Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ed Schultz not giving up. He's still promoting Bernie Sanders in spite of being canceled. (Original Post) Cleita Jul 2015 OP
I saw the last 10+ mins. of ED with John Nichols & woman consultant. Very positve comments appalachiablue Jul 2015 #1
good for ed restorefreedom Jul 2015 #2
She was something else about her 150 manufacturing jobs in Wisc. under Scott Walker. Cleita Jul 2015 #3
yeah if i were ed restorefreedom Jul 2015 #5
Of course not. She would have had those references at her fingertips if they were real. Cleita Jul 2015 #7
Saw her not long ago on Bill Maher & she was tamer today by far. Lol with those stats! appalachiablue Jul 2015 #10
tamer today? restorefreedom Jul 2015 #35
She was in rare form on Maher. Name, Genevieve Wood. Texas Towlie below says she's from appalachiablue Jul 2015 #43
that explains the shrill unintelligable babbling. nt restorefreedom Jul 2015 #45
Yep, she's awful and making the rounds lately. Just remembered seeing her on appalachiablue Jul 2015 #24
See post #29. TexasTowelie Jul 2015 #32
She is from the Daily Signal, TexasTowelie Jul 2015 #29
Sounds RIGHT- Genevieve Wood. appalachiablue Jul 2015 #41
I didn't hear about Louisiana but he may have. I got interrupted in the middle. eom Cleita Jul 2015 #4
Is there a name for this woman consultant? ... aggiesal Jul 2015 #21
I didn't get her name, TexasTowelie Jul 2015 #30
Genevieve Wood, The Daily Signal funded by Heritage Fnd funded by Kochs who fund S. Walker. appalachiablue Jul 2015 #54
Thank you! n/t aggiesal Jul 2015 #57
Glad Ed is still supporting Bernie, but I read that he was canceled because napi21 Jul 2015 #6
Wow. At least Ed was able to bring up TPP 71 times! When GE owned MS/NBC they didn't care appalachiablue Jul 2015 #8
Just curioius here you read that. Armstead Jul 2015 #9
Ring of Fire. Here's the link. napi21 Jul 2015 #52
Both I think. However, he didn't mention TPP on this show, hence my headline. Cleita Jul 2015 #11
Speaking truth to power...damn "power" emsimon33 Jul 2015 #61
We all know banks are too big to fail, and need to be broken up passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #12
There used to be laws limiting media companies. Guess WHO signed the bill, JDPriestly Jul 2015 #15
Oh come on now...just because they are married doesn't mean they are birds of a feather... L0oniX Jul 2015 #22
I hope that history does cite all the damage Bill Clinton did as president emsimon33 Jul 2015 #62
It's getting to be the Ed Sanders Show George II Jul 2015 #13
So did they join in with the cheering and applause, too? senz Jul 2015 #18
...many people there were republicans... kenn3d Jul 2015 #28
Either that or, as has been speculated by many (not just here)... George II Jul 2015 #33
Yes I agree that they are curious. They want to see what an honest politician looks like. rhett o rick Jul 2015 #63
Yeah...the "corporate media" won't show them, but Sanders has been on the "corporate media"... George II Jul 2015 #68
Most likely because his main competition is keeping a low profile. People might ask her what rhett o rick Jul 2015 #73
you don't have to go to a rally to find out who he is. passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #38
I thought he was supposed to be a journalist, not a politician-promoter. n/t pnwmom Jul 2015 #14
Ed is a commentator, and he's all about working men and women, pnwmom. senz Jul 2015 #19
Not quite...which is probably why he was cancelled. When is his last show? George II Jul 2015 #69
So what do you think of all the other shows that are promoting Donald Trump? Cleita Jul 2015 #20
Nailed it. n/t L0oniX Jul 2015 #23
I haven't seen them, but if they are they obviously shouldn't be. n/t pnwmom Jul 2015 #34
You watch no TV or listen to the radio or read no newspaper? Trump is sucking up all the air Cleita Jul 2015 #36
I don't watch TV news or radio. I read, and very little of that would be Rethug pnwmom Jul 2015 #49
I'm glad to hear you don't watch Fox News. mwooldri Jul 2015 #48
LOL passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #39
Thanks. Cleita Jul 2015 #40
sorry just caught that and updated my post passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #42
What shows have been promoting Donald Trump? I haven't seen a single one. George II Jul 2015 #70
This is a joke. No? Cleita Jul 2015 #71
Please answer the question. Thank you. George II Jul 2015 #72
So what are the corporate fascists going to do now? Jack Rabbit Jul 2015 #16
Bad reference? That's what they used to do with me when I got fired for being rebellious. Cleita Jul 2015 #17
Canceling a show with bad ratings is "corporate fascism"? brooklynite Jul 2015 #51
Ed represents the working people of America as does Sen Sanders. Corporations don't rhett o rick Jul 2015 #64
I'm not defending anyone; I'm acknowledging the realities of business... brooklynite Jul 2015 #65
oh good! Now maybe Bernie can pay him to promote him instead of MSNBC footing the bill wyldwolf Jul 2015 #25
Good idea. Maybe Bernie can offer him a place on his campaign. He would be an asset. eom Cleita Jul 2015 #26
The thing that chafes my ass about him is he was a right wing radio show host.... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #27
He was always for labor and unions even when he was a Republican. Cleita Jul 2015 #31
That and a year or so ago he was gung-ho for the Keystone Pipeline, promoting it for ..... George II Jul 2015 #44
That lasted about three days. He was listening to Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who was for it. Cleita Jul 2015 #60
AFAIK he did reasonably well as a radio host. mwooldri Jul 2015 #50
Are people permitted to Skidmore Jul 2015 #66
Genuine change is good... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #67
#OpComcast cocainecowboy Jul 2015 #37
Ed asks: Can Bernie Sanders Win? kenn3d Jul 2015 #46
The MSM is very opinionated, period. But the bias is usually right wing or just left of right. Cleita Jul 2015 #47
Unlike Tweety, Rachel, Chris Hayes, etc. emsimon33 Jul 2015 #53
M$NBComcast did not treat him well. They moved him around first to weekends and then Cleita Jul 2015 #55
So that's why they got rid of him. grahamhgreen Jul 2015 #56
Ed Schultz was cancelled b/c he spoke against ComCast KauaiK Jul 2015 #58
I agree. Pushing Bernie is also against Comcast's interests as well. n/t Cleita Jul 2015 #59

appalachiablue

(41,145 posts)
1. I saw the last 10+ mins. of ED with John Nichols & woman consultant. Very positve comments
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:44 PM
Jul 2015

about Bernie and recent polls. Big mistake to take ED off at 5. Last week I heard he might be put in at 3, not sure though- Comcast is doing things their way. A few months ago they got rid of some like Ronan Farrow and moved Chris Jansing to WH reporting.

*Did ED mention Bernie's events in Louisiana?

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
2. good for ed
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jul 2015

i saw that consultant before. she is unwatchable imo. She's completely delusional and she talks over everybody all the time.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
3. She was something else about her 150 manufacturing jobs in Wisc. under Scott Walker.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:48 PM
Jul 2015

Then she had some vague reference to federal statistics but couldn't be specific? Ed just looked amazed.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
7. Of course not. She would have had those references at her fingertips if they were real.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jul 2015

These RW blowhards are so used to pulling "facts" out of their ass on FoxNews and CNN, where no one questions their source, that she had to fall back on another lie.

appalachiablue

(41,145 posts)
43. She was in rare form on Maher. Name, Genevieve Wood. Texas Towlie below says she's from
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:52 PM
Jul 2015

The Daily Signal, funded by Heritage that's funded by the Kochs who fund Scott Walker. Fundy crowd- barf!

appalachiablue

(41,145 posts)
24. Yep, she's awful and making the rounds lately. Just remembered seeing her on
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:48 PM
Jul 2015

another show over the wkend. Somebody thinks she's valuable, I don't know why.

TexasTowelie

(112,248 posts)
29. She is from the Daily Signal,
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:09 PM
Jul 2015

the news arm of the Heritage Foundation which of course is funded by the Koch Foundation which of course pulls Scott Walker's puppet strings.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
6. Glad Ed is still supporting Bernie, but I read that he was canceled because
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:00 PM
Jul 2015

of his trashing the TPP. Apparently NBC was one of the few businesses invited to the TPP negotiations and are in complete support of it. They even cited that Ed had 71 broadcasts about TP an they're unhappy.

appalachiablue

(41,145 posts)
8. Wow. At least Ed was able to bring up TPP 71 times! When GE owned MS/NBC they didn't care
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:05 PM
Jul 2015

as much, but Comcast is very conservative I heard.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
11. Both I think. However, he didn't mention TPP on this show, hence my headline.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:07 PM
Jul 2015

He's pro-labor, so anyone who is, is pretty much against these trade agreements because the past have proved them to be bad for labor. The fact that no one really knows what's in these agreements and that they are being conducted behind closed doors seems to point to the fact that billion dollar industries will get the gold mine in these agreements and the working class will get the shaft. Just saying. I don't know why the majority of the nation isn't included in this decision.

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
61. Speaking truth to power...damn "power"
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:48 PM
Jul 2015

In protest, once Ed is replaced, I am turning off MSNBC and watching Al Jazeera, which I now do on the weekends anyway!

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
12. We all know banks are too big to fail, and need to be broken up
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:04 PM
Jul 2015

I thought there were laws in place to keep media companies from being too big too, but apparently not. We need to get Bernie working on this too. These huge mergers and buyouts just keep happening and we all lose because of it.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
15. There used to be laws limiting media companies. Guess WHO signed the bill,
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:15 PM
Jul 2015

the TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT that eliminated the most important of those limitations?


[b]BILL CLINTON, THAT'S WHO!

One of the many reasons that I will NEVER, EVER vote for Hillary. NEVER, EVER.

Sold out. Sold out. And willing to sell the American people out.

Didn't take that much intelligence to realize that that Telecommunications Act would poison what was left of our democracy after Reagan got through with it.

And Bill Clinton signed it.

May he feel the shame from this date to eternity. For shame, Bill Clinton.

And Hillary is made of the same stuff when it comes to being able to understand the consequences of signing this bill or that. She proved it with the Iraq War Resolution. She was warned ahead of time by Code Pink that war in Iraq was not the answer. But Hillary ignored that good advice.

And Bill -- the Telecommunications Act is just one of the things he did as president that demonstrated poor judgment if not worse.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
22. Oh come on now...just because they are married doesn't mean they are birds of a feather...
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:46 PM
Jul 2015

or does it?

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
62. I hope that history does cite all the damage Bill Clinton did as president
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:50 PM
Jul 2015

He is probably the most intelligent president in my lifetime, so he knew what he was doing. The Village Idiot Bush, on the other hand... .

George II

(67,782 posts)
13. It's getting to be the Ed Sanders Show
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:13 PM
Jul 2015

Was it his show this afternoon or Alex Wagner's show that had the woman who was at the Louisiana rally. She said many people there were republicans who just wanted to see who Sanders is.

I've been saying pretty much the same thing for about 6 weeks, people don't go see him because they're followers or potential followers of of Sanders, they're just curiosity seekers.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
18. So did they join in with the cheering and applause, too?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:36 PM
Jul 2015

All the footage I've seen show truly enthusiastic people who cheer where good Dems would cheer.

How does that "sour grapes" story go?

kenn3d

(486 posts)
28. ...many people there were republicans...
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:05 PM
Jul 2015

I watched the live feed and I can tell you that entire crowd (@4500 people) was enthusiastic beyond expectations.

Bernie knows that a lot of Red State Democrats quite rightfully feel forgotten and forsaken by all the calculating politicians who have cynically written them off while counting up likely electoral college votes elsewhere.
And plenty of discouraged ever-poorer working class Republican voters are hearing his message too ... be sure of it.


George II

(67,782 posts)
33. Either that or, as has been speculated by many (not just here)...
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:14 PM
Jul 2015

...republicans are doing all they can to pump up Sanders to detract from Clinton.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
63. Yes I agree that they are curious. They want to see what an honest politician looks like.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:13 PM
Jul 2015

The corporate media won't show them.

George II

(67,782 posts)
68. Yeah...the "corporate media" won't show them, but Sanders has been on the "corporate media"...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:49 PM
Jul 2015

...more than any other candidate in the last month or more. What does that say about him?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
73. Most likely because his main competition is keeping a low profile. People might ask her what
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 06:22 PM
Jul 2015

her financial ties are to the Canadian oil and the XL Pipeline.

Sen Sanders is for the 99% and not the billionaires.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
38. you don't have to go to a rally to find out who he is.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:43 PM
Jul 2015

Last edited Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:53 PM - Edit history (1)

It's all available on-line. I call bullshit on this "theory".

Anyone dedicated enough to go to a rally, is most likely a Bernie enthusiast.

I would never go out of my way to attend a Hillary rally. Just not worth the effort. I see enough on-line already.

Oh, and you may want to check out this thread too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251477126

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
20. So what do you think of all the other shows that are promoting Donald Trump?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:38 PM
Jul 2015

Do you consider them politician-promoters too? Or is it only for those who give Bernie Sanders some air time?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
36. You watch no TV or listen to the radio or read no newspaper? Trump is sucking up all the air
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:37 PM
Jul 2015

in the media. Besides that since Chuckie Todd is replacing Ed. Do you prefer him to a person who was on our side? Now, even if Hillary does get the nomination and not Bernie, Ed would have promoted her candidacy and now his voice will be absent. Is that what you wanted? You can be sure the Toadie won't show her except in the most unflattering way. I can't believe that's what you want.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
49. I don't watch TV news or radio. I read, and very little of that would be Rethug
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:56 PM
Jul 2015

sources trumpeting about Trump.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
48. I'm glad to hear you don't watch Fox News.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:54 PM
Jul 2015

They're full of non-journalists there. The frightening thing is that some of them think they are journalists. Ed has never pretended to be one.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
39. LOL
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:45 PM
Jul 2015

and what about those in media talking up Hillary and ignoring Sanders (most of them)...are they just political promoters too...oh no...they are journalists!

BTW, this should have been directed to pmwmom, not Cleita. Sorry babe!

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
17. Bad reference? That's what they used to do with me when I got fired for being rebellious.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:30 PM
Jul 2015

I am joking.

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
51. Canceling a show with bad ratings is "corporate fascism"?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:29 PM
Jul 2015

More to the point, canceling a show that was given a weekday slot TWICE was "corporate fascism"?

More to the point, canceling a low-rated show while leaving a bunch of other liberals on the air is "corporate fascism"?

Good to know.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
64. Ed represents the working people of America as does Sen Sanders. Corporations don't
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:23 PM
Jul 2015

like either. Not surprised to see him get the boot. Weird that you are defending MSNBC.

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
65. I'm not defending anyone; I'm acknowledging the realities of business...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jul 2015

...TV shows that nobody watches get cancelled, even if you or I happen to like them. They gave Ed two shots at a weekday slot and he couldn't draw in a crowd.

Meanwhile, MSNBC has plenty of other progressive voices still on the air.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
27. The thing that chafes my ass about him is he was a right wing radio show host....
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:04 PM
Jul 2015

The thing that chafes my ass about him is he was a right wing radio show host who changed his politics and ran to television because El Rushbo was handing him his ass in radio ratings.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
31. He was always for labor and unions even when he was a Republican.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:12 PM
Jul 2015

Like many people of the era he was anti-tax but it was when the party of Eisenhower became the elitist banker's party that he changed his affiliation. He was still a bit centrist for a long while but has really evolved over the years into a good Democrat. He says himself having to see how the working class lived back then that changed his views. Some people do change. Sometimes they change for the worse like Donald Trump who was actually once a Democrat and liberal.

George II

(67,782 posts)
44. That and a year or so ago he was gung-ho for the Keystone Pipeline, promoting it for .....
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:53 PM
Jul 2015

....about 15 minutes a show.

Then...boom.....he started railing against it every single night.

I lost a lot of respect for him when that happened. Not for his position either way but his complete turnaround from one night to the next.

I wonder how much he gets in commission for all the text messages he solicits in his nightly "polls", which serve no purpose?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
60. That lasted about three days. He was listening to Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who was for it.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:17 PM
Jul 2015

Instead he got educated by Jane Kleeb and has been against it ever since, over a year now. I think that speaks for itself.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
50. AFAIK he did reasonably well as a radio host.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:06 PM
Jul 2015

Besides when Mr. Limpballs is on a few thousand stations and Ed is on a handful... who's going to win? In any case progressive talk died... where is Air America now? You have a handful of progressive stations left and they're carrying programming from progressive presenters who weren't really part of Air America anyway.

The only thing I connect Ed and the aforementioned excuse of a radio presenter is that to me they sound a bit alike. That's all.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
66. Are people permitted to
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:36 PM
Jul 2015

Last edited Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:37 PM - Edit history (1)

incorporate new and different ideas and to change their minds? Or are we forever consigned to type as presented in the first ideas we held earlier in life? I hope we are not that rigid.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
67. Genuine change is good...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:27 PM
Jul 2015

After all Saul became Paul on the road to Damascus. I have questions about the timing of the change and the circumstances that surround it. They remind me of the timing and circumstances that surround the 'conversion' of the late Arlen Specter.

 

cocainecowboy

(45 posts)
37. #OpComcast
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:37 PM
Jul 2015

Needs to commence now to ensure Comcast has to get rid of Chuck Todd because of a real scandal involving a sheep, a loofah, and a rubber.

kenn3d

(486 posts)
46. Ed asks: Can Bernie Sanders Win?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:01 PM
Jul 2015
http://www.msnbc.com/the-ed-show/watch/can-bernie-sanders-win--492016707732

This show is indeed remarkably opinionated for MSM, and quite optimistic about Bernie's surprising campaign. And yet it's also very refreshing to those who agree with and support this remarkable candidate.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
47. The MSM is very opinionated, period. But the bias is usually right wing or just left of right.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:04 PM
Jul 2015

When opinion goes to the left, it is refreshing for us on the left, who are actually the majority.

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
53. Unlike Tweety, Rachel, Chris Hayes, etc.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 05:19 AM
Jul 2015

Ed was telecast only once a day. This did him a great disservice, especially given his time slot. Replacing him with that Republican idiot Chuck Todd will be a disaster.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
55. M$NBComcast did not treat him well. They moved him around first to weekends and then
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:24 AM
Jul 2015

to this time slot and finally to airing his show only once a day. Most people were still at work or commuting during that time slot.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ed Schultz not giving up....