Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,437 posts)
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 12:11 PM Jul 2012

At what point

do Republicans, particularly those in the House, start "co-owning" the economy? Every time the jobs report come out and it's weaker than expected, the Republicans slam President Obama up and down about it and blame his policies for not creating jobs and the pundits get busy debating about whether or not the jobs report is "good" for President Obama or "bad" for President Obama but nobody seems to ever question the increasingly pervasive premise that the President is basically expected to "create jobs" with his bare hands and that if the private/public sector doesn't consistently deliver "good" numbers, it's his fault alone. There are probably a few things POTUS might be able to unilaterally tweak at the executive level to help the economy but, basically, his ability to create jobs pretty much rests on proposing legislative measures that might help create jobs.

So, what has President Obama done on that score? Well, of course, there was the dreaded and much maligned stimulus plan that he and a Democratic Congress was able to get passed (with the aid of 3 Republicans) which, while smaller than it ultimately needed to be, brought unemployment down and kept us from falling over the cliff. Second, he proposed the American Jobs Act late last year but Congress has failed to act on it for the past year. The House has refused to hold a vote on it and/or work out any kind of bipartisan compromise with President Obama and the Senate Republicans would eagerly filibuster it in the Senate so that it wouldn't even be brought up for a vote. Given that this is an election year, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Republicans- still primarily obsessed with repealing ACA- will NOT do anything substantive for the rest of the year on jobs or anything else. Recent history, I think, will bear me out on this, unfortunately.

So, I ask again, WHEN are Republicans going to start "feeling the heat" about NOT doing anything about jobs? They ran in 2010 on focusing on jobs yet they spent last year madly trying to repeal ACA, gut Planned Parenthood, NPR, and pretty much any government and/or social safety net program they hate in the name of cutting the deficit. On top of all that, they decided to act out a nearly year-long drama over raising the debt ceiling, which appeared ultimately delivered a "kick to the gut" to the economy and, worse, resulted in the first ever downgrade of our country's credit rating, largely due to the dysfunctional mess that Congress has become due to rampant Republican Tea Party obstructionism. President Obama introduced the American Jobs Act in the fall of last year but nothing has been done on it since in the House, which the Republicans control. I would suggest that the Democratic-controlled Senate hold a vote on it but the Republicans will, of course, ensure that it never comes close to getting an up-or-down vote.

Is the GOP "economic sabotage" meme starting to get out there and, more importantly, is ANYBODY in the corporate media starting to notice? Are the American people starting to notice at all?



The basic message that President Obama needs to communicate to the electorate between now and November is that the economy was a mess when he took office and his policies helped make things better but the Republicans have repeatedly kneecapped every other effort to create jobs and reduce unemployment and have no viable plans to do differently if given total control of the country (again) in November, just more of the same old policies that got us into the previous mess even though the Republicans will then be saddled with the mess, so I'm not sure how this really works towards their long-term advantage but I guess I'm not entirely sure that matters to them either. Nothing seems to matter much to them other than power and their ability to implement their radical agenda.



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At what point (Original Post) Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2012 OP
It's probably the same reason the Dems don't take responsibility for the Bush mess... Mayflower1 Jul 2012 #1
2 years of the Dems controlling Congress Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2012 #4
To the Right wing DonCoquixote Jul 2012 #2
Excellent thread! budkin Jul 2012 #3
It's sickening Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2012 #5

Mayflower1

(100 posts)
1. It's probably the same reason the Dems don't take responsibility for the Bush mess...
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 12:25 PM
Jul 2012

as they controlled Congress for the last 2 years of his presidency. Unfortunately, the President takes the fall for the economy, no matter who actually caused the mess. By the same token, he also gets the credit for it, when he really isn't solely responsible for the success. (This is the argument the Repubs use for Bill Clinton's success, they claim it was actually the Repubs in both houses of Congress at the time Bill Clinton was President.)

It's politics.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,437 posts)
4. 2 years of the Dems controlling Congress
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 12:28 PM
Jul 2012

was not enough to change anything in regards to Bushonomics, particularly since George W. Bush would've refused (and actually DID refuse to sign) anything they sent him and/or Senate Republicans made sure to prevent anything potentially embarrassing from coming up for an actual vote in the Senate. The 2008 meltdown was years in the making- several years in which all three branches were controlled by Republicans.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
2. To the Right wing
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 12:25 PM
Jul 2012
IT IS NEVER, EVER THEIR FAULT!

They have formed 30 years of lies, starting with the deficit they made. Sometimes we just have to stop treating fanatics as if they have reason.

budkin

(6,716 posts)
3. Excellent thread!
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 12:28 PM
Jul 2012

The media never talks about how the House deliberately stonewalls any legislation that would help create jobs solely for the purpose of attacking the president in the economy. Goddamn it pisses me off. They actually celebrate when there are bad job numbers. Obama needs to keep hammering this over and over.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,437 posts)
5. It's sickening
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 12:30 PM
Jul 2012

to see the corporate media and the Republicans treating the anemic job numbers as a political windfall for them.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»At what point