Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOpinion: Four reasons why The Wall Street Journal attack on Bernie is bogus
Great response to the WSJ smear job by Robert Reich.
Opinion: Four reasons why The Wall Street Journal attack on Bernie is bogus
The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article claiming that Bernie Sanders's proposals would cost $18 trillion over a 10-year period. The number is wrong and the information doesn't add up.
By Robert Reich - SEPTEMBER 21, 2015
Ive had so many calls about an article appearing earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal charging that Bernie Sanderss proposals would carry a price tag of $18 trillion over a 10-year period that its necessary to respond.
The Journals number is entirely bogus, designed to frighten the public. Please spread the truth:
1. Bernies proposals would cost less than what wed spend without them. Most of the cost the Journal comes up with$15 trillionwould pay for opening Medicare to everyone.
This would be cheaper than relying on our current system of for-profit private health insurers that charge you and me huge administrative costs, advertising, marketing, bloated executive salaries, and high pharmaceutical prices.
(Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, whom the Journal relies on for some of its data, actually estimates a Medicare-for-all system would actually save all of us $10 trillion over 10 years)....
Full editorial:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Robert-Reich/2015/0921/Opinion-Four-reasons-why-The-Wall-Street-Journal-attack-on-Bernie-is-bogus
The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article claiming that Bernie Sanders's proposals would cost $18 trillion over a 10-year period. The number is wrong and the information doesn't add up.
By Robert Reich - SEPTEMBER 21, 2015
Ive had so many calls about an article appearing earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal charging that Bernie Sanderss proposals would carry a price tag of $18 trillion over a 10-year period that its necessary to respond.
The Journals number is entirely bogus, designed to frighten the public. Please spread the truth:
1. Bernies proposals would cost less than what wed spend without them. Most of the cost the Journal comes up with$15 trillionwould pay for opening Medicare to everyone.
This would be cheaper than relying on our current system of for-profit private health insurers that charge you and me huge administrative costs, advertising, marketing, bloated executive salaries, and high pharmaceutical prices.
(Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, whom the Journal relies on for some of its data, actually estimates a Medicare-for-all system would actually save all of us $10 trillion over 10 years)....
Full editorial:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Robert-Reich/2015/0921/Opinion-Four-reasons-why-The-Wall-Street-Journal-attack-on-Bernie-is-bogus
About Robert Reich:
Robert is chancellors professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Clinton. Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written 13 books, including The Work of Nations, his latest best-seller Aftershock: The Next Economy and Americas Future," and a new e-book, Beyond Outrage. His new movie, "Inequality for All," is available on Netflix. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 557 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion: Four reasons why The Wall Street Journal attack on Bernie is bogus (Original Post)
think
Sep 2015
OP
WDIM
(1,662 posts)1. Not a surprise "Wall Street Journal" would attack Bernie.
Wall Street and their Journal depends cooking the books and fuzzy math. They are so use to skimming the numbers in their favor they dont even remember how to do real math.
think
(11,641 posts)2. And not surprising that many dozens of local and other "news" outlets would repost it without
any consideration as to the validity of the information being re-posted.
American journalism is in sad shape.