2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTop unions put brakes on Clinton endorsement SEIU and AFSCME decide to hold off
Top unions put brakes on Clinton endorsement
SEIU and AFSCME decide to hold off, in part because of a prospective Joe Biden candidacy.
By Annie Karni
09/22/15, 01:08 PM EDT
...
The decisions are a setback for Hillary Clinton, who has been courting the labor giants in the hopes of an early lock down of two powerhouse unions that can organize millions of members and resources on the ground. And they come against the backdrop of a Clinton campaign show of force -- in terms of establishment donors, delegates and endorsements -- as Biden weighs his options. Adding the support of two of the most muscular unions now would have sent a powerful message there is little room in the race for the vice president.
...
Both unions, however, chose to put off any decision and remain uncommitted in the 2016 race. "We are determined to take the time necessary to make sure every voice is heard," an AFSCME official told POLITICO.
Supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders hailed the delay as a victory, and attributed it as much to Bidens influence on the race from the sidelines as Sanders momentum.
The hesitation on their part is likely due as much to Bernie as to Biden -- he throws uncertainty into the mix, said Rand Wilson, communications director for SEIU local 888 in Boston, who personally supports Sanders. This gives more time for the supporters of Sanders to work hard to win their national leaderships support. Its very positive.
...
Top union officials are also looking to avoid the revolt among rank-and-file teachers who publicly called on the American Federation of Teachers to withdraw its endorsement of Clinton last July, claiming there had been little internal discussion with teachers before the union backed Clinton.
...
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton02016-unions-delay-endorsements-213922
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)They have numerous excellent people to look at. I think we can all agree these two will be big when they endorse.
Bucky
(54,027 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Googled it and there doesn't seem to be a consensus there.
JI7
(89,252 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I immediately googled tommy2tone after reading the reply. There are some very witty duers here that often send me on google searches where I learn something new. I didn't read any more replies after googling it. Very funny. Thanks for the heads up.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)http://www.calmclinic.com/anxiety/signs/yawning
Nervous?
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)oasis
(49,392 posts)the Dem nominee. Taking on the GOP Money machine in the general election is going to be tough enough as it is.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)They are basically bets being placed by people who want something in the future and are putting their money on who they think might win -- or they are debts being paid for past favors.
If you vote for or against someone based on who "endorses" them, you are failing at voting.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)They bring resources with them. Union members do a lot of nuts and bolts campaign work.
I'm glad these two big unions are taking their time.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Is the labor performed more by volunteer union members who support that particular campaign?
Are the resources paid for with money from union dues?
Thanks Comrade Grumpy
druidity33
(6,446 posts)we can choose to contribute to the Political Fund (It's not part of dues), but as far as i know we never endorse candidates, only support legislation.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)TBF
(32,070 posts)they would usually follow the endorsements but sometimes voted even more left (they especially liked Jesse Jackson). I don't think a Clinton endorsement at this point would deter Sanders supporters so it's wise of the unions to hold off.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)What do you know about the part about working for the candidates (the nuts and bolts mentioned above)? I'm curious how much of the membership's union dues go to that once the leaders endorse. Do you know?
TBF
(32,070 posts)my parents were working manufacturing back in the 1960s-80s.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)give them weight
edit. and what Comrade Grumpy said
jwirr
(39,215 posts)with it. That said I wish they would hold off until at least after the first couple of debates.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)druidity33
(6,446 posts)Can you elaborate?
Omaha Steve
(99,664 posts)No reply yet?
Robbins
(5,066 posts)Time and again she has been against unions and working people in favor of corporations,and wall street.
You have a real Pro-union guy like Bernie who has walked the talk.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)A Wall Street Union? Pharma Exec?
Agreed Robbins.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)or the Chamber of Commerce
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)she and Bill were paying members of when he was Governor in Arkansas and running for President?
Lest someone demand proof, I hope the NY Times is adequate.
NY Times
Arkansas Times
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Is he holding back on entering the race, because he really doesn't want to, but he will if it means throwing the race for Bernie and defeating Hillary?
Response to Catherina (Original post)
Post removed
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)What is the consensus among your associates?
zappaman
(20,606 posts)I dunno.
What do YOU know about this???
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)This is great news!
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)Not sure it matters much either way.