Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts) Thu Jul 12, 2012, 11:13 PM Jul 2012

0

uh oh, Cheney: Romney 'only' man for foreign policy!

It was a strong endorsement from a man who has come to represent the neoconservative foreign policy wing of the Republican Party. Until Thursday, Romney had avoided appearing with Cheney or with Bush.

link

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

uh oh, Cheney: Romney 'only' man for foreign policy! (Original Post) yortsed snacilbuper Jul 2012 OP

Translation: If you want to go to war AGAIN based on LIES vote for Mitt think Jul 2012 #1

Cheeeeeney is nuts anyway!! center rising Jul 2012 #2

Cheney is an American terrorist davidpdx Jul 2012 #3

Only man for foreign policy why? LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #4

think

(11,641 posts)

1. Translation: If you want to go to war AGAIN based on LIES vote for Mitt

Reply to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:02 AM

Jul 2012

center rising

(971 posts)

2. Cheeeeeney is nuts anyway!!

Reply to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:30 AM

Jul 2012

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)

3. Cheney is an American terrorist

Reply to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 08:41 AM

Jul 2012

and should be sent down to Guantanamo for an extended vacation.

LiberalFighter

(50,950 posts)

4. Only man for foreign policy why?

Reply to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 10:10 AM

Jul 2012

Because he wants to go to war against Iran?

Or because he knows how to outsource jobs to China?

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»uh oh, Cheney: Romney 'on...