Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumExaminer: The hypocrisy of David Brock's Clinton-supporting super PAC
Examiner: The hypocrisy of David Brock's Clinton-supporting super PACLike many people, David Brock wears multiple hats. A journalist and author, in 2004 he founded Media Matters for America, a progressive, non-profit research and information organization dedicated to monitoring, analyzing and correcting misinformation in conservative media. He also leads a Clinton super PAC, Correct the Record; and on Monday they sent out an email to a Huffington Post reporter that connected Senator Sanders (I, VT) to the new Labor Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn. In it, Correct the Record distorted the record.
On Monday, Correct the Record drew "similarities" between Senator Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn which, according to the email, "include Sanders' introduction of legislation to terminate the United States' nuclear weapons program, comments that NATO's expansion into former Soviet states is dangerous because it could provoke Russia, opposition to more U.S. funds for NATO, and saying he 'was concerned' that proposed new NATO members had shipped arms to Iran and North Korea."
The similarities continue, according to Huff Po, because Corbyn had written that former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's "electoral democratic credentials are beyond reproach." The similarity with Sanders? He had helped negotiate a deal with Venezuela's national oil company to provide low-cost heating oil to low-income Vermonters. That is the "similarity" which "Correct" the Record drew between Corbyn and Sanders, an assertion that Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs claimed was "distorting the record." Is anyone at Media Matters for America paying attention?
These "similarities" are precisely the type of misinformation Brock's Media Matters for America was created to expose. If Mr. Brock had a sense of decency, he would issue an apology, but don't hold your breath waiting. The Hill describes Brock as perhaps Secretary Clinton's "most aggressive operative." He is also, perhaps, her most hypocritical operative.
CNN: Bernie Sanders ratchets up knocks on pro-Clinton super PACs
Clinton Surrogate David Brock Pleads with Base to Stick with Clinton
Time on David Brock: Meet Hillary Clintons Bulldog
Clinton surrogate David Brock: Supporting Warren is "Cynical" and "Misguided"
Brock Refuses To Apologize For His Dirty Work Linking Sanders To Hugo Chavez
Hillary Clinton and David Brock bending the rules on Campaign Finance and Dark Money
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1059 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Examiner: The hypocrisy of David Brock's Clinton-supporting super PAC (Original Post)
portlander23
Sep 2015
OP
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. "If Mr. Brock had a sense of decency" - he does not. n/t
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)2. Hypocrisy: Anti-gunner using armed bodyguards. nt
reddread
(6,896 posts)3. whore
FSogol
(45,488 posts)4. The examiner is RW garage and shouldn't be linked to on DU.
Shouldn't be hard to find the type of stuff you are looking for on more legitimate news sources.
From wiki:
When Anschutz started the Examiner in its daily newspaper format, he envisioned creating a conservative competitor to The Washington Post. According to Politico, "When it came to the editorial page, Anschutzs instructions were explicit he 'wanted nothing but conservative columns and conservative op-ed writers,' said one former employee."