Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

totodeinhere

(13,059 posts)
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 12:45 AM Aug 2015

O’Malley: Dems tilting race toward Hillary

Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley in an exclusive interview Wednesday with The Hill accused party insiders of trying to tilt the primary contest in Hillary Clinton's favor.

O’Malley lit into the Democratic Party for seeking to limit the number of presidential debates, which he said would help Clinton glide to the nomination.

O’Malley said he raised the issue with the chairwoman of the Democratic Party, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), during last week’s National Urban League conference in Fort Lauderdale.

“There's an effort by a few insiders to try to limit the number of debates that we have and I've shared with the chair — Debbie Wasserman Schultz — that I think that’s a grave mistake and I think it's undemocratic,” O'Malley told The Hill in between in-between campaign stops in Cedar Rapids and Des Moines.

I agree with O'Malley. The establishment of the Democratic Party is trying to fix the primary election for Hillary Clinton. But I have news for the them. They are not the party. We the base are the party and we will choose the nominee, not them.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/250372-omalley-dems-tilting-race-toward-hillary-clinton
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
O’Malley: Dems tilting race toward Hillary (Original Post) totodeinhere Aug 2015 OP
O'Malley and Bernie is Hillary, she has the experience and ability. the two needs to understand Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #1
. Purveyor Aug 2015 #2
Try some facts, THINKabout it: elleng Aug 2015 #3
I tried some facts, on your fact 5, has O'Malley gone to migrant camps seeking childern to see Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #9
This isn't the Special Olympics. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #4
....did you JackInGreen Aug 2015 #5
No, but just because she is a woman is not a reason to cry the dems are tilting the race towards Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #10
I think the reason JackInGreen Aug 2015 #11
How is not having debates before any candidates tilted towards anyone? Allow the GOP to run Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #12
I think the only person JackInGreen Aug 2015 #13
Your opinion, no proof. IMO, having 26 is a clown car. Name recognition is not experience or Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #15
This is not going to go well for Debbie Wasserman Schultz bigdarryl Aug 2015 #6
Progressives haven't made the DLC/3rd Way redundant in years of trying HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #7
I think people are just tired of long primaries ericson00 Aug 2015 #8
This isnt a monarchy Report1212 Aug 2015 #16
Just smdh head at that attitude.. frylock Aug 2015 #20
The Presidency isn't a lifetime achievement award.. frylock Aug 2015 #19
its also not an award for being "anybody but ________" ericson00 Aug 2015 #23
People have been very explicit as to why they would rather not have Clinton.. frylock Aug 2015 #24
Your performance art is made of AWESOME! n/t winter is coming Aug 2015 #21
people aren't, the DNC and Hillary are..... virtualobserver Aug 2015 #26
Dear Martin.... Adrahil Aug 2015 #14
But that's not the point. The problem is that the DNC is attempting to protect totodeinhere Aug 2015 #18
Now that's bravery RobertEarl Aug 2015 #17
O'Malley's right. Hillary is a weak candidate, and DWS knows it. winter is coming Aug 2015 #22
Whiners bug me. n/t Evergreen Emerald Aug 2015 #25

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. O'Malley and Bernie is Hillary, she has the experience and ability. the two needs to understand
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 12:59 AM
Aug 2015

this is a fact and not try to crush the woman. If either of these guys had the same experience and ability then she could cry the same story.

elleng

(131,084 posts)
3. Try some facts, THINKabout it:
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 01:14 AM
Aug 2015

Martin O'Malley, among OTHER things:

1. Ended death penalty in Maryland
2. Prevented fracking in Maryland and put regulations in the way to prevent next GOP Gov Hogan fom easily allowing fracking.
3. Provided health insurance for 380,000
4. Reduced infant mortality to an all time low.
5. Provided meals to thousands of hungry children and moved toward a goal for eradicating childhood hunger.
6. Enacted a $10.10 living wage and a $11. minimum wage for State workers.
7. Supported the Dream Act
8. Cut income taxes for 86% of Marylanders (raised taxes on the rich).
9. Reformed Maryland’s tax code to make it more progressive.
10. Enacted some of the nation’s most comprehensive reforms to protect homeowners from foreclosure.

Mother Jones magazine called him the best candidate on environmental issues.
Article here:
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/12/martin-omalley-longshot-presidential-candidate-and-real-climate-hawk

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
9. I tried some facts, on your fact 5, has O'Malley gone to migrant camps seeking childern to see
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:55 AM
Aug 2015

what it would take to get those children in schools and their well being including health care? I have researched O'Malley and I determined Hillary does have more foreign experience, she has advocated for children in her work with the Children's Defense Fund, she could have accepted a position in a large law firm but wanted to work with to help children. She has advocated for women's rights, trying to get the pay equalized between men and women. She has sponsored bills to tie the minimum wage increases to raises for Congress, it did not pass but she has worked to get the minimum wages on a steady increase. The last federal minimum wage increase she worked hard to get. She supports the Dream Act. She presented healthcare to Congress in 1993, it did not get passed but has advocated for healthcare. I am not degrading O'Malley or Bernie but this Dems are tilting the race towards Hillary is not true anymore than they would be tilting the race towards O'Malley and Bernie. I have been disappointed in the showing O'Malley has had but to say it is tilted for Hillary just may not be a factor, Hillary just may be polling because many others knows her record.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
5. ....did you
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 06:12 AM
Aug 2015

Just advocate "taking it easy" (though I don't see either even vaguely attempting to "crush" her) because she's a woman with experience and ability?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
10. No, but just because she is a woman is not a reason to cry the dems are tilting the race towards
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:59 AM
Aug 2015

Hillary and we know the history of who has priority in hiring, etc for many years, it is a long hard fought battle and now that Hillary is polling better the statement of the dems are tilting the race towards Hillary is another reason to cry poor me, Hillary is polling better than they are.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
11. I think the reason
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:04 AM
Aug 2015

There's an accusation of a tilt is that by this time election year we'd had 6 debates and no restrictions (I think) on candidates to debate on their own. Now we have Hillarys former national campaign co-chair scheduling them amd we get nothing until october.
I think that's adequate to breed suspicion. Her gender doesn't come into it.
do you really think the only reason for the suspicion is mysogyny?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
12. How is not having debates before any candidates tilted towards anyone? Allow the GOP to run
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:10 AM
Aug 2015

their clown car, they are not having as many debates either. Neither does the fact they are only planning 6 debates, it is protecting the DNC candidates. If the candidates are incapable of getting their stand on the issues across to the voters in 6 debates then 26 isn't going to help.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
13. I think the only person
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:22 AM
Aug 2015

Defended by having 6 debates is hillary.

When the July Quinnipiac poll says that 2% to 3% need to know more about Hill; But 43% need to know more about Bernie, I think the only person defended is the one with more name recognition. The others can only benefit from exposure.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
15. Your opinion, no proof. IMO, having 26 is a clown car. Name recognition is not experience or
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:57 AM
Aug 2015

ability. Bernie is responsible for getting his name and abilities to the public.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
7. Progressives haven't made the DLC/3rd Way redundant in years of trying
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:21 AM
Aug 2015

Letting the insiders take up the mission of destroying themselves may be for the best.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
8. I think people are just tired of long primaries
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:42 AM
Aug 2015

like we had in 2004 and 2008. Sometimes, there is nothing wrong with a nice orderly window dressing show. Hillary has earned the nomination, its been a long time coming.

Report1212

(661 posts)
16. This isnt a monarchy
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 12:11 PM
Aug 2015

Where we "owe" it to some figure who's been around to give them power. This is about the country not figureheads

frylock

(34,825 posts)
19. The Presidency isn't a lifetime achievement award..
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 03:40 PM
Aug 2015

Hillary hasn't earned jack crap until the votes are counted.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
23. its also not an award for being "anybody but ________"
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 04:45 PM
Aug 2015

which seems to be the only serious cases for Clinton's rivals

frylock

(34,825 posts)
24. People have been very explicit as to why they would rather not have Clinton..
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 05:49 PM
Aug 2015

all pretty much based upon policy. It's the Clinton supporters that are focused more on personality.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251498806#post7

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
14. Dear Martin....
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:30 AM
Aug 2015

Debates are not gonna catapult you from 3% to 40%+. Won;t happen. But you're still my second choice!

totodeinhere

(13,059 posts)
18. But that's not the point. The problem is that the DNC is attempting to protect
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 02:14 PM
Aug 2015

Clinton by limiting debates. That is wrong. They should be neutral. If debates won't help O'Malley then so be it but at least let him debate and get his views out.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
17. Now that's bravery
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 12:52 PM
Aug 2015

The man is standing up to the power structure that can crush him.

Unlike some, he is showing true bravery by standing up for true Democracy. You who are opposing more debates could learn a lot from O'Malley.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
22. O'Malley's right. Hillary is a weak candidate, and DWS knows it.
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 03:46 PM
Aug 2015

You don't risk making your candidate look desperate by rigging the game unless you're afraid they'll need it. Congratulations, DWS, you just handed the GOP another stick to beat us with. Moron!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»O’Malley: Dems tilting ra...