Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 12:19 PM Aug 2015

If You Break It, You Own It - Hillary's vote for the war is the defining issue for me

ISIS is just one more side effect that Hillary owns.

For the thousands that are dead, American, Iraqi or otherwise, their problems are over, but
for the people left behind, the hundreds of thousands with injured bodies and minds, their
war continues, although the body count rises with each suicide.

I know that people say that she has apologized for her mistake. She is not the only one
who enabled Bush and Cheney.

Tell that to the people who have had their arms, legs and worse blown off, or have traumatic
brain injuries. (hundreds of thousands with PTSD)

In jobs that I have held since the invasion of Iraq, I have met many veterans of that war.
They are the best people that I have ever met.....many of them dealing with horrific injuries
to body and soul, often amazingly without complaint. Many of them also feeling guilt that they
are no longer there to support their comrades.

We owe them more than a mere "thank you for your service". We owe them
judicious use of their service and sacrifice.

State Senator Barack Obama and Representative Bernie Sanders could see through the nonsense.

The more important point though.....What I would have wanted her to do then
was LEAD the fight against the war.....that didn't happen

..If I could see through the nonsense that Bush and Cheney were peddling,
why should I choose someone for the office of President who couldn't?

THE ROAD OF GOOD INTENTIONS (2006)
(John Gorka)

There's addition and subtraction, but division overall;
Hope, once in fluid motion, is slowed behind a crawl.
The images are strong and the words are pretty good,
But there's more fiction out of Washington than out of Hollywood.

cho: On the road of good intentions, all gets justified to hell,
The price revealed in stories too short, too sad to tell.

Is this permanent improvement through abbreviated lives,
Or another tragic venture, shocking when the bill arrives?
By the rubble where the house was, there are markers in the dirt.
Children with no need of freedom, they can no longer be hurt.

The soldiers and their families, with life and limb they pay,
While the ones who sent them marching get to dance the night away.
I always come back to the soldiers with their courage and ideals.
I've seen them smoking in the airports. There's no telling how it feels.









84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If You Break It, You Own It - Hillary's vote for the war is the defining issue for me (Original Post) virtualobserver Aug 2015 OP
It is one of the big NOs artislife Aug 2015 #1
One of two big issues for me.... daleanime Aug 2015 #2
Seven Clinton Vulnerabilities EndElectoral Aug 2015 #82
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Aug 2015 #3
IWR shows she either thinks like a neocon so deluded they really think it'll be bloodless MisterP Aug 2015 #4
I trust you said the same things about John Kerry in 2004? brooklynite Aug 2015 #6
I did virtualobserver Aug 2015 #11
As did many of us. zeemike Aug 2015 #23
Yes...the convincing points are rather stale...nt artislife Aug 2015 #75
You're welcome to vote on any issues you want... brooklynite Aug 2015 #5
That is why I supported Barack virtualobserver Aug 2015 #12
Me, too! Nt artislife Aug 2015 #76
That's the one vote I won't hold against her. Vinca Aug 2015 #7
I want a president who can smell the BS before it hits the fan virtualobserver Aug 2015 #13
that would be Palin...she also acts without blinking at 3 am Sheepshank Aug 2015 #50
It is about Hillary being fooled, not gut feelings or odors virtualobserver Aug 2015 #68
And yet, a goodly number of people were skeptical or outright disbelieving of those lies. winter is coming Aug 2015 #14
Bush did not fool me, ever. If I am more capable of exhibiting intrinsic wise judgment in Zorra Aug 2015 #21
Thank you. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #34
Yes, it was obvious at the time that Bush was lying Martin Eden Aug 2015 #74
They deliberately let the genie out of the bottle, and it murdered hundreds of thousands Zorra Aug 2015 #81
Political calculation, hubris, and betrayal Martin Eden Aug 2015 #84
Anyone that listened to the inspectors knew there weren't any weapons of mass destruction. A Simple Game Aug 2015 #22
Hillary did not have access to the briefings given to the Armed Services Committee, pnwmom Aug 2015 #39
I didn't need to listen to any more lies to know they were lying. Many people knew and Hillary's not A Simple Game Aug 2015 #49
Inspections were going on in the winter and spring after the IWR had already been approved. pnwmom Aug 2015 #51
You know what would have been nice? Maybe if at the time we had a Senator Obama A Simple Game Aug 2015 #60
I opposed the war at the time and was unhappy that the IWR was approved. For weeks I'd stood out on a street pnwmom Aug 2015 #61
Sanders did not have access to the briefings either but still voted against the resolution. EndElectoral Aug 2015 #83
She had been out of the White House only a short time. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #32
She trusted those liars to tell the truth? I doubt it. arcane1 Aug 2015 #53
Bernie knew they were lies, I knew they were lies, why couldn't she figure it out? beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #71
She was just doing her job. Nobody could have predicted the results. Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #8
people blame Bush for that JI7 Aug 2015 #9
It could hurt her this time, depending on who the nominee is. virtualobserver Aug 2015 #15
It'll probably be Bush...ain't that a funny circumstance? Sheepshank Aug 2015 #52
Agreed. No interest in a Biden run, for the same reason nt Dems to Win Aug 2015 #10
that is the painful truth virtualobserver Aug 2015 #16
It was for me when she ran against Obama dem in texas Aug 2015 #17
Specifically, HOW did she actually "vote for war"...the details in the legislation she voted for.... George II Aug 2015 #18
We all knew Bush would lie. You could see that coming a mile away. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #20
Friday, October 11, 2002 she voted to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq virtualobserver Aug 2015 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Aug 2015 #67
Did you have the same problem with Kerry/Edwards? Persondem Aug 2015 #19
Both of the, and Clinton, and many others........ George II Aug 2015 #26
only a naive person would have granted Bush that power.....they were hell bent on war virtualobserver Aug 2015 #30
She was already trying to get her resume in order artislife Aug 2015 #77
I desperately wanted Warren to run virtualobserver Aug 2015 #78
I think he cheched in with Elizabeth before he jumped in. artislife Aug 2015 #79
Dean in the primary......Kerry and Edwards were wrong..... virtualobserver Aug 2015 #27
Yeah. I voted for Kucinich in the primaries. Of course I voted for Kerry in the 1monster Aug 2015 #28
Did you get an answer? I am curious. I surely can see NOT voting for Kerry AllFieldsRequired Aug 2015 #54
While it wouldn't stop be from voting for HRC in the general... thesquanderer Aug 2015 #24
I was not happy . . . Gamecock Lefty Aug 2015 #29
I've met some severely injured people who regret it even more than Hillary virtualobserver Aug 2015 #31
No one has a perfect record. I wish Bernie would indicate a change of heart on his anti gun-control votes. pnwmom Aug 2015 #33
A million dead brown people are no big deal, right? Not compared to a lawsuit by white people. arcane1 Aug 2015 #55
How many brown people do you think have died in the US because of our lack of adequate gun control? pnwmom Aug 2015 #57
They die every day in Iraq too n/t arcane1 Aug 2015 #58
Good thing Bernie Sanders is pro-gun control then, eh pnwmom? beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #70
I support Bernie because of his platform but jomin41 Aug 2015 #35
You wanted Hillary to "LEAD the fight against the war"? oasis Aug 2015 #36
opposing the war in Iraq could have saved so many lives virtualobserver Aug 2015 #37
True that. It was no easy decision for any Democrat. oasis Aug 2015 #43
Then she doubled-down by pushing hard for military strikes against Libya Maedhros Aug 2015 #38
and her supposed "regret" about her vote.... 2004 article- Hillary Clinton: No regret on Iraq vote virtualobserver Aug 2015 #40
proof y'all didn't pay ANY ATTENTION AT ALL. the VOTE for iwaq was POLITICALLY timed by asshat W. pansypoo53219 Aug 2015 #41
It required political courage to vote against it. virtualobserver Aug 2015 #42
I wondered about this statement as I could not recall how many voted for or against in the AllFieldsRequired Aug 2015 #56
Sanders was in a safe seat. It did not take all that much political courage Persondem Aug 2015 #62
The debate on whether it was gutless, or a cautious tactical move, or naiveté.... virtualobserver Aug 2015 #72
Like Hillary Kerry voted for it. Biden voted for it, oh John Edwards too! A Simple Game Aug 2015 #59
Yep. Playing politics with lives is over the limit. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #44
This is such a non issue with primary voters . FloridaBlues Aug 2015 #45
Hillary Clinton: No regret on Iraq vote virtualobserver Aug 2015 #47
Tell that to the Cindy Sheehans of the world d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #64
Biden voted for it too; care to tell us what you think? ericson00 Aug 2015 #46
I wouldn't vote for Biden in the primary either virtualobserver Aug 2015 #48
That's why Kerry lost the Dem primary in 2004. JoePhilly Aug 2015 #63
Obama barely passed by? d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #65
That is probably the dumbest descrption of why Hillary lost to Obama ... JoePhilly Aug 2015 #66
Dumbest? Try reading the articles from the time d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #80
It only is important if you care about what happened to the people who served... virtualobserver Aug 2015 #69
^^^this^^^ beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #73

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
2. One of two big issues for me....
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 12:25 PM
Aug 2015

the other being money, which is the road block for any action we want taken.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
82. Seven Clinton Vulnerabilities
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 02:10 PM
Aug 2015

1. Iraq War Vote - voted for it. This is the major one. Perhaps people will be forgiving, but it helped enable the mess that exists to this day. It is the one unforgiveable vote that stops me from even considering her.

2. TPP - writings indicate a pretty strong supporter of it. Unions dramatically against it. Yet, she wants the AFL-CIO endorsement.

3. Keystone XL pipeline - equivocates, refuses to say what she'd do which makes her appear indecisive.

4. Bengazi - left a mess in terms of this phone email and GOP will hammer her on it.

5. Victor Pinchuk scandal - looks very bad in terms of favoritism to Pinchuk with Iran when she was Sec. of State.

6. Bank bailouts and TARP - big difference on their votes on how Sanders and her addressed the market mess. Since banks profited immensely it may be used to attack her as over friendly to the financial sector, especially if her contributions from that area are excessive.

7. Trust- perhaps this may be the biggest one. Do people beyond her most ardent supporters trust her? Polls say no.

Response to virtualobserver (Original post)

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
4. IWR shows she either thinks like a neocon so deluded they really think it'll be bloodless
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 01:57 PM
Aug 2015

and over in 6 months

or she's so venal she wanted to score conservative brownie points (like her anti-flag burning amendment) at the expense of gallons of American and Iraqi blood, or even just bolster MIC derivatives like Feinstein

it had only 48 "yea" votes without the Dems, and any REAL party would've been able to whip its members on something this essential to its reputation and to the wellbeing of the country

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
23. As did many of us.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:58 PM
Aug 2015

But we were told that he could not win just like now...and told we needed a war hero to counter Bush photo op landing on a carrier.

We are told lots of shit that is not true.

brooklynite

(94,571 posts)
5. You're welcome to vote on any issues you want...
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 01:58 PM
Aug 2015

...I'll just observe that this was part of her record in 2008, and she got as many votes as Barack Obama, who opposed the IWR.

Vinca

(50,271 posts)
7. That's the one vote I won't hold against her.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:08 PM
Aug 2015

The Congress was fed heaping piles of BS just like the public. What they were told by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of war criminals were lies.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
50. that would be Palin...she also acts without blinking at 3 am
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:25 PM
Aug 2015

a standard that seem quite weird to me.

A president that doesn't get any info, but acts on gut feelings or odors alone. Not my cuppa tea, thanks.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
14. And yet, a goodly number of people were skeptical or outright disbelieving of those lies.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:33 PM
Aug 2015

Easily deceived? Indifferent? Complicit? None of those make her an appealing candidate.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
21. Bush did not fool me, ever. If I am more capable of exhibiting intrinsic wise judgment in
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:54 PM
Aug 2015

matters of war than a candidate for the office of Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces, then that candidate has no business being Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces.

There is no Monday Morning quarterbacking going on here. It was painfully obvious, crystal clear, to tens of millions on the progressive left, worldwide, that Bush was lying.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people and lay waste to the earth with reckless abandon.


The Bloodstained Path
by Dennis Kucinich
The Progressive magazine, November 2002

Unilateral military action by the United States against Iraq is unjustified, unwarranted, and illegal. The Administration has failed to make the case that Iraq poses an imminent threat to the United States. There is no credible evidence linking Iraq to 9/11. There is no credible evidence linking Iraq to Al Qaeda. Nor is there any credible evidence that Iraq possesses deliverable weapons of mass destruction, or that it intends to deliver them against the United States.
snip---
We know that each day the Administration receives a daily threat assessment. But Iraq is not an imminent threat to this nation. Forty million Americans suffering from inadequate health care is an imminent threat. The high cost of prescription drugs is an imminent threat. The ravages of unemployment is an imminent threat. The slowdown of the economy is an imminent threat, and so, too, the devastating effects of corporate fraud.

America cannot and should not be the world's policeman. America cannot and should not try to pick the leaders of other nations. Nor should America and the American people be pressed into the service of international oil interests and arms dealers.

We must work to bring Iraq back into the community of nations, not through destruction, but through constructive action worldwide. We can help negotiate a resolution with Iraq that encompasses unfettered inspections, the end of sanctions, and the cessation of the regime change policy.

http://www.progressive.org/node/1424


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1509091

Martin Eden

(12,867 posts)
74. Yes, it was obvious at the time that Bush was lying
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 08:55 PM
Aug 2015

We knew about PNAC and we knew that once given the green light Bush would invade come hell or UN inspectors.

There is no excuse for Hillary, Kerry, Biden, et al. They were either too incompetent to be US senators, or they calculated it was politically advantageous to be hawks, or they were on board with the neocon agenda.

Take your pick, it's a disqualifier where my vote is concerned.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
81. They deliberately let the genie out of the bottle, and it murdered hundreds of thousands
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 01:10 PM
Aug 2015

of innocent people, and set in motion the process of destabilization and eternal war for profit.

They are disqualified as too clueless, or malicious, to be President.

(off topic note: Jeb Bush was a signatory of the PNAC manifesto.)

Martin Eden

(12,867 posts)
84. Political calculation, hubris, and betrayal
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 05:22 PM
Aug 2015

It was still the post 9/11 political environment, and Bush had not yet spent his political capital. Prominent Democrats like John Kerry and Hillary Clinton must have known GW was feeding the public a line of BS, but they stuck their finger in the political winds and calculated they needed to be "tough" on national security. I suspect they also shared the hubris of so many who thought the US had the right and the wherewithal to impose our will through military force. In that regard, they were on board with the neocon agenda.

I would not however go so far to state these Democrats leaders wanted perpetual chaos and war to feed the MIC. But I will say they betrayed the American people whom they were sworn to serve. More than ever we needed strong Democratic leaders who were smart enough to assess the situation and courageous enough to call out lies and liars for what they were. The stakes (in terms of real consequences for human lives and for our country) were about as high as they ever come, and far too many Democrats (nearly half) failed miserably to stand up when we needed them the most.

I was especially disappointed in John Kerry, who rose to prominence as the leader of Vietnam Vets against the War. I refused to support him in the 2004 Democratic primary, just as I refused to support Clinton & Biden in 2008 and Clinton now. I still went to Ohio to GOTV for Kerry in the general, because Bush had to be stopped.

I think those who support Hillary Clinton today either don't understand what went down in 2002-2003, or they are willfully blinding themselves to it. She is still a hawk. I do not trust her in matters of war and peace, or reigning in the power of her Wall Street friends. Add her vagueness on fracking & Keystone, that makes three strikes.

But, as I said, voting for the IWR was a disqualifier by itself.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
22. Anyone that listened to the inspectors knew there weren't any weapons of mass destruction.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:57 PM
Aug 2015

I knew, millions of people protesting knew, most countries other than Britain and the US knew.

Why didn't Hillary know? Or did she "trust" Bush to do the right thing? There are no good excuses, none.

And a few more things, the US and Britain knew too, but there was a lot of money to be made and what better way than a war? Cheney knew there was no yellow cake, Powell knew there were no aluminum tubes or anthrax, they knew even if the weapons were there there were no delivery systems, they all knew. Hillary knew too, but to run for President you have to look tough don't you? She voted the way she did for reasons of political gain which is unforgivable. How could she put so much faith in the people she called the vast right wing conspiracy just a short while before? If you reward her for such misconduct then don't be surprised if someone else does the same in the future.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
39. Hillary did not have access to the briefings given to the Armed Services Committee,
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:23 PM
Aug 2015

and neither did you or anyone else except those members.

Ted Kennedy said that those briefings had convinced him to vote against the IRW, but that he was barred by law from telling anyone else what he had learned there. So he didn't blame Hillary or any other Democrat for trusting Colin Powell -- who at that point in time was viewed as an independent figure, aloof from politics. In fact, at one point even the Dems tried to recruit him to run for President.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
49. I didn't need to listen to any more lies to know they were lying. Many people knew and Hillary's not
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:16 PM
Aug 2015

listening to independent sources is no excuse.

Why would anyone discount the source of information that was there doing inspections and had no reason to lie? Big deal they told a few of them extra special lies and told them it was super secret hush hush. Did Bush also tell them that Sadam tried to kill my Daddy? Wow I'm not impressed.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
51. Inspections were going on in the winter and spring after the IWR had already been approved.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:25 PM
Aug 2015

The plan was supposed to have been that if the inspections revealed IWR's, then Bush could go ahead, with UN approval. Otherwise, he wasn't supposed to. But he ignored that contingency and invaded Iraq even though the inspectors didn't find WMD's. That isn't what Dems who voted for the IWR had approved.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
60. You know what would have been nice? Maybe if at the time we had a Senator Obama
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 05:21 PM
Aug 2015

someone would have been smart enough to suggest a diplomatic solution. No, it had to be sanctions or war, no other options. And how many children died while Clinton was President because of those sanctions? Maybe that's why most thought Obama was the better choice in '08. Maybe that's why many still think there is a better choice.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
61. I opposed the war at the time and was unhappy that the IWR was approved. For weeks I'd stood out on a street
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 05:26 PM
Aug 2015

corner with a group of anti-war people, waving signs against starting the war. So you don't have convince me about that.

But I, like Ted Kennedy, am not blaming Hillary for making the mistake she made trusting Colin Powell. I wish she hadn't, but I appreciate that she's expressed regret and learned from the mistake.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
32. She had been out of the White House only a short time.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:17 PM
Aug 2015

She likes to point to her time in the White House as "experience."

Anyone in the White House in 1999 should have known the difference between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. She should have known.

And she did know. The Code Pink women told her the score on Iraq. There is a video of her speaking to them. There is a video (hard to find now) of them speaking back to her and telling her of what they experienced and saw visiting Iraq.

There is a video -- hard evidence of her walking out in a huff after being warned in a very quiet, kind way that a vote for the Iraq War would be a huge mistake.

This is not a matter of making a mistake. This is a matter of refusing to listen to rational, decent advice based on first-hand experience. This is a matter of Hillary's choosing to do the expedient, popular thing and not the wise, difficult but morally correct thing.

Hillary's vote for the Iraq War was proof of her failure to follow the moral high-ground.

Hillary's vote for the Iraq War is one of a number of decisions by her that have led me to the conclusion that she has poor judgment.

We do not need a president who, like the Bushes, has poor judgment.

We need Bernie. He follows the moral high ground on virtually every issue.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
53. She trusted those liars to tell the truth? I doubt it.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:28 PM
Aug 2015

They had access to better information than we did. We knew it was all lies but she didn't?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
71. Bernie knew they were lies, I knew they were lies, why couldn't she figure it out?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:26 PM
Aug 2015

That's one vote I will never forgive or forget, I will always hold it against her.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
52. It'll probably be Bush...ain't that a funny circumstance?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:27 PM
Aug 2015

and knowing what we know now, he'd do it again....or not....or depends, whatever the last response was lol.

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
17. It was for me when she ran against Obama
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:40 PM
Aug 2015

Back then I could not bring myself to vote for her in the primary because she'd backed the invasion of Iraq. That was then, and this is now. I will vote for her because I think she can win and the most important thing for Democrats is to win the presidential election. I don't think Bernie could be Jeb. It the Dems lose, we will get another Scalia on the Supreme court, shutting down Obamacare, more tax breaks for the rich, it can go on and on. No matter who wins the nomination, you must vote Democrat.

George II

(67,782 posts)
18. Specifically, HOW did she actually "vote for war"...the details in the legislation she voted for....
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:45 PM
Aug 2015

...and please don't repeat the refrain "we all knew bush would lie".

Thanks.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
20. We all knew Bush would lie. You could see that coming a mile away.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:53 PM
Aug 2015

And Hillary was either too blind or too craven. Take your pick.

Sorry.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
25. Friday, October 11, 2002 she voted to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:59 PM
Aug 2015

H.J.Res.114 - Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002

Bernie Sanders and Lincoln Chafee voted no.

Response to George II (Reply #18)

Persondem

(1,936 posts)
19. Did you have the same problem with Kerry/Edwards?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:47 PM
Aug 2015

Cuz they were 2 for 2 in authorizing force.

Come on Sparky, who did you vote for in '04?

George II

(67,782 posts)
26. Both of the, and Clinton, and many others........
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:59 PM
Aug 2015

........voted to "authorize force" ONLY after the failure of the Government of Iraq failed to comply with a long list of conditions. It turns out that the Government of Iraq actually DID comply with all the conditions, rendering the "authorization to use military force" invalid.

Many like to ignore the specifics of the legislation because it sounds better to claim that all these people "voted for war", which is a blatant lie.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
30. only a naive person would have granted Bush that power.....they were hell bent on war
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:15 PM
Aug 2015

most Democrats in Congress didn't make that mistake.....but Hillary did.....

There was no reason to be threatening them with war in the first place.

There was no justification for giving Iraq ultimatums. They made that shit up.
I could figure that out from my couch. Hillary couldn't do that as a Senator.


 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
77. She was already trying to get her resume in order
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 09:19 PM
Aug 2015

For her run at the presidency.


Which is another one of my reasons I cannot support her. The run for senate in NY was just to fulfill her resume requirements. Like electives for a college degree. She chose the state and she knew when she would take her first go at the presidency. So calculated.

If anything, I admire Warren more, because I don't think she will ever run. She is busy doing good work in Congress. It isn't a stepping stone but the main event.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
78. I desperately wanted Warren to run
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 09:27 PM
Aug 2015

I was thankful that Bernie did. Wouldn't they make a wonderful team?

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
79. I think he cheched in with Elizabeth before he jumped in.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 10:57 PM
Aug 2015

She isn't going for it. I think he would have been her biggest supporter. I like the idea of someone younger and PoC, a woman would be even better. But mostly, I want someone who truly believes in the same things those two do.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
27. Dean in the primary......Kerry and Edwards were wrong.....
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:04 PM
Aug 2015

and their nuanced criticisms weakened their ability to attack. Hillary's current stances have the same effect on a number of issues.

Obviously they were preferable to the re-election of President Cheney

1monster

(11,012 posts)
28. Yeah. I voted for Kucinich in the primaries. Of course I voted for Kerry in the
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:08 PM
Aug 2015

General... But I was happy to vote Kucinich in the primaries even though he was no longer in the race.

AllFieldsRequired

(489 posts)
54. Did you get an answer? I am curious. I surely can see NOT voting for Kerry
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:31 PM
Aug 2015

or Clinton, unless it is the November election and your choice is a Democrat or a Republican.

Then I dont know how anyone could not vote for the Democrat.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
24. While it wouldn't stop be from voting for HRC in the general...
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 02:58 PM
Aug 2015

...I'm very glad we have the opportunity to vote for someone who I believe was on the right side of these issues, at least in the primary (IWR, Patriot act, etc.)

Gamecock Lefty

(700 posts)
29. I was not happy . . .
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:08 PM
Aug 2015

with Hillary's authorization for the Iraq war, but that was what - 12 years ago? She had shown regret over that vote.

Good for King Bernie for being against it from Day 1, but Hillary's still getting my vote.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
31. I've met some severely injured people who regret it even more than Hillary
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:17 PM
Aug 2015

It isn't ancient history to them.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
33. No one has a perfect record. I wish Bernie would indicate a change of heart on his anti gun-control votes.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:17 PM
Aug 2015

Against the Brady bill and for the PLCAA -- the NRA sponsored bill that overturned gun liability laws in 50 states. His votes might have made sense to his largely rural voters, but not for the US as a whole.

Family members of the dead Connecticut school children are being blocked from a lawsuit specifically because of the PLCAA.

When Hillary voted for the IWR conditional upon finding WMD's, she made the mistake of trusting Colin Powell, who lied in his presentation to Congress. And she erred in trusting Bush not to go ahead, despite the lack of WMD's, without UN support. And she long ago expressed regret for her mistakes.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
55. A million dead brown people are no big deal, right? Not compared to a lawsuit by white people.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:32 PM
Aug 2015

True colors, shown.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
57. How many brown people do you think have died in the US because of our lack of adequate gun control?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:37 PM
Aug 2015

People die in the US every day from gun violence, and the NRA and gun proponents help to prolong it.

But this isn't a competition. We shouldn't be killing people in wrongful wars or on our own streets or in classrooms.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/12/14/schoo-shooting-how-do-u-s-gun-homicides-compare-with-the-rest-of-the-world/

America sees far more gun violence than countries in Europe, and Canada, India and Australia, which is perhaps how it gets its bloody reputation among comparatively peaceful nations.

When a person kills another in the United States, though, he or she generally uses a gun: 60 percent of U.S. homicides occur using a firearm, which is the 26th-highest rate in the world. (In other gun-permeated countries, such as Finland (45.3 guns per 100 people), only about 19 percent of homicides involve a firearm.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
70. Good thing Bernie Sanders is pro-gun control then, eh pnwmom?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:24 PM
Aug 2015

Nice attempt to portray Bernie as an NRA shill and "gun proponent" but it won't work.

The memes that Bernie is a "gun nut" and non-supportive of poc were proven wrong a long time ago.

But kudos for simultaneously beating a dead horse and trying to breathe air into its lungs at the same time.


jomin41

(559 posts)
35. I support Bernie because of his platform but
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:18 PM
Aug 2015

HRC's Iraq vote was a major disappointment for me. I'll vote for her if she wins the nom. It would be suicidal not to.

oasis

(49,387 posts)
36. You wanted Hillary to "LEAD the fight against the war"?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:18 PM
Aug 2015

Hillary has courage.She got up before the senate to question what Bush knew about the events leading up to the 9/11 attacks. It went over like a lead balloon.

In my view, it took plenty of courage for her to stick her neck out in a challenge of the bullshit propaganda the Bush Administration was putting out.

Hillary laid it on the line, and got no backing, against a popular president during a period when Americans had a growing anxiety about war and terrorism.

I have no doubt she struggled with her decision on voting for the IWR.

oasis

(49,387 posts)
43. True that. It was no easy decision for any Democrat.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:38 PM
Aug 2015

I'm going to edit my previous post about Hillary's senate charge against Bush's pre 9/11 attack knowledge. She did question him, but it was circa 2004. Sorry my memory gets blurry on dates far back when there was a lot going on.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
38. Then she doubled-down by pushing hard for military strikes against Libya
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:23 PM
Aug 2015

that were based on trumped-up propaganda, about which she then gloated on national television.

pansypoo53219

(20,977 posts)
41. proof y'all didn't pay ANY ATTENTION AT ALL. the VOTE for iwaq was POLITICALLY timed by asshat W.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:27 PM
Aug 2015

it was set BEFORE THE ELECTION, just so EVERYBODY IN CONGRESS had to show just 'who was more patriotic', NOT AFTER the election. i remember because i was so pissed the NITWIT made the vote POLITICALLY CHARGED to WIN.
and it pissed me off that the MEDIA did not point that out AT all, but since 9/11, Wdiot boy could do no wrong.

and i do believe KERRY VOTED YEA TOO.

AllFieldsRequired

(489 posts)
56. I wondered about this statement as I could not recall how many voted for or against in the
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 04:34 PM
Aug 2015

Democratic Party and just looked it up.



Party Yeas Nays Not
Voting
Republican 215 6 2
Democratic 82 126 1
Independent 0 1 0
TOTALS 297 133 3

Party Yeas Nays
Republican 48 1
Democratic 29 21
Independent 0 1
TOTALS 77 23


MY QUESTION, of those who voted for the war, Democrats, how many were up for reelection and for those who voted against it were they a ways off from theirs?

Persondem

(1,936 posts)
62. Sanders was in a safe seat. It did not take all that much political courage
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 05:40 PM
Aug 2015

for him to vote as he did.

More Dem senators voted for it than against it 29-21 and 82 Dem members of the House voted for it. It's not like this was some gutless, oddball thing for Clinton, Kerry, Edwards and Biden to do.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
72. The debate on whether it was gutless, or a cautious tactical move, or naiveté....
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:30 PM
Aug 2015

might be an interesting one, but none of the choices are particularly Presidential.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
59. Like Hillary Kerry voted for it. Biden voted for it, oh John Edwards too!
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 05:04 PM
Aug 2015

Now what did they have in common? Maybe letting politics dictate whether we go to war and hundreds of thousands die and are maimed not to mention the monetary cost? Can't run for President if you don't look tough enough can you?

What do you think, should we call our armed forces, pawns for politics? Of course the other side were just a bunch of sand monkeys so they don't count, not even the infants, children, and women.

FloridaBlues

(4,008 posts)
45. This is such a non issue with primary voters .
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:45 PM
Aug 2015

Old rehashed news. She has repeatedly said she regretted that vote .

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
64. Tell that to the Cindy Sheehans of the world
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 06:06 PM
Aug 2015

that Hillary regrets her decision. I'm sure it'll help ease the pain of losing their loved ones to a bogus occupation built on lies and profits.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
46. Biden voted for it too; care to tell us what you think?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 03:50 PM
Aug 2015

if your main reason to not vote Clinton is over Iraq but you would vote Biden, you're nothing but a hypocrite.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
63. That's why Kerry lost the Dem primary in 2004.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 05:46 PM
Aug 2015

And its why Hillary was crushed by Obama in 2008 ... oh wait, that's not what happened.

Obama barely passed her.

Suddenly, this is the most important for Dem primary voters ever!!!!

not.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
65. Obama barely passed by?
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 06:14 PM
Aug 2015

She blew her own chances by dodging sniper fire while hanging around with rednecks downing Jack Daniels and reading the bible. She's got too much baggage to be an ideal candidate. Don't think the cons are just gonna sit by let that slide:

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
66. That is probably the dumbest descrption of why Hillary lost to Obama ...
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 06:19 PM
Aug 2015

... that I have ever read ... and not just on DU ... anywhere.

The funny thing about your post is that all of the "baggage" she has, amounts to nothing. Lots of RW screaming to be sure, but little else.

In 2008, she lost to Obama because she took the caucus states for granted. That's basically it. He had a better ground game in those states. If not for that, she wins easily ... AND she wins the general election EASILY.

Now ... some of you want to claim that she can't beat the GOP whack jobs that she would have beat in 2008. Did she kill some one since 2008?

Oh wait ... she killed Chris Stevens because he had evidence she killed Vince Foster ... and the evidence was on her email server!!

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
80. Dumbest? Try reading the articles from the time
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 11:18 AM
Aug 2015

Better yet I'll provide them for you since you Clingons have such short memories of what made her a mess:

Here's the sniper fire "misspoke":

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/25/campaign.wrap/index.html?iref=hpmostpop

Here's her calling Obama an elitist (going after the redneck vote):

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-04-13-obama-clinton_N.htm


Here's her world famous southern accent making a comeback from 2008 (from think progress):

http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2015/06/02/3664725/shouldnt-make-fun-hillary-clintons-southern-accent-according-linguist/

So no these aren't right wing talking points its recorded history. She pandered and she lost. Plain and simple.

In short:



And NO! Nobody out here other than you is claiming that the right wing circus was gonna beat her in 2008 if she if she won the nom. We all remember the "No talk express" and the many sound bites that caribou barbie gave us. A dead dog would've been elected to POTUS since the War Shrub administration killed it for the cons.


 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
69. It only is important if you care about what happened to the people who served...
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:23 PM
Aug 2015

and who died and those who still suffer.

How it affected elections is trivial by comparison.

This is not a talking point.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If You Break It, You Own ...