Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:15 AM Aug 2015

Why we lose mid-elections? No, it's not Sanders fault. It's because candidates run away from Obama

I recently posted a reply to Willy on his thread about this:

That the Clinton supporters try to blame the losses solely on gerrymandering. It's really like being stuck on stupid. The gerrymandering only affected HOUSE SEATS. Then why THE FUCK IN GOD'S GREEN EARTH DID WE LOSE ALL THE SENATE and GOVERNORSHIPS?

First, it's because those Democrats ran away from the ACA and Obama. (if you didn't get that, stop and read it again)

Second, those who lost tried to act like quasi-Republicans (hello Mary Landrieu? Anyone remember what she pushed for?)

When Democrats enact or try to enact REPUBLICAN POLICIES we will lose.

We have gotten hosed into mid-term elections. The only thing...only thing that saved us in 2012 was that Obama was at the top of the ticket. He still inspired enthusiasm and great turn out and helped in the down ticket races.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=555660

Some of the candidates (not all) decided that they were going to distance themselves from Obama and in some cases support Republican causes. I gave one example above. Blame those candidates that ran shitty campaigns and made bad decisions. For God's sakes "traitor" Tom Cotton and pig castrator Joni Ernst won senate seats.

None of these had anything to do with Bernie Sanders or gerrymandering. Period.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why we lose mid-elections? No, it's not Sanders fault. It's because candidates run away from Obama (Original Post) davidpdx Aug 2015 OP
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Aug 2015 #1
Don't forget the woman who ran against McConnell and would not even say she supported Obama tularetom Aug 2015 #2
Yes, very very good point davidpdx Aug 2015 #4
Alison Lundgren Grimes, a Clinton Democrat as she called herself, was coached by Bill Clinton AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #3
Yep, as noted above by Tulareton davidpdx Aug 2015 #5
ha! it must have been a mindmeld AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #9
Obamas ratings sucked BlueStateLib Aug 2015 #6
Keep in mind those approval ratings are all voters davidpdx Aug 2015 #7
Yep. Look at turnouts for Bernie in Red states. Wilms Aug 2015 #8
Yes, Yes, and yes again GitRDun Aug 2015 #10
K&R. Bernie Sanders couldn't have had anything to do with the Democratic losses in 2014. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #11
No. It's because people are gullible and believe the bull shit the 1% party feeds them. C Moon Aug 2015 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author davidpdx Aug 2015 #13
K and effing R Scuba Aug 2015 #14
Huge KnR. mylye2222 Aug 2015 #15
I saw that davidpdx Aug 2015 #17
Well now she does support it. mylye2222 Aug 2015 #18
K&R think Aug 2015 #16
I think that's overly simplified. HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #19
My State does just fine in midterms actually. Bluenorthwest Aug 2015 #20
The main reason we lose midterms is that old people vote in them dsc Aug 2015 #21

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
2. Don't forget the woman who ran against McConnell and would not even say she supported Obama
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:22 AM
Aug 2015

IIRC, she was very strongly supported by both Clintons as well.

And she got her ass kicked pretty handily by one of the most unpopular people in the Senate.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. Yes, very very good point
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:25 AM
Aug 2015

In fact I was very disappointed in the strategy she chose because I donated to her campaign. There are often not any campaigns in my state that need the donations, so I try to help candidates in other states. She was one of the three I supported. All three lost.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
3. Alison Lundgren Grimes, a Clinton Democrat as she called herself, was coached by Bill Clinton
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:23 AM
Aug 2015

... to reject Obama in her campaign.

She lost the election in Kentucky, with President Obama garnering more votes than she did.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. Yep, as noted above by Tulareton
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:28 AM
Aug 2015

Both of you must have had a mindmelt at the same time. lol

It is too bad she lost. She ran from Obama like a scared chicken. Probably one of the best examples from 2014 of why we got hosed.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
9. ha! it must have been a mindmeld
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 01:01 AM
Aug 2015

I rather like Obama getting more votes than her in Kentucky.

It was a big FU to both her and Bill Clinton.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
7. Keep in mind those approval ratings are all voters
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:45 AM
Aug 2015

The key would have been to turn out our base in those states. My question is did we?

Despite his ratings, I believe those candidates would have done better getting behind President Obama than running from him like a chickenshit.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
8. Yep. Look at turnouts for Bernie in Red states.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:59 AM
Aug 2015

How many of those people were at the polls for the mid-terms?

GitRDun

(1,846 posts)
10. Yes, Yes, and yes again
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 01:14 AM
Aug 2015

The Democratic campaigns were absolutely devoid of any energy.

Watching them run from the ACA and other progressive opportunities was maddening.

I hope we do a better job this time...Obama will not be on the ballot.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
11. K&R. Bernie Sanders couldn't have had anything to do with the Democratic losses in 2014.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 02:57 AM
Aug 2015

He did not run on the Democratic ticket or declare himself to be a Democrat until this campaign.

What is this about?:

C Moon

(12,221 posts)
12. No. It's because people are gullible and believe the bull shit the 1% party feeds them.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 03:14 AM
Aug 2015

Last edited Sun Aug 30, 2015, 01:18 PM - Edit history (1)

Response to C Moon (Reply #12)

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
15. Huge KnR.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 07:22 AM
Aug 2015

As welk as now, as DWS and DNC released clearly wrong DNC résolution not backing Iran Deal. Not only it is also runing away from Obama but it will be interpretated as division and could damage Clinton campaign.

Thank you so much for your OP.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
17. I saw that
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 09:08 AM
Aug 2015

It makes me wonder if Clinton supports the deal or not. I guess she might have to ask her 200 advisers, put a poll out, and then stick her finger out to see which way the wind is blowing.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
18. Well now she does support it.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 09:21 AM
Aug 2015

But I do remember that just before the deal was sealed on last July 14, she made a curious statement saying basically that, would a deal been reached or not, Iran would still be a threat. I thought it was particulary mispmaced as a crucial moment ( last round of negociations)

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
19. I think that's overly simplified.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 09:40 AM
Aug 2015

It pretty much doesn't consider the nature of voter turnout between types of elections.

Democratic turnout is soft in non-general elections. There are probably a handful of effectors that drive that, but the pattern is very consistent over decades of elections.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
20. My State does just fine in midterms actually.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 10:12 AM
Aug 2015

So this stuff, you guys can hash out on your own while I go smoke some actual hash we legalized last November while electing Democrats.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
21. The main reason we lose midterms is that old people vote in them
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 11:07 AM
Aug 2015

and young people don't, and we are currently not winning the votes of older people. The last midterm we did well in was 2006, which not coincidentally, was the first election after Bush tried to privatize Social Security. We won the elderly vote in that election and got the wonderful results we did.

Now as to the specifics of 2010 and 2014. The governors in 2010 went down for one big reason. The economy tanked and they were at the helms of those states when it did, and they got the blame (very unfairly). In 2014 the incumbent GOP governors got to run on Obama's recovery and were able to pull out narrow wins in most cases. In Ohio we fielded a dreadful candidate who got anailated, and in PA they ran a similarly bad candidate and he lost big.

In 2010, we did pretty well in the Senate with our incumbents. In 2014 we did horribly but we were defending some Senators from turf we had little business having seats in. The win in Alaska in 2008 was a fluke, Arkansas was trending bad for us for decades, North Carolina was lost by ISIS and ebola, South Dakota has trended away for years, Montana did the same. Now there were some races we should have one that we outright blew. Iowa and Colorado come to mind.

But again, if we can't get younger voters to decide these elections matter, or failing that, do better among older voters, midterm elections are going to continue to be barren ground for us.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why we lose mid-elections...