2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI went to a party yesterday, truth be told most vote for democrats, and......
every single Democratic voter was going with Bernie. The real surprise is that the conservative ones were also considering Bernie. Everyone agreed that the establishment promoted politicians were screwing us.
A side point...all thought that Trump was a clown.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I have no doubt that if it came down to Sanders v. Trump, Bernie would get a lot more votes than the Dem usually does.
The only political yard sign have seen so far - Bernie for President.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Just a single sign.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Just asking.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)So that big lead she has is a fabrication!
Those rascals!
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)It is just that when people are asked by a pollster who they support, they think of a name that makes sense to them at the time.
Once they start to actually pay attention, a lot of that weak support goes elsewhere.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary
The trend is clear. Unless something changes, she won't be the front runner by the time the first debate rolls around. Having so few debates, so late in the process was designed to help the front runner. That really may have turned out to be a mistake. Time will tell.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)The Bernie supporter anecdotes are true, and your "joke" is just a joke.
Enjoy the ride!
Blus4u
(608 posts)And I thank yo for that!
Peace
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)murielm99
(30,755 posts)It was for the county Democrats in a nearby county. I live in a rural, mostly red area. I did not encounter ONE Bernie supporter. They all want Hillary.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)If they live in a mostly red, rural area, then they probably only get right-wing news like the mostly red, rural areas near me. If they've heard of Sanders, they've probably only heard he's a "socialist" and probably don't even know he's running as a Democrat.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Wanted the establishment candidate? What are the odds of that?
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)murielm99
(30,755 posts)who vote, give money, GOTV, etc. They are all pretty knowledgeable Democrats. We actually have the internet, social media, indoor toilets and all of that stuff.
Anti-establishment? Don't make me laugh. The Senate is anti-establishment? And how many years has the demigod Bernie been in the Senate?
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)But Hillary is the Democratic Party's establishment candidate.
That is also why she has so many establishment endorsements already.
We are not impressed.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)tblue37
(65,483 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I was surprised when they told me independently that they were of course supporting Sen Sanders.
It appears that a lot of grassroots Democrats are welcoming a change from the authoritarian controlled picks from the Democratic Elite. DWS made it crystal clear that she wasn't about to listen to the grassroots Democrats for the need to have more debates. That decision will hurt the Democratic nominee in the general, but DWS makes it clear that is not the most important issue. Keeping Sanders out is the number one objective.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)but of course she / they will blame everything and everyone else. She /they will be at fault for her / their lack of introspection about 2014.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)will blame Sanders. This situation isn't too different from 2000. The DLC controlled Party Elites wanted to run Gore even though the people were tired of the conservative Democrats Clinton/Gore giving away the farm. The Oligarchs don't care if Gore won or Bush won, they didn't want a progressive. Same as today. The Oligarchs and their Democratic puppets (Democratic Elites like DWS) don't care if Clinton loses the general just as long as Sanders doesn't get a shot.
OhWiseOne
(74 posts)Smarter would be good too.
If Bernie wins the dem primary a repub will win the general election. Opposite happens with Hillary.
840high
(17,196 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Mbrow
(1,090 posts)Pointed out, the last two democratic presidents ran as FDR Dem's, but both governed as center right Dem's. This means that Dem's that run as progressives win. Both BC and BO ran to the left during the general election and moved right after winning, this is why you have low turn out when you run another corporate Democrat candidate and this is why Bernie can win this election, also remember the Iowa poll of Bernie supporters, it's not that they don't like HRC, they just like Bernie better. If you look at BC and BO speeches before the election you will see what He means, the idea that either ran as a center Democrat is a RW talking point.
wolfie001
(2,264 posts)With Obama, all of the pent-up goodwill flowed out after every inspiring speech!!! When he decided to follow so many of Shrub's ill-conceived policies, the balloon burst. Sander's seems to be a leader who will say something then he'll follow thru.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)People showed in 2008 that a change candidate can win. They came out in droves because they really believed in it. They can do so again, and hopefully they will, just have to see past the change imposters to get there.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)With the way the Latino vote is looking, most any (D) could win.
The risk with Hillary is that some other shoe drops late in the campaign and she never recovers. Bernie is the much safer bet.
artislife
(9,497 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)I just can't see anyone going for Republicans this time.
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)there were several calls from Republicans, all but one (I believe) said he or she was going to vote for Sanders.
Sanders I believe has an ability to attract Republicans that is greater than any other Dem I've seen. Bernie has exactly the attitude that will succeed in bringing about the revolution that he is calling for.
My only real worry about the general election and the other elections for that matter is that the red tilt in the voting machine counts will be too great for Bernie to overcome. I hope the campaign adopts some sort of platform policy condemning UNVERIFIED VOTING and STRONGLY supporting the auditing of machine counts so as to VERIFY THE VOTE. TRUST BUT VERIFY!
We need to support people like Beth Clarkson in Kansas who is doing everything in her power to verify the vote in KS and is being opposed by the Sec of State Kris Kobach. And by the way, anybody who wants to help her out would be welcomed with open arms. Here's the latest from KS, Clarkson's editorial in the Wichita Eagle of a few days ago.
http://www.kansas.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/article32685087.html
questionseverything
(9,657 posts)Its now been 13 years since HAVA Help America Vote Act gave states $3.9 billion in subsidies to modernize their voting rolls and election equipment, which resulting in installing Hackable electronic voting machines. As of 2012, 95 percent of the countrys voters were voting on electronic touch-screen machines, or on optical scanners. Computer programming is the province of small elite private programmers and/or corporations who work in the shadows beyond the reach of public records request: http://fatallyflawedelections.blogspot.com/2015/03/william-e-doyle-hidden-de-facto.html
All theses electronic voting machines use programs that enjoy copyright protection from public scrutiny, not secure from hacking and there is ample evidence that voting machines can be hacked and here is ours in Arizona! Attorney Bill Risner disclosure statement filed with court Jan 12, 2012, which is a mind blowing, comprehensive statement of facts collected over many years of investigating and litigation of Pima County: http://tinyurl.com/LPFiling
In Tucson, AZ we won 3 court cases to collect the evidence; nevertheless at the end, after 8 years, they would not allow us to present the evidence in court. Pima County Elections programmed the memory cards to rig the outcome of a $2 billion bond election in May 2006. I refer you to this summary article after the Maricopa Appellate Court denied our appeal: http://fatallyflawedelections.blogspot.com/2014/07/elections-remain-compromised.html
Also please watch this short video that shows how the precincts memory cards can be pre-stuffed with votes and still produce a zero tape before the 1st ballot is ever counted:
The Diebold, GEMS/AccuVote machine that in 2012 was in use in 20 states by more than 26 million voters was hacked into by a team at the U.S. Department of Energys Argonne National Laboratory, which concluded that anyone with $26 in parts and an eighth-grade science education could manipulate the outcome of an election, according to Collier. Team leader Roger Johnson called it a national security issue. Want proof? Watch this:
///////////////////////////////////////
has beth reached out to risner the attorney from az?
i do not know how we are ever going to get the courts to actually look at the evidence BUT the more people know this is happening the better chance we have of stopping it
jeff47
(26,549 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)What makes you think that?
Hillary couldn't even get the nomination the last time.
What examples are you basing your unfounded scenario on?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)My bet is "no."
/ignore list.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Very little buzz for Bernie in RI.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)revmclaren
(2,529 posts)That's even more the question in California then 'Who's Bernie Sanders?'
C Moon
(12,221 posts)I would vote for Hillary in the general election (I'm not a hater); but I see nothing in social media about Hillaryit's all Bernie.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)2 family members and 3 coworkers and friends are voting for sanders. The rest...dozens...Clinton all the way.
I do believe it is very much based on where you live and how the message resonates. I still get a lot of 'sanders who?' This is sad because he does have a great many ideas to change the country. But he has self labeled himself as a socialist so most don't want the whole package. My family (the ones with brains who vote democrat and not republican ) are old school dems who will never vote for someone without a D before their name. The country is full of them. Thats who sanders has to win over to win the primary. That and P.O.C., who he needs to court as if his chance of the presidency depends on it...which it does. Chance of winning...slim to none...but not impossible. In my p.o.v. Of course.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)I don't know anyone who is voting for Bernie for the exact reasons you give, he's a self-labeled socialist. He may now be regretting that proclamation, but the Gop will never let him live it down. He can't win, and the Democratic Party can't afford to be as stupid as the GOP is by, continuing to beating up on Hillary. If folks here want to see that Republicans get to appoint the members who will serve out my lifetime and many of yours on the Supreme Court, keep doing what they're doing.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Apparently, someone was so inspired...
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)CA also passed Pro 8 in 08.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)especially in the central valley. I'm talking democrats...
Are you?
And Obama isn't running...
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)My sister almost disowned me. Now I'm Hillory all the way. Sister and 90 percent of woman in the family happy. Serenity.....
The difference between a Socialist and a Democratic Socialist is kind of like the difference between a Giant and a San Francisco Giant -- totally different animals.
Bernie Sanders is a Democratic Socialist, and if your family members have the quality brains as you claim, they will read about the significant differences.
Democratic socialism calls for the economy to be run democratically -- for the good of the people, not only for the good of the people in control of the means of production, or for the people who have control of the vast majority of the capital. In a Social Democracy, wealth is not taken away from the wealthy. The system is set up in such a way, though, that they do not amass more wealth at such a rapid pace. Wealth, s it is generated, is spread more democratically and in a more equitable manner for a much wider swath of the population.
You win the internet today.
"The difference between a Socialist and a Democratic Socialist is kind of like the difference between a Giant and a San Francisco Giant"
Brilliant!
MoonchildCA
(1,301 posts)I'm so tired of people just throwing the Socialist label around. He is a self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist, and yes, there is a difference.
This is coming from a California Dem who not only has a brain, but is solidly behind Bernie.
Most of my friends and family prefer Bernie Sanders, and I've come across a few people wearing Bernie Tees, and I've seen a couple of Bernie bumper stickers. I'm in Ventura County.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)5. In a speech he gave at the National Committee for Independent Political Action in New York City on June 22, 1989, reprinted in the December 1989 issue of the socialist publication Monthly Review: In Vermont, everybody knows that I am a socialist and that many people in our movement, not all, are socialists. And as often as not and this is an interesting point that is the honest-to-God truth what people will say is, I dont really know what socialism is, but if youre not a Democrat or a Republican, youre OK with me. Thats true. And I think there has been too much of a reluctance on the part of progressives and radicals to use the word socialism.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/14-things-bernie-sanders-has-said-about-socialism-120265#ixzz3kAy40T4x
This is what people find when searching google for sanders and socialist. And millions use google for good or for bad to check out candidates.
What's on the Internet stays on the Internet...forever. All they will see is socialist and close their minds. Sad but reality.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)revmclaren
(2,529 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Somehow, I doubt it.
Oh - that's right. She did meet with hoity toity insiders up there and raised $300,000 from the well-to-do group:
http://wpri.com/2015/06/10/hillary-clinton-scheduled-to-attend-fundraiser-in-east-greenwich/
The people out there for the honk and wave probably haven't earned $300,000 in their lives - and that's the point.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)Real world stuff... Begin campaigning and getting the go Hillory stuff going next month. Will be AWESOME!!!!
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)and letting me get my Clinton plug in...
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Considering the crowds Bernie is actually drawing at his events I don't know if I would make a joke like that. He has had the biggest events of ANY candidate of any party this year.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)Votes are what matters. 4 decades of voting has proven that.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)MoveIt
(399 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Oh, no need to intellectualsplain her famous observation about the 1972 election to me.I know the back story.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)I was at a Quinceañera with my girlfriend and my observations of what some folks were feeling were quite different, not on the Trump side though.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Massachusetts was in a different galaxy at that moment in time.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Pauline Kael was a very smart woman and of course she knew Nixon had a lot of support. The fact that she didn't know anybody personally who supported Nixon is remarkable and speaks to the rarefied environment she found herself in.
I just finished 'One Man Against The World: The Tragedy Of Richard Nixon'. It's about the tenth book I have read about him. He really believed the president was sovereign and not the people.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)I was sucked in by the fact that it was based on recently declassified material.
Scott Walker is the scariest newcomer who reminds me of Nixon.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)There are no new revelations in it... It's interesting that Nixon learned about the Watergate break in after the fact. That's often forgotten. But he couldn't disassociate himself from it because to do so would have left him exposed to all the other nefarious things his underlings were doing that he was aware of.
I also want to read Evan Thomas' book about him. His biography of RFK was great but my favorite RFK book was written by Jack Newfield.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)I was too young to really understand what was happening in 1968 fully. I don't think I could have borne it if I had been aware.
I worry that this election year might be a similar one.
Trump is irresponsible and dangerous. Dylan Roof wanted to start a race war.
The two recent shootings of the TV news crew and the sheriff in Texas are being whipped up
as #blacklivesmatter linked assassinations by certain elements, with other RW media hinting around at that.
This is so far off topic. I'm just uneasy about the way in which this is developing.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)My mom took me to the front of rope line in Rego Park, New York to shake his hand when he was running for senator in 1964. Somewhere in storage I have a letter and photo from him that I received in response to a letter I wrote him. When he was shot I was devastated. As you know he didn't die instantly. I remember walking around the next day with a transistor radio to see if he lived. I have said this before...The martyred Kennedy brothers, Dr. King, and Muhammad Ali were my heroes when I was fourteen years old and they still are now.
Like I said in "the Hillary caused Benghazi" thread some times really bad things happen despite our best efforts. RFK is dead because Sirhan Sirhan shot him.
The guy that killed the TX cop was deranged and racist, just like Dylan Roof. As RFK said what we need is "love and understanding."
BTW, my gf and I used to live in Koreatown which is in walking distance of the Ambassador Hotel where RFK was shot. It's a school now. I Can remember the first time I walked past it.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and Timothy McVeigh never put themselves at risk. They just sit back and write books and now web sites to motivate the unbalanced minds to take action.
The right wing is working to motivate additional Dylan Roof's, whether they all fully understand that or not. Some of them are quite aware of what they are doing.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)With the advent of the net it's even easier for haters to disseminate their hateful information.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)cultural point of view being very selective. The same joke would work if told by Angela Davis or Abbie Hoffman or Harvey Milk, all of whom lived in various Nixon free communities. It's funny. It was supposed to be. I can't believe people think that was a sincere comment from her. Good lord.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Oh, no need to intellectualsplain her famous observation about the 1972 election to me.I know the back story.
-Me
I get it. In her milieu there were no Nixon supporters. I was a junior high school student in exurban Florida in 1972. My experience was essentially the opposite though I was politically aware enough to believe some of my teachers voted for McGovern. IMHO, I don't believe the allusion works as well with Angela Davis or Abbie Hoffman as they weren't representatives of East Coast intellectualism.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think that drills down to the core of how profoundly some people here are out of touch, especially when it comes to Millennials (who are a bigger demographic than baby boomers, eeek).
There are as many years between 1972 and 2016, as there were between the 1928 election of Herbert Hoover and 1972.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)eom
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think the polarizations that drove the split between McGovern and Nixon are pretty different than the Democratic Primary situation we see today.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)In the spirit of promoting comity I will just let you knowing what my response will be stand.
I will just say my observation has nothing to do with ideological splits and everything to do with Ms. Kael's observation she didn't personally know any Nixon supporters. In my exurban Florida junior high school they were the majority. In fact a student stood up in class and said George McGovern should be assassinated. If that was today he would be getting a visit from the Secret Service.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 30, 2015, 11:43 PM - Edit history (1)
battles of 1972 over and over again, whether they consciously realize it or not.
1972 is as relevant to 2016 as 1928 was to 1972.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Again, my observation has nothing to do with 1972 and everything to do with the seminal poster's anecdote.
I moved from NYC to FL when I was 12. I lived most of my life in Seminole County, Florida The Democratic party was so weak that for a long time they couldn't even field Democratic candidates for state House and state Senate positions. The choice was a Republican and some times a libertarian.
And in that vein I will paraphrase Ms. Kael:
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But the point, stripped off all its context, becomes pretty meaningless. If anything, the US has become less politically homogeneous, in the intervening years, which means... what?
It means that almost any candidate or situation can probably find an "island" of insulated supporters, now. There's probably even an enclave somewhere of authoritarian Republican blowhards that don't know anyone who isn't supporting Chris Christie. Maybe.
In short, pointing that out doesn't really prove anything one way or another.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)seem to be Manhattanites.
Speaking of living in a bubble.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Color me shocked.
you realize your analogy puts Hillary in the Nixon slot, don't you?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)eom
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Or, you aren't.
Here you seem to be, downthread you swear that's not your intent.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)eom
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I still suspect that HRC will win the primaries and be the nominee. She couldnt do that if "no one liked her".
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)What on earth...?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Indepeendents, Greens too
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Except that I do know a few that are torn between Bernie and Sanders but those ones usually vote Republican anyway. I am still trying to reason with them and tilt them to the Bernie side.
svpadgham
(670 posts)But to play Devil's advocate, I'd like to say that Senator Sander's message appeals to me a little more than does Bernie's.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Everyone Ive talked to is supporting Bernie. Go into the coffee shops, wine bars etc, lots of people are wearing Sanders shirts. Sanders bumperstickers are everywhere. But just talking to people - some I know very well, some total strangers - and Ive not heard one say theyd vote for Hillary in the primary. This is HER HOME COUNTY were talking about.
Then again the community I live in and the surrounding towns were always known as socialist territory. The Socialist publication The Masses was published nearby. http://www.westchestermagazine.com/Westchester-Magazine/February-2015/Westchesters-Communist-Past-Croton-On-Hudsons-Red-Hill/
Naturally, like most of us have said, if she wins the primary shell get our votes. But im really surprised at the overwhelming number of Bernie supporters.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)OverBurn
(957 posts)that the Bernie and Hillary people seem to have for each other, at least on this site.
I'd be ecstatic if Bernie is the next POTUS, but I love Hillary over ANY repuke that might stumble out of the crazy clown car.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)If sanders is the primary winner, I will gladly vote for him and campaign my ass off for him. My first choice is Clinton though.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)Don't let them cloud your thinking.
On another thread it was mentioned that only 2% of Bernie supporters back him because they are "anti-Hillary".
I'd also vote Hillary (If I wasn't Canadian) if she was the nominee.
People have to realize that the angry over-the-top near-libelous OPs are popular because of their inflammatory nature, both with the rest of that angry minority, or the reactions of those criticizing the OP.
randys1
(16,286 posts)more information?
I mean hell, I could say I went to a party too and they all said they are voting for Donald Duck
MoveIt
(399 posts)Take a step back, lol.
randys1
(16,286 posts)MoveIt
(399 posts)LOL
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)Must be a boring Sunday....
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)revmclaren
(2,529 posts)As I posted earlier, California has its own unique voting patterns....sometimes bordering on paranoia. Huge repug enclaves... Sanders IS a relative unknown. He needs to change this in states like mine. I do respect him, but he needs to win me over before I would ever give him my vote. And at the moment, he's to wishy washy. To 'SAFE' in his aproch to issues. I.M.O.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)it surprised me that no one even mentioned Hillary's name. That may spell trouble for her. No matter which way I go in the primary I don't have a gene in my body that would allow me to pull a republican lever.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)some of us understand this as we know what it took to get to the place where she is. Vote your own conscious. Both are good people, both do want the best for this country.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)revmclaren
(2,529 posts)And I really mean it.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)The one unifying consensus at the party was that everyone was tired of the same old, same old while we are getting screwed.
By the way...I disappeared because I went to eat some dinner. My bad..I guess.
wyldwolf
(43,869 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The Ohio Democratic Party will host an informational meeting on Thursday, September 3, for anyone interested in serving as a delegate to the 2016 Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. Party Secretary Bill DeMora will be on hand to answer questions and provide information about how to run to be a Delegate and preview the logistics of going to the Convention. The meeting will be at 7:00pm at the Montgomery County Democratic Party Headquarters, 131 S. Wilkinson St. in Dayton.
I wonder if I'm a delegate if I'm bound to vote as my state does, or if I can flip them the bird and vote as I want to, heh heh.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)I have seen a lot of post about how ugly responses have been but I haven't been following the post so I didn't see it.
Now I do.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Don't let it get you down, you're on the greatest page!
Cheers!
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)All of them are going with Hillary 'cause they think she's hot.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)but whatever works.
Have a few biker friends myself. Takes a lot to get their thumbs up.....
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)They're cheap dates.
revmclaren
(2,529 posts)God to be young again...well...maybe not!
Reter
(2,188 posts)Bernie is anti-NSA and against the Patriot Act, like the real Tea Party wing. I have a friend supporting Rand Paul. Says he would consider Sanders if Paul loses the nomination.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Everything else regular people just want honest leadership and a hopeful message. I think most regular people don't have real strong views about politics and policy with the exception of one major position. They want a fair shake. They want to know that if they do the right thing by working hard, they will have an opportunity to secure a modestly comfortable future for themselves and their families.
mountain grammy
(26,644 posts)When I run into my fellow Dems, and there's just a few of us here, I ask, so have you made up your mind for the primary. They all say Bernie, except the chairperson of our local Dems. She's for Hillary. I'm really looking forward to our caucus.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Everybody I knew at the time voted for McGovern
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Trump, i.e., they like Sanders better than Clinton the same way we like Trump better than Cruz or Walker and they would prefer their candidate to run against Sanders in the same way we'd rather have our candidates run against Trump and (2) among the Democrats in Texas there is a racial and ideological divide - the white true believer Democrats all favor Sanders but this is not necessarily true among non-whites and those Democrats who vote split ticket and who vote in presidential years but sometimes skip off-year elections.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Vinca
(50,302 posts)I'm sure those same people would vote for Hillary if she's the nominee, but their first choice is Bernie.
harun
(11,348 posts)People voted for change last time, didn't get it, they will try harder this time.
randome
(34,845 posts)Of course since my daughters moved away to college, my polling numbers were down to one, with a margin of error of 12%.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Always possible you might actually be supporting Bernie and confidence error showed it as a Clinton vote.
Yes, I just made a geeky polling statistics joke. I am a treasure to have at parties.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)Bernie is one of us and he is liked by everyone. I get the "it's about time" feeling in regard to Bernie when I talk with others. He is real and he is not out to benefit himself, but to benefit those who have been screwed over far, far too long.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)People are finally getting over that hurdle. They used to say, "I would vote for him, but he can't win..." Now they're saying, "Maybe he can't win, but I'm voting for him anyway..."
moobu2
(4,822 posts)Weird.
Ron Green
(9,823 posts)taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)All of my family are democrats going for Hillary. Around the office, Bernie is seen as the crazy socialist (and I'm in a very blue Los Angeles). I seriously believe that Bernie would struggle to win California if he were the general nominee.
treestar
(82,383 posts)the polls are more scientific
Also they could be saying that to agree with you to avoid arguing
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)by surprise that no one even mentioned Hillary.