2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSuddenly, Hillary Clinton Is a Critic of the TPP
http://inthesetimes.com/article/18284/suddenly-hillary-clinton-is-a-critic-of-the-tppAs with similar business-backed trade pacts, labor unions, environmental groups and public health organizations are warning that the deal could result in job losses, reduced environmental standards, higher prices for medicine and more power for corporations looking to overturn public interest laws. And so, in her quest for Democratic primary votes, Clinton is suddenly trying to cast herself as a critic of the initiative.
I did not work on TPP, she said after a meeting with leaders of labor unions who oppose the pact. I advocated for a multinational trade agreement that would 'be the gold standard.' But that was the responsibility of the United States Trade Representative....
CNN has reported that during her tenure as U.S. secretary of state, Clinton publicly promoted the pact 45 separate times. At a congressional hearing in 2011, Clinton told lawmakers that with respect to the TPP, although the State Department does not have the lead on thisit is the United States Trade Representativewe work closely with the USTR. Additionally, secret State Department cables published by the website WikiLeaks show that her agencyincluding her top aideswere deeply involved in the diplomatic deliberations over the trade deal.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)consistent message. To hell with the polls. I bet she's one hell of a lawyer, she just isn't a terribly good politician.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)it's in serious danger of dying hard, thanks to the Hawaii meeting. Once a bunch of other countries saw how it would raise the cost of pharmas, they started backing away.
dangerous dan
(15 posts)Speaking in Australia in 2012, she said the "TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40 percent of the world's total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment."
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Wasn't that attached to Kerry by republicans? Nice people you are emulating.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)TPP must produce jobs, raise wages, & protect security
An MSNBC reporter asked Clinton on April 21 whether she had concerns about the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade agreement the Obama administration is in the process of negotiating, According to CBS, Clinton responded, "Any trade deal has to produce jobs and raise wages and increase prosperity and protect our security. We have to do our part in making sure we have the capabilities and the skills to be competitive. It's got to be really a partnership between our business, our government, our workforce, the intellectual property that comes out of our universities, and we have to get back to a much more focused effort in my opinion to try to produce those capacities here at home so that we can be competitive in a global economy."
Source: National Journal 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Apr 27, 2015
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Free_Trade.htm
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)How about raise drug prices world wide?
produce jobs in China India and other low wage countries
and raise wages in those same countries
and increase prosperity of the .001%
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's a boatload of rotten. Trade agreements should be only about trade. Period.
They should not meddle in civil law, and public policy of participating nations.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Who's telling the truth?
I did not work on TPP, she said after a meeting with leaders of labor unions who oppose the pact. I advocated for a multinational trade agreement that would 'be the gold standard.' But that was the responsibility of the United States Trade Representative.
She "advocated for A (capitalization and emphasis mine) multinational trade agreement that would be the gold standard? Or... did she call TPP "the gold standard"?
My question is this... did she TEACH the Master, or did she LEARN from the Master? "It depends on what the meaning of IS, IS."
Divernan
(15,480 posts)Pat Boone eviscerates Deep Purple's Smoke on the Water
&feature=youtu.be
Mick Jagger wept! With the exception of the one guitar solo, those musicians were lobotomized. Back in the 50s, Boone could take an R&B classic from Little Richard or Fats Domino and surgically remove any trace of soul from the recording. Flash forward to 1997, he dons leather & records In a Metal Mood, a collection of hard covers. Songs by Deep Purple, Judas Priest, AC DC, Alice Cooper all received the Pat Boone bleaching. Oh, the humanity!
xocet
(3,871 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Make it STOP!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)HFRN
(1,469 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)6 of them were in office and voted for CAFTA. Those same 6 also voted for NAFTA as members of the Senate or the House.
I'm in a Union and I've followed trade policy for most of my life. But DU wanted to talk about Hillary with the TPA vote as well, DU could have been focused on those 6 Senators.
Bernie Sanders voted against NAFTA and CAFTA and many of the other crappy trade deals. He is my choice on the issue and for nominee. However, of our spectrum of candidates, Lincoln Chafee is far and away the strongest free trader, having voted for and promoted all that came his way, including CAFTA. Which Hillary voted against.
Hillary Clinton has always had standards for trade deals. She likes more of them than I do, but she rejects the worst of the worst. A mixed bag. This makes Sanders the better choice, but I think if a person is actually an activist in trade policy, knowing the actual nature and voting records of important political figures is far more useful than dealing in rhetoric and characterization. Reality can be very useful.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Weren't we told repeatedly that she couldn't come out against it because it would be disrespectful to her boss?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She's been against it all along and it just weighed on her conscience until she had to speak up.
Or something.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Bloomberg
Jan 10, 2013
In an article titled: "Hillary Clinton's Business Legacy at the State Department"
Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-01-10/hillary-clintons-business-legacy-at-the-state-department#p2
Hmmmm....what to believe ...
I know, I believe I'll vote for Bernie!
I know exactly where he's at on TPP...no question about it.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)She needs to try and get her story straight.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)cuz i am smelling manure.....
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)"But somebody else screwed it up..."
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)She was integrally involved in all of the major initiatives of the first term of the administration, said Rice, who served as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations when Clinton was Secretary of State. She was instrumental in formulating and implementing the rebalance to Asia, of which the Trans-Pacific Partnership is a part.
http://inthesetimes.com/article/18284/suddenly-hillary-clinton-is-a-critic-of-the-tpp
KoKo
(84,711 posts)She will eventually claim she didn't really know what was in it. Sigh....
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Can't wait to hear her wiggle out of a question concerning TPP during the debates. Come to think of it, I wonder if Debbie DNC would even allow the question.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)will keep tpp questions out or minimal.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Fool me once. ..
eridani
(51,907 posts)Namely, that any claim a public figure has made can be instantly checked and compared with previous claims due to those internets tubes. Apparently not.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)aka mr. "minister of explaining stuff."
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)The deal is looking to be delayed and wounded and maybe even killed, with several countries balking over the big American pharma protections in it.
She knows that the TPP riles the Democratic left wing, but waits to speak out against it only after outside forces are likely to hurt or kill the damned thing?
I was willing to give her a pass on her belated support for equal rights (that is an issue that takes a long time to be resolved, aspecially for people over a certain age) and I was glad when she went public about her change of heart.
But now I feel duped. She really doesn't come out against odious matters until it is politically safe to do so. She really hasn't changed since 2007. And for what little it is worth, she just lost my confidence in her leadership. This isn't leading, this is following.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)They hear something that is not true. It is restated again and again, until they believe it. "Suddenly, Hillary Clinton Is a Critic of the TPP," is an example. It has not been sudden. It has been the same stance she has had from the beginning.
An agreement is not a bad thing, depending on what is in it. That is what Clinton has said all along.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)She'll tell us after the election what her specific trade policies would be
You're right, she's not suddenly a critic of TPP. She just mouths off a bunch of platitudes to avoid telling us where she really stands..
However Hillary accidentally dropped her real priorities in among the platitudes in an article she wrote not very long ago that's posted on DU regarding the TPP.
Among other lofty goals, she said a trade agreement like TPP should "promote ..the coherence of our regulatory system"
Do you understand what that is code for? It means all nations should abide by the same laws and public policies set by.....whom? How about shadowy entities designated by Big Corporations and their minions?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)instead of bringing other country standards to ours, we will drop to theirs.
bigger profits for the corporate overlords
somehow, certain people always forget to flesh that out. funny, that
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Susan Rice says she was "integrally involved".
Who's telling the truth?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And the Giants.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)and if there were no Bums, I'd be a Giants fan as well.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Laugh. Out. Fucking. Loud.
So you're throwing Susan Rice under the bus AND calling her a liar? Because she begs to differ.