2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSheepshank
(12,504 posts)I am all for solar energy...I want it on my home. i can'afford the tens of thousands of dollars it would cost right now.
I am looking forward to hearing more about her program that would help people like us that are willing but don't have that kind of loose change sitting in our couch cushions.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)Persondem
(1,936 posts)Do you have any links that support your claim of advocacy?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Maybe?
Persondem
(1,936 posts)So making stuff up is now ok ... Now THAT *might* work on children.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Persondem
(1,936 posts)your sources.
She says it needs to be conducted and regulated properly so it doesnt cause excessive environmental harm, but she believes that can be done. Which puts her totally in line with President Obama, and out of line with most of the environmental community.
emphasis added
I can assure you that I am no fan of fracking, but as she was part of the Obama administration I am willing to give her some benefit of the doubt. I am more curious as to what candidate Clinton to say on the issue.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)firing those workers? Can you show us where he came up against the unions and argued those industries should be dismantled and the workers fired?
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Solar panels won't stop fracking.
Fracking itself releases greenhouse gasses.
Hillary supports fracking
"Fugitive methane" released during shale gas drilling could accelerate climate change
Add methane emissions to the growing list of environmental risks posed by fracking.
Opposition to the hydraulic fracturing of deep shales to release natural gas rose sharply last year over worries that the large volumes of chemical-laden water used in the operations could contaminate drinking water. Then, in early January, earthquakes in Ohio were blamed on the disposal of that water in deep underground structures. Yesterday, two Cornell University professors said at a press conference that fracking releases large amounts of natural gas, which consists mostly of methane, directly into the atmospheremuch more than previously thought.
Robert Howarth, an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, and Anthony Ingraffea, a civil and environmental engineer, reported that fracked wells leak 40 to 60 percent more methane than conventional natural gas wells. When water with its chemical load is forced down a well to break the shale, it flows back up and is stored in large ponds or tanks. But volumes of methane also flow back up the well at the same time and are released into the atmosphere before they can be captured for use. This giant belch of "fugitive methane" can be seen in infrared videos taken at well sites.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fracking-would-emit-methane/
Hillary also supports the dirty tar sand pipeline.
But she's afraid to say so until after the election.
That's following, not leading.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Only none of it has anything to do with Clinton.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)That article says nothing about Hillary's posts on those issues.
Do you really have so little to say about your own candidate that you have to resort to making shit up? The amount of energy you devote to your contempt for this one woman is sad, and of course you have no evidence on the subject so you post an article that doesn't have anything to do with her position, hoping for what? Who do you actually think you are going to convince with that? And you resurrect an old thread for that? Somehow I have a feeling I'm going to look at the news and find some new poll results.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)approved by wall street and the oil companies as it is mostly orthogonal to their interests.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)and instead prefer perpetual dependence on fossil fuels? Makes sense. The point is not to combat global warming but to channel the 10 percenters' anger at "corporations," only not the MIC or Big Gun. Those corporations are sacrosanct.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)I support radical green measures, not the too-little-too-late proposals of a corporatist dem.