2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas the Incident between Black Lives Matter and Bernie Sanders changed your opinion of him?
More negative and more positive are pretty subjective descriptions I have to admit.
Bryant
43 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
I have supported Bernie Sanders and I have a more positive impression of him | |
4 (9%) |
|
I have supported Bernie Sanders and my opinion of him hasn't changed | |
31 (72%) |
|
I have supported Bernie Sanders and I have a more negative impression of him | |
0 (0%) |
|
I have not supported Bernie Sanders and I have a more positive impression of him | |
0 (0%) |
|
I have not supported Bernie Sanders and my opinion of him hasn't changed | |
2 (5%) |
|
I have not supported Bernie Sanders and I have a more negative impression of him | |
4 (9%) |
|
I do not support bullshit polls, and this bullshit poll has given me a more negative impression of them | |
1 (2%) |
|
I like to vote! | |
1 (2%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
daleanime
(17,796 posts)wish I could say that it hadn't changed my thoughts at all.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Bryant
daleanime
(17,796 posts)of Bernie.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Hasn't changed my mind about Bernie one bit. Others have lost credibility in my opinion.
okasha
(11,573 posts)He doesn't have them.
abakan
(1,819 posts)billionaire bosses telling him what to do.
okasha
(11,573 posts)If he can't handle a few protesters, how will he respond in a real crisis? He clearly doesn't think on his feet.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Canceling the later meeting was a particularly inept thing to do.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)The #BLM protesters are not running for an office whose requirements include dealing with Putin, Netanyahu, Hamas, the Assads, whichever member of the insane ruling dynasty of Pyongyang has not yet been murdered by the others, Ahmadinajad and the Ayatollah Khameini....and those are just a few. They don't wave signs. Many of them have nuclear weapons.
The President of the United States can't walk away from a summit meeting in a snit because someone yelled at him. Can. Not.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She didn't even make an appearance because she got booed last time.
okasha
(11,573 posts)She had a prior obligation; she honored it. Sorry, no story there.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)If it was important to her she would have been there.
okasha
(11,573 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)A fuckwit stunt like that would have them thrown out of the Oval Office, never to return.
okasha
(11,573 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)That meeting was supposed to be with other people on his staff and the still had the meeting. Would I have rathered he cancelled his meeting with Hispanic labor leaders or rescheduled to go to the meeting with Black Civil Rights leaders instead, yes I would rather he did that. I am not particularly upset he stuck to the schedule he had for the day though.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Well, that explains why they found it necessary to "ambush" Sanders himself, doesn't it?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Perhaps you disapprove of the way Sanders is talking to civil rights leaders.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Best stop.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)an angry meltdown or otherwise lost his composure, then no. Showing up at an event like that is an investment of a candidate's precious time and money, especially when they're underdogs in the race--just being shouted down shouldn't reflect poorly on them.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)What a bunch of politically clueless grandstanders.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Sensible Centrists aren't the ones getting pepper-sprayed or their heads knocked at Occupy. Nor are they ones out in 95-degree heat protesting with Reverend Barber of Moral Mondays. Early Moral Mondays in Raleigh were primarily older white people, older white people getting arrested. Word eventually got out, and the events became much more diverse.
The ones hitting the streets for voting rights, economic justice, social justice, labor rights, womens' rights, etc. are WHITE LIBERALS, standing alongside minorities. Somewhere along the line, #BLM decides to attack/mock/whatever said white liberals... people on their side. I'd like someone explain to me why they think that is winning strategy. Maybe it's not all #BLM, but just these loudmouths in Phoenix.
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)A few people hijack a cause for their own purposes and to associate everyone in the #BLM movement with these particular people seems short sighted.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)If so, that isn't hijacking, it is the organization.
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)Thank you for the info.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)At least you voted for the desired result.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)designed to surprise, confuse and confront. The reception the BLM activists got was by far the very kindest I have ever seen exhibited to any group or person disrupting an event with a political message. They were given a mic and the stage. They were listened to by those they interrupted, not berated, the event staff did not eject them or call security and the audience did not focus ire upon them. I'm here to tell you that in the universe of disruptive activism, that's a very fine result. Results usually range from mean comments from the speaker and shouts from the crowd to tasers, handcuff and security people.
I have seen such activism at political speeches, musical events, a poetry reading, awards ceremonies, religious services. I have never once seen the activists given the time to speak. Not once.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)But what has changed is my opinion of the supporters.
I have a higher esteem for some of the Hillary supporters--dont' get too excited, a few lower who IMO are capitalizing on this andrubbing their hands..but too many
and I have a lower esteem for some of the Bernie supporter---which causes me anguish
The O'Malley supporters are still the gold standard for civility.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)makes my support for Sanders stronger.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Every time I read one of these transparent op's I'm gonna go rec a thread supportive of Sanders.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)We have to see still if he takes the opportunity he's been granted and puts together a path to win those voters who have shown him what they need to win their votes. Anyone who simply expected it to spring up instantly hasn't been following the race very carefully. I hope, for his sake as well as the rest of us, that he does seize the opportunity to work with the black community more closely.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)But it is fun to watch Clinton supporters self-righteously saddling it and riding it around, particularly after Clinton's disgusting and shameful race-baiting campaign the last time she ran for the WH.
Same Clinton bullshit. Different election.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)She had other plans that day.
The Blame Clinton meme was used on Bill. Drag it out, dust it off, get some more use out of it! LOL.
What is shameful is deflecting your candidates' poor performance and blaming someone who was not even there.
You remind me of some of those LOLcats we see here every Sunday. You are like one of the LOLcats where the cat tears up the house and blames the dog. No, wait. Those are funny. You are not.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The spin on this event is far more damaging than the event itself, since spin requires neither honesty nor fact.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)I see your name in nearly all of these threads about NN, spinning, spluttering, blustering, casting blame. Give it a rest.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That says it all.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)Goodbye.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Fare thee well.
stranger81
(2,345 posts)Prism
(5,815 posts)The activists had their say, Bernie replied in his way, and we're on to the next event.
Where's the story?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The focus isn't on what he actually did, it's on what his opponents say he did.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)But I think his supporters are more whackadoo than ever.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Every single word.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)RandySF
(58,938 posts)But I don't doubt his commitment to civil rights.
DinahMoeHum
(21,795 posts)Netroots Nation has gone downhill since the absence of DailyKos and Markos Mouklitsas.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I knew this was a weak area for him, but I think it's a pretty weak area for all of them. Clinton just has the benefit of earlier mistakes, and a big staff to advise her. I don't think any of the candidates are anti-racism champions, but I do think they'll all put good people in the SCOTUS, I think they'll all veto any measures to restrict voting they have the opportunity to veto, etc.
I didn't vote because the intent seems anti-BLM to me. I am fine with BLM protesting and understand them feeling like they couldn't wait until invited (which would be never) and I don't expect protesters to be polite.
aikoaiko
(34,173 posts)He offered the structural change that BLM demanded; it just wasn't what they were expecting
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)about his chances.
Not a good showing. Unfair circumstances? Yes, but welcome to the NFL.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)And I'm still voting for Hillary.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)and will get right with them soon. He needs them in his corner - we need them in our corner.
What this incident - more specifically the reactions to it - has done, has changed my mind about quite a few Bernie supporters. I have been more shocked and disheartened over the past couple days than I have ever been in my 14+ years on DU.
I still want to support Sanders, but frankly it's hard to not feel embarrassed about being associated with his DU supporters. I've never heard so much butthurt white liberal whining as I have since Saturday. It's beyond disappointing, some things I've seen posted here have made me feel literally ill. I can't imagine how the very few remaining DUers of color manage to still stick around.
I stopped being any kind of active poster quite a few years ago, and for a long time have mostly avoided discussing anything overtly political on DU at all.
I decided to finally jump into GD-P because I wanted to support Bernie - especially after my good friend Jackpine Radical died. When I went to his memorial a little over 3 weeks ago, his widow had printed a handout of Sanders' 12 Points for people to pick up, along with the funeral card and memorial program. So I thought the least I could do in Jim's honor was to start getting more involved in supporting Bernie.
Yeesh - what a weekend I picked to do it...
Number23
(24,544 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)However, my opinion about the aftermath is a very minority opinion and that is that eventually this is going to help both Bernie and Martin in the polls with the AA community. It might take a while, both are going to have to have some long conversations with BLM and Civil Rights leaders of many organizations. I believe this was a good catalyst to get that going. BLM provided a natural segue to having those conversations.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)They all have work to do. My opinion of these young activists has improved. They put dems on notice, good for them. They aren't going to accept repeated stump speeches.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I support Sanders but will not be voting for him in the primary. I chose the option that I am not supporting him and my opinion of him is unchanged. Here on du, we seem to be for or against. I am for O'Malley. I support Sanders and Clinton at all opportunities.