Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Can't Win The General Election! (Original Post) XemaSab Sep 2015 OP
Remember that! madaboutharry Sep 2015 #1
A 1 term black Senator from Chicago jfern Sep 2015 #2
With the middle name HUSSEIN XemaSab Sep 2015 #4
Gads, that was all over DU in early '08. hifiguy Sep 2015 #3
When a groundswell of socialists are identified in key battleground states... and... wyldwolf Sep 2015 #5
He is following a very unpopular candidate artislife Sep 2015 #15
Not nearly the same thing wyldwolf Sep 2015 #17
Now ... for the win ... how did Obama get past that? JoePhilly Sep 2015 #6
Let's start with... wyldwolf Sep 2015 #8
Add...a hell of a lot of money brooklynite Sep 2015 #11
The most important thing he did ... I think ... JoePhilly Sep 2015 #24
Damn, I have to take my yard signs down now. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2015 #7
Oh shame, my bumperstickers are stuck! sadoldgirl Sep 2015 #9
Bernie is no Obama Gothmog Sep 2015 #10
But Hillary is Hillary artislife Sep 2015 #16
Yeah, I think Bernie actually means what he says Fumesucker Sep 2015 #18
Boom!!!! 99Forever Sep 2015 #23
Exactly. Bernie actually wears his comfortable shoes, and walks the walk n/t arcane1 Sep 2015 #26
Barack Obama raised $778 M in 2008... brooklynite Sep 2015 #12
this time is different restorefreedom Sep 2015 #14
I'm not thinking about ads; I'm thinking about field staff brooklynite Sep 2015 #19
he has an army of mobilized people restorefreedom Sep 2015 #20
I keep asking for an explanation as to how Sanders will be viable in the general election Gothmog Sep 2015 #21
it is not about the money restorefreedom Sep 2015 #25
I live in the real world where money is still important Gothmog Sep 2015 #27
the socialist bugaboo is over restorefreedom Sep 2015 #29
Polling shows an Islamic name is the LEAST likely name to win a general election! Bonobo Sep 2015 #13
I have seen many here say the same about Clinton. It's simple posturing. SouthernProgressive Sep 2015 #22
92% of Americans at the time said they would vote for a black candidate. 50% now say no to Socialist stevenleser Sep 2015 #28
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
3. Gads, that was all over DU in early '08.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 06:49 PM
Sep 2015

Couldn't swing a dead cat w/o hitting a post claiming that.

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
5. When a groundswell of socialists are identified in key battleground states... and...
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 06:51 PM
Sep 2015

.... Sanders follows a very unpopular Republican, let us know.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
15. He is following a very unpopular candidate
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:21 AM
Sep 2015

her name is Clinton.


When you look at the whole voting age public.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. Now ... for the win ... how did Obama get past that?
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 06:52 PM
Sep 2015

What did he do on the ground to win the primary?

By how much did he win the primary?

How does Bernie demonstrate that he would beat anyone the GOP puts forward?

These are important questions.

The fact that Obama was able to overcome that view and win the primary, does not mean anyone can do it.

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
8. Let's start with...
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 06:56 PM
Sep 2015

1. Immensely popular with African-Americans and Latinos.
2. A disastrous Republican presidency behind him.
3. A primary rival who didn't prepare herself for early caucus races.
4. Incredible charisma.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
24. The most important thing he did ... I think ...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:19 PM
Sep 2015

... is that during the primary process, he was able to convince people, including lots of folks who liked and supported Hillary, that he would beat any candidate the GOP put forward, just as Hillary would.

With that settled, he was able to eek out the win.

And then from your list, I think #3 was the crucial mistake for Hillary. If she'd have taken those seriously, she'd have won.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. Yeah, I think Bernie actually means what he says
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 05:55 AM
Sep 2015

For instance Bernie has already found his comfortable shoes...

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
14. this time is different
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:18 AM
Sep 2015

social media is taking the place of bullshit ads

this is a revolution. its not about the $, its about the votes.

that is the whole point. money will no longer rule.

brooklynite

(94,657 posts)
19. I'm not thinking about ads; I'm thinking about field staff
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 07:02 AM
Sep 2015

However well-intentioned a voter is, you don't just assume that they'll show up on election day.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
20. he has an army of mobilized people
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 08:37 AM
Sep 2015

the are volunteers, so they probably don't officially count as "infrastructure." but they are smart and passionate. i believe gotv will be and has been a big part of his effort.

Gothmog

(145,424 posts)
21. I keep asking for an explanation as to how Sanders will be viable in the general election
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 01:18 PM
Sep 2015

Sanders does not appear to be viable in a contest where the Kochs will be spending $887 million and the likely GOP nominee will be able to raise another billion dollars. This article had a very interesting quote about the role of super pacs in the upcoming election http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/03/bernie-sanders-grassroots-movement-gains-clinton-machine

Harvard University professor Lawrence Lessig, who founded a Super Pac to end Super Pacs, said Sanders’ renouncing Super Pacs is tantamount to “bringing a knife to a gunfight”.

“I regret the fact the Bernie Sanders has embraced the idea that he’s going to live life like the Vermont snow, as pure as he possibly can, while he runs for president, because it weakens his chances – and he’s an enormously important progressive voice,” Lessig said.

President Obama was against super pacs in 2012 but had to use one to keep the race close. I do not like super pacs but any Democratic candidate who wants to be viable has to use a super pac, The super pacs associated with Clinton raised $24 million and so Clinton raised $70 this quarter.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
25. it is not about the money
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:21 PM
Sep 2015

this is happening by social media and networking.

romney had money too and he lost.

this is a people's revolution. we should not expect it to conform to typical election behavior.

he gets the votes, he wins. period.

Gothmog

(145,424 posts)
27. I live in the real world where money is still important
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:10 PM
Sep 2015

Good luck in selling this concept to voters who understand how elections works. I do not believe in magical twitter accounts and magical youtube videos that can offset $400 million of negative ads using poll tests terms such as socialist and socialism. The terms "socialist" and "socialism" test poorly already in polls and these terms will be radioactive after $400 million of negative ads.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
29. the socialist bugaboo is over
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:41 PM
Sep 2015

and as far as whether or not money is important, just look at the success Bernie's had so far and so quickly without any debates or advertising. After the debates and if he's gonna start spending some of his money on ads, it's only going to get better. Plus hillary keeps sinking and once she debates Bernie, her number is going to drop like a stone.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
13. Polling shows an Islamic name is the LEAST likely name to win a general election!
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 11:36 PM
Sep 2015

"It's not that I have a problem with him being a black, muslim socialist who may not have been born in America, but I don't think America will vote for him!"

 

SouthernProgressive

(1,810 posts)
22. I have seen many here say the same about Clinton. It's simple posturing.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:19 PM
Sep 2015

One person who is on a timeout said it about Clinton four or five times a day. Political posturing is what it is. Sanders can't win in the general. There you go. Does that make me any different than those saying Hillary can't win in the general? Advisors posture. It's not even close to new.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
28. 92% of Americans at the time said they would vote for a black candidate. 50% now say no to Socialist
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:18 PM
Sep 2015

candidate.

That's the empirical data regarding the point you are trying to make.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obama Can't Win The Gener...