Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:27 PM Nov 2015

I am voting for Bernie solely because he is a man.

An old, white man at that! Does that make me sexist?

This whole comment is sarcasm including the title!

I didn't think I needed to state that, but it seems everyone is a literalist here.

I would knock on doors for Sen. Warren if she were running!

I don't give a damn about a candidate's gender! It is their platforms I vote for.

Just wanted to post a thread to counter the at least three, two by the same person, regarding Hillary garnering support solely because of her gender.

Happy Sunday!

This place is becoming a bad joke.

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am voting for Bernie solely because he is a man. (Original Post) ybbor Nov 2015 OP
That's fine and dandy... luvspeas Nov 2015 #1
If you remove old it could have been a Romney ad. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #2
Bernie builds car elevator... daleanime Nov 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #6
True Blue Blood Democratic Opposition To Bernie..... daleanime Nov 2015 #7
True Blue Blood? DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #40
. SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #51
That's cool. If, however, you exhorted other men to vote for Bernie because Bernie is a man, djean111 Nov 2015 #3
True ybbor Nov 2015 #8
Thanks. But I fear logic is actually unwanted. In fact, I know that! n/t djean111 Nov 2015 #31
46 female Senators in the history of the Republic dsc Nov 2015 #4
In what way is that relevant to the choice of who we place in the Whitehouse as a result of Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #9
For me, and many others, the symbolism would matter dsc Nov 2015 #10
I thought the other post was a sarcastic jab at the idea of voting for a president based on their Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #11
It was/is ybbor Nov 2015 #13
The OP was a joke! ybbor Nov 2015 #12
My 2 female senators have lost me artislife Nov 2015 #16
I'm with you yuiyoshida Nov 2015 #29
Only if they are secure with who they are. There have been a lot of leaders who knew LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #27
What a great observation. SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #28
I have worked for just a couple of women who were very secure in who they were and had a LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #32
Me ban you? And it would matter in the big scheme of things anyway? SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #33
And I love your avatar, she or Anne Richards are the 2 I would have loved to LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #35
Oh myyyyyyyy! SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #37
And the nightly news would have been so much fun. LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author demwing Nov 2015 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #44
Interesting username. ColesCountyDem Nov 2015 #46
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #47
The first female Senator was a white suprematcist and the last Senator who had owned slaves jfern Nov 2015 #50
Of course, that makes you sexist! sadoldgirl Nov 2015 #14
I'd vote for them(? Not sure of the pronoun to use) ybbor Nov 2015 #19
That certainly has been the past critera for consideration. Affirmative action Evergreen Emerald Nov 2015 #15
uh... artislife Nov 2015 #17
Nice pleasant conversation, rather than snark. Evergreen Emerald Nov 2015 #20
I wasn't being snarky, I was being truthful. nt artislife Nov 2015 #21
Ok Evergreen Emerald Nov 2015 #23
So you are admitting that her gender is a major factor for your vote? ybbor Nov 2015 #18
You are entitled to your opinion Evergreen Emerald Nov 2015 #25
Was that why she voted for the Iraq war? eridani Nov 2015 #48
We've only had that choice since the inception of this country. nt boston bean Nov 2015 #22
He makes me feel uncomfortable. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #24
I loves me some grumpy old coots! SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #30
Plenty of Republicans feel the same way VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #26
this would have more of a point if there weren't Clinton supporters running around saying MisterP Nov 2015 #34
You are making up things. riversedge Nov 2015 #39
I literally do not remember SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #42
and here I thought people chewed gum on planes for 5 hours to get my BP past 180! MisterP Nov 2015 #45
Yup! SoapBox Nov 2015 #36
Provided you have confidence they will stand on their platforms. nt SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #41
lol, thanks I just have to add that if he transgenders, I would still vote for him. /s Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #49
Only the Democrats would run a woman or minority for POTUS treestar Nov 2015 #52
LOL! lovemydog Nov 2015 #53

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
5. Bernie builds car elevator...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:43 PM
Nov 2015

because he's just like Mitt.


Thanks I needed that, I has in danger of the TBBDOTB seriously. Hope it hasn't ruined your lovely day.

Response to daleanime (Reply #5)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
40. True Blue Blood?
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:42 PM
Nov 2015

True Blue Blood? Do they have blue bloods in Belarus and southern Italy?

My dad quit school in the ninth grade, moved out his parent's sixth floor walk up apartment to become a stevedore. My mom was in Rapid Advance, graduated from high school at fifteen years old, got a job as a book keeper to support her widowed mom and brother.

My dad died when I was fourteen and left my mom and I with a seven square foot shot gun shack and a lot of debt.


I was almost rich once but lost everything in the Great Recession. Now, money would just be another encumbrance. When you ain't got nothing, you got nothing to lose.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. That's cool. If, however, you exhorted other men to vote for Bernie because Bernie is a man,
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:32 PM
Nov 2015

and only a man can understand the problems that men face, or said that not voting for Bernie is merely sexism against old white men, then there is pushback.

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
8. True
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:49 PM
Nov 2015

And I love your comments in all those other threads! You have so much patience, I could only lurk reading the circles of "logic" going on in them.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
4. 46 female Senators in the history of the Republic
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:33 PM
Nov 2015

20 of those still serving, 34 still alive, and people are around who were alive when the first one was seated but yeah just the same.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
9. In what way is that relevant to the choice of who we place in the Whitehouse as a result of
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:51 PM
Nov 2015

this election?

dsc

(52,166 posts)
10. For me, and many others, the symbolism would matter
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:56 PM
Nov 2015

I also think that women can bring both different points of view and different skills to the table. I notice you have no problem whatsoever with the OP voting for Bernie due to being a man, only my post.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
11. I thought the other post was a sarcastic jab at the idea of voting for a president based on their
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:01 PM
Nov 2015

gender. I did not take it seriously in any way.

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
12. The OP was a joke!
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:04 PM
Nov 2015

It is so far from how I feel. I actually edited to make it more clear that I was joking after your comment.

I am voting for Bernie because Sen. Warren isn't running. I would vote for her but it would have nothing to do with her gender. Gender should not play any role in a choice for a position for anything.

I am sorry you did not understand my sarcasm.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
16. My 2 female senators have lost me
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:09 PM
Nov 2015

And I voted for them every time. They voted for the TPP. Enough of this bs. Man or woman, you must be on the side of the planet and all her inhabitants.

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
27. Only if they are secure with who they are. There have been a lot of leaders who knew
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:42 PM
Nov 2015

that doing something was wrong but they felt like they had to prove that they were not wimps. I think that applies to just about every president we have had since Jimmy Carter.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
28. What a great observation.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:12 PM
Nov 2015

Probably because they took the wrong lesson from Carter's loss. It wasn't because he told the unpalatable truth, it was because Reagan stole the election.

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
32. I have worked for just a couple of women who were very secure in who they were and had a
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:19 PM
Nov 2015

great time. But I have worked for quite a few (who I believe were not) who treated everyone like they were a child and had to bossed around all the time. My guess is they thought they had to be more than what they though a man was. (Whatever in the hell that means). ;>


Touchy subject -- - Please don't ban me

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
33. Me ban you? And it would matter in the big scheme of things anyway?
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:26 PM
Nov 2015

You give me too much credit.

Oh, I know EXACTLY what kind of boss you are talking about. Male or female. Got one right now.

Gotta tell you my Mom's terms for "doesn't matter in the big scheme of things" -

No one will know in a hundred years.

No one will notice on a galloping horse.

I have to tell myself that a lot right now......

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
35. And I love your avatar, she or Anne Richards are the 2 I would have loved to
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:29 PM
Nov 2015

the first woman president. How much fun would that have been?

Response to dsc (Reply #10)

Response to Ed Suspicious (Reply #9)

Response to ColesCountyDem (Reply #46)

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
14. Of course, that makes you sexist!
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:08 PM
Nov 2015

I want a disabled transexual native American Veteran
to run! I hope that includes gender, minority and
military.(sarc)

Well, I have to do yard work now, if you call that
happy. "Bad joke" is a good understatement!

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
19. I'd vote for them(? Not sure of the pronoun to use)
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:30 PM
Nov 2015

I am going out to rake leaves and get the yard ready for the winter myself. It is at least beautiful out here!

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
15. That certainly has been the past critera for consideration. Affirmative action
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:09 PM
Nov 2015

has attempted to address one of the issues. We have attempted to change that for generations...and still the amount of women in Congress is minimal. Old, White, Male has been the standard. It is time to change it.

Clinton has a unique perspective as a woman and as a progressive democrat, a lawyer, and mother, a grandmother, and a fighter.

Her gender is a plus for me.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
17. uh...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:14 PM
Nov 2015
Clinton has a unique perspective as a woman and as a progressive democrat, a lawyer, and mother, a grandmother, and a fighter.

Progressive= no-Centrist
Democrat= technically yes
lawyer= whoop dee do
mother/grandmother= as a childless woman I am not for elevating a woman solely on the fact that she got knocked up and kept the child
fighter= the best adjective to so many supporters. But what has she fought? Middle East peope, Honderan, North African and republicans.
Heavily armed for all but the republican she was fighting against her own missteps and their taking advantage of it.

So ---she isn't that impressive to me.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
23. Ok
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:25 PM
Nov 2015

"Progressive= no-Centrist" -- Actually, no one is all one side (look at Sanders and gun control). Clinton is progressive and has fought hard for progressive issues her whole life. I agree that some of her positions are centrist. And, so are mine.

"Democrat= technically yes"--she is a Democrat. If you are attempting (but not in a snarky way) to suggest that she is Republican, than you need to bone up on the differences. Your ideas are dangerous for the country. And...she is much more of a Democrat than Sanders...just ask the Democratic party.

"lawyer= whoop dee do" (not snark?) She was one of the few women in law school at that time, and has been breaking barriers ever since. Her contributions as a lawyer are unmatched.

"mother/grandmother= as a childless woman I am not for elevating a woman solely on the fact that she got knocked up and kept the child." That is an ugly statement. However, ignoring that for a moment: because she is a mother, she has a unique perspective that many white, old, males do not have...that are relevant today. She worked her ass off to protect children and provide them with health care and early learning. She understands the needs of working mothers.

"fighter= the best adjective to so many supporters. But what has she fought? Middle East peope, Honderan, North African and republicans.
Heavily armed for all but the republican she was fighting against her own missteps and their taking advantage of it." If you do not know what she has been fighting for, you have not been paying attention. It is as if you have made up your mind to de-humanize her and therefore nothing can penetrate that wall. "Misteps" the republican party, flanked by the media have attacked her for decades. She has come out, tattered at times, but always picks herself off to fight again. I believe that much of the de-humanization of her is from those who grew up observing the constant attacks, and they just became part of the lexicon.

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
18. So you are admitting that her gender is a major factor for your vote?
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:23 PM
Nov 2015

I will not be voting for her for the same reasons I wouldn't vote for Jim Webb or Lincoln Chaffee. I would vote for Martin O'Malley over the former SOS because I do not believe she is progressive, nor does she call herself one anymore.

The fact that she is female has nothing to do with my choice in the same way the reason I am voting for Bernie is based on his platform, not his gender.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
25. You are entitled to your opinion
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:34 PM
Nov 2015

In my opinion, O'Malley does not have nearly the qualifications or experience that Clinton has. He is second best. And, it appears that he is forgiven for many of the same stances, that some on DU denigrate Hillary for. Are men treated differently for prior actions?

And, for some reason, I can't put my finger on why, but he creeps me out.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
48. Was that why she voted for the Iraq war?
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 05:51 PM
Nov 2015

The chaos in the Middle East has been really shitty for the women there.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
24. He makes me feel uncomfortable.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:33 PM
Nov 2015

Ill-fitting suits. Stiff and forced smile. Finger-wagging angry demeanor. Frumpy shirt. Unkempt hair. Stooped and slouched. Shuffle walking. Nothing about him seems natural, relaxed or genuine. World leaders will see him as a grumpy old coot and would be ridiculed and not taken seriously.

Ugh!

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
30. I loves me some grumpy old coots!
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:17 PM
Nov 2015

When I grow up, I want to be a grumpy old coot. Oh, wait - I think I may have achieved my ambition.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
34. this would have more of a point if there weren't Clinton supporters running around saying
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:27 PM
Nov 2015

they don't care WHAT policies she'll push, she has salpinges

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
42. I literally do not remember
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:48 PM
Nov 2015

The last time I learned a new vocabulary word!

Interesting how it applies to both fallopian tubes and ear canals.

Oops, not the part you hear with, the part you sometimes have to pop.

Oh Lord, that didn't sound good. The eustachian tubes. What you chew gum for on airplanes.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
36. Yup!
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:30 PM
Nov 2015

"I don't give a damn about a candidate's gender! It is their platforms I vote for."

I fully agree.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
52. Only the Democrats would run a woman or minority for POTUS
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 08:11 PM
Nov 2015

so it never really comes up to the test.

Democrats wouldn't vote on that basis, that's up to Republicans. Which is why Fiorina and Carson can run, but they will never win. Republicans are the only ones who would vote for another based on that, but they will make sure their nominee is a white man in the end.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I am voting for Bernie so...