Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTPM Editor's Blog--- Hillary's Big, Big Night
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/hillary-s-big-big-night
TPM Editor's Blog
Hillary's Big, Big Night
ByJosh Marshall
Published October 14, 2015, 8:54 AM EDT 2006 views
As I noted last night, Hillary Clinton turned in a very solid debate performance. She was polished, turned away questions about what would seem to be her greatest vulnerabilities with confident and convincing pivots and more than anything else she had the feel of a candidate on the rebound. As I also wrote last night, the collapse of the 'Benghazi' committee and its associated nonsense came at the perfect moment for her. The debate would have had a very different feel to it had it been held six weeks ago.
We were running Insight polls overnight and this morning, gauging reactions to the debate and re-testing Democratic primary preference questions we've been running for the last four months. Based on those results I would expect you'll see Hillary get a substantial boost in the polls coming out of night's first debate.
Let me give you a basic breakdown.
First, Bernie Sanders had a really good night too. Just based on my own impression, if you're a fan of Bernie Sanders or someone whose politics make you at all amenable to being a fan of Bernie Sanders, you like what you saw.....................
Hillary's favorability numbers also went up, but not dramatically. Where you see the difference is on candidate preference where her support shot up a lot. She took some support from Sanders, but not much. Where she got most of her support was from people who'd been supporting Joe Biden (obviously not even in the race) and people who'd moved into the undecided column. .....................
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 541 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TPM Editor's Blog--- Hillary's Big, Big Night (Original Post)
riversedge
Oct 2015
OP
Sander's "already high favorability numbers actually went up significantly." Unfavorables plummeted.
w4rma
Oct 2015
#4
randome
(34,845 posts)1. To me, Marshall's take is the tie-breaker.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
onehandle
(51,122 posts)2. Hillary doesn't need of her numbers to rise to win this.
And yet they did.
Marshall is right.
riversedge
(70,311 posts)6. but I am glad they did
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)3. Seems like a pretty good analysis.
I expect we'll see it confirmed in the real polling, too.
Biden will bail, I'm sure.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)4. Sander's "already high favorability numbers actually went up significantly." Unfavorables plummeted.
And our numbers show that his already high favorability numbers actually went up significantly. His unfavorables, already low, plummeted. Remember, even if you're a Democratic news junkie and know about Sanders and his campaign, there are many people for whom this was the first time seeing speak live for a substantial amount of time.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)5. Josh has been posting "Sanders can't possibly win" articles for a while now.
He's not exactly impartial.
We'll see how this really shakes out over the next week or so.
randome
(34,845 posts)7. He calls it like he sees it. Saying Sanders can't possibly win is how he sees it.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
jeff47
(26,549 posts)8. Hence he's "not exactly impartial".
He's got a very strong opinion, and all of his articles are run through that opinion.