Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:39 AM Nov 2015

Lawrence Lessig, Champion of Electoral Reform, Drops Bid for President

Actually, I think that wanting to use presidential debates as a public forum should only be allowed to those candidates with actual campaign organizations.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/11/02/lawrence-lessig-champion-electoral-reform-drops-bid-president

Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig announced Monday that he was dropping his bid for the Democratic nomination because the party effectively "shut him out."

Lessig's campaign, which launched in early September, primarily focused on campaign finance reform and the failed electoral process.

In a video message posted to his campaign website, Lessig said that he was forced to drop out of the race because new Democratic Party rules excluded him from taking part in the upcoming debate.

"From the start it was clear that getting into the Democratic debates was the essential step to this campaign," he stated. However, under new inclusion rules announced last week "unless we can time travel there is no way I can qualify," Lessig said. "Under the new rule I am just shut out."

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
1. Eridani, I certainly wouldn't want GOP-type frivolous, self-aggrandizing
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:51 AM
Nov 2015

candidates messing up our elections either. That said, I do really wish Professor Lessig had been allowed into the debates to lay his one-issue platform before the electorate. There is nothing frivolous, after all, about our desperate need for campaign finance reform.

To save Democracy.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. I agree that his signature issue is really important
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:53 AM
Nov 2015

But actual candidates have organizers, and some plan for GOTV.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. He'd gotten up to the 1% 'cutoff' the DNC required.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:56 AM
Nov 2015

Then DWS changed the rules to keep him out of the debates, because he'd be yet another lefty pushing Clinton places she didn't want to go, defending unsavory economic policies and actions that people don't like.

Bucky

(54,013 posts)
5. It was always a silly gimmick... running for president in order to resign from the job
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:22 AM
Nov 2015

As important as the issue of campaign finance reform is, let's leave the "performance art" candidacies to the Republicans.

Lessig should join the WolfPAC team.

 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
6. He walked that back later, but too late the damage was done.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 10:31 AM
Nov 2015

Still, the DNC told him the rules, he met them and was denied.



Unfair to him, and unfair to the people who helped put him in that position.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Lawrence Lessig, Champion...