering his single-digit support in that community.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
79. Ah, I get it. Labels are what concern you.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:37 AM
Nov 2015

He is running as a Democrat on the Democratic ticket.
That's good enough for me.

As a Party, we seem to be all fine with people who say they are Democrats (and register as such) but don't act like or vote as Democrats. Why is that? Is the label more important than actions?

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
83. You *can* see it that way - OR - you can say that you have enough
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 11:08 AM
Nov 2015

belief in the Democratic Party platform to want to take the next step and make it official and register as a Democrat. It speaks to character.

He is running as a Democrat on the Democratic ticket.
That's good enough for me.

If, for example, Rand Paul decided to run on the Democratic Party ticket but doesn't register as a Democrat, would that be a-okay with you? It wouldn't be okay with me.

As a Party, we seem to be all fine with people who say they are Democrats (and register as such) but don't act like or vote as Democrats. Why is that? Is the label more important than actions?

Fist of all, we need to understand that not every single Democrat is perfect. We need to look to their constituency to understand why that is. No politician is perfect. Not a single one. Even Bernie Sanders.

That said...

Labels are NOT more important than actions. I make that case every day. Actions always speak louder than words. I have NO problem accepting Bernie Sanders as a Democrat. He's voted with Democrats 98% of the time (the core reason the Democratic Party has allowed him to run in their primaries). He's strong against wealth inequality. He's pro-labor, pro-Social Security, pro-universal healthcare, pro-education, pro-strong national security, pro-veterans, and isn't afraid to vote for war when it's necessary. So why is HE so adamantly against registering as a Democrat and making it official. Because he doesn't, and his resisted all these decades, people who vote Democratic Party distrust his motives. It's why his poll numbers seem frozen. They don't trust him.
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
106. That's a lie that BS has never stumped for anyone. Chuy Garcia
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:11 PM
Nov 2015

would be first in line to say so...

http://progressillinois.com/posts/content/2015/04/03/us-sen-bernie-sanders-stumps-garcia-garza-chicago-calls-political

So would Susan Garcia

Just because you haven't heard that he's done it, doesn't mean he hasn't.

Furthermore, I know you know this but the candidates in Vermont can't register for a party.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
55. So then explain to me how he goes about registering as a Democrat in Vermont.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:45 PM
Nov 2015

He can't. They don't have party affiliation/registration there. You run as the party you want to run as. That is just how it is.

He is running as a Democrat in the presidential election. That is as much as he can do to become a Democrat. He is a Democrat in the primary race.

When he ran for Senate he ran as an Independent. He was elected as an Independent.

If you want I'll try to find my post where I explained all this to someone else. Hopefully I added it to my journal. But it's all explained in full on the Vermont SOS website.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
66. It's not that he hasn't registered as a Democrat. It's that he's SAID, again and again,
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:51 PM
Nov 2015

that he "is not, and has never been, a Democrat".

Over and over again he calls himself a Democratic Socialist (Socialist). I'll take his word on it.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
84. Political expediency? That's how I see it.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 11:22 AM
Nov 2015

Up until he had to file his candidacy with New Hampshire, he continued to claim that he's an "Independent" and "Socialist" and "Democratic Socialist". But I didn't hear his tone when he spoke those words to those reporters, so I don't know if he was exasperated, facetious, or genuine.

And I'm certain the majority of Democrats - especially minorities - feel the same way.

When Charlie Crist changed his Party affiliation from Republicans to Independent to Democrat in order to run as a Democrat for Governor of Florida, not many people bought his "change of heart", and he lost.

So no. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I will NOT remove my factual posts just because Sanders told reporters after having to file as a Democrat in order to run in New Hampshire (the ONLY State where he has a shot at winning from Hillary Clinton) that he's NOW a Democrat.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
88. The post is still false.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:04 PM
Nov 2015

But, I didn't really think you would remove it just because of that little fact.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
77. So you choose to ignore that he SAID he's running as a Democrat. Which makes it so.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 03:29 AM
Nov 2015

Whatever.

You are choosing to harp on the equivalent of Benghazi. Tells me all I need to know about trying to have a discussion with you.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
85. Browbeating a registered Democratic voter into believing that Sanders has become
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 11:29 AM
Nov 2015

a Democrat just because he filed his candidacy in New Hampshire (the only State that he has a shot at winning from Hillary Clinton) while uttering to reporters that he's "a Democrat now", isn't going to make me more inclined to believe he actually is one, no more than I'm inclined to believe Rand Paul should he have done the same thing.

If and when Sanders actually does the hard work, solidifies Democratic alliances, and actually goes out and campaigns with and for Democrats, rather than just file as a Democrat in a State that requires him to be a Democrat in order to run on that ticket in that State - which smacks of political expediency - then I'll be convinced he actually is a Democrat. Not before.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
115. So now presenting facts is browbeating.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:27 PM
Nov 2015

Okay, fine. Be the Benghazi type. That's what you are doing is the equivalent of, yelling Benghazi.

Political expediency for what??? What is his selfish motive??? He desperately wants to fix this democracy and give the 99% better lives. What is wrong with that?

I see that's the new meme, someone else said that just a little bit before you. Or was it you? What's the negative to it? Why does it matter?


 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
58. What, praytell, IS a Democrat?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:54 PM
Nov 2015

Is there like a written test or something?

Any party that has been home to Zell Miller and Paul Wellstone is not real easy to define.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
68. That's an amazing take and a great fucking question.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 12:36 AM
Nov 2015

I've always appreciated your thoughtful insights. I think like everything political, the party is in constant flux depending on who allies with whom, what becomes important, etc.
I suppose you could start here at the NY Times. There are variations depending on state party platforms, but it's important to note the first priority is support of the middle class.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
130. The data do not support this conclusion
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:57 AM
Nov 2015

Polling for the GE indicates Sanders has a better chance than Hillary. Sanders has won many more elections than she has, and she has lost more than he has.

The folks who trot this distraction out at every turn need to ask themselves whether they are simply puppets of the DLC/GOP/1-percent propaganda machine, or if they have the spine to stand up for what they know in their hearts to be good government. You say, "I truly like Bernie", but a person who "truly" feels this way would try to think of ways to overcome the challenge of the GOP machine rather than hide behind the knees of the biggest spoiled bully in the DLC playground.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
6. Such a flattering one to
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:32 PM
Nov 2015

boot. So you are now comparing Bernie to Bush? Please lets be real here. BTW who is closer to Bush out of the two, Hillary or Bernie???

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
32. Choosing a particular avatar and the site having the avatar are different things.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:22 PM
Nov 2015

The site has sports avatars too and I don't think anyone thinks the teams are Democrats.


cui bono

(19,926 posts)
34. I agree with you on this, the site has sports team avatars as well and that doesn't mean anything
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:24 PM
Nov 2015

politically. But we all know Bernie is running as a Dem so hopefully people saying he isn't a Dem will die down. It's really so stupid. It's the equivalent of bringing up something as idiotic as Benghazi.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
9. Well many people
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:35 PM
Nov 2015

use such things to show support on the inter webs these days. If you do not realize that then I can't help you.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
25. but because it's an avatar option on DU, it means something significant?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:13 PM
Nov 2015

I hear Bernie finally said he was a Dem just yesterday. Took him fucking long enough, and only because he was pressed into it so he could register in NH. I wonder if that political expediency will last after the Primaries?

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
92. don't get me started on whether you thunked
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:16 PM
Nov 2015

not when so many are devoted to party brand names and corporate logos.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
7. Please show me where you and I have not accepted him as a democrat.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:34 PM
Nov 2015

The great avatar issue of '15!!!!!!!

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
80. Socialist and Democrat are not mutually exclusive.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:44 AM
Nov 2015

One is an economic philosophy, the other is a political party.

I'm a post-capitalist and I'm a Democrat for example.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
107. There are Socialist Democrats and Democratic Socialists
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:15 PM
Nov 2015

And yes those are mutually exclusive....one accepts some Capitalism and one rejects it all.....Bernie NEVER called himself a Socialist Democrat....the one that accepts regulated Capitalism

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
123. Again, you are mixing a political party with economic theory.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:43 AM
Nov 2015

I just explained to you that I have been a lifelong Democrat and a post-capitalist.
I think that economically that capitalism has run its course and is a failed economic system.
And I am a member of the Democratic party because it is the only viable party that could create an environment to enable us to move beyond the crushing failure that is capitalism.

So no, they are not mutually exclusive rather inclusive to each other..
This whole argument about his status and label is just another distraction created by the M$M to divide the party.
We would all do well to move on from such transparent manipulation.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
124. No I am not
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:58 AM
Nov 2015

Democratic socialism
Democratic socialism is a political ideology advocating a democratic political system alongside a socialist economic system, involving a combination of political democracy (usually multi-party democracy) with social ownership of the means of production. Although sometimes used synonymously with "socialism", the adjective "democratic" is sometimes added to distinguish itself from non-democratic forms of socialism, such as the Marxist–Leninist brand of socialism.[1]

Democratic socialism is usually distinguished from both the Soviet model of centralized socialism and social democracy. This distinction arose from the authoritarian form of government and centralized economic system that emerged in the Soviet Union during the 20th century.[2] A distinction is also made between democratic socialism and social democracy in that the former is committed to systemic transformation of the economy while the latter is not.[3]

Democratic socialism rejects the social democratic view of reform through state intervention within capitalism, seeing capitalism as inherently incompatible with the democratic values of freedom, equality and solidarity. Democratic socialists believe that the issues inherent to capitalism can only be solved by transitioning from capitalism to socialism, by superseding private property with some form of social ownership, with any attempt to address the economic contradictions of capitalism through reforms only likely to generate more problems elsewhere in the capitalist economy

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
129. You can still be a Democratic Socialist and a Democrat.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:56 AM
Nov 2015

End of story.
You keep parroting an M$M meme designed to divide the party.
Why is that?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
135. If Sanders had not run as a Democrat he would have run as an independent, and then what?
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:14 PM
Nov 2015

I welcome Sanders with open arms into the Democratic Party race, which proves the grace and vision of Sanders and the inclusiveness of the party as it exists, without needing to be redefined from the outside.

And so of course Sanders had to run as a Democrat in order to be included in 5 nationally televised debates, the first of which got 15.5 million individual viewers! How much of Sanders limited funds would purchase that many eyeballs for two hours in prime time?

Quid pro quo.

We should all settle down.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
137. Now we dont have to worry about that
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:23 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Sun Nov 8, 2015, 04:49 PM - Edit history (1)

He had to suck it up......and become on of the ones be spoke so disparagingly about.....because he hasnt a snowballs chance in hell without us....

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
140. But then again Democrats would have struggled much more to win back the WH.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:34 PM
Nov 2015

There has had to have been some kind of written agreement for this kind of very big quid pro quo that I think is clearly happening.

Someone should ask them....get it out on the table, because it is a good thing.

You may not be the one to ask, but what is the news on Sanders TV ad buys in Iowa and NH, now into it's fourth day?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
145. No sir..disagree..
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 04:59 PM
Nov 2015

Should the Right have cowtowed to the Teabaggers? Has that served them well? Look at them now for the answer. You do not let the extreme call the shots for that reason.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
143. What are you talking about?
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 01:51 PM
Nov 2015
"The fact that he HAD to proclaim he IS a Democrar now proves that fact..."


Only in your mind, back in the real world not so much.
I'm done getting baited by you.
You repeat the same debunked M$M talking point over and over like some religious mantra, answer no questions, and refuse to engage in some sort of meaningful dialog. Sad.
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
144. Did he or did he not have to SAY he is now a
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 04:52 PM
Nov 2015

Democrat? After years of proclaiming proudly that he was NOT one...Democratic Socialists are Socialists not Democrats. He never said he was a Socialist Democrat....and the difference between them is one accepts regulated Capitalism and one simply does not..

Point proven...

Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #124)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
10. Sanders is now a Democrat, having beocme a Democrat when decided to run for the Democratic
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:50 PM
Nov 2015

nomination.

Formerly he was an independent and a Democratic Socialist, self Identified. Most of the elected politicians in his state were Democrats and members of the Democratic Party.

Lots of politicians change parties.

I am glad Sanders joined the party.

His Icon was available because people liked his policies.

My icon, Cthulhu was never a Democrat. Because he sleeps in R'lyeh he was never a democrat, or even a citizen. Since Cthulhu will rise up and rule over Earth where mankind will cast aside concepts of civilization and inhibition. Since Chaos will ensue, upon earth, and men will revel in their most base instincts, I suspects Cthulhu is either a Libertarian or an Anarchist.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
59. Yes, you are right. But the rules of the Democratic Party are fine with it.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:59 PM
Nov 2015

I suspect that if he looses he will return happily to being an independent, a socialist, a Democratic Socialist, or what ever he is content to call himself.

He is attempting an insurgent revolution to redefine the Democratic Party.

It looks like he is not going to be successful, but not a vote has been cast yet.

Whether or not he is a Democrat is irrelevant to me as a voter. It is his stand on gun regulation, and specifically his vote on the Brady Bill and immunizing gun manufacturers that make him my last choice in the Democratic Primary.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
61. NO they weren't UNTIL yesterday when he was FORCED to become one of us...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:03 PM
Nov 2015

or his campaign was over...he had no choice but to do the one thing he hasn't done in 40 yrs.....Say he is a Democrat.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
63. It was New Hampshire state law that had the problem, not the Democratic Party. See the relevant link
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:07 PM
Nov 2015

Those entities are not synonymous.

The Democratic presidential nominee that doesn't have to be a registered Democrat
According to a Democratic National Committee aide, Sanders would not have a problem getting on Democratic primary and caucus ballots because the current party rules do not call for presidential candidates to be registered members of the party.

The DNC defines a presidential candidate as someone who "has accrued delegates in the nominating process and plans to seek the nomination, has established substantial support for his or her nomination as the Democratic candidate for the Office of the President of the United States, is a bona fide Democrat whose record of public service, accomplishment, public writings and/or public statements affirmatively demonstrates that he or she is faithful to the interests, welfare and success of the Democratic Party of the United States, and will participate in the Convention in good faith."


I will still not vote for him in the primary.
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
74. I am right and now
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 01:06 AM
Nov 2015

He had to eat his words and become a Democrat.finally after 40 yrs...because there was no requirement by the DNC to be a Registered Democrat.and that therefore doing so didnt make him one BUT..Exactly as I said 5 states DO require it to be on their ballots...New Hampshire is just one of them.

And just like I said months ago...either he finally becomes a real Democrat....or his campaign was finished......yesterday he acquiessed and admitted he had no choice but say he is officially one of us....after 40 yrs of denigrating us and even running in campaigns against us......Bernie finally ate that crow...

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
136. That is news to me...gonna have to back that up...or change the laughing emoticon.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:18 PM
Nov 2015

Maybe you were thinking of the pre-evolved Elizabeth Warren?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
52. Bernie announced **yesterday** while registering in NH that he was now a Democrat
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:31 PM
Nov 2015

he had never announced prior to yesterday that he was a Democrat and in fact went to great pains to avoid addressing that issue outright. He is on record telling people he is "Not a Democrate" and instead, "I am an Independent". He could no longer evade the "D" designation and I suspect will look to to drop it as soon as it's no longer politically expedient for him to use it. Perhaps after the Primaries.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
60. You are right, but the Democratic Party rules do not require him to be a Democrat.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:03 PM
Nov 2015

New Hampshire, however, has different rules.

His fellow Senator, their governor, and a majority of their State Legislature are members of the Democratic party. He could have chosen to join the party at any time in his long career.

I applaud his joining the party.

I still won't vote for him in the primary. It has nothing to do with his membership in the party.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
62. Yes, he could have joined any time. This recent capitulationis not genuine imho
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:06 PM
Nov 2015

and will only last as long as is politically expedient.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
64. I agree. I suspect the will retun to indepedance if and when he looses.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:09 PM
Nov 2015

If he wins, he becomes the de facto head of the Democratic Party and can change it however he sees fit.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
20. Can Bernie Sanders Win the Love of a Party He Scorns?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:05 PM
Nov 2015
Can Bernie Sanders Win the Love of a Party He Scorns?
The long, troubled history of Bernie Sanders and the 'ideologically bankrupt' party whose White House nod he now seeks.
By MICHAEL KRUSE and MANU RAJU August 10, 2015

"You don’t change the system from within the Democratic Party.”

“My own feeling is that the Democratic Party is ideologically bankrupt.”

“We have to ask ourselves, ‘Why should we work within the Democratic Party if we don’t agree with anything the Democratic Party says?’”


Bernie Sanders, everybody—the same Bernie Sanders who is running to become the Democratic Party’s candidate for president of the United States.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/bernie-sanders-2016-democrats-121181

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
24. He is represented here
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:12 PM
Nov 2015

on DU for years and no one complained.....until he was a threat to Hillary's campaign of course.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
26. That doesn't change the fact that Bernie has held the democratic party
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:14 PM
Nov 2015

in contempt for most of his life until right now.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
31. He is a better representative of
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:21 PM
Nov 2015

what the Democratic party use to stand for...............before the Third Way got involved that is. It's not Bernie's fault the party veered to the right.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
36. As soon as Bernie loses the democratic party nomination
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:29 PM
Nov 2015

He will go back to his normal democratic party hate. The republicans appreciate the effort no doubt.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
41. If you were an informed Democrat you would be aware that Bernie is one of 5 co-founders of
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:46 PM
Nov 2015

the largest Democratic Caucus in the US Congress, the Progressive Caucus.
How is that 'hate'? He founded an enduring and powerful Democratic legislative caucus. You just sound silly.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
44. Bernie Sanders quotes:
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:49 PM
Nov 2015
"You don’t change the system from within the Democratic Party.”

“My own feeling is that the Democratic Party is ideologically bankrupt.”

“We have to ask ourselves, ‘Why should we work within the Democratic Party if we don’t agree with anything the Democratic Party says?’”

"I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat."
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
46. How is that hate? I'm a second generation Democrat and I think the Party is ideologically bankrupt
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:04 PM
Nov 2015

much of the time. This Party voted for DOMA and still excuses it. Bankrupt. But to you DOMA was fantastic and thus any criticism of the Party a big sin.
Quotes without citations or dates attached. Liz Warren was a Republican, there are quotes of her praising Supply Side. There are quotes of Hillary strongly opposing marriage equality in great, great detail. Do you think she still does oppose it?

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
48. No. The Democratic Party doesn't subscribe to straight socialism. Bernie does. That's why he calls
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:12 PM
Nov 2015

himself a Democratic Socialist (Socialist) and not a Social Democrat (which is the ideology of the Democratic Party and Democrats). He's to the left in some things of the Democratic Party, but he's NO Paul Wellstone.

Senator Wellstone and Rep. Sanders debated H.R. 629, the 1997 Texas-Vermont-Maine Compact, the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact Consent Act and Senator Wellstone was one of that bill's biggest detractors. That bill would dump low-level nuclear waste from Maine, Vermont, and Texas nearby a predominantly Spanish-speaking Mexican-American community: Sierra Blanca.

In 1998, Paul Wellstone decried the dump as "part of a 'national pattern of discrimination in the location of waste and pollution' that preyed on those lacking political clout and financial resources." Sanders was a staunch supporter. Thanks to the Sierra Club, the bill got a lot of nationwide exposure and although it passed, Texas officials denied the necessary licenises to build the establishment of the Sierra Blanca dump site.

Just as an aside? Bernie himself has stated, in 1985, that he's not now and has never been a Liberal Democrat. He said this thirty years ago. Today, he says he's not a Democrat. He just caucuses with Democrats. Or is he lying?

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
67. True. He's a democratic socialist. That should surprise no one.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:54 PM
Nov 2015

I would never expect him to waffle and suddenly proclaim he IS a liberal democrat because it's politically expedient.

As I've gotten older, I've tended to pay more attention to people's actions than their words, or labels.

Bernie Sanders represents my philosophy, and is closest to what I consider the Democratic platform. The party itself has veered right of this in the past several decades.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
23. You can also get a Lincoln avatar...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:10 PM
Nov 2015

Was he a Democrat?

How about John Adams? George Washington?

Hell, you can have a Bush avatar, if you really want.

Sid

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
27. Really stretching it
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:17 PM
Nov 2015

Sid, going into the 1770s and 1800s good points BTW I already addressed the Bush icon. But thank you for your reply it was so enlightening.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
38. DU under 'Topics' has 'Democrats' and under 'Democrats' comes 'Bernie Sanders' and always
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:32 PM
Nov 2015

has..... Under 'Democrats' in 'Topics' no Nelson. Different Party, but one I also supported.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
50. Incorrect
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:19 PM
Nov 2015

The Bernie Sanders group you're referring to was only added after he decided to run for the Democratic nomination.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
30. The 'not a Democrat' routine is a handful of cranks who take issue with the opinion of the DNC
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:20 PM
Nov 2015

and who have been actively advocating against the objectives and intentions of the Democratic Party of New Hampshire. Oddly, this handful claims they are very super ultra Democrats even as they openly oppose Democratic Party positions.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
35. The DNC and the Democratic Party has accepted Sanders as a Dem.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:26 PM
Nov 2015

But HE refuses to be seen or acknowledged as a Democrat.



So now you want to browbeat DU members into accepting him as a Dem even when the man himself has always vehemently rejected that label? That's pretty pompous, don't you think?

Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #35)

-none

(1,884 posts)
138. In other words, Bernie thinks for himself and not as part of a herd.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:28 PM
Nov 2015

He isn't a part of Group Think. He has a 40 year long history of working with the Democrats, for the people.
People who insist on using party labels for a person, such as Democrat/Republican/Independent, instead of using where a person is in the political spectrum, are purposely muddying the waters to confuse the issues.

Democrats and Republicans have switched places in the political spectrum from which they started. The Republicans used to be the liberals and Democrats used to be the conservatives. So we need to start using Liberal/Conservative, instead of party affiliations when describing people running for office.

There are many former Republicans in the Democratic party now, because the Dem leadership has moved so far to the Right to align with many Republican's world view.

What has not changed is whether a person is conservative or liberal or somewhere in between. Burnie Sanders is a liberal working for the people, regardless of party affiliation. As a result, the people are financing his campaign.
Hillary is financed by the same 1% big money backing as the Republicans canadates are. And that is why Bernie is being supported more and more by those who know about him, over Hillary's high profile name recondition, backed by the 1% to maintain the status quo.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
142. President Obama doesn't think for himself? Nancy Pelosi doesn't think for herself?
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 12:52 PM
Nov 2015

Senator Manchin doesn't think for himself? Former Senator Mary Landrieu didn't think for herself? Barbara Lee - the ONLY person who voted against the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) Against Terrorists (which Sanders voted for, by the way) doesn't think for herself?

Of course they do. The difference between them and Senator Sanders is, they're registered Democrats and proudly so. Senator Sanders is somewhat of a registered Democrat (needed to be in New Hampshire or he wouldn't be able to file his candidacy papers there), but it comes across as an act of political expediency.

So your argument is specious.

Burnie Sanders is a liberal working for the people, regardless of party affiliation.

On guns, he's NO Liberal. On voting for wars, he's NO anti-war liberal hero. On immigration reform, he's more of a Republican, using Republican talking points to justify his vote against immigration reform and voting with Republicans.

However...on publicly declaring that it would be a "good idea" to primary President Obama, our first African American president, he's an odd one out. Not even Republicans dared to say it, knowing they'd piss off the African American community. So if that makes him a Liberal, fine. But I seriously doubt Senator Sanders is as liberal as his supporters would like to see him.

moobu2

(4,822 posts)
39. Bernie just wants to be a Democrat when it's convenient to him
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:35 PM
Nov 2015

he's just using the party to give his presidential run a credibility it wouldn't have had had he run as an independent.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
42. And as soon as he is done using the party for his own ends
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:46 PM
Nov 2015

Bernie will go right back to attacking it and its democratic members, I have no doubt.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
78. OMG... you guys get more and more hilarious.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 03:33 AM
Nov 2015

Just when I'm thinking of leaving the site you guys make it funnier than the Onion.

"using the party for his own ends"

Yeah, his own ends happens to be saving our democracy and the working people who live here. What a selfish man who is taking advantage!!!1 This is series!!!!!1

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
43. Party over policy!
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:48 PM
Nov 2015

That's what Hillary supporters are about.
Issues don't matter, they honestly don't and all they want is some Dem in office and nothing more even in despite of everything below. When confronted with facts they try and deflect with "but GUNS! Bernie and guns! He's an NRA dude!" Or the infamous "He's a socialist! He's scum!" I wasn't aware that it was suddenly 1960 all over again. It speaks volumes really between ideology of old and how we've progressed as a country. Some are stuck in the past and don't realize the issues which we face today. Sorry, but people should be able to feed their kids on a living wage at $15/hr and college students shouldn't be swimming in $100k in student loan debt.

It's time for a change, a very big change!

Bernie is more of a Dem than Hillary EVER WILL BE.











 

senz

(11,945 posts)
110. I'd like to bookmark your comment here on DU
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:46 PM
Nov 2015

in order to keep all the graphics handy, but I don't see the "bookmark" button any more. Am I missing something?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
118. And yet my bookmarks are intact.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:52 PM
Nov 2015

Wonder if this is an oversight from the website overload DU experienced yesterday? Guess I'll go over to the Welcome thread and report it.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
54. Because he is a small d democrat
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:33 PM
Nov 2015

Once upon the Democratic party itself was small d Democratic, but most of the members still are.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
57. Which is why they want to shield the public from his message
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:48 PM
Nov 2015

Because his message is rooted in basic, simple truths. Just like the Democratic party platform was once upon a time rooted in basic, simple truth.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
98. This is why the "Third Way" is a new and different party.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:54 PM
Nov 2015

Instead of calling themselves Democrats, they should have formed a new party back in the 1990s. If they had, we wouldn't be dealing with this confusion because Democrat would still represent democratic ideals.

They invaded the Democratic Party and took over. They assumed the mantle of "Democrat" while discarding many of the party's traditional, defining beliefs and aims and are now attacking a TRUE democrat for not wearing the compromised mantle of the blended, diluted remains of the Democratic Party.

Seriously, this is the problem. The Third Way should form its own party. And take DWS with them.

William769

(55,148 posts)
76. Bush's Icon has been here for years and he's not in the Democratic party.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 03:28 AM
Nov 2015


There are others also that are not in the Democratic party that can be used.

You might want to do a little research before posting a OP like this.

Feel the Burn now?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
94. Under Vermont law, Bernie is a Democrat. That is dispositive and all that is relevant.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:20 PM
Nov 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128018753

Not that it matters legally, but the DNC and the Vermont Democratic Party have accepted him as a Democrat. That has been clear to sane, honest people since May, when he announced informally that he was running for the Democratic Presidential nomination.

All else is bs wankery. Shun it. Attempts at honest discussion are wasted anyway. This is not a point honest people of good faith are disputing.



Tarc

(10,476 posts)
116. It may be a bit peculiar to run for the nomination as an Independent
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 05:30 PM
Nov 2015

But at the end of the day that's just a ticky-tacky thing to debate. I'm fully in Clinton's camp, but Sanders espouses everything that the Democratic Party stands , just as Clinton does, so I have no problems with him being on the D's ballot.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
125. It's one of the ugly bullshit lies that some Clinton supporters peddle on DU
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:39 AM
Nov 2015

(noticed I said some not all because it is a dozen or so really obnoxious DUers).

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
126. Personally...
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:42 AM
Nov 2015

... I care fuckall what or who this site or any of it's members "accept" as Democrat.

They aren't in charge of that, anywhere but in their own heads.

sellitman

(11,607 posts)
127. He has voted as a Democrat more than Hillary
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:47 AM
Nov 2015

She voted for the War along with ALL the Republican's

Oh wait......she's evolving once again.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Bernie is not accepted...