2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumKos: When it came time for the hard work of implementing single payer in Vermont, Bernie was AWOL
Bernie Sanders' Single Payer Vermontby brooklynbadboy
<...>
That doesn't seem so bad to me. Healthcare has a price, obviously. The tax increases would be offset by no longer having to pay premiums. For businesses, no more having to pay for health insurance for their workers. This was the progressive reform every liberal has been calling for. Vermont's legislature passed it, the Governor signed it. The taxes needed to make single payer a reality are modest. There is Democratic super majority in both houses. All that was needed was the political courage to do it. The courage to act with truth and conviction.
Where was Bernie Sanders?
When single payer was a theory, a campaign talking point, and progressive dream, Bernie Sanders was all in. When the Governor and legislature enacted it into law, Bernie Sanders touted it as a model for the nation:
Vermont is without a doubt the most liberal state in the union. It is the only state that has single payer healthcare as law. Bernie Sanders was instrumental in fighting for that law. He made lots of speeches advocating it, much as he is doing now running for president.
But when the time came for the hard work, the difficult task of pushing, cajoling, persuading, 'leading the people' as Sanders likes to say, to get Vermonters and the legislature to accept the necessary tax increases to make single payer a reality, Bernie Sanders was AWOL.
He said he's planning to go forward. He said the debate isn't finished. So lets hear it. What will Bernie Sanders do about single payer healthcare in his own state, where it is already law?
Single payer advocates in much less friendlier states, and in the Washington he seeks to govern, would love to know.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/06/27/1397137/-Bernie-Sanders-Single-Payer-Vermont
Report1212
(661 posts)US Senator does not handle state issues. This isnt how federalism works.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)try to muscle their way into their business.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)The next Ferguson? A Governor cracking down on Unions?
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)substantively different things, no?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)we better get used to it.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Bloggers.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)what is this you say, Sanders wasn't in state government!?
?w=676
jfern
(5,204 posts)Yesterday: "Sanders' $15 trillion single payer is too expensive"
Today: "The junior US Senator didn't manage to convince everyone in the state to pass single payer"
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)Or ever will.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)It is from Daily Kos, but written by another blogger.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)demmiblue
(36,865 posts)I hope you are not allergic.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... realize that United States Senators are not part of state governments?
It appears not. Why the fuck would anyone read any further when an assclown writer doesn't even understand the most basic things about how governments operate?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He has not shown himself to be a leader. People will think that is some kind of diss but it simply isn't. More Sanders on the ground means continuous movement in the right direction. I can't see where he has done anything but support single payer. The work is done by executives in states.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)The blogger seems to be confused by the difference between a governor and a senator.
MoveIt
(399 posts)seaglass
(8,173 posts)in MA because healthcare was so important to Kennedy. If it was so important to Bernie and he is so popular in VT, why couldn't he help in some way?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/us/politics/ted-kennedy-helped-shape-mitt-romneys-career-and-still-haunts-it.html?_r=0
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)However, the Affordable Care Act gives states a way out of this conundrum. As of 2017 states will be allowed to apply for a waiver from the laws terms if they can demonstrate that they are pursuing other ways to provide at least equal coverage and benefits to residents. In that instance, states will be able to receive a waiver and a lump sum equal to the funds that would have been paid as subsidies to individuals and small businesses.
Vermonts law, as enacted, will not implement a single-payer system until the state receives a waiver in 2017.
http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/30/7/1232.full
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Facts are pesky things, best leave them out.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)Going forward with a project four years in the making would require tax increases too big for the state to absorb, Shumlin said. The measure had been the centerpiece of the Democratic governor's agenda and was watched and rooted for by single-payer health care supporters around the country.
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/2014/12/17/shumlin-right-time-single-payer/20547557/
I was happy when VT got this legislation passed. It was targeted to begin in 2017 but would need to be funded. Now it won't be.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Bernie has no control over what happens to universal health care in his state.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bbb really embarrassed himself and so did the op by reposting this idiotic hit piece on DU.
This idiotic old hit piece.
Get some new material.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)The insurance industry and pharmaceutical industries who are using the billions of taxpayer dollars transferred to them by the ACA to finance whatever means necessary to assure their position will never be threatened.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)because while posting stuff saying "Bernie was afk", they seem to miss the fact that Hillary is all together AGAINST single-payer entirely. Oooops!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/hillary-clinton-likes-oba_b_4881399.html
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Where was Bernie Sanders?
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)at that too.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Gothmog
(145,321 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Congrats for posting the most ill lnformed, ignorant question of the day.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Why would he have a part in this? I don't expect my US Senators to try and get Michigan's roads fixed. The state is responsible for that.
The argument makes no sense to me at all.
shireen
(8,333 posts)Bernie was serving in the House at the time. Enacting single payer in Vermont was a state matter, and Bernie could not interfere directly in that legislative process.
So what am i missing?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)It would only cause me some discomfort by indicating my lack of awareness of the difference between state and federal offices.