Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:06 PM Nov 2015

Has anyone flipped who they are supporting due to our "discussion" here on DU?

Last edited Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:22 PM - Edit history (1)

Honest question.

On edit: Keep in mind the key part of the question is whether who you support has flipped DUE TO our discussion on DU.

I am trying to guage whether anyone has persuaded anyone here.

It feels like we are just preaching to our own choirs.

173 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has anyone flipped who they are supporting due to our "discussion" here on DU? (Original Post) Bread and Circus Nov 2015 OP
I flipped as soon as I realized Bernie was in Trajan Nov 2015 #1
I guess I decided to do a writein for Elvis Presley. I saw he was running for a state office. LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #2
Gee, I'm not sure how to break this to you, but Elvis is merrily Nov 2015 #89
DU taught me who NOT to support. nt antigop Nov 2015 #3
Due to the issues being posted? Cassiopeia Nov 2015 #20
At least one person. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #4
Lmao +1 jkbRN Nov 2015 #12
LMFAO L0oniX Nov 2015 #22
Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #26
That feels as if you are implying people are being racist. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #29
Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #30
So Bernie Sanders supporters are being racist? Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #32
Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #33
Oh c'mon. Really? panader0 Nov 2015 #37
Long after the Scandinavians, yes. But, they were not brutal to the people they found here. merrily Nov 2015 #101
My comment about Columbus was in reference to an earlier post. panader0 Nov 2015 #112
No I have never been to the AA forum. Please answer the question honestly. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #39
That commenter got a hide and so can't respond in this thread jfern Nov 2015 #61
I wished it had not been hidden. I do think if we make such serious charges... Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #65
It was pretty blatant allegation of racism imo B&C riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #71
Broadbrushing all supporters of Sanders as racists should be hidden. JMO. merrily Nov 2015 #102
Good Capt. Obvious Nov 2015 #85
Not me, I was raised by an opinionated black woman who worked for my moms aunt. LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #93
Is it possible to dislike an AA individual without it being racist? Do you like Ben Carson? Romulox Nov 2015 #47
well randys1 Nov 2015 #48
Sounds like you have a problem with an opinionated Black man. Hmmmmm.... Romulox Nov 2015 #52
well randys1 Nov 2015 #53
You also seem to have bad taste in music. Grand Funk Railroad????? nt Romulox Nov 2015 #58
Hey now, There's nothing wrong with GFR LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #95
She's stalked my real life and brought it to DU riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #49
Sounds like a serious accusation, one you best be prepared to prove randys1 Nov 2015 #51
Gladly. She admits it herself riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #59
LOL! Like you prove your allegations? merrily Nov 2015 #103
If you don't want anyone to know who you are you probably shouldn't post your name and seaglass Nov 2015 #73
What a shitty thing to do after seeing her comments. demmiblue Nov 2015 #74
Accusing someone of stalking when info is readily available is pretty shitty. She can easily seaglass Nov 2015 #75
You are making it easier to encourage more potential psychos to stalk her (on and off DU)... demmiblue Nov 2015 #80
+1 merrily Nov 2015 #105
+1000. nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #111
That story is about my bi-racial heritage riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #77
No if you post your personal info on DU it is not protected no matter what group you are in. You seaglass Nov 2015 #86
No one other than you has linked that old DU post riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #92
Maybe not currently, if being on timeout again means anything... nt edgineered Nov 2015 #28
Performance art. nt Romulox Nov 2015 #46
. Autumn Nov 2015 #55
No. Agschmid Nov 2015 #5
Apparently many Hillary supporters have Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #6
Yeah I'm pretty certain Hillary supporters want responsible government too. redwitch Nov 2015 #7
The facts don't support your belief Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #10
+1.nt Snotcicles Nov 2015 #15
They do not discuss issues AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #18
Jury results pintobean Nov 2015 #17
ALL? AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #21
This alert is interesting because Android3.14 Nov 2015 #98
Why don't you explain why you believe what you do... jberryhill Nov 2015 #19
Thank you, finally someone says it with the gusto needed. randys1 Nov 2015 #27
Back at ya berryhill Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #82
No, I will not take a chill jberryhill Nov 2015 #145
Thank you. More sane Bernie supporters need to speak up about this kind of crap. Nt stevenleser Nov 2015 #144
Beautifully stated, as is your follow up. yardwork Nov 2015 #172
You don't get one without the other. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #38
A few have claimed to Prism Nov 2015 #8
WOW ... How piously judgemental of you! ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #97
Oh stop Prism Nov 2015 #118
+1 (Not to mention, being impiously judgmental is a skill very few have mastered.) merrily Nov 2015 #125
What are you talking about? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #128
I guess we are different ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #127
Who said anything about arguments? Prism Nov 2015 #137
This is what I was responding to ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #143
Pious???? Puglover Nov 2015 #173
No. I mean, yes. Um, don't know. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2015 #9
Yes yes yes! luvspeas Nov 2015 #40
I know, right? merrily Nov 2015 #133
I haven't picked a candidate tammywammy Nov 2015 #11
That's about where I am too. procon Nov 2015 #24
No I was undecided until rbrnmw Nov 2015 #13
because of DU? That is the key part of the question. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #31
No because of how she handled herself rbrnmw Nov 2015 #34
Fair enough. Then she won you as a voter. That is awesome. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #43
So you didn't like Bernie's witch trial? Bernin4U Nov 2015 #157
Nope. I am aligned with principles more than party - NRaleighLiberal Nov 2015 #14
No but it's helped me think about my choices to compare Armstead Nov 2015 #16
I could change between Clinton and O'Malley... NCTraveler Nov 2015 #23
I believe that, too artislife Nov 2015 #141
Flipped? No. Affirmed, confirmed and reaffirmed ? Yes. Eom GusBob Nov 2015 #25
Not due to discussion here, no Matariki Nov 2015 #35
I was on Bernie now I'm with Hillary. JaneyVee Nov 2015 #36
Interesting. What made you flip? Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #41
Her overwhelming aura of competence... JaneyVee Nov 2015 #54
That sounds fair. Going for an effective politician. One that can win in your view. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #60
But no question on the validity of said endorsements? Bernin4U Nov 2015 #158
LOLOL. nt Romulox Nov 2015 #42
Several of DU's most conservative posters *claim* to have switched from Bernie to Hillary. Romulox Nov 2015 #44
I know right? It's laughable. JimDandy Nov 2015 #62
Still some out there faux-ing support for Bernie. Some on this very thread, in fact. merrily Nov 2015 #84
I've switched to Hillary several times now MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #45
Thank YOU randys1 Nov 2015 #50
You still need a sarcasm emote for a MannyGoldstein post? merrily Nov 2015 #81
Have you no mercy? Have you no pity? merrily Nov 2015 #114
In my defense, Poe's Law is to the Internet as MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #117
Exactly my point: Poe's Law is why deus sine machina made emoticons. merrily Nov 2015 #120
So emoticons are exempt from Poe's Law? MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #121
I suppose even emoticons can be used as tools of various kinds. merrily Nov 2015 #124
That... that was *sarcasm*? MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #131
o.k. nt merrily Nov 2015 #132
P.S. FWIW, I don't think you suck. I suspect no supporter of Sanders does. merrily Nov 2015 #122
Oh? Have we met IRL? MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #126
You claimed we had. merrily Nov 2015 #130
The contrast between Bernie and Hillary is so profound, it wouldn't make sense to switch. Maedhros Nov 2015 #56
That's the bottom line. All that's left for both groups on DU is to JimDandy Nov 2015 #66
I supported Sanders until I discovered his record on Bradey Bill Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #57
I have it on great authority that Bernie totally supports Bradley and likes his mother too. nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #90
It is his voting record that matters, not who he likes. nt Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #96
It doesn't appear as if you ever really looked in to the record. nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #99
Don't be fool be appearances. nt. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #100
Why don't you post something you found about Bradley? nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #108
Oh, look, it's the Bradley Bunch Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #150
My mistake, the Bradey bill. STill, he voted against it. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #156
It is actually Brady and that is how I know you never actually researched it. Live and Learn Nov 2015 #169
What's wrong with gun mfrs? Bernin4U Nov 2015 #159
Immunizing them from lawsuits is the problem. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #160
Sorry, maybe I missed? Bernin4U Nov 2015 #164
So you agree with Sanders providing a special privaledge of Corporate Welfare to Gun Manufacturers. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #165
Show me a case Bernin4U Nov 2015 #167
I used to support Hillary demwing Nov 2015 #63
I flipped from supporting Sanders to unquestionably supporting Sanders tularetom Nov 2015 #64
I was a default HRC supporter; thought Bernie was a Kucinich; that Manny & Willy were nuts. aikoaiko Nov 2015 #67
Some posts here have raised my opinion of O'Malley, but I haven't flipped. DanTex Nov 2015 #68
Yes the snarky Bernie supporters have turned me off to him doc03 Nov 2015 #69
Me too. I used to care about issues and stuff. Then I read some snark on the internet. Romulox Nov 2015 #70
Well thanks your post is exactly what I was talking about. n/t doc03 Nov 2015 #168
I like Sanders a lot less than I did at the outset--solely because of the behavior MADem Nov 2015 #72
That does it: I'm switching to Hillary MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #113
No, you aren't. It remains unclear to me who you actually support. nt MADem Nov 2015 #139
Presidential? No. merrily Nov 2015 #76
I've supported Bernie ever since he got into the race. PatrickforO Nov 2015 #78
No, but I've got more people on Ignore Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 #79
I agree. It really makes my heart sink. pinstikfartherin Nov 2015 #136
I haven't necessarily flipped, but I've gone from leaning toward Sanders lovemydog Nov 2015 #83
So you like Sanders but are willing to switch because of things people who claim to support him say? peacebird Nov 2015 #104
You're saying all that stuff. lovemydog Nov 2015 #106
No because no one has ever been able to retrowire Nov 2015 #87
I support anyone not Republican in the middle or left. joshcryer Nov 2015 #88
I liked Hillary until she voted for that damn Iraq War. nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #91
Really? Me, not so much. merrily Nov 2015 #155
No (nt) bigwillq Nov 2015 #94
No Depaysement Nov 2015 #107
Nope n/t JustAnotherGen Nov 2015 #109
Not really Dem2 Nov 2015 #110
No, I liked Bernie from the get-go Aerows Nov 2015 #115
No, I haven't flipped. Blue_In_AK Nov 2015 #116
No, but I've been stunned watching Team Hillary work here Hydra Nov 2015 #119
Nope - I'll vote for Bernie. 840high Nov 2015 #123
Trashing Bernie because of disliking Bernie supporters is sooooooooo 7th grade. valerief Nov 2015 #129
No, but my support or Clinton in the GE is in jeopardy HassleCat Nov 2015 #134
No, and I think some people need a DU intervention. pinstikfartherin Nov 2015 #135
yes DonCoquixote Nov 2015 #138
Agree. Bernie handled himself correctly. Bernin4U Nov 2015 #162
Nope. Not a bit. The more you attack and ridicule Clinton, the more I think we need her. McCamy Taylor Nov 2015 #140
Of course Flying Squirrel Nov 2015 #142
Yes Hepburn Nov 2015 #146
Got passion? Of course it's going to get "ugly". Bernin4U Nov 2015 #166
Not in this election so far.... BooScout Nov 2015 #147
I don't post to flip anyone UglyGreed Nov 2015 #148
No, but LWolf Nov 2015 #149
Not much in presidential elections, but it has helped in more local races Renew Deal Nov 2015 #151
Nope JackInGreen Nov 2015 #152
I have observed several who have flipped who they are supporting due the "discussion" on DU. Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #153
I supported Hillary in 2008, caucused for her. Compared her to Warren, Bernie talked about running Autumn Nov 2015 #154
I'm not going to vote for Bernie now. I've read I'm too simple-minded, Pathwalker Nov 2015 #161
This thread is comedy gold. Puglover Nov 2015 #163
I know, right? merrily Nov 2015 #171
I had leaned O'Malley for a while once it was clear Schweitzer was out, but the O'Malley group Recursion Nov 2015 #170

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. At least one person.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:13 PM
Nov 2015

bravenak started out claiming Bernie as a candidate, then briefly seemed to favour O'Malley, and is currently full on behind Clinton.

Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #4)

Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #29)

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
32. So Bernie Sanders supporters are being racist?
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:18 PM
Nov 2015

Please just be honest and say it.

Implying it is worse in my view.

Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #32)

panader0

(25,816 posts)
112. My comment about Columbus was in reference to an earlier post.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:07 PM
Nov 2015

The since tombstoned poster said "Columbus discovered America" about 20 times.
I was referencing that because of the repetitiousness of the above poster.
I'm no Columbus fan.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
39. No I have never been to the AA forum. Please answer the question honestly.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:25 PM
Nov 2015

No hiding behind veils.

Because what you are doing is implying racism but not showing the courage of your conviction.

It is a powerful charge but if that is how you feel come out with it.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
65. I wished it had not been hidden. I do think if we make such serious charges...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:57 PM
Nov 2015

We should be very direct about it.

I would rather hear it, know, where we all stand, and deal with it.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
71. It was pretty blatant allegation of racism imo B&C
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:14 PM
Nov 2015

even randy seemed to know it - basically admitting s/he would get the hide



I'm not sure there would ever have been a forthright statement owning the accusation. S/he hemmed and hawed for several posts after you directly questioned it

LiberalArkie

(15,716 posts)
93. Not me, I was raised by an opinionated black woman who worked for my moms aunt.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:01 PM
Nov 2015

Went to Selma in 1965 with her son. I was her "white bread boy" :>

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
49. She's stalked my real life and brought it to DU
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:33 PM
Nov 2015

Yeah, I have a problem with her right now.

It fucking sucks and it's scary as hell.


seaglass

(8,171 posts)
73. If you don't want anyone to know who you are you probably shouldn't post your name and
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:22 PM
Nov 2015

where you live on DU.



seaglass

(8,171 posts)
75. Accusing someone of stalking when info is readily available is pretty shitty. She can easily
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:30 PM
Nov 2015

delete the post.

demmiblue

(36,857 posts)
80. You are making it easier to encourage more potential psychos to stalk her (on and off DU)...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:38 PM
Nov 2015

classy.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
77. That story is about my bi-racial heritage
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:34 PM
Nov 2015

that bravenak now wants to smear. She wants to dictate whose "black enough". You okay with that?

That story was in a protected group and has now been disseminated out to the general forums. You okay with that?

Bravenak didn't get that story from a DU search, she got it from an online search from my email account that she stalked me for. She's said that out loud, in Manny's thread. You okay with that?

You have time to delete unless you too are invested in further exposing a person's personal info on DU. That is a violation of the TOS.

Bravenak has become unhinged in her obsession with anyone who crosses her. This whole thing started when she alert stalked me for confronting her. That hide is clearly evident on my transparency page.

This is scary stalking. You're putting my personal ID out there for even greater exposure. You think that's okay? You want to be a part of that? Really? It's sick.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
86. No if you post your personal info on DU it is not protected no matter what group you are in. You
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:46 PM
Nov 2015

should delete it if you don't want it available to anyone who views this site. I will delete my link but that does not make the information you posted disappear.

I like Bravenak and frankly your post doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
92. No one other than you has linked that old DU post
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:57 PM
Nov 2015

No one. Not even Bravenak. It's in the fucking genealogy forum where I assumed the members were colleagues, not crazy stalkers. Where a post every three months means things are hopping. So yeah, I actually did have a reasonable expectation of privacy (in Internet terms). I certainly never expected the exposure to come from within.

And frankly, she didn't find that story on DU, she got it from me direct from the
Chicago Tribune article. I gave her the link to make sure she knew I was bi-racial. I never linked DU to this story. Only the Trib. Anyone searching for it on DU2 had to be pretty dedicated to finding it.

Whoever has dug up the old DU2 link is simply backtracking.

I'm well aware that everything we put online is there forever. I'll delete the post but it doesn't mean it's ever erased.

Thanks to you.



Edited to

Edited to add that you'd have to have my real name to find that post. I did a Google search and a DU search. Either you or Bravenak are still stalking me to retrieve it. It's impossible otherwise.

Nice.

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
6. Apparently many Hillary supporters have
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:16 PM
Nov 2015

Do a site search, see for yourself.

But here's the deal.

Bernie's supporters support him
because he support them...
the way Government is supposed to work!

Hillary's supporters tend to the *bandwagon*
mode of candidate support.
They don't like Bernie because of his supporters,
yet they love Hillary because they want to
be on her team. The *Fanwagon™* effect.

See how this works?
Bernie folks want responsible government.
Hillary folks want to be on the *winning* team.

redwitch

(14,944 posts)
7. Yeah I'm pretty certain Hillary supporters want responsible government too.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:19 PM
Nov 2015

I think that suggesting they do not isn't fair, isn't nice and does not move discussion forward in any meaningful way. Tired of the drama on here.

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
10. The facts don't support your belief
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:24 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary has a LONG track record
of supporting catastrophic polices
which have been unquestionably
irresponsible.

Iraq, NAFTA, Welfare Reform, Tough on crime.
She supported DOMA which denied civil rights.
The Clinton Doctrine destroyed Libya, and destabilized Syria...
and on and on

Hardly "responsible" government, IMO.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
18. They do not discuss issues
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:47 PM
Nov 2015

Instead they go on endlessly about 'Hillary is the only candidate that can win' so it is a fair point.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
17. Jury results
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:45 PM
Nov 2015
On Tue Nov 3, 2015, 05:39 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Apparently many Hillary supporters have
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=763480

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Claiming ALL Hillary supporters don't want good government and are only fans is condescending, demeaning and insulting. This doesn't belong on DU.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Nov 3, 2015, 05:44 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Don't presume to fucking tell me why I support anyone.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Frivolous alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: LOL
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I disagree with the logic, but it is not hideworthy.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It says "many" right there in the subject line.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
98. This alert is interesting because
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:12 PM
Nov 2015

The post must have touched that cognitive dissonance we are all observing in many of the HRC supporters. The fact of the alert succinctly legitimizes Cosmic Kitten's analysis.

Nicely done, CK.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
19. Why don't you explain why you believe what you do...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:48 PM
Nov 2015

...and leave others to explain why they believe what they do.

I haven't flipped, and still support Bernie.

There is no fucking reason whatsoever for you to talk about others the way you do.

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
82. Back at ya berryhill
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:39 PM
Nov 2015
There is no fucking reason whatsoever for you to talk about others the way you do.


And none for you to get involve either.
Are you the internet police?

Take a chill
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
145. No, I will not take a chill
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:36 AM
Nov 2015

There is a difference between objecting to someone's behavior and playing armchair psychologist.

Your behavior is evidently obnoxious.

What makes you act that way I have no idea, but there is no reason for it.
 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
8. A few have claimed to
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:23 PM
Nov 2015

Which I kind of like. It identifies them as utterly unserious about politics in any substantial way. Everything they say can be immediately dismissed, because the motives are hilariously corrupt.

It's just selfish people who don't particularly care outside of their selfish preoccupations, but who invest a great deal in message board fights. Sure, people are dying in the streets, but I saw a jury on DU I didn't like! This outrage will not stand, not while I'm sitting on my ass!

The worst part is, these are ostensibly adults.

And the fact they boast of this behavior openly, as if it were a virtue . . .

Just magical.



 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
97. WOW ... How piously judgemental of you! ...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:06 PM
Nov 2015

Universe forgive someone listen to the argument of supporters of the "other side" and be swayed.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
118. Oh stop
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:34 PM
Nov 2015

Anyone who claims they're changing their vote because they butted heads on a message board aren't being serious people.

"I'm changing my vote because people on the Internet are mean!"

Yes, let's leave the electoral process to five year olds.

But! I earned caps wow. Points!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
127. I guess we are different ...
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:18 AM
Nov 2015

I try to listen to the arguments of others and try and learn.

Some arguments I discount completely, others make me think.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
137. Who said anything about arguments?
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 01:18 AM
Nov 2015

"I'm changing my vote from Sanders to Clinton because I don't like how Sanders' supporters have behaved."

That's what I'm addressing. That is an unserious way to determine one's vote. That is who I dismiss out of hand.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
143. This is what I was responding to ...
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 07:33 AM
Nov 2015
Keep in mind the key part of the question is whether who you support has flipped DUE TO our discussion on DU.

I am trying to guage whether anyone has persuaded anyone here.

It feels like we are just preaching to our own choirs.


And ... the person that you dismiss out of hand, you probably could learn something from WHY that person is saying it. While they may be unserious to you ... they have a serious reason for holding that opinion ... and if you support that candidate, you might: pause to consider "Am I that guy/person they are talking about?"; and, if you support that candidate beyond typing stuff on the internet, you might pause to consider what you could do to shut "that guy/person" up/down.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
9. No. I mean, yes. Um, don't know.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:24 PM
Nov 2015

Every day I log in here, I find a disgusting thread, or hear about DUers acting like asses on another site that turns me off to both front runners. I've no longer come to expect a serious discussion of the issues.

procon

(15,805 posts)
24. That's about where I am too.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:03 PM
Nov 2015

When it gets to the point where I just can't imagine myself associating with "those" kind of people, I guess I'll know which candidate I'll pick.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
13. No I was undecided until
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:43 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary's salem witch trial. When I saw her kicking as with class I knew she was my choice.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
157. So you didn't like Bernie's witch trial?
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:35 PM
Nov 2015

Oh wait, he didn't have one.

So you'll get behind team A, because team A beat team C (in a more or less exhibition game), and we all hate team C. No matter that team B hasn't even played against team C?

In this case it means that Bernie's lack of skeletons, and failure to get his nose dirty, is a problem.

So how about Bernie's interjection about emails during the debate? Of course we don't know Hillary's answer, since she didn't have to give one. But it seemed to me that Bernie, in only a few seconds, did a better job of shutting down the stupidity than Hillary had been able to do for months.

If there's a better example of "pwnage", I'd love to hear...

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
14. Nope. I am aligned with principles more than party -
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:44 PM
Nov 2015

I support liberal/progressive/Democratic policies and principles, and as I near 60, it's always been that way - if anything, I've moved more leftward as I age. My heart grows sick to watch the division become more about excesses of money than principles. So to my mind, the left/right split is now clearly joined by the have too much/have not nearly enough split. There are overlaps.

So in the primaries, it is about the person who best reflects those principles. And in the general election, it will be whoever wins the nomination for the Democrats. Because Republicans and republican principles are toxic to all personkind.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
23. I could change between Clinton and O'Malley...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:03 PM
Nov 2015

All day. I have further thoughts on O'Malley but think it would be offensive talking about that at this point in time. I believe whatever happens to him in this primary he is going to have a major role at the national level.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
141. I believe that, too
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:50 AM
Nov 2015

I especially have loved the way he has really supported the Muslim community these last few weeks.

I worked at an office and left it, but stayed in the area and would see the handyman from time to time. He was from Somalia. After 9/11, I was so worried how this country was treating him. Seattle cracked down on Somali businesses that would help send money back home and were accused of sending money to terror cells. He was pretty gracious when asked how things were, but we did agree it would have been better if he had walked to the Canadian embassy all those years ago...

I don't believe in organized religion, but I do believe that everyone should be able to practice their faith and not be accused of terrorism because of it.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
54. Her overwhelming aura of competence...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:36 PM
Nov 2015

And her ability to build broad coalitions across a wide range of Democratic base demographics.

Then the union endorsements, party endorsements, civil rights hero's endorsements solidified my position.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
158. But no question on the validity of said endorsements?
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:40 PM
Nov 2015

Particularly from the unions, some of which came unseasonably early and/or may be tainted by cronyism?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
84. Still some out there faux-ing support for Bernie. Some on this very thread, in fact.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:41 PM
Nov 2015

Maybe the mockery of those who stuck their head up out of the fake Bernie supporter foxhole first has kept them quiet. Maybe they'll never come out of the foxhole. But I see them. Just in case they're wondering, I see them. And I laugh at their transparent dishonesty.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
45. I've switched to Hillary several times now
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:30 PM
Nov 2015

Although, oddly, I've never switched from Hillary to another candidate. But whatever.

I totally agree with Bernie about everything, but he and his supporters are such misogynists and racists that I can't agree with anything they believe.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
114. Have you no mercy? Have you no pity?
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:13 PM
Nov 2015

You had poor, perceptive randys1, who has posted many times that, not only is he a supporter of Bernie, but he has worked and/or volunteered for the Bernie campaign, thanking you for calling Bernie's supporters racists and misogynists, just as any true Bernie supporter would. Even after your many posts, he never grokked that you were being blatantly sarcastic.



I tried to warn him of your foul tendency to use sarcasm without labeling it as such, but it was too late. Now, he has three hides on this thread alone for strongly implying Bernie supporters (such as you and, of course, him) have a problem with strong women of color; i.e., that Bernie's supporters are racist and sexist. O, the humanity!


I blame all of this entirely on your failure to use a sarcasm emote in your Reply 45, or, at the very least, to sign it as Third Way Manny. This kind of reckless posting has taken a horrible toll. After all, how could poor randys1 be expected to know a MannyGoldstein post might be sarcastic if there were no express indication?

Emoticons are your friend. There's just no excuse for not using them, well, liberally, in your posts.

I am so done. From this moment, you are dtm.


 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
117. In my defense, Poe's Law is to the Internet as
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:33 PM
Nov 2015

Dark energy is to our universe; the irresistable deus ex machina that smothers all as time passes.

OK, that was bull@#%&. I just suck.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
130. You claimed we had.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:26 AM
Nov 2015

If that was indeed you, you confused me on that occasion, too. Fortunately for me, I recover quickly.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
56. The contrast between Bernie and Hillary is so profound, it wouldn't make sense to switch.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:37 PM
Nov 2015

There are two groups of people: Reagan Democrats and Liberals/Progressives. Each has their candidate.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
66. That's the bottom line. All that's left for both groups on DU is to
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:59 PM
Nov 2015

develop and test talking points and arguments to see if they stick and are capable of persuading those who can be persuaded outside DU. You can watch the Clinton swarm descend, in real time, each time they think they have something. It's fun taking aim at their pitches.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
57. I supported Sanders until I discovered his record on Bradey Bill
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:37 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:33 PM - Edit history (1)

And voting to immunize gun manufacturers.

I support no one, but lean slightly towards O'Malley.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
169. It is actually Brady and that is how I know you never actually researched it.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:28 PM
Nov 2015

And why I really can't take what you say about it seriously.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
159. What's wrong with gun mfrs?
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:57 PM
Nov 2015

Not that I know much about it (closest I've come to firing a gun was a getting to try an older brother's bb rifle at age 12). But it seems they're pretty good at what they do.

As far as responsibility, a company is only charged to make something that works as they legally sold it. Period.

You don't get to have something both ways. If you don't like that a product exists, or how it's used, is one thing. Take it up with your congress person.

Or hell, be a rebel and create a plan to steal all the guns and drop them to the bottom of the ocean. It may not be effective, or even smart, but at least it's logical.

But to say that a product that was sold legally, can suddenly become an illegal sale due to the conduct of the end user, follows no logic. That's called grasping at straws.

Fight the good fight, not the bad one.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
160. Immunizing them from lawsuits is the problem.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:01 PM
Nov 2015

And it amounted to corporate welfare.

And, it is counter to the health and welfare of the American people.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
164. Sorry, maybe I missed?
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:28 PM
Nov 2015

Is there more to it than the idea that they should be responsible (or not) for the actions of their customers' customers?

Did not passing the bill make them exempt? (There was another bill in place it would over ride?)

Giving them exemption does not make sense, but holding them responsible definitely does not. They should be in the same boat as everyone else.

That said, I do have a big problem with our current system of anyone can sue anyone for anything. Especially considering how juries can be tailored to have the collective mental capacity of preschoolers.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
165. So you agree with Sanders providing a special privaledge of Corporate Welfare to Gun Manufacturers.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:44 PM
Nov 2015

I have a big problem with Republican anti-tort reform movements designed to immunize corporations from their responsibilities and, thereby, increase their profits.

No industry should ever be shielded from responsibility for their actions.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
167. Show me a case
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 05:15 PM
Nov 2015

Labeling and characterizations aside, can you show a case where it's been an issue? Or even a hypothetical would be fine? Just to see where you're coming from.

Of course no industry should be shielded from their responsibility. Obviously it's a question of defining what that responsibility is. Afaik, companies are responsible to sell products that work.

If a company sells a car, and the car drives off a cliff because of a design or mfg flaw in the brakes, the car company is responsible. If the car drives off a cliff because the driver chose not to use the brakes, the car company is not responsible. Agreed?

But again, let me know what I'm missing in terms of specifics and/or examples. Speaking in broad terms ("We want liberty!&quot is too vague to be helpful.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
63. I used to support Hillary
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:46 PM
Nov 2015

But since the earliest stages of the 2008 campaign, I've learned a lot about her on DU, and what I learned killed any enthusiasm I once had.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
64. I flipped from supporting Sanders to unquestionably supporting Sanders
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:52 PM
Nov 2015

But I honestly don't believe any discussion on DU had anything to do with it. It was more of a matter of having an opportunity to compare and contrast the candidates statements, positions and past records that sealed the deal for me.

aikoaiko

(34,170 posts)
67. I was a default HRC supporter; thought Bernie was a Kucinich; that Manny & Willy were nuts.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:59 PM
Nov 2015


And then I heard Bernie's message and saw the crowds. I realized a Bernie nomination was possible.

I'm still uncertain about willy and manny. Lol

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
68. Some posts here have raised my opinion of O'Malley, but I haven't flipped.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:06 PM
Nov 2015

I still think Hillary is the best candidate.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
70. Me too. I used to care about issues and stuff. Then I read some snark on the internet.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:13 PM
Nov 2015
Well, I thought, so much for the issues! There is snark on the internet, and I just won't have it!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
72. I like Sanders a lot less than I did at the outset--solely because of the behavior
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:20 PM
Nov 2015

of his supporters. I still think he is personally a decent person, despite his rather stolid and singularly-focused personality and difficulty connecting with individuals on a personal level, but I can't say much for his leadership given the behavior of his fans. He's got to have an awareness of this aggressive conduct and the sour taste it leaves. Some--not all, but some-- of his enthusiasts are really rude and nasty. Bullying, even. And it's not just here on DU--I see the same angry and hectoring "tone" everywhere.

When I see swarms here doing things like hiding a newspaper article they don't like, or comments snarking about and MOCKING Clinton's private 2 hour meeting with mothers of victims murdered by gun violence, I have a hard time believing people who would say/do these things are Democrats, or even progressives. It's just too much. Too much hatred, too much anger, too many insults. I have to wonder how many of these supporters would actually stick with Sanders if he got the nomination, or if they'd run to the GOP. I wonder how much support is real, and how much is courtesy of Rovian-style operations.

If Clinton decided she didn't want to run, I think I'd go for O'Malley as a 2nd choice.

Guess I'm just not feeling that old bern.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
78. I've supported Bernie ever since he got into the race.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:34 PM
Nov 2015

The discussion here has done nothing to sway me either way. I supported Bernie from the start, I support him now, and I will support him moving forward. He's the only guy that is talking about the stuff that's truly important.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
79. No, but I've got more people on Ignore
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:35 PM
Nov 2015

than ever before and that includes a few Bernie supporters. I took a break from DU for awhile, came back, but I think it's time to make another exit. The intellect isn't here anymore. Just "rah rah" my side and if you go into one of the "protected" groups you better meld into the zeitgeist or else . . .

Stupid, juvenile shit most of the time. 99.9% keyboard warriors who don't actually get out and DO anything and don't want you posting on anything that you're doing because your "bragging." What the hell happened to this place?

pinstikfartherin

(500 posts)
136. I agree. It really makes my heart sink.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 01:04 AM
Nov 2015

I've been coming here lurking since the Bush/Kerry election, and I've always learned so much from DUers even though I don't post much. But this? This is a damn shame.

I'd really like a forum for the DUers around here who want to talk policy and discuss the issues without the hate-filled, mocking rhetoric. You simply cannot get that here. I miss intelligent DU discussion, and all this place does anymore is make me sick.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
83. I haven't necessarily flipped, but I've gone from leaning toward Sanders
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:41 PM
Nov 2015

to undecided, to leaning toward Sanders and now back to undecided.

Based upon what I see as condescension and arrogance toward people of color by some self-described Sanders supporters here at DU.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
104. So you like Sanders but are willing to switch because of things people who claim to support him say?
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:23 PM
Nov 2015

Really? Good grief, is he supposed to be some all powerful creature that can control what everyone who claims to support him says and does? Really?

I am at a loss for words, going to the obvious...

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
106. You're saying all that stuff.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:26 PM
Nov 2015

Not me. I don't come here to be argumentative. A question was asked and I answered it. I hope you enjoy a good evening.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
87. No because no one has ever been able to
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:51 PM
Nov 2015

refute Bernie's policies in any concrete way.

So until someone can thoroughly and clearly show me why Bernie is bad then I'm gonna just keep on feelin' the bern.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
88. I support anyone not Republican in the middle or left.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:52 PM
Nov 2015

None of the candidates have surprised me. It's been the most typical primary I've ever seen.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
155. Really? Me, not so much.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:10 PM
Nov 2015
http://jacksonville.com/reason/fact-check/2014-03-08/story/fact-check-was-hillary-clinton-fired-watergate-investigation (not confirmed or denied, not proven or disproven, but stated in a book written by someone in a very good position to know whom Hillary could have sued for libel, even under the standard applicable to public figures)

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4218509

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_hillary_clinton_in_1990_im_proud_of_walmart_20150525

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12778959

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251471617

http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/06/us/elusive-papers-of-law-firm-are-found-at-white-house.html?pagewanted=all

In 1998, with First Lady Hillary Cinton, From began a dialogue with British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other world leaders, and the DLC brand – known as The Third Way – became a model for resurgent liberal governments around the globe.[17]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_From

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vast_right-wing_conspiracy

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
110. Not really
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:39 PM
Nov 2015

My heart says Bernie, my head says Hillary - I still have time to decide who I'll vote for.

I will admit that reading this site tends to turn me off to Bernie a bit. Insulting the intelligence of supporters or otherwise harshly ripping either of these two candidates is not pleasant - I see a lot more of that behavior on the Bernie side for some reason.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
115. No, I liked Bernie from the get-go
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:14 PM
Nov 2015

and the level of vitriol against him by supporters of another candidate has made me dig my heels in so hard, they are HELPING him. What they aren't doing is helping the Democratic party, that's for damn sure.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
116. No, I haven't flipped.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:17 PM
Nov 2015

I prefer Bernie like I always have, but I will vote for Hillary if she's the nominee, in spite of some of her more vocal supporters here who really aren't doing her any favors.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
119. No, but I've been stunned watching Team Hillary work here
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:41 PM
Nov 2015

And then seeing Hillary's main campaign use the same tactics a few days later.

I went from being very discouraged by Hillary's policy choices to being utterly enlightened in the wrong way about why she and her supporters favor those policies.

I thought our party was supposed to be better than the Bushes, not part of the family.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
129. Trashing Bernie because of disliking Bernie supporters is sooooooooo 7th grade.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:24 AM
Nov 2015

I'm amazed I keep reading this sorry excuse so often on here.

But then, I keep reading Carson is rising in the polls.

I'm convinced I've entered an alternate reality. This cannot be the real world.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
134. No, but my support or Clinton in the GE is in jeopardy
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:35 AM
Nov 2015

I always supported Sanders, but I figured Clinton would be fine as Plan B in the general election. I still plan to vote for her next November, assuming the primaries go the way the corporate media says they should go. But I'm no longer enthusiastic about doing so. In fact, I'm not happy at all I will have to do so. I don't like the preaching from either choir. Bernie's choir is particularly nasty when it comes to digging for meaningless dirt, which is interesting, since there is some real dirt on Clinton, and they should just leave it at that, without trying to inflate little things into big things. On the other side, Hillary's choir comes up with these obtuse defenses of her mistakes that are just annoying, and their warnings that opposing Clinton will only help Republicans is strange. I guess we shouldn't judge the candidates by their friends, particularly since neither Clinton nor Sanders even knows what's posted here on DU.

I agree with you that neither side has persuaded anyone, with a small number of exceptions. I wouldn't be surprised, however, if they convinced a few people not to vote at all. Or maybe they sent a few people in search of a nice Republican.

pinstikfartherin

(500 posts)
135. No, and I think some people need a DU intervention.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:48 AM
Nov 2015

I'll never see the point of supporters turning you off of a candidate whose positions you otherwise support. If DU influences your opinion, just quit now. Seriously. It probably means that you spend too much time here, and if you look around lately? That's not good.

Hell, with all of these posts about switching because of Bernie or Hillary supporters being horrible, everyone here should be supporting O'Malley. His supporters at least seem sane and willing to discuss the issues. BUTTTT that's not happening, and we're taking sides of supporters who are routinely insulting and inciting one another....

Neither side is clean, and it's mostly the same people stirring the pot. Both supporters are horrible here at DU and act like children. Put your support behind O'Malley if you want to pick a "clean" side. Otherwise, it's just empty complaining and finger pointing because you spend too much damn time on DU.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
138. yes
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:16 AM
Nov 2015

I was once an enthusiastic Bernie supporter, but the way some people turned on Bravenak made me NOT want to be in that choir. Some of the Bernie supporters, as much as I like Bernie himself, have acted in a manner that goes beyond the pale, which is unforgivable in life, and should have been unforgivable here on DU, which, sadly, it was anything but. Nathan Bedford Forrest is smiling from Hell at the way some bernie supporters treated black people because they dared think they had to right not to be polite after a solid year of lynching by cop.

My mind about Hillary is not changed; if the Democratic party were to nominate a ham sandwich in the general, than to paraphrase Churchill "I will need to say something nice about the devil" and vote for a ham sandwich, namely because the GOP has people dumber than a ham sandwich. But,just because I have taken my little loyalty oath aka "let's not do the Nader thing again" pledge, that will not deny me the chance to remind Hillary that she will need our votes, and to hear our voices, something she obviously did when she condemned Keystone and the TPP

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
162. Agree. Bernie handled himself correctly.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:16 PM
Nov 2015

He wasn't up to speed on this issue, and needed to be taken to task. After that, he seemed to be on the right track.

I don't blame him for being a little clueless at the time. It happens to everyone. What matters is how he handled it. And he handled it correctly. His detractors call his lack of immediate reaction a weakness, but I see it as a strength. Understand first, then react.

But a lot of his supporters didn't get it. I wasn't on here, but saw a lot of the ugliness elsewhere. It pissed me off for sure, but I like to think a lot of them got a clue as well. Maybe they were just a little slower on the take.

Otoh, I don't give Hillary any points for corralling them preemptively, twice.

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
142. Of course
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 05:02 AM
Nov 2015

It's basic psychology, and attacking Bernie Sanders only makes the Bernie supporters more certain of their beliefs. So, apparently all the arguing is to try and convince the few undecideds who might be reading. I certainly have no hope of ever changing a Clinton supporter's mind, and neither do they have much hope of changing mine. Some external paradigm-shifting thing would have to happen on a par with the revelations about Subway's Jared or Bill Cosby.

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)
146. Yes
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:43 AM
Nov 2015

I originally started as a Hillary supporter -- a weak one -- but a supporter. After seeing the conduct of and the statements made by some of her supporters on the DU, I started to look at Bernie and found what they said was totally false. The more I looked at Bernie, the more I liked him. In the beginning, I contributed $25.00 to Hillary and I still have 3 Hillary bumper stickers in my in basket on my desk. Now, I have a standing $25.00/month contribution to Bernie and a Bernie sticker on my car.

If not for the nastiness of some of the HRC supporters -- not all of the, but several of them -- who regularly post ugliness about Bernie Sanders, I might not have done my investigation. Hillary is now a very far behind 2nd choice for me. So thank you to a few very vocal and nasty HRC supporters for opening my eyes to the candidate, Bernie Sanders, who supports most closely where I stand on important issues.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
166. Got passion? Of course it's going to get "ugly".
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:58 PM
Nov 2015

To assume otherwise seems a little naive.

My wife was telling me of a recent lunch outing with a group of workmates, to welcome some new hires to the group. All very standard stuff, certainly.

At one point one of them who apparently is relatively new to American culture, asked their boss, "So, who do you plan to vote for?"

A big faux pas, of course.

Why would they do that? Because in many other places in the world, it's totally normal.

In many places in the world, you'd go out with friends, co-workers, whatever, and discuss anything. And no matter how heated it gets, it's all just discussion. Water under the bridge.

Here in the US, we're huge whimps. Most anything interesting (sex, religion, politics) is taboo. Off the table. Perhaps a remnant of our initial Puritanism?

Instead, we have (certain places on) the Internet. Since we're all anonymous, we're finally comfortable to speak freely. But because we're anonymous, manners seem to go out the window.

Sucks, but what's the alternative? Discussions of politics and civil discourse seem to mutually exclusive, based on our current culture.

Personally, I choose growing a little thicker skin, over shutting it out, if those are the two options. Others are free to do as they like. But if there's a third option, being in chat forums but without a suitably thick skin, it just seems to be asking for trouble.

BooScout

(10,406 posts)
147. Not in this election so far....
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:50 AM
Nov 2015

But I will say I became an Obama supporter after the primaries of 2008 partly because of some discussions I had on DU with others. The fact that Clinton supported him so strongly played a larger role for me, but folks here helped to put me strongly in his corner, where I remain to this day. I think some folks need to realize no President or politician is perfect and on the whole, especially considering the complete clusterfeck Obama inherited and has had to deal with regarding the Republicans and very specifically the Teabaggers. Getting anything by those obstructionists should be considered pretty damned good.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
149. No, but
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:56 AM
Nov 2015

I did back in '03. I started out supporting Dean, and ended with DK, based on discussions here at DU.

I still liked and respected those who were supporting Dean...then and now. I made that switch early, months before the primaries actually rolled around.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
152. Nope
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 10:31 AM
Nov 2015

I was pretty 'ready for hillary' with the long standing joke in the house 'unless Sanders or Warren run.....I can dream."
BANG.Bernies in and little has swayed me since.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
153. I have observed several who have flipped who they are supporting due the "discussion" on DU.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 10:36 AM
Nov 2015

DU members has been stalked, had nasty mail sent and even to their home who was Sanders supporter. There has been others who are tired of the talking points over and over, the same talking points which have been debunked and I saw posted here yesterday and they continue. I did not dislike Sanders when this campaign first started but I can say his supporters have gotten nasty, calling Clinton names, and my thoughts have not been endeared of the supporters. There are some statements made by Sanders of which I agree and disagree. I have researched Sanders, just as I have Clinton and O'Malley, none of these candidates are perfect. I base my support for Clinton on years of research and following, know she has foreign affairs experience and with the recent Benghazi testimony has shown a presidential side.

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
154. I supported Hillary in 2008, caucused for her. Compared her to Warren, Bernie talked about running
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 10:39 AM
Nov 2015

compared Hillary to Bernie, Bernie announced, no comparison. Support Bernie 100%. No looking back. I like Hillary she's a nice person, just don't want her in the White House.

Pathwalker

(6,598 posts)
161. I'm not going to vote for Bernie now. I've read I'm too simple-minded,
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:01 PM
Nov 2015

have no conscience, am tearing down the party, have no integrity IF I don't choose him and only him, vow to stay home on election day if he's not the nominee. Oh, and after a lifetime of being a dead-dog Democrat, I am now not entitled to call myself a Democrat because his supporters are the experts on who is and who is not allowed to call THEMSELVES a Democrat. I sometimes wonder whose side they're on. IMO.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
170. I had leaned O'Malley for a while once it was clear Schweitzer was out, but the O'Malley group
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:29 PM
Nov 2015

definitely won me over.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has anyone flipped who th...