2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton was asked in the interview to name her top two achievements as Secretary of State. NH
July 28. 2015 8:52PM
In one-on-one interview, Clinton talks issues, calls Planned Parenthood videos 'disturbing'
By DAN TUOHY
New Hampshire Union Leader
...................."If I had to name two, I would say, No. 1, putting together the coalition that imposed sanctions on Iran, which I did for the first 18 months that I was Secretary of State, culminating first in the Security Council deciding that, including Russia and China, they would impose sanctions, Clinton responded. And then continuing with a persistent effort to actually enforce those sanctions, which made it possible for us to get to the negotiating table to determine whether there was an agreement that we could be behind.
I think on the other issues, whether it was forming better communication or cooperation with China, or reaching out to our allies in Europe who felt very neglected, putting together an economic strategy in the State Department to win and keep American jobs something very important to me standing up for Internet freedom ... theres just a long list.
Clinton was asked whether there is anything in the Iran nuclear deal that makes her uncomfortable.
Id start from the fundamental premise I dont trust the Iranians, she said. This is not Ronald Reagans trust but verify. This is dont trust and verify. And I have no illusions about the regime were dealing with. You dont make peace or agreements with your friends. You do it with adversaries. I think its a deal that if vigorously enforced, which is what I would do as President, will keep the lid on Irans nuclear weapons program. And I think thats in the security interest of the United States, Israel and the region.
- See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150729/NEWS0605/150729073#sthash.dKfRftHJ.dpuf
Zorra
(27,670 posts)DFL_Wellstone_dems
(23 posts)And trained and equipped that puppet's secret police...
And provided them with CIA support to hunt down and kill moderate political and religious leaders...
And incited a genocidal maniac (Saddam Hussein) to invade...
And then armed the genocidal maniac with weapons of mass destruction...
And imposed crippling economic sanctions that caused decades of death and suffering...
And then had the BALLS to call the other side the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world.
But that's just a simple interpretation of non-disputed historical fact. We shouldn't let that spoil the narrative.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)These were the people hurt by our sanctions.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Sanctions are often not effective. Sometimes they are. They were in this case, and HRC gets some credit in my book.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)that is 1/2 MILLION Iraqi children.
Now THAT is "effective", isn't it?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)... that had been bombed mercilessly by the thousands of sorties flown over Iraq. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children died from dysentery as a result.
The Secret Behind the Sanctions: How the U.S. Intentionally Destroyed Iraq's Water Supply
http://www.progressive.org/news/2001/09/5166/secret-behind-sanctions-how-us-intentionally-destroyed-iraqs-water-supply
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)... for not expressing an opinion on KeystoneXL and the TTP, she ought to be just as evasive about how she stands on the Iran agreement.
The Iran sanctions being her number one accomplishment only underscores her involvement as Obama's Secretary of State on Iran matters.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Hillary withheld her opinion on the Iran deal until it was presented, and obviously endorsed, by the President. She then supported it.
Obama has not yet made a decision on Keystone. Though, frankly, Keystone is a strictly political decision. I think the enironmental case against it is fairly weak, unless we are just going to ban transport of that oil sludge altogether.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Wow. Pigs just flew out of my butt.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Of course she did.
My point was she didn't express an opinion on the final deal until Obama presented it.
Or are you talking about something else?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)However the pipeline is a cheaper method of transporting it. Therefore, the break even point where it is no longer profitable changes. This means more is extracted - more carbon in the air.
That was the assumption of the study HRC commissioned and which the decision was supposed to be based on. Clearly, HRC wanted to get a positive study then throw the hot potato to her successor.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)in achievements as Sec. of State.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)She uses a lot of words to not answer the question.
askew
(1,464 posts)The Iran answer was a good one. The other answer was too vague and makes it sound like fluffy BS.