Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:00 PM Sep 2015

Opinion: Four reasons why The Wall Street Journal attack on Bernie is bogus

Great response to the WSJ smear job by Robert Reich.

Opinion: Four reasons why The Wall Street Journal attack on Bernie is bogus

The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article claiming that Bernie Sanders's proposals would cost $18 trillion over a 10-year period. The number is wrong and the information doesn't add up.

By Robert Reich - SEPTEMBER 21, 2015

I’ve had so many calls about an article appearing earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal – charging that Bernie Sanders’s proposals would carry a “price tag” of $18 trillion over a 10-year period – that it’s necessary to respond.

The Journal’s number is entirely bogus, designed to frighten the public. Please spread the truth:

1. Bernie’s proposals would cost less than what we’d spend without them. Most of the “cost” the Journal comes up with—$15 trillion—would pay for opening Medicare to everyone.

This would be cheaper than relying on our current system of for-profit private health insurers that charge you and me huge administrative costs, advertising, marketing, bloated executive salaries, and high pharmaceutical prices.

(Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, whom the Journal relies on for some of its data, actually estimates a Medicare-for-all system would actually save all of us $10 trillion over 10 years)....

Full editorial:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Robert-Reich/2015/0921/Opinion-Four-reasons-why-The-Wall-Street-Journal-attack-on-Bernie-is-bogus


About Robert Reich:

Robert is chancellor’s professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Clinton. Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written 13 books, including “The Work of Nations,” his latest best-seller “Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future," and a new e-book, “Beyond Outrage.” His new movie, "Inequality for All," is available on Netflix. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion: Four reasons why The Wall Street Journal attack on Bernie is bogus (Original Post) think Sep 2015 OP
Not a surprise "Wall Street Journal" would attack Bernie. WDIM Sep 2015 #1
And not surprising that many dozens of local and other "news" outlets would repost it without think Sep 2015 #2

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
1. Not a surprise "Wall Street Journal" would attack Bernie.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:42 PM
Sep 2015

Wall Street and their Journal depends cooking the books and fuzzy math. They are so use to skimming the numbers in their favor they dont even remember how to do real math.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
2. And not surprising that many dozens of local and other "news" outlets would repost it without
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:51 PM
Sep 2015

any consideration as to the validity of the information being re-posted.

American journalism is in sad shape.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Opinion: Four reasons why...