2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,648 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)which indicates the whole thing is a construct of someone with an agenda; Hillary has never worked for Monsanto and despite knowing lobbyists who did work for Monsanto, hard to avoid in DC, has no direct ties to those guys. https://www.metabunk.org/partially-debunked-list-of-monsanto-employees-in-government.t3664/
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)European country, Poland. They are on the run, at last, everywhere governments put their people before the Corporations who fund them.
Monsanto Named 2013's 'Most Evil Corporation' In New Poll
That list explains why even though over 90% of the PEOPLE in this DEMOCRACY want their food LABELED, our Corporate funded Congress ignores them in favor of the Most Evil Corporation in the World.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)That people ascribe evil to any corporation is hilarious.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)to the internal dialog that would provide the ability to tell such from evil.
That or since it spends the same they just don't care about motivations for evil outcomes.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:52 AM - Edit history (1)
Edit to add that I didn't realize Hillary was in the pic, and debunked to boot.
Oh well, doesn't negate the point.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Hillary Clinton Needs no introduction, no connection with Monsanto. (https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00000019&cycle=2008, http://littlesis.org/person/13191/Hillary_Clinton)
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)All meme's have become truth, no one bothers to fact check anything.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)conservatives fall for.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)They HATE Muslims. I do know that of a fact and I don't need a link.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)...with sentence structure, grammar, and spelling. Moreover, a couple of searches revealed he's full of shit. Try not to use inhalant freaks as your authoritative source material.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)and that this piece of information has never made it to any actual media outlets?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)rpannier
(24,330 posts)I'm almost certain that sitting USSC Justices cannot sit on boards of private companies or act as their counsel.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and ends with
If ones involvement whit Monsanto in the past was a valid argument for not having the person in a political office, then so should it be for any person in politics with a prior workplace.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)From your link (emphasis and grammar policing mine):
Nobody is claiming these people work both jobs at the same time.
MAJOR strawman.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)as stated,she didn't,that's debunked.The fact that some did means nothing.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Hillary did NOT work at Monsanto.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)Did Hillary like all of Wal-Mart practices? No, said Garry Mauro, a longtime friend and supporter of the Clintons who sat on the Wal-Mart Environmental Advisory Board with Mrs. Clinton in the late 1980s and worked with her on George McGoverns 1972 presidential campaign.
But, Mr. Mauro added, was Wal-Mart a better company, with better practices, because Hillary was on the board? Yes.
Taken from a NYT article.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And if you want another take (working at Walmart that is) read about this woman, a great leader in Boston.
http://radioboston.wbur.org/2015/08/27/margaret-mckenna
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The largest gun and ammo dealer in the US, maybe the world.
Yet she also wants to grab guns from legal owners? WTF?!?!?!?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Did I miss the news cycle?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And it means she will lose the general election.
Bernie's position to keep guns away from people who will cause mass murders is a much more acceptable to the public position.
I notice you guys are ignoring that and using smears to divert attention.
The republican would never be able to hang 'gun grabber' on Bernie. And they sure won't object to Hillary voting to invade Iraq.
Isn't that Iraq war vote something you guys are still trying to hide? Well, it cost her in 2008, and it's still a thing. Hiding it won't work.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)My opinion on guns is NOT the majority here so I don't really share it all that often.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)selling Cheap$hitFromChina. That's our Hillary... champion of the working man and woman!
MADem
(135,425 posts)She was offered the seat on the board because Sam "Made in America" Walton's WIFE wanted a woman on the board.
At the time she was with them, Mister Sam was still running the joint, and WalMart was all about selling US-made products.
Soooooo....back to the drawing board with you, then! At least TRY to be slightly factual--it would help your credibility.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Some exec from Nordstrom was. Hillary served from 1986-1992. Walton stepped down as CEO in 1988 -- still involved on the board but technically not running the joint.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Walmart#Imports_and_globalization
Wal-Mart is virulently anti-union and Hillary didn't make waves. As I said, champion of the working man and woman, that's our Hillary!
Huh, she isn't touting her Wal-Mart stint in her campaign bio. Wonder why?
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/about/bio/
backatcha, MADem,
MADem
(135,425 posts)And she worked for him during his Buy American lifetime--which, if you bothered to research, was that he STATED that he would not buy foreign IF US goods were available.
Not sure if you expect the board of directors to stock those bins you're going on about? Do a full audit of where everything came from in the few meetings they went to each year? Do you understand how limited the role of a member of a board is? How rarely they even meet?
She's said--long ago--that she parted ways with WALMART and she disagreed with the impediments the corporation put up with regard to union organizing, as well as their bad record on promoting women. She refused a campaign donation from them. What, you want her to keep saying it, over and over again? Do you want Bernie Sanders to keep repeating that he doesn't have the same attitudes about women that he wrote about in that stupid little essay that he wrote, too? How many times do people have to say something before it sinks in?
You haven't tossed anything back at me.
If you think you have, and it makes you feel good, you're easily pleased.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Do you usually kick and rec false internet memes?
Duppers
(28,125 posts)How can the USA dig itself out?
Consider, the first response to this informational OP was mockery, laughter, from a Hillary Clinton supporter.
And Hillary Clinton is leading in the opinion polls, inducing more mocking laughter: "you can't win without big money and HRC has big money" kind of laughter.
And that's the way it is.
How do you even talk to these people, for whom information doesn't matter?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Who again does information not matter for?
delrem
(9,688 posts)and except for David Beler and Hillary Clinton it checks out as accurate.
I couldn't get much info on David Beler.
Although I most certainly did find plenty of pro-GMO associations for Hillary Clinton, there's nothing about "monsanto councel" and no such connection beyond the rather rarefied connect via Rose Law firm.
So -
I'm a bit taken aback by how deeply this one company has embedded itself in the US gov't. I don't think it's funny, ludicrous, at all. And I'll give you your point in defense of Hillary. One has to be EXACT in all details, on that score.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)to stop digging but we always want to keep digging and tend to end up with bigger and deeper holes.
The Clinton candidacy's support in the face of the particular problems and challenges we face as a nation and a world is indicative of this.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,015 posts)imagined or otherwise.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)Reason to vote for Bernie....
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Hillary did NOT work at Monsanto.
To say otherwise is just false, no way around it.
oasis
(49,393 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... it will be quoted as "fact" anyway.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It literally was debunked in 2013 too, here on DU.
oasis
(49,393 posts)I can't wait until 3/2. Super Tuesday plus one.
Party in the DU Hillary Group.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)But... let's not get too excited.
We've got ALOT of work to do still.
oasis
(49,393 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And not because of this OP.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)I'm just curious as to why, if you thought this was legitimate piece of "news" (and I'm assuming that you did), you didn't provide the original source in the OP.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)on Facebook.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... as an OP, without there being a legitimate source to back it up, and without bothering to at least Google to see if there was any evidence at all behind the info?
That's pretty - uh - well, I'll say no more. I'm sure you know where I'm going.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Maybe the OP will edit in the morning?
It's quite late.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)And maybe the OP will edit in the morning.
I am just still astounded that someone would post an unsourced tweet as though it were legit information, and do so without any investigation into its legitimacy whatsoever.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)It's like the internet. You can't tweet anything on Twitter unless it's true!
MADem
(135,425 posts)But hey, if it's ripped from Twitter, it must be true!!!!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Hoping LIV's will disiminate it.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)If the general public doesn't wake up soon this country and possibly the world is screwed!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)This needs to stay up top for the rest of the primary. If it's found on the Internet, it's worthy of discussion. I think some people believe Google is a news organization providing you with facts.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Lol. This shit is too funny. After this brilliant post, the most recognizable name around here moving forward will be the one at the very top of the op.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I'm still supporting Hillary. Got anything else?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Clinton and her inner circle have many ties to Monsanto, and they are very cozy. Clinton pushed GMOS as SoS, and in otehr venues.
GMO's is a legitimate subject for debate -- opinions vary. But Clinton needs to own her support for it.
And, more importantly, her ties to a Big Monopolistic Chemical and Ag Monster like Monsanto indicate her worldview and allegiances.
She is totally comfortable with a corporation that is trying to fuck over small farmers and gaining total control (only a slight exaggeration) of many aspects of life and commerce. t is an example of the kind of corporations that we should be whittling down to reasonable size, instead of enabling their empire-building schemes.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)In addition to the glyphosate backlash, Monsanto has had to deal with several EU countries who have said no to the company's GM crops. A new European Union law signed in March allows individual member countries to be excluded from any GM cultivation approval request. European opposition to GMOs has been strong: Unlike in the Americas and Asia, where GMO crops are widely grown, only Monsanto's pest-resistant MON810, a GMO maize, is grown in Europe. Several nations have taken advantage of the new exclusion law: Scotland, Germany, Latvia, Greece, France and recently, Northern Ireland, have all invoked it.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/monsanto-suffers-several-2015-setbacks
Monsanto not only suggested the topic to professor Calestous Juma. It went so far as to provide a summary of what the paper could say and a suggested headline. The company then connected the professor with a marketing company to pump it out over the Internet as part of Monsantos strategy to win over the public and lawmakers, according to e-mails obtained through a public records request.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/10/01/harvard-professor-failed-disclose-monsanto-connection-paper-touting-gmos/lLJipJQmI5WKS6RAgQbnrN/story.html
portlander23
(2,078 posts)I don't think Mrs. Clinton was employed by Monsanto, so I would retract this.
Partially Debunked: List of Monsanto Employees in Government
If you want to make a serious critique however, I think there are things that could be said:
Hillary vs. Bernie on Frankenfood
Last year, at a San Diego biotech conference, Hillary coached her audience in messaging. "Genetically modified sounds Frankensteinish. Drought-resistant sounds like something you'd want. Be more careful so you don't raise that red flag immediately."
It's also highly unlikely for Hillary Clinton to stand up against her benefactors, saying she favors a review of RoundUp, 2,4-D, and the even more toxic poisons used by farmers worldwide when she has friends in the industry telling her that they will "feed the world" someday with their agricultural methods.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It's like I have logged on to FR. Truly.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It's now up to 57 even though the entire thread is about how the meme is false.
I have a feeling they aren't just "ironic" rec's...
People actually believe this to be true, that's the only reason I can fathom. The problem with that is that it's a meme from at least 2013, and it's demonstratively false.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... up to 67 RECs - despite, as you've said, the entire thread being about how it's false.
And people talk about how gullible FOX-News watchers are ...
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)'what's the source.'
Sorry I haven't read this full thread. Has the original post been debunked?
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)if posters here knew of my clients, I'd be sent to Purity Prison for life.
Response to SoapBox (Original post)
blackspade This message was self-deleted by its author.
burrowowl
(17,641 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Damn them all!
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Hillary Clinton is elected POTUS.