2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolls coming in -Indicating Clinton Won
Article title: Sorry Bernie fans : The Polls are Coming In, And It Looks Like Clinton Won The Debate
http://www.vox.com/2015/10/16/9553489/hillary-clinton-debate-won
When legions of DC insiders concluded that Hillary Clinton won the Democratic debate on Tuesday, I was instinctually more skeptical. Insiders had badly misjudged what actual voters thought of some recent debates, and there was a case, I thought, that Sanders who put in a solid performance and who is still relatively little-known nationally could have picked up some support.
But now that the post-debate polls have started coming in, we're getting evidence suggesting the insiders got this one right.
NBC News/SurveyMonkey, the Huffington Post/YouGov, and Gravis/One America News have all released polls finding that Clinton won the debate by huge margins among Democratic voters who watched it:
Now, the first two are online polls (though conducted with much more methodologically rigorous techniques than the simple online surveys showing Sanders won), and the third is an overnight robocall poll from a minor firm. But they all ended up with very similar results, and the NBC/SurveyMonkey poll in particular is highly respected in the field as using sound methodological techniques.
It's less clear, however, that Clinton's apparent win actually boosted her level of support. NBC/SurveyMonkey found that she picked up 3 percentage points and Sanders picked up 2 (with Biden being the most hurt). HuffPost/YouGov only asked about whether Clinton or "someone else" should be the nominee, and Clinton picked up 8 points in that question.
https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/V_CrWM6--qYvTH_6l3XN7UyOjJA=/105x0:2891x1857/755x504/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47447616/GettyImages-492637622.0.0.jpg
Robbins
(5,066 posts)but these polls are flawed when you look inside them.
18 to 29 year olds are underpolled and 40 to 64 year olds are heavily polled.
and large number of people polled didn't even watch debate.
you can carry all you want about these so called polls.2 which come from republican leaning gravis and youguv but if you don't poll those who actully watched debate your a joke.especilly if you aren't polling bernie supporters.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)In that senior category Hillary in polling very well.Plus the last poll before the debate I saw showed Hillary and Bernie were tied with young voters
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)And by the way, the internals and sampling are fine and standard.
You're going down the 2012 Unskewed Polls rabbit hole...
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I remember 2012 and most people on DU were laughing their asses off at the skewed polls conspiracy theorists.
Now a lot of Bernie supporters are going down the same hole.
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)uponit7771
(90,348 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)smh
Robbins
(5,066 posts)if most people had actully watched debate and under 40 were of same sample as over 40 then I would have no problem with it.
it's not.
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)Last refuge of a worried campaign.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)it's well known a lot of under 40 are going to rallys and donating to bernie.
back in 2008 a lot of under 40 donated and supported obama so dismiss all under 40 at your peril.
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)and they are hurting bad enough to get out and vote. The Boomers are hurting too, and will support the best candidate for themselves AND their children and grandchildren.
Today's demographics will not save a candidate of the 1%. There will not be a bunch of sheep, but a pack of wolves going to the polls.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)year old people don't vote!
Hillary is going to be a great president!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Congrats to Hillary.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)"Who won the debate?"
Priceless!
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)to Bernie, Clintons supporters were like oh this is bunk, now theyre trotting out polls saying Hillary won and saying how solid they are.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)They only let people vote once.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Not the polls taken after media analyst's have had a chance to influence the outcome.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Hell, if I hadn't watched it and only read what the media said about it, I'd think HRC won, too.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)The Facebook poll doesn't count. It is patently dishonest to say that those polls are accurate.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)No polls coming out from folks who watched. Why would that be? We know the polls were taken. Why aren't they being released? We know why.
How long can DWS keep her finger in the dike before it bursts?
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)Since most are indicating that they won't vote for him.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)"Who won the debate". See anything odd or untoward about that?
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)So, whether they did watch the debate or not, Bernie is trending downward compared to Hillary.
Would it be more fair for you if we go back in time and strap all likely Democratic voters to a chair to watch the debate?
The only truly important question is "Who are you voting for?". Post-debate, we know right now what that answer is for most Dems in NH.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)nbc's own poll has bernie rising from 29% to 31% nationwide
and of course you and other clinton supporters after dismissing NH only want to cite one NH poll which is dead heat.
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)But so far there have been 2 post-debate, both showing improvements for Clinton, not Bernie.
Also, 31% in a poll won't win you an election.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)he continues to dismiss young voters and compare bernie to fringe candiates.Sorry but ron paul never hit as high as bernie does but they can continue this memo and be shocked by reality.
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)after all your attacks on him and his supporters.
I also seem to remember a few polls like gallup and surflock that had 2012 totally wrong.
Yep as lifelong dem sine 1992 no difference between me and karl rove and dick morris.
StrongBad
(2,100 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The term is 'Cognitive Dissonance".
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Can't tell you how many times I voted in that one.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)It wouldn't have mattered WHAT she said on that stage as long as her utterances were understandable. The money-grubbing media had their "stars" all briefed as to how deep to heap the laudits on Dame Hillary.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)is how much in additional donations Bernie picked up and in the numbers of additional people now aware of and paying attention to him, particularly those who will be voting.
POLLS DO NOT VOTE, and any people polled who do not vote are also irrelevant.
Honeylies
(77 posts)As others have mentioned, but here's screenshots:
DCBob
(24,689 posts)The bottom line is most people think she won the debate which will translate into stronger support for Hillary in the polls.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But it is so nice to have scientific proof that Hillary won.
And we also have the same proof that she has gained on Bernie because of it in NH.
GO HILLARY!
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)that rose to the level of scientific proof and there never will be.
Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)Hillary Clinton is now in a virtual tie with Sen. Bernie Sanders in the key early voting state of New Hampshire, according to a Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll released on Friday.
Clinton leads Sanders 37 percent to 35 percent among likely Democratic primary voters - within the margin of error - the survey found. Vice President Joe Biden -- who's considering a run -- came in third place with 11 percent support.
Several recent polls had shown the Vermont independent had been leading Clinton in the Granite State, which Clinton had won in the 2008 presidential primary.
Nearly half of likely Democratic voters in New Hampshire said Biden shouldn't run for president, compared to 36 percent who want him to jump into the race.
A majority of Democrats polled said Clinton won Tuesday night's Democratic debate in Las Vegas, while less than a quarter said Sanders won.
But even with Clinton's slight lead, she received the lowest rating when voters were asked who they trust the most. About 22 percent said they trust Clinton, 23 percent trust Biden and 33 percent trust Sanders.
And despite the trust issues, more than half of people surveyed said Clinton has the best chance of winning the general election next November. Only 16 percent said Sanders has the best chance and 14 percent said the same about Biden.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)the polling outfit that said obama had no chance to win ohio and Virginia back in 2012
questionseverything
(9,657 posts)105 people over the age of 65 polled
and he still only lost by 7 votes,not 7% but 7 votes
Not Sure
(735 posts)Comes off a little like "don't believe your lying eyes" to me.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)It's a tried and true method...by the likes of all sorts of creeps.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)If I had time, I'd cut and paste responses when Bernie's polls looked so good.
Neither side can deny, it's a good race. No clear winner.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)even more momentum. I especially like the following section of the article describing the poll results ....
"Among voters who watched the debate, Clinton opened up a 5-point lead over Sanders. And despite a pushback from Sanders fervid supporters who thought his strong debate performance was being overlooked by the media, poll respondents overwhelmingly agreed that Clinton won the debate."
(bolding added)
That puts Clinton's lead outside the MoE.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)and it's not like that's the only reason why they are.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)of information...these too are corporate polls.
Polls are only as reliable as the person who commissions/pays/conducts them are Honest. Do you trust CorpoMedia?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)(likely voters) which candidate they intend to vote for.
If Clinton does indeed get a 3 point bounce to Bernie's 2 point bounce, then I'll grant her a 'win', although it really sounds more like with Biden not showing up, more people are simply starting to drop him from consideration, and we always expected more of his support to peel off to her than to Bernie. Still, maintaining or even growing her lead has to be considered a 'win', while a Bernie 'win' would have to be him narrowing the lead she has already.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)sorry Vox is biased.. CNN Vox same thing
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)I am Happy for Happy!
Delusional or Otherwise; at least it a source for momentary comfort. And comfort is extraordinarily rare these days.
Proceed...!