2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’s surge doesn’t mean the Democratic race is wide open. Here’s why.
Lots more analysis at link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/09/17/bernie-sanderss-surge-doesnt-mean-the-democratic-race-is-wide-open-heres-why/
Bernie Sanderss surge doesnt mean the Democratic race is wide open. Heres why.
By Michael Tesler September 17 at 11:00 AM
....................But now, Hillary Clintons current popularity with African Americans dramatically exceeds black support for Bernie Sanders. These data from daily surveys by Gallup in July and August, indicate that most black people are unfamiliar with Sanders and that he is not particularly popular among those that recognized his name.
So the challenge for Sanders is clear: a little knownsSenator, from an almost all-white state, who has been criticized by black activists for preaching a message of economic equality that ignores the historic and ongoing circumstances entangling race and class in the United States, somehow needs to galvanize minority support for his candidacy against an opponent who has been extremely popular with blacks and Latinos for over two decades.
Early wins by Sanders in Iowa and New Hampshire are unlikely to change that, too. Gary Hart, whose 1984 candidacy is often compared to Sanderss current campaign, could not translate his better-than-expected strong showing in the Iowa caucuses and resounding victory in the New Hampshire primary into a broader coalition beyond his white base. Nor could Barack Obamas early-state momentum erode Hillary Clintons strong support from Latinos in the 2008 primary.
So until the polls show a substantial upswing in minority support for Sanders, any news story suggesting that the Democratic race is wide open is seriously overselling the Senators chances.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)what a living wage would mean to all those who are working full time for poverty wages -- like, for instance, many of their children. We have a whole generation of all colors and ethnicities out there who REMEMBER what it was like to graduate high school or college and step almost directly into a good-paying job and the middle class. I am one of them.
I don't expect his message to be hard to sell once Bernie gets out of Iowa and New Hampshire.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)take care of a POC's social justice issues and all Bernie needs to do is convince them of that.
That is the very reason Bernie will never get it.
I am amazed that after all this time that idea is still going strong here.
A POC with a good job driving a nice car will still be racially profiled.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Great job in getting the candidates to address racial justice. I know O'Malley put one out. Did Hillary?
azmom
(5,208 posts)Justice record is abysmal.
YANCEY: I think that her record is abysmal (laughter). I think that her support of policies that have decimated black community - she talked a lot about her advocacy for children, for black children, for Latino children while simultaneously sending those children's parents to jail and, if we talk about the Juvenile Justice System, sending those children themselves to jail. And so it's kind of speaking out of both sides of her mouth in a way.
http://www.npr.org/2015/08/20/433257673/black-lives-matter-activist-hillary-clintons-racial-justice-record-is-abysmal
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And his supporters have never said that. You guys are the only ones who have ever said that.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Bernie Sanders on Civil Rights
http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Bernie_Sanders_Civil_Rights.htm
jfern
(5,204 posts)And Hillary supporters post this shit while claiming the media is unfair to their candidate? If the media was fair, Hillary wouldn't be the front runner any more.
MADem
(135,425 posts)"stand with Rand."
I don't think they are an overwhelming portion of his support, more like a subset (these guys are jerks, but they're making that kind of noise):
https://reason.com/archives/2015/09/15/bernie-sanders-first-libertarian-sociali
azmom
(5,208 posts)That may not sit well with black voters.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251599122
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)You have to be ignoring some pretty hard and cold facts to claim that. Some of the earliest laws passed in this country were to make sure that only white males could own land and vote, and this country was built on the backs of slaves. How can anyone deny that?
azmom
(5,208 posts)And the black vote are locked down. Maybe it's to get the racist vote.
riversedge
(70,256 posts)"And the black vote are locked down. Maybe it's to get the racist vote."
azmom
(5,208 posts)"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/08/clinton-obama-not-winning_n_100763.html
jfern
(5,204 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... when Bernie is AHEAD of where ultimate president Barack Obama was versus Hillary at this point of the campaign in 2007.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Going down after the first debate.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Doesn't matter. Foregone conclusion, the fortune telling lady has already taken all her things inside, right?
azmom
(5,208 posts)Money to her campaign. What are they thinking?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Really, it's sort of offensive that they're bothering with them at all, rather than just naming her the nominee now.