Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 06:41 PM Aug 2012

4 Ways Paul Ryan’s Budget Would Devastate The Poor


-snip-

1. CUTS FOOD STAMPS BY $133 BILLION: Ryan’s budget would send the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or food stamps) back to the states as a block grant and cut the program by $134 billion. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, “an average of almost 10 million people would have to be cut from the program in the years from 2016 through 2022 to achieve the required savings.” If the cuts were to come from benefits, rather than kicking families out of the program, “All families of four — including the poorest — would see their benefits cut by about $90 a month in fiscal year 2016, or more than $1,100 on an annual basis.” Ryan continually claims that the food stamp program is “unsustainable,” even though the numbers show that’s simply not the case.

2. CUTS MEDICAID BY 1/3: Ryan would treat Medicaid in the same way: transform the exiting matching-grant financing structure into a pre-determined block grant that will not keep up with actual health care spending and send it back to the states. This would shift some of the burden of Medicaid’s growing costs to the states, forcing them to — in the words of the CBO — make cutbacks that “involve reduced eligibility for Medicaid and CHIP, coverage of fewer services, lower payments to providers, or increased cost sharing by beneficiaries—all of which would reduce access to care.” The reductions to Medicaid kick in right away: between 2013 and 2022, the budget makes $1.4 trillion in cuts to Medicaid —a 34 percent reduction. As a result, states could reduce enrollment by more than 14 million people, or almost 20 percent—even if they are were able to slow the growth in health care costs substantially.

3. 30 MILLION AMERICANS WOULD LOSE HEALTH COVERAGE: Romney and Ryan would repeal the Affordable Care Act, including the subsidies for middle-class Americans to purchase coverage and the expansion of the Medicaid program for lower-income Americans. As a result, more than 30 million Americans would lose access to insurance. The popular regulations that prohibit insurers from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and rescinding coverage would also be repealed.

4. CUTS PELL GRANTS FOR 1 MILLION STUDENTS: Ryan consistently claims that increases in financial aid are driving up the cost of higher education, even though evidence doesn’t back him up. The budget Ryan authored, according to an analysis by the Education Trust, would eliminate Pell Grants entirely for one million students. In 2011, 74 percent of Pell Grant recipients had family incomes of $30,000 or less. These cuts would come despite the fact that the price of a college degree has skyrocketed 1,120 percent over the last three decades.

Full article, hyperlinks, and graphic here: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/08/17/705401/how-paul-ryans-budget-would-devastate-social-programs-for-todays-lower-income-americans/



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
4 Ways Paul Ryan’s Budget Would Devastate The Poor (Original Post) Tx4obama Aug 2012 OP
It's not clear to me how a devout Catholic could possibly put WestSeattle2 Aug 2012 #1
Of course Ayn Rand would wholly embrace Ryan's budget - WestSeattle2 Aug 2012 #2
Remember what the GOP Wellstone ruled Aug 2012 #3

WestSeattle2

(1,730 posts)
1. It's not clear to me how a devout Catholic could possibly put
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 07:12 PM
Aug 2012

forth such a budget and still claim to be Catholic.

“The principle of subsidiarity reminds us
that larger institutions in society should
not overwhelm or interfere with smaller or
local institutions, yet larger institutions
have essential responsibilities when the
more local institutions cannot adequately
protect human dignity, meet human needs,
and advance the common good”. - US Catholic Bishops

http://www.usccb.org/about/domestic-social-development/resources/upload/poverty-common-good-CST.pdf

WestSeattle2

(1,730 posts)
2. Of course Ayn Rand would wholly embrace Ryan's budget -
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 07:14 PM
Aug 2012

and that speaks volumes about where his true allegiance and devotion lies.

Very sad.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
3. Remember what the GOP
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 08:13 PM
Aug 2012

has been touting,the churches will pick up the slack. Just what the hell has been going on for the last 10 -12 years,charities are screaming for help.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»4 Ways Paul Ryan’s Budget...