2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBlack Lives Matter
Last edited Tue Jul 21, 2015, 10:59 AM - Edit history (1)
I truly am perplexed at the outrage here and other places about the Netroots Nation meeting. Seriously, what is the big deal?
So two candidates had to deal with some protesters for a few minutes. They were ambushed. It was by people, that most assume to be Democrats, going after Democrats in the presidential primary. If that's the worst that happens to them, they have nothing to worry about.
I think NN screwed up. I think that had a wonderful opportunity to have actual dialog and instead caused a bit a debacle. The message from BlackLivesMatter came across loud and clear, but the candidates were not given the opportunity to respond properly.
I think both candidates handled it only okay. Taken off guard like that, obviously unprepared, they didn't have the detail in their responses as they would have if this had been discussed with them. They both have good responses and plans. Senator Sanders was asked about what he's done lately and was able to respond with one of the best things about the ACA, the millions he was able to have put in for health clinics across the country. Health services that, if not for him, would not exist. Just one of the great things he has accomplished recently (yes, he's done more than march and organize protests 50 years ago. Deal with it.) Governor O'Malley was able to respond with a very pointed plan for police reform. I'm sure, had he been prepared, it would have been a much more detailed response. Although it was a damn good response anyway.
Bernie Sanders did not cancel his meeting with BLM. Because of the rally that was just a few hours later, he sent a representative, which was ALWAYS the plan. That's what happened, his rep went to the meeting.
Bernie is and was doing just fine without our protecting him. O'Malley is doing fine without our protecting him. Both candidates obviously took what was said in the NN rally to heart and both have upped their game when addressing the issues that are, very much, issues for people of color. Sanders has always brought in the abuses of police and incarceration to his stump speeches. Now, he's saying even more.
As much as someone here may not like what happened, or may not like how it happened, deal with it. It happened. It got the conversation going again. In fact, acting as though an apology is owed to the candidates from Black Lives Matter is only making matters worse for the candidates.
Us white folk may be upset by what people of color have to deal with day in and day out, the abuses of people in power. We may understand it, but we do not have to worry like people of color do. We will never feel that fear, the loneliness, the outright feeling that you are hated.
And until you have to worry about dying because you didn't use your turn signal, or walked into a stairwell at the wrong time, or even worse, have to worry about your child being murdered for playing in the park and NO ONE having to even answer for the little one's death, STFU about what Black Lives Matter does.
On edit: I don't mean I believe people aren't allowed an opinion on BLM. I am talking about how they decide to go about getting attention. I have said it was a missed opportunity and I firmly believe that. As do many people. But I don't dismiss their right to protest as they did.
still_one
(92,251 posts)that was a lost opportunity for those at the town hall
marym625
(17,997 posts)That, imho, is the only thing that was wrong. Well, I didn't like that host at all. I think he did a terrible job and is part of why there wasn't a dialog.
Blown opportunity.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)White liberals need to stop wagging their fingers at #BlackLivesMatter.
Don't tell them what to do and how to do it.
It comes across as condescending.
still_one
(92,251 posts)What people are doing is expressing their opinion of events at a town hall on a discussion forum. Imagine that, people expressing different views on a discussion forum
If people are inclined to do as you suggest, why would they post it on DU, and not go directly to the BLM site where as you put it, "Telling BLM" what to do" would at least stand a better chance of being viewed by those members of BLM
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I actually have seen a lot more people that are against Bernie's Candidacy talking about a rather puny number of supposed Bernie Supporters that appear to be just a bit paranoid.
I have noticed attacking Bernie supporters and generalizing about the majority of us that do for the actions of a tiny percentage has been the manner in which those that support other candidates deal with Bernie's candidacy.
It is kind of sad.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)We definitely need to do a better job of listening, and that includes our candidates. My only regret is that a more organized discussion didn't take place that allowed both candidates to really explain themselves completely.
marym625
(17,997 posts)It's just much too important. It's genocide and it should be at the forefront of the conversation.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Gay or Brown...
I knew there was a reason i liked you
marym625
(17,997 posts)I don't know what I am supposed to see on the Facebook page. I know what the page is. But I don't know what you're showing me. I hope that's not sarcasm. But, if so, oh well.
randys1
(16,286 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Omg I forget who else. Sorry. I was trying to help out because I used to admin Thank You For Supporting Marriage Equality on Facebook (longest Facebook page name in history) and Dream of Equality.
Thank you very much.
randys1
(16,286 posts)those people who open their minds and hearts before they respond and tell others how to think.
I like that.
You and I will probably disagree on some of the Bernie stuff, as I am pretty hard on some of his supporters, but at the end of the day you have the right stuff as far as I can see.
marym625
(17,997 posts)That's very kind of you.
Yeah, we're polar opposite with primary candidates, from what I've seen. But that's not everything there is. I know we have agreed on some things and I don't expect that to change.
I feel bad I can't think of who started that page. If I remember, I will let you know
Thanks again. Have a great night!
TM99
(8,352 posts)Did I like the ambush? Not really.
Do I think that ambushing allies is a winning strategy. No, I don't, but I am not a Post New Left liberal activist.
Do I think they both heard the message? Hell yes! That was reflected for me when I heard Sanders words Saturday night, saw how the AA in the crowd positively reacted, and spoke with several AA former students on Sunday about campaign planning here in Phoenix. And I am glad that O'Malley apologized for saying 'All lives matter'.
Do I want to see more? Hell yes, I want more protests with all candidates and at both conventions. I also want more dialogs. It is great that you cleared up the lies that Sanders canceled his meeting with the BLM. And I want to see him dialog with them directly without an aide doing it for him.
Do I like that a small few are using this to attack their opposition candidate on these boards with tactics straight out of the Atwater/Rove handbook? Fucking hell yes! It shows me that they really don't care about black lives. They only want to use them and us as a tool to push their prole.
A big hearty thank you from me to you!
I love agreeing with people I respect!
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)thing that happened at the venue in 2007 to Hillary Clinton. The only difference was instead of black activists, it was anti-war activists.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)our 2 most progressive candidates were ambushed/disrupted/more than heckled for being....on their side.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)They both see racism as a symptom of income inequality and believe that if income inequality is addressed, racism will be addressed de facto.
That's not how #blacklivesmatter sees it. Income inequality is simply just another symptom of the systemic racial inequality they live with ever day of their lives.
So you see, neither Sanders nor O'Malley are on their side because they are not, and never have, addressed the issue of racial inequality head on.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Bernie Sanders said this~
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251459384
Why the heck are people protesting those in their corner, rather than those against them, or the current president who if you are correct could actually DO something?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 20, 2015, 04:39 PM - Edit history (1)
Yay, lover of rivers!
marym625
(17,997 posts)Just plain wrong
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I'm sorry, but there is no other way to put it.
What you said, simply isn't true.
As a supporter of Bernies I have also been a supporter of BLM and a very vocal and outspoken opponent of police racism and violence by policemen for years.
I don't know who you are talking to or about but these generalizations you are making are absurd.
marym625
(17,997 posts)apnu
(8,758 posts)... Sanders and O'Malley see income inequality as the most actionable solution to the problem? That maybe by addressing things in terms of income is the quickest way to resolution. If that's the case, thought, I wonder why its not said. Obviously the two issues are tied together.
So to your last sentence, I agree they should -- all candidates should, address racial inequality directly. Its time to talk about this stuff, its time for America to acknowledge our racist past and the racist structures within the greater American culture. We need to talk about this stuff so we can move on and make sure it never happens again.
But I wonder if there's some kind of disconnect between the income inequality / class warfare and the racial inequality camps.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)does anyone THINK anymore before they shoot?
rsexaminer
(321 posts)I don't know if this was their intention or maybe they have been hijacked, but the BLM movement is coming across so ignorant, an when Sanders spoke about reforming the criminal justice system, and investing in education and jobs programs, they actually boo'd him. I guess they don't want those things. SMH.
marym625
(17,997 posts)They understand perfectly. I think, if I may be so bold, is that when you have to worry about being shot for walking down the street, job bills and free education don't matter. What matters is a way to get these killer cops off the street right now.
Obviously, economics and social justice are intertwined. You can't have social justice without first getting money out of politics. But we can do a whole hell of a lot more to stop the government sanctioned murders.
I cringed at Sanders response and I am a HUGE supporter.
Please, on this, just chill.
Welcome to DU!
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)and claiming Sanders canceled on them. I'd like to step on that rumor asap and a link to your source would do that.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I have to find it again.
marym625
(17,997 posts)To the meeting. I haven't found the one that said that was always the plan yet. I should have bookmarked it. When I read it, I didn't know what a big deal it would be.
You want to wait or you want one that says he didn't go but his manager did? The way they're written, it reads like that was a change
Zorra
(27,670 posts)hit piece claiming that Bernie cancelled that meeting that his rep attended.
I smell a rat.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I'm not. It's just divisive
Response to Zorra (Reply #28)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)and you stated it way more eloquently than I ever could.
My initial reaction was "Applause" then...I grew uncomfortable...because it went on....then I heard the grief, fear, Urgency...the Anger...Backs Against The Wall......I "felt" it.
I was humbled. And ashamed.
I began to "feel the knowing" of just how fkg easy it is to be White. It doesn't make me very proud, either.
Like it or not...this is what democracy looks like.
I stand With BLM.
I must ask: What other means and venue do those who Disagree with BLM, suggest they use that has not already been Exhausted without remedy...for Centuries, now?
marym625
(17,997 posts)You said it more eloquently than I. But, thank you
To your question, hell if I know. Sad. Truly just sad.