Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 01:58 AM Oct 2015

Nate Silver: The Media Underestimated Hillary Clinton. It Overestimated Her Debate

Somehow, the media judged Clinton’s night to be way better than “pretty good.” CNN’s Van Jones declared Clinton’s performance to be “flawless” and compared her to Beyonce. Mark Halperin gave Clinton a perfect A. The New York Times, which has been very tough on Clinton, was full of praise for her tonight.

So you can expect the “Clinton comeback” narrative to prevail over the “Clinton in disarray” narrative — at least for a few news cycles.

The difference between FiveThirtyEight’s view of the debate and Mark Halperin’s or The New York Times’ is that we’ve been skeptical of the “Clinton in disarray” narrative for a long time. While Clinton isn’t “inevitable,” she has a lot of things going for her, with near-unanimous support from the Democratic establishment, high favorability ratings among Democrats (even as her ratings have fallen among independents), and a solid lead in national polls that appears to have stabilized recently. Nor are her opponents in much of a position to topple her. Sanders has won plenty of support from white liberal Democrats, but not very much from Hispanics, African-Americans or white moderates. Joe Biden isn’t running yet and would have lots of potential problems if he did, especially given his extremely late start to the race. Martin O’Malley is at 0.4 percent in the RealClearPolitics polling average.

From our vantage point, then, declaring a “Clinton comeback” is a bit like declaring Tom Brady or LeBron James to be the comeback player of the year. Clinton didn’t have anything to come back from; she was winning the nomination race before last night’s debate — by a lot.
------------------
538 Staff gave Clinton an A- versus a B for Sanders.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/first-democratic-debate-hillary-clinton/

I self-deleted another post on this topic, as it was about Nate tweeting his thoughts on the debate. Since then he wrote up a more complete article that is more apropos for an OP.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
5. Read this part though...
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:37 AM
Oct 2015
Clinton didn’t have anything to come back from; she was winning the nomination race before last night’s debate — by a lot.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
7. That has NOTHING to do with ANYTHING in ANY context
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:43 AM
Oct 2015

You've literally just drudged up a random sentence that alone seems pro-Hillary and suggested that it some how negates the fact that Bernie won the debate.

So you're basically saying she didn't have to win the debate... so she clearly won the debate.


You're not even talking it circles, more like squiggles.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
15. All Clinton had to do was not stumble. Apparently she and Sanders both did very well.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 09:15 AM
Oct 2015

But 'very well' adds up to more for Clinton than it does for Sanders. Clinton is still way ahead in the polls.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
18. He said Clinton won but the media is exaggerating her performance
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 11:54 AM
Oct 2015

538 staff have Clinton an A- versus a B for Bernie.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
3. President Hillary Clinton is going to be awesome!
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:36 AM
Oct 2015
From our vantage point, then, declaring a “Clinton comeback” is a bit like declaring Tom Brady or LeBron James to be the comeback player of the year.


Clinton didn’t have anything to come back from; she was winning the nomination race before last night’s debate — by a lot.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
6. I was surprised by how well Hillary Clinton did.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:41 AM
Oct 2015

Not because I thought her campaign was "in disarray."

But because she was smoother tonight than she was in her debates with Obama I watched 8 years ago.

moobu2

(4,822 posts)
9. Everybody at my house thought Hillary
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:49 AM
Oct 2015

was almost perfect. Bernie was okay, but he just said the same stuff he always says in every speech. Boring really.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
11. Yes, her "I'm a Progressive" moment was refreshingly different
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 03:11 AM
Oct 2015

from the Hillary we knew from NAFTA to the TPP.

Gothmog

(145,628 posts)
14. Nate Silver has some great analysis
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:56 AM
Oct 2015

The meme that the Clinton campaign is in disarray was really dumb. The Clinton campaign is a well oiled machine and is doing great

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nate Silver: The Media Un...