Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:25 AM Oct 2015

Bad news for Sanders if he falls behind in New Hampshire

If Sanders falls behind in New Hampshire, it will be very bad news for his campaign. Not only is New Hampshire right next door to Sanders’s home state, Vermont, it’s also filled with his base voters: white liberals. If Clinton wins New Hampshire, it’s probably a sign that Sanders won’t be competitive in most states outside of Vermont.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/hillary-clinton-got-the-biggest-post-debate-polling-bounce/

93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bad news for Sanders if he falls behind in New Hampshire (Original Post) Always Randy Oct 2015 OP
Plenty of time for things to sort themselves out. And Clinton... Smarmie Doofus Oct 2015 #1
you are right about the stumbling--- Always Randy Oct 2015 #3
1000+++++ global1 Oct 2015 #17
I dare any candidate to go negative on Hillary Clinton. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #22
Clinton is no Rousey. Chan790 Oct 2015 #24
Great point. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #25
Its probably not necessary BootinUp Oct 2015 #28
They are both pretty tough, albeit in different ways. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #30
Agreed! :) BootinUp Oct 2015 #34
it's all about SCOTUS for me Always Randy Oct 2015 #37
And 95% will go Rhonda who? moabfan Oct 2015 #41
It might not be a pretty sight Always Randy Oct 2015 #51
You mistrake your dislike for Hillary as being the feelings of everybody else. upaloopa Oct 2015 #29
I am for a vast healing after the nomination Always Randy Oct 2015 #40
No, I know a lot of people {D, R, I} who think that about Hillary. Chan790 Oct 2015 #54
If I were Sanders.... I'd rethink his "never go negative" credo. workinclasszero Oct 2015 #36
There is a lot of time before the primaries, and a lot can happen to any of the candidates. A still_one Oct 2015 #52
that is absolutely the right tack to take Always Randy Oct 2015 #53
We'll find out if he has an issue in 110 days. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #2
bump and boost---from the Gowdy hearings Always Randy Oct 2015 #4
It'll be largely forgotten after next week moabfan Oct 2015 #56
thank you for the response Always Randy Oct 2015 #62
umm 100 days till Iowa caucus today Sat. riversedge Oct 2015 #65
Yes, and NH primary is 8 days after that. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #89
Funny Scootaloo Oct 2015 #5
It cant mean both? uponit7771 Oct 2015 #6
Given that "meaningful" and "meaningless" are direct antonyms, no. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #7
Sanders is in a no win in NH primary, South Carolina?...if he comes close then Hillary has a serious uponit7771 Oct 2015 #8
I agree Always Randy Oct 2015 #9
dustbin enid602 Oct 2015 #85
everyone shakes these trees differently Always Randy Oct 2015 #10
I am starting to think White Liberals artislife Oct 2015 #11
We're truly terrible people Scootaloo Oct 2015 #15
I'm a white liberal, and I'm not your enemy Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #18
I'm gonna trust you artislife Oct 2015 #81
Even though I'm a white guy Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #93
Hanging with you yuiyoshida Oct 2015 #19
They seem awfully nice. artislife Oct 2015 #83
White liberals alone aren't enough to win the Democratic primary mythology Oct 2015 #20
Is that the reason we fear them? artislife Oct 2015 #58
Fear? No. It's just "hippy punching" Matariki Oct 2015 #88
If Bernie loses NH he's finished. DCBob Oct 2015 #13
Super Tuesday isn't this week. artislife Oct 2015 #78
The second sentence in the OP explains why losing sufrommich Oct 2015 #23
NH is only significant if Bernie loses there. Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #33
But not if Hillary does... artislife Oct 2015 #84
Variations in polling won't matter BainsBane Oct 2015 #12
The campaign is going to start spending on TV fairly soon. Duckfan Oct 2015 #14
Well, you'll just have to hope that Hillary takes the lead. delrem Oct 2015 #16
Hillary is a white liberal with minority support Bernie isn't. upaloopa Oct 2015 #32
No, I don't think you understand FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #38
NY state and NH are ~40 miles apart. Hillary's message can't carry that 40 miles? Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #21
I didn't even consider this. Shows how powerful a narrative can be. Thanks for the wake up call. Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #26
It's geography and demographics,as the article points out. sufrommich Oct 2015 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #75
LOL. That's like saying Maine and Quebec are politically very similar (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #49
Or Vermont. OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #57
If Sanders doesn't win in NH, he's done. Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #31
ANd if he does win NH, it is meaningless FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #39
Not so much "meaningless" as "completely expected". Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #77
PPP: Hillary +10 in NH over Bernie workinclasszero Oct 2015 #35
even NH is liking Hillary riversedge Oct 2015 #66
Yes! workinclasszero Oct 2015 #68
thank you for your post Always Randy Oct 2015 #74
PPPP is kind of a Democatic mainstream poll Always Randy Oct 2015 #79
If he loses both Iowa and NEw Hampshire, this thing will be over well before Super Tuesday. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #42
Bernie is looking incredibly weak right now workinclasszero Oct 2015 #43
He was this weak all along. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #44
Yes and this little Bernie hothouse called the DU workinclasszero Oct 2015 #46
DU ain't the only place. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #48
Maybe people will finally learn that online polls workinclasszero Oct 2015 #50
I wouldn't say he looks "weak". Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #47
Aw yeh the corporate boys are smiling now senz Oct 2015 #91
Which bodes bad for Dems pinebox Oct 2015 #55
So here come the threats not to vote or vote third party. DCBob Oct 2015 #59
Where did I make a threat? pinebox Oct 2015 #60
thdre seems to be a lot of animosity on this site Always Randy Oct 2015 #71
I would ignore all of that huffing and puffing. Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #61
When its Hillary vs Carson workinclasszero Oct 2015 #82
I won't say whether I'll vote for Hillary demwing Oct 2015 #63
Careful, such a post can be hidden! treestar Oct 2015 #64
All told, Clinton has averaged 59 percent to Sanders’s 27 percent in national polls without Biden si riversedge Oct 2015 #67
Yes, the Biden people were bound to support Hillary treestar Oct 2015 #69
what a deep and thoughtful post. thanks for the insight. Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #72
thank you for sharing Always Randy Oct 2015 #73
Let's wait a little and see what happens. Vinca Oct 2015 #70
That's it, call off the campaign. Cassiopeia Oct 2015 #76
Bad news for Hillary if she falls behind in New Hampshire artislife Oct 2015 #80
+1 Matariki Oct 2015 #87
That's a big "if" Matariki Oct 2015 #86
What the heck is the purpose of this OP? senz Oct 2015 #90
It's an article from fivethirtyeight. nt sufrommich Oct 2015 #92
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
1. Plenty of time for things to sort themselves out. And Clinton...
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:51 AM
Oct 2015

... has a remarkable talent for stumbling around just when her fan base is just starting to crow.

Plus which people basically don't like her. ( A *huge* drawback... esp in the general election.)

If I were Sanders.... I'd rethink his "never go negative" credo.

If he's not going to draw distinctions between himself and Clinton... who will?

He's got to make the case that it's a contest between a vision of a fairer, more equitable and more just society, on the one hand .... and more of the same on the other.

Or in this case...."President More of the Same". (With even more war and FANTASTICALLY expanded military budgets.)

He should couple all of the the above with a full-tilt, unrelenting horsewhipping of the Republican Party and its $$$$ owners.

Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
3. you are right about the stumbling---
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:57 AM
Oct 2015

she is not perfect---I was astounded that Obama beat her ---but that is politics i guess--

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
22. I dare any candidate to go negative on Hillary Clinton.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 08:26 AM
Oct 2015
If I were Sanders.... I'd rethink his "never go negative" credo.


I dare any candidate to go negative on Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton makes Ronda Rousey look like Winona Ryder.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
24. Clinton is no Rousey.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 08:37 AM
Oct 2015

Rousey, let's be clear, is a brutal maestro of the Octagon who could probably beat half the men (conservative estimate) in her weight-class. She talks trash because she backs that shit up like a sledgehammer to the face. She's probably the best fighter in any weight-class in any fighting-sport of either sex competing today.

Hillary Clinton is a politician who has a talent for coming across as insincere and smarmy and whose past efforts to go negative have left both her and her opponents smeared in metaphorical shit. She also loses as often as she wins when she goes negative.

Hillary is no Ronda Rousey...she's Bethe Correa.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
25. Great point.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 08:41 AM
Oct 2015
Clinton is no Rousey.


She's actually tougher. She might actually be harder to finish than Rasputin.

BootinUp

(47,165 posts)
28. Its probably not necessary
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 09:04 AM
Oct 2015

to convince folks that the probable next president is as tough or tougher than Rhonda Rousey. lol. I think history will eventually sort this out.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
30. They are both pretty tough, albeit in different ways.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 09:08 AM
Oct 2015

As a guy I know I would want no part of either one of them in combat.

 

moabfan

(48 posts)
41. And 95% will go Rhonda who?
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:17 AM
Oct 2015

Many of us doesn't follow UFC. I only happen to follow UFC because of one guy that I know from college who's very active in the business.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
29. You mistrake your dislike for Hillary as being the feelings of everybody else.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 09:07 AM
Oct 2015

Bernie can't get over 25% support of Dems. He certainly will not pick up the minority vote in the primaries. Therefore he has no way to win the nomination.

Reality is a hard pill for some people to swallow.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
54. No, I know a lot of people {D, R, I} who think that about Hillary.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:36 AM
Oct 2015

I don't know why Hillary supporters have a hard time accepting that their candidate is unlikable for a lot of people.

It's probably not going to cost her the GE if she gets the nomination...but I don't expect that there is going to be a massive oh gee, Hillary really is a warm, likable, sincere person sea-change. Her personality is what it is.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
36. If I were Sanders.... I'd rethink his "never go negative" credo.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:11 AM
Oct 2015

Really? At this stage of the game Bernie going negative would be a clear sign of a failed campaign.

But hey...proceed Bernie fans.


still_one

(92,256 posts)
52. There is a lot of time before the primaries, and a lot can happen to any of the candidates. A
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:58 AM
Oct 2015

misspoken word, gesture, or action can shift things very quickly one way or another.

History is littered with such examples


Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
53. that is absolutely the right tack to take
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:34 AM
Oct 2015

particularly when your choice is behind ----every time in my life when I was down ---staying the course worked ------I am a Sanders man all the way if he gets the nomination ------I have said here before it is the SCOTUS appointments that I truly worried about ---thank you for your response and engagement on these points

Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
4. bump and boost---from the Gowdy hearings
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:59 AM
Oct 2015

not many candidates can have that kind of thing as a gift to their campaign---the next few weeks will show some of this ---thank you for posting

Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
62. thank you for the response
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:59 PM
Oct 2015

this Benghazi thing is pretty big ---and the GOP hung their hat on it---now they are going after Planned Parenthood ---and I am thinking that it is more of an HRC issue---what do you think?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
5. Funny
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:13 AM
Oct 2015

When he was ahead, we were all told that it doesn't count because New Hampshire has a lot of white people.

Now suddenly it's a crucial state again, and very meaningful.

How odd.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
8. Sanders is in a no win in NH primary, South Carolina?...if he comes close then Hillary has a serious
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 03:04 AM
Oct 2015

... challenge

enid602

(8,621 posts)
85. dustbin
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:43 PM
Oct 2015

It would be kinda sad to see him relegated to the proverbial 'dustbin of History, ' so early in his career. Without having accomplished much. Oh well, there are always future contests.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
11. I am starting to think White Liberals
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 03:40 AM
Oct 2015

are the enemy.

As a Latina, I have to rethink some of my friendships on this site.....


 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
83. They seem awfully nice.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:37 PM
Oct 2015

I mean, pitbulls get a bad rap, can it be the same with White Liberals?

I like em.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
88. Fear? No. It's just "hippy punching"
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:55 PM
Oct 2015

Easy target. Hell, they'll do it to themselves if you ask them.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
23. The second sentence in the OP explains why losing
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 08:32 AM
Oct 2015

New Hampshire would be more of a disaster for Bernie than Hillary.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
33. NH is only significant if Bernie loses there.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 09:13 AM
Oct 2015

Last edited Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:52 PM - Edit history (1)

Based on the demographics most of us have been assuming that Bernie has NH locked up. If he loses there his campaign is almost certainly doomed.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
84. But not if Hillary does...
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:39 PM
Oct 2015

Why do I get the same feeling I had when trickle down economics was being explained?

My head tilts a little and my gut says...this feels like a con.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
12. Variations in polling won't matter
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 03:40 AM
Oct 2015

but he has to win the actual NH primary to stand any kind of a chance in the election. If he can't win there, it's hard to see where he can win. He has a lot of money though, so he could go on for a while, even without wins.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
16. Well, you'll just have to hope that Hillary takes the lead.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 05:17 AM
Oct 2015

Won't you?
And if she doesn't, it'll be bad news for her campaign, won't it?
After all, it's home of "white liberals", as some extremely divisionist propagandists might point out, and who is whiter and more liberal than Hillary Rodham Clinton?

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
21. NY state and NH are ~40 miles apart. Hillary's message can't carry that 40 miles?
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 07:36 AM
Oct 2015

The argument that Bernie has an edge because of the geography seems pretty slim, like the distance between the state Hillary was a Senator from and the boarder of New Hampshire.


sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
27. It's geography and demographics,as the article points out.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 08:54 AM
Oct 2015

Vermont and New Hampshire are very similar,the state of New York,not so much.

Response to sufrommich (Reply #27)

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
57. Or Vermont.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:43 AM
Oct 2015

That's a most peculiar argument. How goes my state of Ohio, bordered by Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia and Pennsylvania? Or Colorado, sandwiched betwen Utah and Kansas?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
45. Not so much "meaningless" as "completely expected".
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:32 AM
Oct 2015

Kind of like Tom Harkin winning the Iowa Caucuses.

Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #31)

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
42. If he loses both Iowa and NEw Hampshire, this thing will be over well before Super Tuesday.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:20 AM
Oct 2015

He cannot afford to lose NEw Hampshire, he's the Senator from the state that shares the longest border with NH!

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
44. He was this weak all along.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:27 AM
Oct 2015

The media including Biden in all the polls served to prop his weak numbers up.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
46. Yes and this little Bernie hothouse called the DU
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:32 AM
Oct 2015

was blowing a lot of smoke up peoples rearends as well

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
48. DU ain't the only place.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:35 AM
Oct 2015

The Berniebros are all over DK and other places.

These were the same people who have derided and denigrated everything Obama has done and will be the people who do the same to President Clinton starting at 12:01 EST January 20, 2017.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
50. Maybe people will finally learn that online polls
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:45 AM
Oct 2015

and spamming internet message boards counts for squat in a primary election campaign?

Nah probably not.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
47. I wouldn't say he looks "weak".
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 10:34 AM
Oct 2015

But even the strongest man in the world would still be crushed when run over by a juggernaut.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
91. Aw yeh the corporate boys are smiling now
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 07:15 PM
Oct 2015

just makes ya happy all over, doesn't it?

Money rules, baby!



 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
55. Which bodes bad for Dems
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 11:37 AM
Oct 2015

because many and I mean MANY Sanders supporters won't support Hillary and will either vote third party or stay home.
That's reality. In the end, if Sanders isn't the nominee, I hate to say it but......ya.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
60. Where did I make a threat?
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:18 PM
Oct 2015

You really should stop projecting. I'll write Bernie in if Hillary is the candidate.
What I said though is the truth. Ask Sander supporters and see what they say. Hillary's favorability numbers are underwater. It is what it is. Connect the dots Bob.

Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
71. thdre seems to be a lot of animosity on this site
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 01:49 PM
Oct 2015

do you think that eventually everyone will be together on whoever is the nominee

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
61. I would ignore all of that huffing and puffing.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 12:18 PM
Oct 2015

When it's Hillary versus Carson or Hillary versus Trump I expect the vast majority of DUers to do the right thing.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
82. When its Hillary vs Carson
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:36 PM
Oct 2015

a man that PROMISES to destroy medicare, I think Bernie supporters will do the right thing.

Dr. Ben Carson's prescription: Abolish Medicare

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/ben-carson-medicare-medicaid-215055

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
63. I won't say whether I'll vote for Hillary
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 01:06 PM
Oct 2015

But I can say I won't donate to her, even if she's the nominee, and I won't support her, even if she's the President.

She doesn't need progressives, as her fan base has repeatedly made clear.

riversedge

(70,248 posts)
67. All told, Clinton has averaged 59 percent to Sanders’s 27 percent in national polls without Biden si
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 01:32 PM
Oct 2015

well, sometimes we can. It is celebration week.



....Clinton gained in five of the six national polls taken after the debate. This shouldn’t be too surprising: Media spin is what matters most after a debate, and Clinton received very positive coverage. That’s in contrast to her media coverage before the debate, which was very negative. What’s a little bit uncertain is how much ground she picked up. The average has her up 6 percentage points, but CNN found her down 1 point, and the Emerson College poll had her up 15 points.

Sanders, on the other hand, seems to have dropped a little bit, though the picture is muddled. He was down in four polls and up in two. That fits with the idea that Sanders didn’t necessarily do poorly in the debate. Sanders has a well-established ideological base and a group of core supporters who are well-versed in politics and were unlikely to be swayed by the debate.

All told, Clinton has averaged 59 percent to Sanders’s 27 percent in national polls without Biden since the debate. In an average of all polls without Biden in the month before the debate, Clinton was at 53 percent to Sanders’s 29 percent.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
69. Yes, the Biden people were bound to support Hillary
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 01:39 PM
Oct 2015

Though there were a few Biden supporters who went to Bernie - interesting people they must be!

Vinca

(50,285 posts)
70. Let's wait a little and see what happens.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 01:47 PM
Oct 2015

Back in 2008, Obama's "breakaway" moment was the speech at the Iowa "JJ" dinner. That event is tonight and I can't imagine Bernie won't blow their socks off.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
76. That's it, call off the campaign.
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 02:28 PM
Oct 2015

Let's just anoint HRC as the chosen one now.

After all why even vote when we've had a few polls come out.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
90. What the heck is the purpose of this OP?
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 03:58 PM
Oct 2015

It sounds childish -- sort of "nyaa nyaa nyaa bad for Bernie."

Is that all you have to say?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bad news for Sanders if h...