2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary is not a liberal. She said so herself.
From her own mouth, Hillary admits to the truth.
She's advocated being center-based as a good thing... as if the GOP hasn't completely distorted the political spectrum.
Clinton argued at the Columbus event that being in the "center" is a positive, not a negative.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/hillary-clinton-democrat-progressive/
We all know how well that's worked out for Obama.
Even during a 2007 debate she muddied the waters by claiming to be a "modern American progressive", whatever that's suppose to mean.
Here's a host of outside opinions on Hillary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Hillary_Clinton
If she called herself a moderate, and all those other individuals call her a moderate, then I think that kind of makes her a moderate. She's NOT a liberal. She may have liberal tendencies... but that's far and away not the same thing. I'll even go so far as to say perhaps she's earnestly trying to become a liberal... but the notion that she's always been a liberal? That's pure bunk.
Response to Bubzer (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Actions always speak louder than words. Hillary voted for the Iraq war, courts all manner of corporations, called the TPP the gold standard, and she regularly flip-flops on positions to gain political points. That sounds more like the GOP than a Dem to me. Bernie, on the other hand, is consistently right on the issues. Hillary can't say that.
The last thing we need in office is someone who has to evolve to be right on an issue. We need someone who has good judgment from the word go.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)the sole purpose of promoting an independent. I'm going to base my vote on which one I think has the best interests of myself & my children in mind. I don't believe that is Sanders.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)against the poster.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Unless you've somehow managed to spy on me outside my postings here, you can't possibly know my "sole purpose" for being here. It's certainly not as one dimensional as you think. But don't worry, I wont offended if you continue to believe that.
I do find it strange that you think a corporatist would have your interests in mind. I suspect that you'd disregard whatever evidence I provide though, so I wont bother. I am glad you're going to vote, however.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)I can't wait for the Sanders supporters to bring their asses to SC & actually try to convince us lowly detractors what your candidate is actually going to do. My neighborhood doesn't give 2 shits about Wallstreet. We want social justice reforms most of our kid's college is already paid for but I need to know they are going to live long enough to get there.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Silly threats aren't going to scare anyone here.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)I have yet to hear anyone give a reasonable explanation as to how BS is going to improve the extreme social injustices that are occuring our neighborhoods. We are a more affluent minority neighborhood that has been dealt major blows due to the institutional racism.
We want answers, not hear but Hillary is a meanie, that loves big bad banks, & voted for the Iraq war. That isn't going to help anyone & will guarantee these ppl get laughed off our porches & neighborhood.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I generally expect a more enlightened mindset from fellow dems.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Did you know that?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Are you suggesting being liberal is bad? Or perhaps you think actions and voting records don't matter?
Voting records are very clear;
So are the supporters;
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Exactly right.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)The simplistic identity politics that you advocate are not healthy for the country.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)That's where my priorities lie. I don't give 2 shits about Wallstreet or the military. These are non issues. I'll stick with ppl I know can get the job done.
Nitram
(22,811 posts)...tend to consider liberalism as a moderate stance. It is just the fact that the right has moved so much farther to the extreme right that being a liberal seems so much farther left. For example, in the 1950s the GOP strongly supported unions.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)You're right on target.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)But for the primaries, now that she has a serious challenge which they didn't expect, she will 'move to the left' to try to beat Sanders.
I think they didn't expect to have to do this because she knows she needs crossover votes to win, and now she has to bash Repubs a lot to get the Dem vote.
After the primaries should she win the nomination, we will see her return to what she says she is, a 'moderate' in an effort to get some of those Repub votes without which she can't win
Bernie has complicated matters for the Third Way. Why we are seeing more and more attacks on him.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat....?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)We understand Sanders is not rising in the polls and now Clinton has gotten ahead of Sanders in Iowa and NH. At the same Tim has moved ahead of Sanders is the same time post have been appearing of how Clinton is not a liberal. It is not working, she is still strong and in the two states he may have had a chance in has flipped for a hard core liberal named Hillary Clinton.
BTW, as Democrats, we know who is a liberal. That RW talking point is not working.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Nice
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)So I guess she IS a Progressive then...
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...did she use the phrase "yelling at each other"?
She must be aware that "yelling at each other" in the political context is a figure of speech used to indicate passionate disagreement. And yet, later, when Bernie used the very similar phrase "all the shouting in the world", she implied that the term "shouting" was a sexist attempt by Bernie to silence her.
Tsk, tsk.