Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When not a single member of Congress has endorsed you..... (Original Post) BooScout Aug 2015 OP
I don't think it's that big of a deal. HerbChestnut Aug 2015 #1
I think you have it right GitRDun Aug 2015 #76
When you are the top choice of the oligarchy ... earthside Aug 2015 #2
Yes - Hillary Is A Member Of The 1% - She Would Be No Better Than Any Other Corporate Candidate cantbeserious Aug 2015 #9
So if you work hard and play by the rules and are able to write books and make lots of money would Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #56
If you are referring to Hillary Joe Turner Aug 2015 #61
THIS!! +100000 Fawke Em Aug 2015 #78
How will Sanders get anything done if elected? Gothmog Aug 2015 #3
re you really suggesting that the DEMOCRATS won't work with him? Wow! djean111 Aug 2015 #11
He won't--not without a political revolution. He says so himself. eridani Aug 2015 #33
Do you really think that Sanders has coat tails or could help win down ballot races? Gothmog Aug 2015 #97
Yes, because he is getting alienated voters involved. eridani Aug 2015 #98
My county party chair was attacked for merely attending a Sanders rally and was called a socialist Gothmog Aug 2015 #108
Then it's about fucking time that Dems in Texas started to defend PUBLIC GOODS! eridani Aug 2015 #110
Well, he's gotten more things passed through this Congress than anyone else jeff47 Aug 2015 #66
Do you have a link for that info? Fawke Em Aug 2015 #79
Not in a convenient, message-board-ready format. jeff47 Aug 2015 #86
Oh - I can do that if you have the link. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #88
Basically, a news article referenced Congress.gov jeff47 Aug 2015 #93
It's a start. Thanks. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #109
Do you have links to this these amendments? Gothmog Aug 2015 #83
Congress.gov isn't hard to find. jeff47 Aug 2015 #85
He sponsored a major Veterans bill passed last year jfern Aug 2015 #90
how will Hillary? Doctor_J Aug 2015 #91
endorsements will come ibegurpard Aug 2015 #4
I think Sanders will only get endorsements... HerbChestnut Aug 2015 #10
precisely ibegurpard Aug 2015 #17
I think they are creating the Biden option to press the issues with Warren along libdem4life Aug 2015 #25
Not The Right Question To Ask cantbeserious Aug 2015 #5
+1 DeeDeeNY Aug 2015 #45
It says we only have an illusion of democracy. azmom Aug 2015 #87
I think the angst and teeth-gnashing are actually from those who are expecting that stuff like this djean111 Aug 2015 #6
...a badge of honor considering the mutual back-washing and general sleaze inherent among them. nt Bonobo Aug 2015 #7
Yep. A body whose approval rates in the low teens AT BEST. Who cares who they endorse? n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #70
lol. I submit it his much more to do with the dominant role cali Aug 2015 #8
Months ago, a Hillary supporter here said that OF COURSE Warren would be endorsing Hillary - djean111 Aug 2015 #14
Hillary will be able to form loyal alliances and coalitions. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #12
Because Republicans are known for coalitions and compromise. RichVRichV Aug 2015 #104
Strangely enough, I don't have a problem with that at all. Autumn Aug 2015 #13
Nor I. Puglover Aug 2015 #15
Hey you. Autumn Aug 2015 #74
But that's not the reaction they were hoping for! beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #16
I'm sorry. I tried to gnash my teeth and wail but then realized I don't give a fuck Autumn Aug 2015 #94
Well that's because that lady deserves respect. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #96
Like we are supposted to be suprised that the 1% won't endorse Bernie. L0oniX Aug 2015 #52
Your OP Is Going To Look Awfully Silly When Bernie Wins The Nomination And All... global1 Aug 2015 #18
They obviously do not. Almost all have endorsed Hillary and that includes the Progressive caucus. leftofcool Aug 2015 #21
Bookmarked... onehandle Aug 2015 #23
She didn't win in 2008 striegl Aug 2015 #39
There is no Obama. onehandle Aug 2015 #48
I knew she was ahead of where she was in 2007, but those numbers are amazing! George II Aug 2015 #47
Unrec. Agschmid Aug 2015 #19
Couldn't find any decent hit pieces today so you went with diy flamebait? beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #20
I wish I could recommend your post. neverforget Aug 2015 #29
Aw thanks! beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #34
It demonstrates their political fredamae Aug 2015 #22
Endorsements by politicians mean squat to me. I'm capable of making my own choice. NorthCarolina Aug 2015 #24
I don't get it either Mnpaul Aug 2015 #60
Well, basically what they are saying NorthCarolina Aug 2015 #62
Yeah, but you're talking about Democrats. onehandle Aug 2015 #26
Ouch! leftofcool Aug 2015 #30
Sounds like someone obsessed with porn made that one up... BooScout Aug 2015 #43
Bernie's not the choice of the status quo. What a surprise. corkhead Aug 2015 #27
Apparently if you are not allowed to post you can still send annoying PMs corkhead Aug 2015 #58
ugh alert that trolling MoveIt Aug 2015 #63
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #65
Time to click that "Alert Abuse" link. (nt) jeff47 Aug 2015 #67
LOL she's shat in my Inbox as well n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #71
OMG SoapBox Aug 2015 #89
THAT one again. sibelian Aug 2015 #101
Nor the choice of the Congressional elite. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #77
Since a great many millions rely on their jobs at corporations Gman Aug 2015 #28
What stage is "And then they sneer at you?" n/t MoveIt Aug 2015 #31
The real leader, the real creator, the real innovator, the real builder, the real solution-finder DrBulldog Aug 2015 #32
I have never been swayed by endorsements. SheilaT Aug 2015 #35
They matter at the Convention. Super Delegates, ya know. leftofcool Aug 2015 #36
If you are referring to Bernie, it means that he Cleita Aug 2015 #37
Congrats on almost identical post # 12,4222 HERVEPA Aug 2015 #38
Remarkable: 124,222 is approximately the many times the post rock Aug 2015 #41
Nope. That's hardly ever an OP headline. HERVEPA Aug 2015 #46
*crickets* beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #49
Cite them rock Aug 2015 #51
Congress has an approval rating lower than Satan's.... John Poet Aug 2015 #40
Sine many will be super delegates at the convention, it really does matter. leftofcool Aug 2015 #44
Having the support of millions of Americans TBF Aug 2015 #42
~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #50
Badge of Honor IMO whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #53
Evidence that some of those endorsers should be primaried. -none Aug 2015 #54
Bernie is not a traditional politician like 99% of those in Congress. Vinca Aug 2015 #55
I suppose if Cronyism is part of your political litmus test NorthCarolina Aug 2015 #57
Excuses does not erase the fact Bernie has not gotten any endorsements, having worked with others Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #59
ZOMG! These crappy OPs need to stop! That 'Warning' is passive aggressive BTW! TheBlackAdder Aug 2015 #64
LOL... when a body that ranks in the low teens AT BEST when it comes to approval ratings... cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #68
There are several diseases with higher approval ratings than Congress. jeff47 Aug 2015 #69
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight Daniel537 Aug 2015 #72
dems will support dems or lose backing 2pooped2pop Aug 2015 #73
Ding ding ding! We have a new meme! Last one didn't work out so good. senz Aug 2015 #75
but itsssss the CORPORATIONS!!! ericson00 Aug 2015 #80
Hillary was endorsed in 2008 election but didn't win Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2015 #81
Obama got a few more thus more super delegates at the convention. leftofcool Aug 2015 #82
those endorsements should really influence a lot independants, first-time, and disaffected voters.. frylock Aug 2015 #84
when that same Congress consistently has a <20% approval rating among voters perhaps azurnoir Aug 2015 #92
Actually it is, It has to do with super delegates. leftofcool Aug 2015 #99
so you're saying the rank and file do not matter it's the party 'officials' who are the in control azurnoir Aug 2015 #111
I wouod have thought he would have at least one by now. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #95
He's got mine! HappyPlace Aug 2015 #103
He got Jesse Ventura's endorsement. He and Alex Jones are best buds, but AJ wants Cruz as POTUS. freshwest Aug 2015 #105
Oh good God! hrmjustin Aug 2015 #106
Yes, but he was a GOVERNOR. That's gotta count for something. Maybe Jesse's just catching a ride. freshwest Aug 2015 #107
LOL.....that's something to brag about for sure! BooScout Aug 2015 #112
No, it's not *Congress* that the president is supposed to serve sibelian Aug 2015 #100
...then you are not an establishment candidate. nt thereismore Aug 2015 #102
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
1. I don't think it's that big of a deal.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:34 AM
Aug 2015

Everybody knows that Clinton was (was) far away the front runner when the campaigns began and has heavy political sway over the party. Couple that with the fact that Bernie is an Independent, not technically a Democrat, and it's pretty easy to see why the Democratic members of congress would gravitate toward Clinton.

GitRDun

(1,846 posts)
76. I think you have it right
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:18 PM
Aug 2015

I don't think it says anything about anyone personally, it shows how the political system works.

There is a tremendous amount of money and influence that surrounds the Clintons. Hillary is the favorite, but the sheer magnitude of Bill and his foundation in terms of money, connections etc. is very attractive.

Contrast that with Bernie Sanders, a nice old guy from Vermont who really isn;t all that connected.....follow the money.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
2. When you are the top choice of the oligarchy ...
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:36 AM
Aug 2015

I would submit that it is you that have become an oligarch.

Warning....denial, angst and teeth gnashing ahead.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
9. Yes - Hillary Is A Member Of The 1% - She Would Be No Better Than Any Other Corporate Candidate
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:41 AM
Aug 2015

Just slightly different around the edges that do not matter to the Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
56. So if you work hard and play by the rules and are able to write books and make lots of money would
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:24 PM
Aug 2015

it make you a bad person?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
11. re you really suggesting that the DEMOCRATS won't work with him? Wow!
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:42 AM
Aug 2015

And I would like to point out that the GOP is going spend a lot of their time "investigating" Benghazi and email-gate, waste of time that those things are. Or, are you suggesting that the GOP is going to stop hating Hillary? Oh my! such fun this morning!

eridani

(51,907 posts)
33. He won't--not without a political revolution. He says so himself.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:42 AM
Aug 2015

Which may happen--he appeals to the 63%.

Gothmog

(145,291 posts)
97. Do you really think that Sanders has coat tails or could help win down ballot races?
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 07:46 PM
Aug 2015

I can tell you that we in Texas are terrified of the effect that Sanders would have on down ballot races. The term socialist does not play well here.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
98. Yes, because he is getting alienated voters involved.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 07:56 PM
Aug 2015

Clinton doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell with the 63%.

Socialism is losing power as a snarl word, and has been for some time. But I do think the campaign should be doing some reframing, talking about public goods instead of Norway and Sweden.

Public goods by definition are straight out of Karl Marx. The more your property is worth, the higher the property taxes you pay to support the fire department. (From each according to his ability.) But they don't send a truck out unless you have a fire. (To each according to his means.) The difference between Democrats and Republicans is that they think public goods should be restricted to the white and/or the wealthy, and we think they should be for everyone.

Gothmog

(145,291 posts)
108. My county party chair was attacked for merely attending a Sanders rally and was called a socialist
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:02 PM
Aug 2015

See http://www.democraticunderground.com/107827740 Sanders would be a drag on down ballot races in most states where the word socialist and socialism are not accepted. I know that there are some in my state party who are terrified of the effect that Sanders would have on down ballot races

eridani

(51,907 posts)
110. Then it's about fucking time that Dems in Texas started to defend PUBLIC GOODS!
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 12:01 AM
Aug 2015

Obama is called a "socialist." And Clinton will be too if she gets the nomination. Deal with it.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
66. Well, he's gotten more things passed through this Congress than anyone else
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:58 PM
Aug 2015

You know, the Republican, do-nothing Congress we currently have?

Sanders has been attaching amendments to a lot of pills and getting them passed.

Clearly a guy who can get Republicans to pass things could never possibly get things passed by Democrats.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
93. Basically, a news article referenced Congress.gov
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 06:22 PM
Aug 2015
https://www.congress.gov/member/bernard-sanders/S000033?q=%7B%22congress%22%3A%22114%22%7D

Which has all the information on everything Sanders has sponsored or co-sponsored, and whether or not it passed. Unfortunately, the news article just breezed right by any real statistics, so it isn't at all useful.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
4. endorsements will come
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:37 AM
Aug 2015

If and when it becomes clear that a "betrayal" of Hillary will not come with danger of political payback from her.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
10. I think Sanders will only get endorsements...
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:41 AM
Aug 2015

Once he officially seals the nomination. The fact of the matter is that Democratic members of congress have everything to lose by endorsing Sanders over Clinton at the moment. Do you think that Bernie cares whether he gets endorsed or not? No way. But you can bet that if Clinton gets nominated and a member of Congress didn't endorse her there will likely be some kind of consequences for that member.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
25. I think they are creating the Biden option to press the issues with Warren along
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:32 AM
Aug 2015

for the Progressives, at least first.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
5. Not The Right Question To Ask
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:39 AM
Aug 2015

Bernie's Policies De-legitimize The Basis Of Power That His Colleagues Rely Upon For Their Status.

HRCs policies do otherwise.

What does that say about HRC And Maintaining The Status Quo?

Ultimately, No One Is Brave Enough To Bite The Hand That Feeds.

What Does That Say About America?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
6. I think the angst and teeth-gnashing are actually from those who are expecting that stuff like this
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:39 AM
Aug 2015

makes any difference at all to Bernie supporters. Really, you expect supporters to switch because of endorsements? Bwahahaha!

I think endorsements are nice. Some are politically driven, and not a statement against another candidate per se.
Sorry, no angst and teeth gnashing here, just a happy certainty that I personally am supporting Bernie because of deeds, records, and issues, and not because of endorsements. What seems like a problem to YOU is not a problem for others, hard as that evidently is to understand.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
8. lol. I submit it his much more to do with the dominant role
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:41 AM
Aug 2015

of the Clintons in the party, the fact that the party establishment has been lining up behind Hillary for years, that Bernie is both a (democratic) socialist and an independent, a reluctance to land on hillary's famous hit list, and a desire to win.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
14. Months ago, a Hillary supporter here said that OF COURSE Warren would be endorsing Hillary -
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:48 AM
Aug 2015

because Warren is a Democrat, and had better endorse Hillary.

Which rather neatly, if unintended, sums up the importance of endorsements from Congress.
I cannot imagine switching support from any candidate to any other candidate because of endorsements.
Not even if Warren dutifully endorses Hillary.

Oh, and the GOP are not going to stop investigating Benghazi and email-gate. Those are, IMO, stupid things, but to think that the party in power in Congress wants to work with Hillary is really delusional.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
104. Because Republicans are known for coalitions and compromise.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:55 PM
Aug 2015

And Bernie supporters are the ones looking for rainbows and unicorns.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
15. Nor I.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:52 AM
Aug 2015

The OP predicted gnashing of teeth. Just a bit of eye strain here from the involuntary roll that they took when I read the OP.

Hey you.

Autumn

(45,103 posts)
94. I'm sorry. I tried to gnash my teeth and wail but then realized I don't give a fuck
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 06:35 PM
Aug 2015

not even a flying fuck who Congress endorses. They just don't impress me at all. I would value the endorsement of a crack addicted lady of the evening standing on a street corner earning an honest living more than theirs.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
96. Well that's because that lady deserves respect.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 06:40 PM
Aug 2015

Selling your body isn't immoral, selling out your constituents is.

The real whores wear expensive clothes and commute to DC.

global1

(25,251 posts)
18. Your OP Is Going To Look Awfully Silly When Bernie Wins The Nomination And All...
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:00 AM
Aug 2015

the Dems in Congress endorse him.

striegl

(18 posts)
39. She didn't win in 2008
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:00 AM
Aug 2015

Hillary had over two times more endorsements than Barack, yet she didn't win the nomination. What's your point about endorsements? That they don't determine who gets nominated for President?

Endorsements are nice but they don't actually vote in the primaries.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
48. There is no Obama.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:34 AM
Aug 2015
'Simply put, Clinton has more support from Democratic primary voters this summer than she did in 2007. Moreover, no one in her polling position has lost a primary in the modern era.'

http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanders-youre-no-barack-obama

George II

(67,782 posts)
47. I knew she was ahead of where she was in 2007, but those numbers are amazing!
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:30 AM
Aug 2015

Still 60+ % in the important states of Florida, Ohio, Illinois.

Seems that when it comes to endorsements, Sanders has flat-lined.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
20. Couldn't find any decent hit pieces today so you went with diy flamebait?
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:01 AM
Aug 2015


Better luck next time, practice makes perfect they say.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
22. It demonstrates their political
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:11 AM
Aug 2015

weakness...and reveals a huge part of the problem(s) with Dems in DC.
They are political cowards- imo -because Campaign Money is at risk IF they should be so bold as to step out of their "proper place" and endorse anyone But the establishment candidate.

But, that's just my opinion.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
24. Endorsements by politicians mean squat to me. I'm capable of making my own choice.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:29 AM
Aug 2015

I can't tell you who in Congress "endorsed" Obama when he was running, or which ones have "endorsed" Clinton this go round...because quite frankly..I don't really care.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
60. I don't get it either
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:37 PM
Aug 2015

I'm not going to vote for someone on the basis of an endorsement. I'm perfectly able to make this decision on my own.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
62. Well, basically what they are saying
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:41 PM
Aug 2015

is it doesn't matter who you support, if you don't support the establishment candidate that is, because the fact of the matter is that political endorsements equals "delegates" at the convention, and those delegates are truly what matters; not public preference. Small 'd' democracy.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
26. Yeah, but you're talking about Democrats.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:33 AM
Aug 2015

The 'Not Hillary' Party is more of a... What do you call it?...

Ah, yes.

A 'Third Way.'

Response to corkhead (Reply #58)

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
89. OMG
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 04:34 PM
Aug 2015

That is the person that was sending me PMs about a week ago...I was shocked.

I Blocked and Alerted...don't tell me that they aren't gone?!?!

Total harassment.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
77. Nor the choice of the Congressional elite.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:21 PM
Aug 2015

That he hasn't been endorsed by many in that lot makes me like him more.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
28. Since a great many millions rely on their jobs at corporations
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:34 AM
Aug 2015

to put food on the table and a roof over their heads, a pro-business candidate is the best candidate. The issue then becomes corporate responsibility and labor protections. Hillary can take care of both of those and do it well.

Bernie has pretty much peaked anyway. He won't be much of a factor in the grand scheme of things. It worked out very well in the 90's.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
32. The real leader, the real creator, the real innovator, the real builder, the real solution-finder
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:37 AM
Aug 2015

is nearly always - at first - in the EXTREME MINORITY. History has taught us that.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
35. I have never been swayed by endorsements.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:46 AM
Aug 2015

Perhaps endorsements matter to low information voters, but not to this one.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
37. If you are referring to Bernie, it means that he
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:52 AM
Aug 2015

is truly outside the corruption that is present day Washington. While the rest of them are playing power politics among themselves, Bernie is reaching out to the people with his message. The power of the people is the only endorsement he needs.

rock

(13,218 posts)
41. Remarkable: 124,222 is approximately the many times the post
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Aug 2015

"Clinton voted for Iraq War" has been posted on DU!

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
46. Nope. That's hardly ever an OP headline.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:24 AM
Aug 2015

But it is contained in at least 34,321 other posts. But please, tell me again, why would anyone have voted for that war when we all knew the info being given out was fake.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
40. Congress has an approval rating lower than Satan's....
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:03 AM
Aug 2015

so it would seem that getting their endorsements might not necessarily help anyone.

TBF

(32,062 posts)
42. Having the support of millions of Americans
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 11:15 AM
Aug 2015

who are not bought & paid for is more important than the paid representatives. Or at least it should be. We shall see.

-none

(1,884 posts)
54. Evidence that some of those endorsers should be primaried.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:20 PM
Aug 2015

We need many more people in Congress with the people in mind.

Vinca

(50,276 posts)
55. Bernie is not a traditional politician like 99% of those in Congress.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:23 PM
Aug 2015

He will not line up and do tricks on command for donations and play lap dog to a party line that is promoting the "presumed" candidate. That's why I support him. If the votes come in and he's beating Hillary, her endorsements will jump ship as fast as they jumped on.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
57. I suppose if Cronyism is part of your political litmus test
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:32 PM
Aug 2015

it might be important to you. For me personally, political endorsements by other politicians means squat because cronyism doesn't necessarily legitimize a candidacy. I do believe that avoidance of the discussion of issues by placing importance on the non-important is par for the course for establishment candidates. I have seen the reference to political endorsements translate to delegates, however this validates precisely Sanders words on the degradation of our democracy; wherein public opinion be damned because the oligarchy owns the delegates, and factually THEY are the only ones that matter; Diebold can handle the rest.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
59. Excuses does not erase the fact Bernie has not gotten any endorsements, having worked with others
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:36 PM
Aug 2015

in my lifetime, I knew the importance in teamwork. In Congress it most important you work with others, this is how bills are passed, you can sponsor all the bills and if you do not have teamwork those bills will not get passed. You have to work across lines and talk with others to even get the message out you want a bill passed and why it is important, WTH happened.

TheBlackAdder

(28,207 posts)
64. ZOMG! These crappy OPs need to stop! That 'Warning' is passive aggressive BTW!
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:50 PM
Aug 2015

.


Just another OP that's sole purpose is to poke a stick in other people's cages. Nothing more!


.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
68. LOL... when a body that ranks in the low teens AT BEST when it comes to approval ratings...
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:00 PM
Aug 2015

Angst about which of them endorse you is completely misplaced.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
69. There are several diseases with higher approval ratings than Congress.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:01 PM
Aug 2015

I'm not sure running on "Congress likes me" is a terribly smart strategy.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
72. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:11 PM
Aug 2015

Because when people look for leadership and courage, they look towards the US congress.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
73. dems will support dems or lose backing
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:13 PM
Aug 2015

Sanders is an independent. Actually with most of the people in congress, if they did support Sanders, I would lose a little respect for Sanders because he is not like the others.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
75. Ding ding ding! We have a new meme! Last one didn't work out so good.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:59 PM
Aug 2015

Hey, when all else fails, you can talk about his funny hair or his beloved out-of-wedlock son.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
84. those endorsements should really influence a lot independants, first-time, and disaffected voters..
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 03:08 PM
Aug 2015

especially with congressional approval ratings being through the roof.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
92. when that same Congress consistently has a <20% approval rating among voters perhaps
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 05:46 PM
Aug 2015

lack of their 'endorsement' isn't such a bad thing afterall

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
111. so you're saying the rank and file do not matter it's the party 'officials' who are the in control
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 05:35 AM
Aug 2015

Last edited Mon Aug 24, 2015, 10:52 AM - Edit history (1)

of the choice of candidate?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
95. I wouod have thought he would have at least one by now.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 06:36 PM
Aug 2015

He probably will get some but it is interesting he didn't get one.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
105. He got Jesse Ventura's endorsement. He and Alex Jones are best buds, but AJ wants Cruz as POTUS.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:43 PM
Aug 2015
Also fully in favor of Rand's national and state by state personhood laws. So we'll see how this shakes out. AJ is on the SPLC list, too.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
107. Yes, but he was a GOVERNOR. That's gotta count for something. Maybe Jesse's just catching a ride.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 10:59 PM
Aug 2015

Yes, Jesse's definitely a Truther, but I haven't heard anything about Sanders on that issue. I don't think he's ever gone in for the False Flag stuff, really.

I don't know how many of BS's supporters are in that group. I believe they've suffered from a Libertarian infiltration like Occupy did and they don't know what to do with them. AJ called for Libertarians and Ron Paul supporters to get into Occupy because he said they were getting with the anti-capitalist folks.

Their philosophy also does not work with BS's AFAIK, even though he is clearly not a pure socialist at all. He is willing to push MIC programs which benefit capitalists and gives jobs. So the fact that a lot of socialists have endorsed him may not be what some people expect. IDK if he sought endorsements from any of these folks.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
100. No, it's not *Congress* that the president is supposed to serve
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:00 PM
Aug 2015

It's the POPULACE. The LAND and it's PEOPLE.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When not a single member ...