2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere are some numbers of Bernie verses some republican candidates and Hillary verses the leading
republican candidates in Pennsylvania:
Carson verses Sanders: Carson +8
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_carson_vs_sanders-5712.html
Carson verses Clinton: Carson +4
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_carson_vs_clinton-5303.html
Trump verses Sanders: Trump +4
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_trump_vs_sanders-5648.html
Trump verses Clinton: Trump +2
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_trump_vs_clinton-5633.html
Pennsylvania: Fiorina vs. Sanders: Fiorina +2
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_fiorina_vs_sanders-5711.html
Fiorina vs. Clinton: Fiorina +1
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_fiorina_vs_clinton-5708.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
FSogol
(45,513 posts)(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)This one is my fave:
There once was a Clintonbot from Nantucket....
FSogol
(45,513 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)and who folks see most in the media and the folks know it is all entertainment a year before the voting....of this I have no doubt.
For historical perspective, note who was leading the GOP in late 2011....I think Trump was once for a while after a mass media free ad blitz on his behalf!
still_one
(92,321 posts)make a valid point, however, that the leading Democratic candidates in the poll are either in the MOE or slightly behind the leading republican counterparts is troubling in a state like Pennsylvania
When they included bush against Hillary, Hillary does lead bush by +5 which is good, but not good enough I think
They also have Toomey leading in the Senate race. Pennsylvania is a critical state