2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs it fair to judge Romney for the comments of his donators?
We are seeing how these people were paying $50,000 a plate and $75,000 per couple say things like "We are V.I.P." and "The common people don't' understand". I just heard a GOP talking head say that wasn't fair.
Well, first YES! It is because Romney showed during the primary he would do anything to win. So, if showing the vast separation between Romney and the 99%, it is completely fair.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Probably more than any recent candidate.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,705 posts)madaboutharry
(40,211 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)elleng
(130,913 posts)its reasonable to look at peoples' friends and associates as a reflection of the values of those people, imo.
procon
(15,805 posts)Why not?
Palin's race baiting comments attracted those with a similar mindset. Romney's remarks about how he plans to reward those in his own class, is likewise drawing the attention of the aristocracy who would benefit if he were ever elected.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)just like Robme!
flobee1
(870 posts)you lie down with dogs......
bluerum
(6,109 posts)Those are his suppoters. His donors. The people he will cow tow to if he is elected.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)The question was posed by a republican talking head, I was answering just as you.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Meaning bowing very low.
Igel
(35,310 posts)The image of cow-towing has a certain appeal.
Even if Romney is towing cows to only the wealthy.
"Whoa, Betsy! I'm supposed to be dragging you! Stop, you damned cow!"
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)You can call a cow and get it to come if it knows your voice, you can chase a cow, but you aren't going to tow one if they object.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Whom, exactly, do you suppose he would serve if God forbid he is elected? You and me?
Pfeh.
333maxwell
(16 posts)Just sayin.
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Welcome to DU!
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)IndyJones
(1,068 posts)and his wife's. So it's difficult to separate his donors comments from his. It's the sense of "we're better and they are less intelligent" that seems to be so pervasive. It's like when he made a comment about how his wife drives American cars, and he was talking about her having several. Or when he made the $10K bet with Perry. Just so out of touch and grossly offensive. It's almost impossible to not think of the "let them eat cake" comment.
Igel
(35,310 posts)Many wealthy--not all, by any means--are jackasses whatever their politics.
Like the wealthy that donate to Obama don't think that most Americans are dolts. Just hang out in Malibu for a while, or try going to some snooty places frequented by the rich. There are a lot of right asses, but there are also quite a few left behinds.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Romney would sell his soul to anybody who will make him President. The voters have a right to know who is behind the curtain pulling his strings should he be elected. A vote for Romney is a vote for the 1%, his lords and masters.
DCKit
(18,541 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)They don't hesitate to hang the actions/comments of Democratic donors, activists, etc. around us whenever they think that they might gain some political advantage from doing so, right? Remember, the Obama campaign has had to denounce Bill Maher, as well as Hillary Rosen for comments they've made. What's good for the goose.................
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Not lately, that's for damn sure.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,658 posts)so, no crying about it either. (Apologies to Tom Hanks )
The Repubs are working the refs, nothing else.
IF W. Mitt Romney would denounce said comments, then it would not be unreasonable to drop the subject. I've yet to hear W Mitt Romney do anything but parrot the same types of comments. So screw 'em.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Tell who your friends are and I will tell you who you are. She does have a point.
shanen
(349 posts)I think we should view this topic within the scope of how to use it effectively against Romney, which in today's American politics mostly means the most effective ads, usually negative ads. The topic has been added to the thread below, but in the context of Thurston Howell, perhaps the most famous fake millionaire in America.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=37926