Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Defense Firms Open to Higher Taxes to Avert Cuts" at WSJ
Defense Firms Open to Higher Taxes to Avert CutsWashington Wire and WSJ
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/07/18/defense-firms-open-to-higher-taxes-to-avert-cuts/?mod=WSJBlog&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
"SNIP.........................................
Two top defense contractors told a House committee Wednesday that Congress should consider including increasing taxes as part of a package of changes to reduce the deficit, a sign that industry fear over the impact of spending cuts next year could challenge party orthodoxy.
Top executives from Lockheed Martin, Pratt & Whitney, EADS North America, and Williams-Pyro told the House Armed Services Committee that the $50 billion in projected military spending cuts set to begin in January already has had a chilling impact on military planning, delaying projects and raised the possibility of layoffs before the end of 2012.
The spending cuts were set by the Budget Control Act, which passed last year as a way to clear the way for lawmakers to raise the debt ceiling. Now, some members of both parties are trying to find a way to undo the cuts, known as the sequester, but both parties are at odds over how to proceed.
.......................................
You cant just be concerned with only your slice of the pie, said Rep. Tim Ryan (D., Ohio.).
..............................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1221 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Defense Firms Open to Higher Taxes to Avert Cuts" at WSJ (Original Post)
applegrove
Jul 2012
OP
gouge everybody any way you want, just don't cut into our huge slice of the pie lol
msongs
Jul 2012
#3
The R's have two choices: Eat the sequester, including Pentagon, or deal on top bracket
alcibiades_mystery
Jul 2012
#4
elleng
(131,006 posts)1. Listened to some of the testimony,
but didn't hear this. Wish I had.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)2. lol, you don't say?
msongs
(67,421 posts)3. gouge everybody any way you want, just don't cut into our huge slice of the pie lol
"I want what I'm getting. If you need to raise taxes on everybody to help me get what I'm used to, by all means raise taxes."
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)4. The R's have two choices: Eat the sequester, including Pentagon, or deal on top bracket
It's pretty simple: eat or deal.
But Obama "lost" that fight in getting the Super Committee set up, right? They were going to end Social Security and Medicare, right?
Eat the sequester, or deal on top bracket.
What's it going to be House and Senate GOP?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)5. I'm pretty sure Obama was betting on this. I mentioned it when the cuts deal was first made.
I said it would pit defense interests against wall street interests and my bet was, the defense lobby will ultimately win that fight.