2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumQuestion Two: Does Bernie's platform and history support black people?
As we can see from the previous poll, obviously Bernie Sanders is not racist in the eyes of DUers.
(http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251466009)
Question Two:
Do you believe that Bernie's platform and voting/speaking history shows that he cares about and supports black people (and all minorities)?
43 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes. | |
41 (95%) |
|
No. | |
2 (5%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
LWolf
(46,179 posts)To open dialogue in a constructive way, can you please help me understand why you think Sanders' platform and history do not support PoC?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)luvspeas
(1,883 posts)Do you believe? That Bernie's platform! And voting/speaking history. Shows that he cares about and supports black people and all minorities?
Do you believe that Bernie's platform? And voting/speaking history shows that. He cares. About! And support's black, people. And all minorities?
Do you believe that Bernie's platform and voting/speaking history shows that? He cares about and supports black. People and all, minorities.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)In the voice of William Shatner.
luvspeas
(1,883 posts)Part one is equally stupid:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=466085
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)We say our sons are in prison he says 'jobs for youths!' Dude, they are in jail because the system targets black people, not because they were on the stoop drinking Cisco. We say our kids are dying, we get, college for all. How dead kids gonna go to college? And how kids with daddy in prison and mom working 3 job gonna find time to study while attending a shitty school in the hood, succed enough to excell in college?
And what he gon do about this racist drug war? The all white juries and the mostly white prosecutors who love to 'make an example' out of our men and give our extreme sentences to us? We ain't heard what we need t hear to give him support yet.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Hillary speaks of more social responses to these injustices and Bernie speaks to more economic ones?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)when discussing race issues. She hires black people. Goes to their churches and eats with them. I feel more comfortable with person who is not afraid to kick it. Hillary tries hard to get it and she fucks up but she doesn't blame us when she's tone deaf, she corrects herself. Please don't make me say anything else nice about that woman.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)eom
bravenak
(34,648 posts)JI7
(89,276 posts)And other minorities and immigrants.
It's not that they see her as some great top fighter for their causes. Most will say they don't think that.
But she is seen as more being connected with all of these communities on a personal level.
The thing with obama was that he was able to do this also and that's why he was able to win against her.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)London Lover Man
(371 posts)Hillary should NOT have supported the welfare reform, and she continued to support it up until she "evolved" (other words, changed her mind)
Bernie's long activism and history shows that he has always been for PoC. I'm surprised at you for dropping your support for Bernie. I don't think you ever had a solid support in the first place.
And must not forget her 2008 dog whistles. She is repeating the same pattern this year.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)London Lover Man
(371 posts)So what's the problem
bravenak
(34,648 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)He is a Senator from Vermont.
There are many, many more African Americans in New York than in Vermont.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)rather deflect to economic/class and not address the underlying issue that is literally KILLING black people!
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 22, 2015, 06:06 PM - Edit history (1)
Racism isn't as simple as hate for hate's sake-if it was just that, it wouldn't still exist.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)eom
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's harass a black person week. Not even black history month yet and here comes the trollin.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Mornings come with birds and kids
Talking to themselves for some reason
And wrists can vibrate at a comfortable rate to get you to sleep or keep you from it
He wears that hole in his shoe with real grace
And if he wears it right he just might have a leg up on everyone bet it'd feel so good.
They'd all watch him tie those gold laces
And they become things that he can't stop tying
Becoming grateful and bitter for his brand new handicap and
Holding the ropes that he'd been thrust upon
Can't get his hands off his feet to enjoy the walk
Now it's tough to tell if ever he was real
Just knows the crunch of his new boots crushes
special snowflakes
Choke the evil out
Smoke"
Stroke"
Choke"
it's satisfied
by removing chunks of dead skin it turns it on the same way
mmmm mmmm mmmm
couldn't keep a straight face staring at it
it satisfies
it turns me on
With that mirror you forced yourself to stare
And you stink of the holiness they soaked you in
It ends up driving you bored and drinking you numb
So special for a minute though
He wears that hole in his shoe with the same face
And if he wears it right he
just might have to keep that leg up on everyone
it feels so good.
They'd all watch him tie those gold laces
And they become things that he can't stop tying
Gracefully bitter for that old handicap and
Gripping the ropes that he holds himself on
Feet paraded on high as his hands take the walk
Tough to tell if ever he was real Just knows the crunch of those old boots keeps him a special snowflake
The video's cover is what looks like a woman without clothes bending over an airbrushed ass. And above that is a turkey. It sounds like a keyboard warrior...
Response to bravenak (Reply #31)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)I am glad people are showing their true selves
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)eom
bravenak
(34,648 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)can't take him being challenged the little bit he has for the few weeks he has announced without blowing a gasket.
It's really something to watch.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)No excuse for that kind of talk.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Know it makes you wreary. I can walk away from real life trolls. But you can't. Sorry, bravenak.
Cha
(297,733 posts)anyone who cares about #BlackLivesMatter?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They are acting like children today.
Cha
(297,733 posts)Well, I can't really say what I think, can I? Unless I want to get a hide.. and it's not worth it.
Enough to say.. It's not #BlackLivesMatter who "shot themselves in the foot".. They are hurting BS more than they could ever know.
The irony is they think they're protecting him with their way beyond rudeness against the Black Community.
Like Cali Democrat said on another thread.. ".. you can't make this shit up"
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)8:33 PM
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Tue Jul 21, 2015, 06:57 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Thank you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=466781
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This person has been trying all day; for the past couple of days actually, to bait people into fights. Jurors, please look not only at this post, but others w/in the thread. I think you will see what I mean. Also, fyi- I am an observer, not a participant in this thread---Just sick of seeing this endless rude, and disruptive behavior. Thanks in advance.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 21, 2015, 07:33 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Voting to leave. I do not see how this post is against the DU rules.
- Glassunion
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is not worthy of a hide.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not a TOS violation.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
Alert abuse Delete this DU Mail
bravenak
(34,648 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,014 posts)Or something
bravenak
(34,648 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)That was a snotty thing to say....
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I suspect that this attitude toward POC and their concerns is why we're having this particular discussion in the first place.
To that I say, no shit.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)So that when the inevitable "I didn't see any Sanders supporters tell black people they were irrelevant/call black people thugs/say #BLM was dead to me" gets going over the next few weeks -- and we ALL know folks here will be doing the "huh? What? I saw NOTHINK!1" game here soon -- here is one glorious example of someone doing just that right here!
Thanks for keeping it real!
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On Tue Jul 21, 2015, 10:26 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
You and your opinions are irrelevant to me. nt
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=466278
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Insulting and a personal attack
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 21, 2015, 10:35 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's less of a personal attack than the object of the reply. I suspect the alerter is attempting to prove the golden BB theory. This really needs to go 0-7.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not a personal attack, a statement that one poster isn't interested in the opinions of another. Certainly have seen this many times on DU so no, not hide worthy.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
arcane1
(38,613 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)It's slime covered rock-fucking-bottom.
Renew Deal
(81,877 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)when I went to check it, nothing came up.
So I must assume they are someone who I have on ignore.
Handy little pal, that ignore tool is. Life is good.
So if I'm not responding. Have a good life.
in another thread this morning I posted this:
I THINK I'm hearing that PoC want racial justice to be a top priority, not only a facet of economic justice. Because while racial injustice has always been with us, it feels like (to this white woman) those injustices have begun to increase again, to be more public, to be legitimized by tptb.
I THINK that some of what I'm hearing is not just a demand for justice, but the anger and bitterness fueling that demand. I think I'm hearing that there is a growing determination not to push injustices under the rug, ever again. I support that.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=466228
Am I getting it? If not, keep talking.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I think he can get things straight.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Sanders has talked about more than economics, and has done so throughout this campaign. Were they not good enough, or were they not being heard? Or was it something else?
Why are his previous acts, like speaking against the "tough on crime" wave in the 90s that ramped this into overdrive not good enough?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)or is it something else?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He seems to be responding to the message well today. Looking forward, i hope his supporters follow suit.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)You're a great voice on DU for African Americans.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)My patience is thin but I try.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)DU is overwhelmingly white.
Expect much of it to go right over their heads!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The clueless. God save me from the clueless.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)others are just clueless.
Anansi1171
(793 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)bubble gum at the same time. Not to mention that most of the issues you brought up he, as President, would have little power to change outside of a bully pulpit and possibly increasing DOJ oversight where it would be applicable, which is limited. Presidents aren't dictators, they have little control over most of the criminal justice system, which is run by the state and local jurisdictions.
Not to mention here's an example of some of his positions:
On the drug war:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Bernie_Sanders_Drugs.htm
Actually, why not look at his stances and judge for yourself:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Bernie_Sanders.htm
bravenak
(34,648 posts)From a Sanders supporters I will fucking scream. Hundreds of lectures from people who seem to think I CANNOT FUCKING READ. Telling me to READ HIS RECORD! HE'S DONE SO MUC FOR YOU PEOPLE!!! HE'S YOUR LAST CHANCE!!!
I have read all of that shit and it has been tossec at me all extra condecendingly and paternalistically for SEVERAL DAYS. Over and over and over and over with the fucking links and marching with MLK shit. I KNOW!! I KNOW HIS DAMN RECORD!!!
Bunch of bernie bullies bullying me. Jesus H Christ. Just HAVE TO correct us black folks and let us know how stupid we are for not feeling the Bern. I'm Berned out!
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)He is not speaking our language and never will if his supporters keep attacking every black person they can find.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)his supporters are attacking every black person they can find? Or are you making that up?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Do you know how many times I have been sent that link and told in a nasty way to CHECK HIS RECORD? It's a fucking meme now.
Now as far as his supporters attacking every black person they can find on the internet... Check the twitter of Imani Gandy and check DU.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026995434#post34
Search berniesoblack. Then read the threads I've posted in. CHECK MY POST RECORD!!! It's there.
This morning Imani asked how the bullying black people into supporting is going. She has gotten HUNDREDS of angry white liberal tweets from sanders fans. We all have. Black america is innundated with condescending paternalistic posts where white people shamelessly try to school black people on how to protest right and on MLK. Been going on and on to th piint that I stopped supporting Bernie. See, I supported him because I KNOW HIS RECORD. But after all the chastising and anger and vitriol towards black protestors calling them thugs, lee atwater plants, useful idiots, and all of the Miss Millie wailing, fuck that. I'm damn near ready to get a no bernie no never avatar.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)GD: Primaries that long, I was avoiding it, remembering, quite distinctly, the wars that were waged last time between, in particular, Obama v. Hillary.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)HFRN
(1,469 posts)I think you'll like what you see
Response to HFRN (Reply #113)
Post removed
Fozzledick
(3,860 posts)Seriously though, if you have read Bernie's record then why do you keep saying such nasty things about him? It seems like you're deliberately ignoring where his position has been all along.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)Sounds like it's a "broken record".....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I warned folks not to bother black twitter. Alot of those people have masters degrees in Black Studies, history, etc.
They posted the same info about a bajillion times. Lol! I hope it over.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)and his cancelling of events afterward. It includes his refusal to understand that racism acts as a force onto itself, that it is not entirely subsumed to economic matters. You seem to think marching 50 yrs ago is enough. It is not. It does nothing to address issues of racism today. There is a reason his supporters are overwhelmingly white, and I would hazard to say not by in large poor.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)And I don't mean subsumed, you have depressed economic areas that are that way because of racism. Are we to deny that redlining exists, or food deserts, de facto segregation, defunding public education, etc.? Are we not supposed to point out that these issues disproportionately affect the African-American community?
You seem to think that Bernie Sanders civil rights activities stopped 50 years ago, when that is blatantly untrue.
Black lives matter, and that includes not only making sure black people are protected from injustice in the courts and law enforcement, but also to make sure we all help increase the quality of their lives. Its all connected, and I would even say that you can't have civil rights without equal opportunity as well.
To give a starker example, I live in St. Louis, above the Delmar divide(North City), many neighborhoods wouldn't look out of place in a post-apocalyptic movie like Mad Max, this is in a major city, entire blocks are abandoned, houses and buildings collapsing, and is this happening on the white side of town? Fuck no, its on the mostly segregated black side. Its so bad that much of North Side is suffering from Black Flight into North County areas and cities like Ferguson.
Now, its not all doom and gloom, but much of it still is, there are several people and groups fighting to preserve what we can and rebuild that which is lost, to try to build a city that's truly integrated rather than with such sharp dividing lines. A city that invests in its people rather than abandoning entire neighborhoods because the residents happen to be mostly majority black.
Recently, St. Louis city barely passed a citizen oversight panel over the police department, its a toothless board that can't do much, the day they voted on it, a "suspicious" package was left outside City Hall, prompting a bomb scare. I'm normally not conspiracy minded, but that seems far too suspicious to me.
The thing is that, the President can do more regarding employment, community investment, housing, and education than law enforcement or racism in general. The fact is that federal aid in economic issues should and will disproportionately benefit the black community. This should go hand in hand with local advocacy for civilian oversight boards(with teeth) that properly represent communities the police are supposed to police. More community involvement with law enforcement, independent offices for prosecution, and other reforms. But, and this is key, no President has jurisdiction over any of this on the local or state level, where it mostly occurs.
Whether the president is Obama, Hillary or Bernie, they can't do much to make black people feel safe on the street from law enforcement.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)and certainly most AAs see the problems they encounter as a result of racism rather than class prejudice. Look at difference in arrest rates of poor whites vs. poor black folks. Also, even African Americans who earn a lot of money are subject to racism. No amount of money whitens.
Sanders seems to believe it is all the result of poverty. It is not. Additionally, there are personality issues that were evident at Netroots. For him to respond to protesters by talking about his record is tone deaf. The problem isn't his record; it's American society. He doesn't seem to understand how important it is to listen to voters. They don't care about "his record." They care about what he plans to do to address problems of racism, and what he says doesn't satisfy them.
I know the things about civil rights that people here love to champion: his marching 50 yrs ago and his support for Jesse Jackson. Guess what? I supported Jackson too. So what? That sure as hell doesn't make me a champion for Civil Rights. I guess I don't know what else he's done. I know he represents a state that is overwhelmingly white. He hasn't had the need until now to address diverse constituencies.
Also, he has a responsibility to say something to his supporters. Many of their responses to the BLM protest was simply unacceptable and counter-productive. He badly needs a come to Jesus moment.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)I will say that many of his supporters aren't helping, to put it mildly, and he should stand up on that issue.
But I also object to the misrepresentations of Bernie Sanders' positions such as the one you just stated.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)discrimination doesn't exist? No. Has he ever voted against affirmative action? No. Does he acknowledge that the criminal justice system is discriminatory? Yes.
I'm not sure what more you would want here. An explicit statement for the exact wording you used, but opposite, I don't think such a statement exists.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)and sees policies that address poverty as the solution. You said that wasn't accurate. I was asking how it wasn't accurate and what he has said or proposed to suggest otherwise. What am I misunderstanding?
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)He has said nothing of the sort, however he does recognize that economic policies were used for years to enforce unofficial segregation, redlining, defunding public schools, etc. It was used as a weapon for racism and discrimination, and he recognizes it can also be used as a tool to reverse those policies.
He also has advocated for ending the war on drugs, oversight of police through civilian comittees, reversing the militarization of the police, etc.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)poverty leads to a loss of agency which leads to a diminished political voice. When minorities make the money they deserve they then have the means to raise a stronger voice. Broke people don't bring the lawsuits that can bring a change. I guess I don't really speak for him, but I imagine this could be part of the thing. I think there is something to be said for that.
okasha
(11,573 posts)is that it's exactly backwards. Racism, misogyny and homophobia all diminish voices. And when those voices manage to rise into the hearing range of the privileged, the response are all geared to their perspective. There is no real effort to see the world through the eyes of the less privileged. It's you, the white, the straight, the male, telling us what our problems are and how we have failed to approach them in a way you regard as appropriate.
I don't know how bravenak has managed to get through this thread without just giving up in nauseated disgust. My hat is off to her.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Of. I'm nust some dude on the internet trying to understand. One thing I'm figuring out rather quickly is that no matter how much I try to listen and then represent my candidate in a respectful manner, its taken as thohh I'm trying to force something on people. I am not. Nor was I attacking Bravnak or talking down to her.so I'm unsure why you brought up her tolerance of this thread in response to my post. I just took a stab at guessing where Bernie was coming from. I guess I just don't know how to communicate with people who would take offense at that.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)By the way some Sanders supporters have been acting. It's insulting and it's not helpful. It'll be up to Sanders and his campaign to reach out and address these issues on their own terms in a way that resonates. I think he can, but we'll see. IMO, it's our job as supporters to listen, get beyond the defensiveness and dismissiveness, and not make things worse.
I am sorry things have gotten ugly. You're an important and valued voice here.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He want a bit of help understanding our issues. I see that as a positive sign. If his supporters try his new tact, maybe things will improve.
Thank you for the support. Shit done got real, eh? Lol! Primary craziness.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)I hope we supporters can follow his example. There's a lot of work to do. The first step is listen and figure out what that work is and how to address it.
BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)It's a both.
I'm going to come at this from an epidemiological perspective (since I'm an epidemiologist who has dedicated his life to solving health inequities).
From the outset let me acknowledge that MANY subpopulations suffer from health and health care disparities (i.e. racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT populations, persons with disabilities etc.) but since we're talking about race, I'll focus on Black/White differences in health.
Bottom line: you can explain a very high proportion (say, between 60 and 80%) of B/W health gaps by evening out (statistically) socioeconomic status. That is, the gaps narrow a lot if you pretend that Blacks and Whites in the US have the same $$/education etc. But a race effect remains.
Bernie is not incorrect in saying that many of the economic policies he puts forward would go a long way to "solving" some of these health differences (including life expectancy). But they wouldn't erase them.
Racism exists. Structural racism exists.
I agree completely that Bernie needs to address racial and social (and health, I hope) injustice head on. Acknowledge that economics go so far. And shine a light on the structural racism that will keep those gaps open 20-40%.
That said, no other candidate is putting forward policies that could close health disparities 60-80%. Not HRC. Not at all.
So, let's engage in a productive, educative conversation with Bernie about that final 20-40%. But let's not disparage him for being the best candidate on these issues, albeit imperfect.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)I'm eager to have a dialogue. I've been a community organizer and CBPR researcher for 20 years. This is my passion.
Dismissing my post in 20 seconds without a thoughtful (or enlightening reply) that moves the conversation forward is also not helpful.
Others do have points to add to this important conversation. There is not 1 "correct' perspective.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Whether it's healthcare or economics, there is always a twust where it never gets discussed or addresses. We can't fix racism and black suffering and get social justice with what you posted.
BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)Will it end racism? No.
But conversely, ending racism -- even structural racism -- would not automatically yield economic and health equity.
Again I submit it's not an either/or but a both.
And even if our courts, our police, our education system etc. ceased to be racist tomorrow, we still wouldn't have eradicated the personal racism that infects a significant % of the US.
I am not deflecting. I'm adding to.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)But 2 decades working to fight injustice, empower communities, and improve lives have taught me - and these lessons have come straight from "our" community -- that pulling all the levers you can, taking action wherever you can, is a better strategy than hitting 1 button to the excision of all others.
Racial, Economic, Health, Housing, Education and Social justice.
Focusing on all doesn't water down the others.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I went to school to. This is about black lives matter. I don't think you get to just arbitrarily decid what they or I should focus on. It's rude.
BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)Merely sharing what I have learned from experience (not school).
I haven't denigrated or disparaged your position and view, yet you dismiss mine. And call me rude for having an unheated conversation.
Black lives do matter. And black lives end in all sorts of unjust ways. Police violence. Uncontrolled diabetes. Hazardous housing. All factors, in my opinion, are worth addressing.
Again, never said you had to adopt my opinion. But please don't put me down for a nuanced difference of opinion.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)See ya around and we'll probably connect better.
BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Its a podcast program called "We Live Here", the last two episodes are talking about what looks to be your expertise:
http://news.stlpublicradio.org/programs/we-live-here
It is basically talking about how depressed economic status and de factor segregation are leading to increased risk factors that shorten the life spans of black people versus everyone else in my metro area. Its a pretty stark contrast too.
BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)Will definitely check out the series.
There's some new research out of Baltimore in a local, disadvantaged community with significant Black and White populations. Bottom line is that given the similar economics, education etc. Black/White health gaps barely exist.
Segregation, lack of access to parks, healthy food, health care, good housing, public transport, etc. are killing Blacks (and Latinos, and the undocumented, and the poor) every day. Add to that racist policing and adjudication and the problems are compounded even more.
There are so many fights to fight and I understand that some folks prioritize one over the other especially given how seemingly insurmountable and daunting they are when taken together.
So I'm glad folks are angry. And I'm glad the conversation is brewing among liberals of all colors.
I hope that we can bring together all of our expertise and passion and develop a plan to address it all - through a candidate (and a Congress) that "gets it".
Someday. If we're loud enough.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)they couldnt care less about social issues, because they know if you control the purse, little else matters
it's nothing new
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They donate to the united negro college fund too. So what?
HFRN
(1,469 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)HFRN
(1,469 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)That the jury who gives comments like this a pass, don't have much of an explanation for doing so. I was juror #1-
Not caring about the kochs does not indicate stupidity like this poster thinks. Apparently if people would just 'connect the dots' they see that it all leads back to the Kochs. This is abusive and it has been going on for several days.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 21, 2015, 03:48 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Inconsiderate and rude. Name calling, labeling⦠it's over the edge and departure from, "You're not seeing the point" comment instead.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: While not necessarily a direct ad hominem, it comes across as very snarky. I would definitely class this as disruptive and rude.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Who does this person think they are calling bravenak stupid? Arrogant and condescending. That is not discussion, it's a personal attack. The kind of person who makes fun of "Social Justice Warriors" on a liberal forum.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think the post should have been alerted on!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Stupid alert.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think the post should have been alerted on!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Stupid alert.
and he could have avoided the above 2 jury comments if he had just posted the alert comment
'Not caring about the kochs does not indicate stupidity like this poster thinks. Apparently if people would just 'connect the dots' they see that it all leads back to the Kochs. This is abusive and it has been going on for several days. '
directly to me - perhaps I might have been enlightened
(but thanks for posting the result)
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It gets exhausting sometimes.
Response to bravenak (Reply #106)
HFRN This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Please list your professional and academic accomplishments, with adequate verification, of course.
Thank you in advance.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)HFRN
(1,469 posts)you hurt my feelings
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)luvspeas
(1,883 posts)you just have an agenda and it's obvious and a big waste of time. also you have people telling you it's offensive. People's feelings are not something to be arguing about. You should delete these threads and apologize.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Bernie spoke out against over policing and mass incarceration when all the other Democrats and liberals were tripping over each other to throw black people in jail. That includes the Clinton, Clinton, O'Malley, and most of the rest.
His heart is in the right place and he was there from the beginning.
Combine that with his economic agenda for the working class, and smart policies trying to keep us out of bullshit wars.
Bernie is a socialist. Socialism is anti-racism. It's built in.
BUT: Yes he has major room for improvement on how he talks about criminal justice issues TODAY. I'm not excusing his faults and failures. I just think on balance he's still pretty good, and certainly better than Clinton or O'Malley who were cheerleaders for locking up black people in mass numbers.
But he has to learn when people say police are murdering black people, he can't immediately flip to unemployment and kids hangin out on corners. It's too much like victim blaming.
I think he will step up and meet the challenge.
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #27)
Post removed
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)...much better than I can:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026995879#post19
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)It's no big deal.
I support the stuff you're talking about too.
I hope all the candidates step up and do the right thing. Including Bernie and also the others.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I think maybe I was talking to the Trayvon picture.
My bad.
Stay cool.
Go Steelers
See ya round this crazy place...
HFRN
(1,469 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Support is not a binary concept; it is spread across a range.
Response to Fearless (Original post)
Post removed
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I do. That does not mean that I am unaware of the huge problem that many white people have with racism. But it does mean that when discussing many issues, I will use a class-based framework to show how the 1% use racism, and religion, and language, and ethnicity to divide working people.
But given that the economic foundation of the US was based upon slavery, any economic discussion will have and should have race as a subtext.
I cannot speak for Senator Sanders on this issue, but he identifies as a socialist so my inclination is to think that a class based economic view of the US and its problems might be Sanders' reference.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Some folks's slips are showing.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Historic NY
(37,453 posts)imagine progressives imploding...
Number23
(24,544 posts)entertaining thing about this thread.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)about this guy. Or Scientologists. Or Standers.
Number23
(24,544 posts)This fucking place...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I bet the rest of the month will be alert the black people festivals all over DU.
Cha
(297,733 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)luvspeas
(1,883 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)luvspeas
(1,883 posts)seems you're not as slick as you think you are, slick.
Cha
(297,733 posts)Renew Deal
(81,877 posts)Bernie's philosophy is to lift all ships. Apparently that is offensive.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Extreme.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)If you're not I doubt you're in a position to say.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)The fact is there are very few people of color on this site. Many have left due to what they have described as a climate of hostility. That would appear to be more evident now than ever.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)where the black guy always dies first.
Response to Fearless (Original post)
Post removed
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Personally I like to see what lurks or bubbles out of DU's muddy undercurrent.
NanceGreggs
(27,819 posts)... what the point of polls like this is.
It is understood that the vast majority of posters on this site are BS supporters. So everyone knows what the outcome of these polls will be.
So again - what is the point?
In addition to that obvious fact, what is the point of asking BS supporters if they "believe that Bernie's platform and voting/speaking history shows that he cares about and supports black people"?
If AAs and minorities don't believe that Bernie is speaking to them and for them, whether a bunch of people on DU think he is, is of absolutely no consequence whatsoever.
Is the idea for BS supporters to slap each other on the back and say, "See, Bernie's got it right, and the AAs and minorities who don't support him are just wrong?"
We've heard a lot on this site about Bernie "getting his message out there". Well, if his message isn't resonating with black Americans and minorities, the problem is with the message or the messenger, and is not the fault of those who just aren't buying it.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)This thread is a clusterfuck
Fearless
(18,421 posts)I.e. I ask a yes / no question and people talk.
I believe that has occurred.
NanceGreggs
(27,819 posts)... is asking a question when you already know what the answer will be, and then trying to make a point about how the answer proved something.
By Skinner's own account, 85% of DU are Bernie supporters. So what is the point of polls that will obviously show that 85% of DU are Bernie supporters?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)We should have quantitative research on what we believe on the question asked. Everyone provided that research. I asked a question and believe that I asked it in an unbiased way. If you suggest I didn't I'd be interested in hearing you out.
NanceGreggs
(27,819 posts)... regardless of the question posed, the "Bernie is right!" response is going to be the majority response.
Everyone here knows that. So what is the point of pretending a different outcome is possible, or that the obvious outcome has any relevance?
If you post a poll on a Republican site about "which is the better political party", you already know that The Democratic Party! isn't going to be the majority response. So why ask the question in the first place?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)You're not electing a set of ideas to the White House, you're electing a person whose experiences and outlook will be very important. You're not electing the person who gets to decide what US policy is, for the most part; you're electing a national spokesperson who gets to nudge the conversation in a certain direction.
Just in terms of the actual actions of the US Government, it's unlikely there would be very much difference at all between a Clinton or Sanders administration (if we had a realistic shot at picking up Congress that might be a different story).
Fearless
(18,421 posts)We could have the House by 2018 if we have the right voice in the White House.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Or will conservatives stop being conservative when they hear the right arguments?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)The gerrymandering issue does need to be solved.
I'll never forget Rove on Fox News ranting about Ohio.
The fix was in. Clearly.
But we still beat them. And we need to, if we ever hope to get bipartisan redistricting.
mythology
(9,527 posts)But I think based on polling results his message isn't resonating with black voters. That could be because he isn't addressing some fundamental aspect as others have suggested like social justice or it could be he isn't framing his argument in a away away that connects to black voters.
Do I think Sanders is a racist or otherwise doesn't care about blacks? No. But the polling shows his message isn't getting support from blacks at this point.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)But whatever black people are in the 99%, absolutely