Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

seafan

(9,387 posts)
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:15 PM Jul 2015

Bernie Sanders beats Bush, Trump and Walker in a head-to-head match-up (CNN, July 26)

Very good news for Bernie Sanders from the latest CNN poll, July 26, 2015, via Alternet.

From page 19 of the poll:

(transcribed)

21. And now, let's assume that Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont will be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2016. After I read each one, please tell me if you would be more likely to vote for that Republican candidate or if you would be more likely to vote for Bernie Sanders (RANDOM ORDER)


Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush: (July 22-25, 2015)

All Americans: Sanders 48% Bush 47%
Registered voters: Sanders 47% Bush 48%


Businessman Donald Trump: (July 22-15, 2015)

All Americans: Sanders 58% Trump 38%
Registered voters: Sanders 59% Trump 38%


Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker: (July 22-25, 2015)

All Americans: Sanders 48% Walker 42%
Registered voters: Sanders 48% Walker 43%



Sample size 1,017 adults
Margin of error +/- 3 percentage points
615 land line phone respondents
402 cell phone respondents




Hat tip to DUer sabrina1 for finding this pic!



21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders beats Bush, Trump and Walker in a head-to-head match-up (CNN, July 26) (Original Post) seafan Jul 2015 OP
Any of the five Democrats running will run right over Trump. Dawson Leery Jul 2015 #1
A "nut?" "Our" cause? LWolf Jul 2015 #4
Trump is a nut, and a gift to us if he's the GOP nominee. winter is coming Jul 2015 #6
Well you can forget about that he will never be the nominee. zeemike Jul 2015 #10
lets see what happens ericson00 Jul 2015 #2
ooooooooo, the dirty "s" word... beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #3
We've been seeing it. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #5
Obama was called a "socialist" so many times that most people eventually looked it up. Gore1FL Jul 2015 #16
+1 daleanime Jul 2015 #17
Even better news.... George II Jul 2015 #7
For the sake of completeness, since you mentioned Ms. Clinton: seafan Jul 2015 #15
I think you .Hillary People are getting desperate as your talking points are destroyed by Facts daybranch Jul 2015 #18
So many good points in what you've written here. seafan Jul 2015 #21
I think you .Hillary People are getting desperate as your talking points are destroyed by Facts daybranch Jul 2015 #19
I would point out that against Jeb Kelvin Mace Jul 2015 #8
K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2015 #9
Another question from this poll seafan Jul 2015 #11
Interestingly, most of those polled identified themselves as independents oberliner Jul 2015 #12
not only is this on CNN, it's a body blow to the "Clinton will sweep the generals" idea MisterP Jul 2015 #13
National polls are meaningless. thesquanderer Jul 2015 #14
National polls are meaningless... davidpdx Jul 2015 #20

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
1. Any of the five Democrats running will run right over Trump.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:20 PM
Jul 2015

He is a nut, and so far an asset to our cause.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
6. Trump is a nut, and a gift to us if he's the GOP nominee.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:41 PM
Jul 2015

He won't hold up well in a general election.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
10. Well you can forget about that he will never be the nominee.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:19 PM
Jul 2015

He is just a show to distract us with.
And the reason he polls well in the GOP is the same reason Sanders is doing well...people are fed up with the state of politics and want change...so the Conservatives are hitting the destruct button because that is all they got.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. We've been seeing it.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:40 PM
Jul 2015

The more name rec he gets as a "socialist" the higher his numbers go. By the time he's got as much name rec as Clinton, he'll be beating her as well.

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
16. Obama was called a "socialist" so many times that most people eventually looked it up.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:19 PM
Jul 2015

They discovered two things.

1> Obama wasn't a socialist.

2> Socialism isn't something to be afraid of and can be applied in some cases for the betterment of everyone.


It's been neutralized in rhetorical value thanks to the long-standing hyperbole of GOP rhetoric for the last 30 years.

George II

(67,782 posts)
7. Even better news....
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:55 PM
Jul 2015

...from the same poll:

CLINTON: 51%
BUSH: 46%

CLINTON: 53%
WALKER: 44%

CLINTON: 57%
TRUMP: 38%

And..........

CLINTON: 57%
SANDERS: 18%

seafan

(9,387 posts)
15. For the sake of completeness, since you mentioned Ms. Clinton:
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:33 PM
Jul 2015

From page 4 of the poll:

July 22-25, 2015

Hillary Clinton: Favorable 45% Unfavorable 48% Never heard of 1% No opinion 6%


That's of major concern for her.

daybranch

(1,309 posts)
18. I think you .Hillary People are getting desperate as your talking points are destroyed by Facts
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:09 AM
Jul 2015

The earlier poster made the point that Bernie Sanders will beat republican candidates. This projection flies in the face of your strategy that as loyal Democrats, we Progressives again must accept the lesser of two evils (Hillary).
For the first time in many years we have the chance to nominate a candidate whose ideas are in sync with the American and certainly with those Progressives. We laugh when you call poll tested lip service news. We laugh when your candidate is either always late to the dance or states the obvious. We laugh when your candidate tries to duck issues which define her political identity which certainly is not progressive on issues of income inequity and protection of the environment. Her positions are parsed and poll tested but only accepted if they pose no significant losses to Banks, Wall Street, the Health Insurance industry, Major Multi-National Corporations, Gambling Industry Owners, and other millionaire and billionaires.

The battle for the democratic nomination is a battle for a real change. We older Progressives want a return to the real economic policies that allowed better times. Times we enjoyed as young people in the 50s and early 60s as our country prospered under the ideas of Progressive and good will Populism, a time when large universities taught business ethics and corporations actually had ethics, a time when Unions were increasing the wages and the economic clout (read purchasing power), a time before republican strategists and candidates openly grabbed hate and division as a method to win elections in Indiana, Ohio, a time where knew there was income equality, a time when whites and African Americans were paid equally in Union shops and Union Companies, a time when a 2 income family meant two cars, ability to send your kids to college without long term debt by saving and paying as they went, good jobs for students so they could actually pay their own college tuition, etc etc.

Younger people too see a need for a real change too if they are to avoid a very dim future. They see debt, lower income jobs, parents dying and no longer being able to help, they see a country with open racial division, with increasingly more living poverty and less and less in greater wealth and they see no real security as they see that no matter how hard they may work and how much they may make in terms of output, it can never make them secure. They know the system of economics and government has been rigged against working people to divert an ever increasing share of their county's output and profits to the same groups who provide the bulk of Hillary's funding.

We older economic progressives have joined with the young. Our ideals are universal. They work everywhere.
Whether Hillary would win by a landslide and Bernie just by a little is only a reflection of the need to fight her donors. You just keep plodding alone as what some progressives call sheeples, following like sheep the democratic party as your shepherd, oblivious that wolves within the party are helping to eat your lambs, just in smaller and more acceptable quantities. We cannot be responsible to DINOs if we want to work for the people. To us, Hillary is at best a Rockefeller Republican and can only appear to be a democrat because the republicans have moved so far to the right in their embrace of hate and division and create racism, sexism, misplaced nationalism, Teaparty ism etc. . Hillary campaigns as the anointed one and she certainly is, but she was anointed by 3rd way democrats, Beltway commentators, Main Stream Media etc. at the behest of the very rich.

Bernie Sanders says their name (her financial backers) and takes bold populist positions we older progressives in the democratic party believe in. We believe a well regulated capitalism can produce a great society , a society more equal, more fair, more productive, and more humane than what will occur if we continue the too large influence of Big Business and the rich which allows it to impoverish our people, to fight our attempts to organize, to destroy our access to facts through Man Stream Media, to turn our children into poorly educated and needy workers for little wages. We have seen and lived a better way. We must bear witness to the young, we must pump up their dreams, and we must shield them from the same tactics of separation and deflection applied by 3rd Way democrats and republicans alike based on our experience. We ask that Hillary supporters in the democratic party look at her positions especially as they relate to economic policies as a whole, especially her non-support of Banking and Wall Street regulation, and relate that to what is best for the people.

Progressives are the future, no matter what label you put on us, Bernie Sanders at this time supports the same ideas we have held for decades. We believed the democratic party represented our best chance at doing what was most supportive of our values. We now have a chance to support a candidate who we believe will champion our ideals and work toward a return of better times because we have seen better times, imperfect but better in so many ways.

We people who saw our more golden age destroyed by falsehoods and hatred now with unity with the students and millennials, and support from Greens, Socialists, Working Family parties, Activists within The African American community community, LGTQs and many many disillusioned independents can retake this country to remake it more
like the one we loved. We invite you Hillary supporters to quit the path of least resistance and work for all the values you most hold dear. We believe if you should actually look at what is possible, ignore the Main Stream slander and mis-characterization, listen to Bernie speak , live or recorded, where possible and by all means listen to Hillary. I know
that every time Bernie speaks I almost nod off in agreement because his unchanging positions I have heard many times before or I can predict them based on my own values as a republican. I also know that the more Hillary takes positions, the influence of her rich backers is evident-witness her non-support of reinstating Glass-Steagall, her continued support of NAFTA and current support of the TPP etc. It looks to us Bernie people as see her positions she clearly has a conflict of interest between the economic opportunity the people desire and the unrestrained piracy her financial backers desire. This conflict between the classes has been a constant as any one who actually knows the history of this country, usually the rich win. But as a result of difficult times, the power of the rich has to be restrained, as Franklin Roosevelt did during the depression, and as Obama has somewhat done with underfunded stimulus packages, and the underfunded Dodd Franks activity and an embattled Consumer Financial Agency. But these steps by Obama do little if anything to remedy the problem. They only provide some minor relief and protection from the greatest failures of our rich greedy class. The do nothing of substance to address economic inequality. Obama never promised to do this. He never supported any governmental actions to address this directly except a return to tax rates of the Clinton days and could not even achieve that even though he was willing to cut the most beloved progressive/socialist program -social security. Obama cannot really help the black community rebound from and continue to fight the racism used to hurt it. He must first say the name but saying the name is not as Black Lives Matter to point at injustice without identifying the cause. The racism is used to justify so called deserved poverty, white privilege, glamorize police as soldiers facing death at every turn, and create fear and strife. I read recently an article purporting to list the causes of racism but these turned out only to be a catalog for some to exploit weaknesses everyone has to a degree. Nothing was said about who needed this racism, why this racism was systematized here in the US for the benefit of occupants of the rich donor class to serve both Northern industrialists
and former slave owners in their quest for more relative wealth ( income inequity). Today the current occupiers of that glass have created an oligarchy in their interest and not in ours.
Again we ask you Hillary supporters to stand back from Main Stream Media Hype, consider the agenda of the people talking, learn our country's real history, make your own analyzes, and patriotically vote with the values in your heart.

We can win for the people. We Bernie Sanders supporters are working to make sure we will have a real choice, not just the lesser of evils.
lesser of evils.

seafan

(9,387 posts)
21. So many good points in what you've written here.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:01 AM
Jul 2015

After a while, it becomes too exhausting to prop up The Machine. It's time to go back to simpler, proven concepts that benefit everyone's lives.

I noted this in your comment:

We believe if you should actually look at what is possible, ignore the Main Stream slander and mis-characterization, listen to Bernie speak , live or recorded, where possible and by all means listen to Hillary. I know
that every time Bernie speaks I almost nod off in agreement because his unchanging positions I have heard many times before or I can predict them based on my own values as a republican.


Nice to read, and a belated welcome to DU, daybranch.

Bernie's values are, indeed, long-standing, heartfelt and enduring.

The object now, for those who wish to maintain the power and privilege of the wealthy few, is to keep Bernie Sanders locked away from media coverage, to slander and distort his record and to prevent the spread of his message to the 41% of people who are unfamiliar with him.

But, we will disabuse them of that notion.











daybranch

(1,309 posts)
19. I think you .Hillary People are getting desperate as your talking points are destroyed by Facts
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 01:11 AM
Jul 2015

The earlier poster made the point that Bernie Sanders will beat republican candidates. This projection flies in the face of your strategy that as loyal Democrats, we Progressives again must accept the lesser of two evils (Hillary).
For the first time in many years we have the chance to nominate a candidate whose ideas are in sync with the American and certainly with those Progressives. We laugh when you call poll tested lip service news. We laugh when your candidate is either always late to the dance or states the obvious. We laugh and cry when your candidate tries to duck issues which define her politically.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
8. I would point out that against Jeb
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jul 2015

he is within the 3% margin of error.

That said, those are still very good numbers. Much better than I expected.

seafan

(9,387 posts)
11. Another question from this poll
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:22 PM
Jul 2015

From page 6 of the July 26, 2015 CNN poll:

(transcribed)

3. We'd like to get your overall opinion of some people in the news. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of these people--- or if you have never heard of them. (RANDOM ORDER)

July 22-25, 2015

Bernie Sanders: Favorable 23% Unfavorable 22% Never heard of 41% No opinion 13%

Jeb Bush: Favorable 33% Unfavorable 43% Never heard of 11% No opinion 12%

Donald Trump: Favorable 33% Unfavorable 58% Never heard of 2% No opinion 7%

Scott Walker: Favorable 21% Unfavorable 23% Never heard of 42% No opinion 13%

.....



Sanders has a lot of room to advance his standing, as there are still many people who are not yet familiar with him. Look for that to change quickly, as he continues barnstorming red states. That 41% who are now unfamiliar with him will be interesting in how they start polling.

Also hard to miss is his net positive rating, while the others are in the weeds in that aspect.

Very good news for Bernie, as opinions of the other candidates have soured over time.







 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
12. Interestingly, most of those polled identified themselves as independents
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:27 PM
Jul 2015

Only 22 percent said they were Republicans and 29 percent said they were Democrats.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
13. not only is this on CNN, it's a body blow to the "Clinton will sweep the generals" idea
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:29 PM
Jul 2015

now we have pollsters asking about Sanders, and putting him against the Pubs, and certifying he's ahead right now against the fake "no more business as usual candidate" Trump

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
14. National polls are meaningless.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:32 PM
Jul 2015

It has to be state by state, because of the electoral college. Winning the popular vote nationally does not tell you who would win the election.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders beats Bush...