2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolls owned by Rupert Murdoch and the world's largest arms dealer show Hillary winning.
I know, shocking, isn't it?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110724812
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)The information they want, and so early too. There's already talk here of "are all other campeigns over?" And that's just how Rupert and TBTB like it.
Instead of thinking of that we're caught up in the superbowl they're throwing us " Ra ra ra, sis-boom-bah, my team first and FUCK anyone else."
Once again, we'll make our bed and lay in it. Some will sleep sound, others restless, and when we all wake up we'll see the house is looted.
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)raining on bernie fans parade.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Bucky
(54,013 posts)Obviously the Koch brothers hired you to troll DU
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)YouGov is an international internet-based market research firm, headquartered in the UK, with operations in Europe, North America, the Middle East and Asia-Pacific.[2]
YouGov was founded in the UK in May 2000 by Stephan Shakespeare and Nadhim Zahawi. In April 2005, YouGov became a public company listed on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange.[3]
Stephan Shakespeare has been YouGovs Chief Executive Officer since 2010.[4] Its Chairman since 2007 is Roger Parry, replacing political commentator Peter Kellner who now serves as President of the company.[5] YouGov's former Chief Executive Officer Nadhim Zahawi resigned from the board to stand in the 2010 General Election and is now a Conservative Party MP for Stratford-on-Avon.
Snip
Accuracy
Two weeks before the Scottish independence referendum, 2014, a YouGov poll indicated that the vote would be much closer than anticipated.[16] The YouGov poll gave those in favour of independence 47% versus 45% for those against; after excluding those undecided, the figures were 51% and 49%, respectively. In the last few days of the campaign, polls indicated a lead for No of 4-6%. Soon after polling stations had closed, YouGov released a final poll that had been taken during the day of voting, indicating 46% Yes, 54% No. The actual result was 45% Yes, 55% No.
During the French presidential election, 2012 campaign, YouGov predicted François Hollande would achieve 30% of the vote and Nicolas Sarkozy 26% (the actual result was 29% and 27% respectively).[17]
During the United States presidential election, 2012 campaign, on the basis of one of the most extensive opinion polls ever conducted, YouGov predicted that Barack Obama would win the national vote by 2%.[18] This prediction proved to be one of the most accurate out of all pollsters covering the election.[19]
Snip
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)What makes me wonder about this election is that under 30 column. If the youth turn out this time all the polling could be way off.
I am judging itty what happened in my youth with the 1968 election. RFK was going to win because of the youth were really tuning out. He was killed, the Chicago PD had a riot at the Democratic Convention. The DNC security even beat up Dan Rather? and threw out delegates. Nixon won.
To add the phase "The whole world is watching" was originated at the Chicago Convention
riversedge
(70,228 posts)riversedge
(70,228 posts)bad polls because of who owns them. whow.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)dsc
(52,162 posts)and that is a small business out of NC.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Response to Scuba (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)It's all vast HRC Conspiracy.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Response to UglyGreed (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Are those people telling me that correct?
Thank you in advance.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)They make you take a quiz too.
riversedge
(70,228 posts)I was just going to post this. Thanks
NBC News/Wall Street Journal Rated A-
http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I'm as cynical about the media as anyone, but if the corporate bigwigs were manipulating the polls, they'd also show Bush wiping out all competitors.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Response to Blue_Adept (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #22)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #19)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I always thought that was a funny grade.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)We were all given little plots to grow things beyond the basketball courts. My buddy and i were terrible. Some of the good ole boys plots could have fed a platoon.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)except the weeds die.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)riversedge
(70,228 posts)I think you need to get to know that poster. Just saying. Btw welcome
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)They are salty.
So sad.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)riversedge
(70,228 posts)Nitram
(22,802 posts)...facts to "prove" Clinton is not really ahead. Just because Murdoch's polls show the same thing as many other polls doesn't mean they are all wrong. I think even you guys can see that. Calm down and support your candidate with sell-reasoned policy arguments.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Many (most?) polls are designed to shape opinion, not measure it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)You are correct. Doesn't matter how much these organizations want it to not be so, they just can't bullshit so far as to try to say she isn't winning.
#hillcat
Walk away
(9,494 posts)That even Fox can't lie about the fact that Hillary is kicking butt????