Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Halliburton

(1,802 posts)
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 07:46 PM Sep 2015

State Department Left in Dark Over Hillary Email System


Throughout the controversy over her use of a private e-mail system while she was secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton has described her decision last year to turn over thousands of work-related e-mails as a response to a routine-sounding records request.

“When we were asked to help the State Department make sure they had everything from other secretaries of state, not just me, I’m the one who said, ‘Okay, great, I will go through them again,’?” Clinton said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “And we provided all of them.”

But State Department officials provided new information Tuesday that undercuts Clinton’s characterization. They said the request was not about general recordkeeping but was prompted entirely by the discovery that Clinton had exclusively used a private e-mail system. They also said they first contacted her in the summer of 2014, at least three months before the agency asked Clinton and three of her predecessors to provide their e-mails.

“In the process of responding to congressional document requests pertaining to Benghazi, State Department officials recognized that it had access to relatively few email records from former Secretary Clinton,” State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement e-mailed to The Washington Post. “State Department officials contacted her representatives during the summer of 2014 to learn more about her email use and the status of emails in that account.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/state-departments-account-of-e-mail-request-differs-from-clintons/2015/09/22/54cd66bc-5ed9-11e5-8e9e-dce8a2a2a679_story.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
3. Colin Powell and Condi Rice BOTH had private servers
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:06 PM
Sep 2015

WHY are Hillary's so important , and not theirs?

Personally , I'd like to know more about our entry into Iraq and Afghanistan, and how much Condi knew about the 9-11 attacks.

Yet, minutiae about Hillary's correspondence is important why?

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
4. Neither had private SERVERS. That is unprecedented by a federal employee. She's the first & the last
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:33 PM
Sep 2015

There's a reason for that too.

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
7. Right you are. They had private email accounts, not servers.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:54 PM
Sep 2015

Private server must have taken place because of Hillary's vast computer knowledge and desire to keep everything out of the public's hands.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
9. And Powell followed the DoD model
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 09:40 PM
Sep 2015

His laptop for private shit was not connected to the government shit

Hate to defend anybody here. But when he explained it, well it was standard process at DoD

starroute

(12,977 posts)
11. The real question now is why Hillary is spinning so hard
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:36 PM
Sep 2015

It seems like she's trying to create a narrative in which she responded to a routine request quickly and even enthusiastically. But that apparently isn't what really happened.

So is she covering something up? Is she just so afraid of being caught out in a screw-up that it comes across as if she has something to hide? And either way, will we ever get a straight story out of her?

Response to Halliburton (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»State Department Left in ...