Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,884 posts)
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:00 AM Nov 2015

The Texas-Vermont-Maine Nuclear Dump: Bringing Environmental Racism Home

Posted in 1998:


This past August, Vermont activists were visited by a delegation of long-time antinuclear activists from West Texas, three of whom spent ten days touring Vermont and meeting with both activists and public officials. They testified at the State House, and before the State Nuclear Advisory Panel. They participated in a five day walk for the abolition of nuclear weapons, met with Rep. Sanders, one of the compact’s leading proponents, and spent a few days at an antinuclear activist camp in southern Vermont. On August 22, they were joined by two Sierra Blanca residents, who spoke at a large antinuclear rally in the southern Vermont town of Brattleboro. The rally, the camp, and a subsequent civil disobedience action at the gates of Vermont’s sole nuclear plant, were part of an effort by the regional Citizen’s Awareness Network and the D.C.-based Nuclear Information and Resource Service to launch a major new Nuclear Free New England Campaign, and rekindle some of the energies that made nuclear power such a powerful public issue in New England in the late 1970s and early eighties.

The Texans shared many years of experiences of fighting the Sierra Blanca nuclear dump, a struggle that has already lasted some fifteen years. Vermonters heard of numerous encounters with the nuclear industry and Governor Bush’s representatives. They were told about concrete test canisters that are already cracking, and of dramatic testimony presented in innumerable public gatherings against the proposed dump. We shared documentary evidence showing that all of the arguments put forward in favor of the dump are misleading and essentially fraudulent. We all gained a much clearer understanding of the politics of nuclear waste in the late 1990s, and the unseemly political maneuvers which have created this nuclear atrocity in our names.

<snip>

Twenty Texas counties and five Mexican states passed resolutions against the dump, and the Mexican Congress has repeatedly expressed its opposition, but public discussion of the nuclear compact in Vermont seemed limited to an occasional Letter to the Editor. This spring, however, a number of events helped re-energize the debate. On April 16th, a city councilor from the town of Juárez, Mexico, just across the Rio Grande from Sierra Blanca, began a 24 day hunger strike, which brought numerous letters of protest from Mexican officials to the planned nuclear dump. A number of Vermont activists once again began to take notice.

The Vermont chapter of the Sierra Club, in cooperation with activists from West Texas, gave the issue a high priority in its summer campaigns, due to the impending congressional vote. On May 1st, Texas activist and radio host Jim Hightower went to Burlington to speak at a major fundraiser for Bernie Sanders, who has played an especially vocal role in ushering the nuclear compact through Congress. Sierra Club members and others gathered outside the Sheraton Hotel to voice their objections to the Sierra Blanca dump and Vermont’s role in creating it. Hightower made his objections clear in his speech to hundreds of Sanders supporters inside.

On May 11th, about a dozen activists met with Sanders at his office. The delegation included two University of Vermont students who had just completed a thorough analysis of the scientific arguments in support of the Texas dump; they found numerous unanswered questions and more than a few outright falsehoods in the proponents’ arguments. Several participants in the meeting were astonished by the “independent” congressman’s vehement and unrelenting support for shipping nuclear waste 2400 miles to West Texas. It was the best site geologically, he claimed, much better than having nuclear waste scattered across the country, and besides, how dare we accuse Bernie Sanders of environmental racism? The August meeting with the Texas delegation featured Sanders at his most obstinate, insisting that he’d done the right thing and that he was no longer interested in the issue now that the compact bill had passed the House.



http://social-ecology.org/wp/1998/10/the-texas-vermont-maine-nuclear-dump-bringing-environmental-racism-home/
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
1. that is the problem with nuclear power - there are no good options - just less horrible ones
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:06 AM
Nov 2015

now the waste is just stacking up in the nuclear facilities.....it is just a matter of time before we have our own Fukushima .

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. So Bernie voted to dump Vermont's nuclear waste in a majority Latino community in Texas
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:12 AM
Nov 2015

As I said before, Bernie is a one-trick pony who's focused on income inequality.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
8. I believe Sanders wife...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:32 AM
Nov 2015

Is a member on the commission. One of two she was appointed to soon after Sanders stumped for Shumlin.

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
3. He had to dump the waste down where all those brown people live.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 03:20 AM
Nov 2015

Couldn't risk contaminating something important like a golf course.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. Problem with this line of attack is that no nuclear waste was ever sent there but NYC did send
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:50 AM
Nov 2015

sewage to be dumped in Sierra Blanca from 1992-2001, NYC had previously dumped it in the ocean raw, but the rest of America stopped that practice, so NY sent their waste to Sierra Blanca by the train load:
Between 1992 and 2001, as many as 45 train cars per day brought sewage sludge from New York City to this 129,000 acre West Texas property, where it was spread out on the ground like peanut butter. The waste site was a former resort called the Mile High Ranch, and was owned by a Long Island New York company, Merco Joint Venture. The contract with New York City was terminated in June of 2001 (two of the company's owners were found guilty of bribing New York mafia bosses in the hope of influencing union officials), and the sludge ranch - one of the largest in the world - now sits idle. Merco filed for bankruptcy in 2002, resulting in the state of Texas purchasing the site from them.
http://clui.org/ludb/site/sierra-blanca-sludge-ranch


Why was NYC sending their human waste to Sierra Blanca? Why is that never mentioned in threads that affect a great concern for that community?

jfern

(5,204 posts)
5. Give them a break, they don't have much else to work with
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 03:49 AM
Nov 2015

So they had to post 4 threads about this today.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
11. What is pitiful is that they do not seem to know the real environmental injustice that happened
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:56 AM
Nov 2015

in Sierra Blanca, which is constantly reconsidered to this day. The town was NYC's sludge pit from 1992-2001 when the company doing the dumping went bankrupt. Tons of sewage, by train, spread 'like peanut butter' over the acreage.
http://clui.org/ludb/site/sierra-blanca-sludge-ranch.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
7. Old smear, does not excuse Hillary's zest for war, fracking, the TPP, increased H-1B visas, cluster
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:26 AM
Nov 2015

bombs. All of which hurt women, children, men, and all races.

The bottom of that barrel must be getting kind of thin.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
9. So what's Bernie's excuse?
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:19 AM
Nov 2015

For voting yes on HR Res 64 (cluster bombs), Afghanistan war, F-35s (more cluster bombs), and no on visa's that help people out of poverty? ON TOP of this environmental racism: http://archives.texasobserver.org/issue/1998/09/11#page=11

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
12. Without even digging into that - I do not like Hillary's stances on things like this, and I do not
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 12:47 PM
Nov 2015

like her proclivity for war and Wall Street.

I am not a purist, either - and if I were, Hillary would not even make the list of those I would vote for.

Let's stop pretending that you would vote for Bernie or I would vote for Hillary, in the primary, okay? You seriously cannot come up with anything against Bernie that would make Hillary an iota more palatable. If you think you can post some gotcha! that would make me switch support - you are sadly mistaken. Let's just leave it at that, eh?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
13. The vote was there, the lobbying was there, the intent was there, the choices were publically made
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:04 PM
Nov 2015

and non of it stands up to the rhetoric touting the pristine history of Bernie Sanders.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Texas-Vermont-Maine N...