O’Malley: Dems tilting race toward Hillary Clinton. The Hill
CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA — Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley in an exclusive interview Wednesday with The Hill accused party insiders of trying to tilt the primary contest in Hillary Clinton's favor.
O’Malley lit into the Democratic Party for seeking to limit the number of presidential debates, which he said would help Clinton glide to the nomination.
O’Malley said he raised the issue with the chairwoman of the Democratic Party, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), during last week’s National Urban League conference in Fort Lauderdale.
“There's an effort by a few insiders to try to limit the number of debates that we have and I've shared with the chair — Debbie Wasserman Schultz — that I think that’s a grave mistake and I think it's undemocratic,” O'Malley told The Hill in between in-between campaign stops in Cedar Rapids and Des Moines.
“It's all about trying to pre-ordain the outcome, circle the wagons and close off debate,” O'Malley said. “If they could actually accelerate the date of the Iowa caucuses and hold them tomorrow — they'd like to do that. Then there'd be no campaign at all. That's what they'd really like.”
Asked if the party insiders included the Clintons, O'Malley said: “Of course they are. President and Secretary Clinton are the most colossal, prolific fundraising couple in the history of representative democracies.”
An aide then reminded O'Malley that he was on the record.
“I know,” O'Malley answered, before continuing. “So yes — lots of people have long histories with the Clintons.”
O’Malley said he told Wasserman Schultz of his concerns.
“I told her that I didn't feel that the party was listening to our concerns and I told her that limiting the number of debates before the first contest would be a grave mistake,” he said. “The people have a right to hear what the candidates stand for. We need to have a debate.”
DNC spokeswoman Holly Shulman said in a statement that DNC officials are “thrilled to hear that Governor O’Malley is eager to participate in our debates.” . . .
His comments on Wednesday also reflected his belief that the debates with Clinton, Sanders and other candidates could help his campaign.
“This isn't about the Clintons or the O'Malleys — this is about our country,” said O’Malley, who noted that he backed Clinton for president in 2008.
“And to limit the number of debates in the Democratic Party in a year as important as this? To tell Iowa that they can only have one? Or to tell New Hampshire they can only have one? I don't know where these people — it's the arrogance and the elitism that's creeped into so many aspects of our national party.”
He said that such leadership in Washington “has people very angry and very fed up and wondering if anybody's still on their side.”
“Of all the years we should be having a debate — this is the year they want to exercise their control and try to make the presidential debate some sort of exclusive where we're only aloud to have a handful of them. We had already had six of them, I think by this time last time around.”
During a campaign stop later Wednesday afternoon, O'Malley was more measured in his criticism against party leaders regarding the debates and Clinton, saying that he has a “great deal of respect and admiration” for the former secretary of State.
O'Malley also ripped Clinton, the front-runner for her party’s nomination, for not taking clear positions on the issues —and suggested that could cost her.
“Her positions and her lack of positions are becoming very apparent to more and more people across Iowa and New Hampshire,” O'Malley said. “People will not long tolerate any candidate who tries to duck or avoid debates or fails to take a position. I know that, for my part, I'm not going to duck.”
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/250372-omalley-dems-tilting-race-toward-hillary-clinton
= new reply since forum marked as read
Confiding in his office ficus would be about as productive, I think. 
and the gloves are OFF!!!
on national TV. We all know how the M$M loves to cover what's really
going on behind the curtain, don't we? Oh wait ...
But seriously, I do think it would get enough airtime to stir the pot enough to
get Wasserman to schedule the fucking debates, in a much more fair way than
she's now doing.
I'm grateful to O'Malley for going public on this, and calling DW out on it.
Well Done Martin O'Malley! You are not my candidate at this time, but hats off
to you for doing this before it further cripples democracy within the party that
carries it's name and it's mantel.
Thought I was the only person watching him!!! 
We watched together.
I just like how he simply asked questions and let people answer.
I know, we are kinda nuts!
neither are WE!
I've left my home at the river for a long weekend in NJ with family (daughter + little grandson,) so when I return I'll get back to MY art, which is like this:
YOU I applaud! 
but then again maybe it IS a 'one,' awaiting coronation 
The PARTY should have removed her. No guts, imo.
Can you say e-mails? Just to name one.
It is sad.
Avoiding the APPEARANCE of impropriety is just as necessary as avoiding impropriety itself. Reducing the number of debates by SEVENTY-FIVE per cent when only Hillary has major national exposure creates the appearance (if not the reality) of Wasserman Schultz trying to create a mulligan. Maybe she should recuse herself from this aspect of the DNC chairpersonship.
rocktivity
P.S. If Rachel Maddow doesn't at least touch on this subject, I'm going to be extremely disappointed.
