2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMitt Romney accuses President Obama of holding on to GM to avoid embarrassing loss before election
Source: Boston Globe
06/05/2012 2:54 PM
By Callum Borchers, Globe Correspondent
Mitt Romney is not ready to concede the success of US automaker bailouts, accusing President Obama of retaining the governments General Motors holding to avoid the embarrassment of a huge financial loss before the election.
The Obama campaign is fond of touting the government-aided recovery of the American auto industry and reminding voters that Romney opposed the bailouts that are widely credited with saving GM and Chrysler.
Romney wrote in a 2008 op-ed in The New York Times that if Detroit car companies receive bailouts, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It wont go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed.
Four years later, there is no demise in sight. But Romney argued in an interview published in Tuesdays Detroit News that government assistance to GM has not been the victory Obama claims for taxpayers, at least. If the government had sold its 26.5 percent stake in GM Monday, when the companys stock closed at $21.11 per share, it would have suffered a $16 billion loss.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2012/06/05/mitt-romney-accuses-president-obama-holding-avoid-embarrassing-loss-before-election/wueXaAT5DFc7A7k1f7NXGO/story.html
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Like a crash test dummy knows cars.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)he no longer "takes a lot of credit" for the auto recovery? Mitt is hard to keep up with!
Bozita
(26,955 posts)SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)but you beat me to it.
LiberalFighter
(51,105 posts)It looks like Romney doesn't understand buying and selling stock.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)His business was a few rich investors who put tons of money in a company, much borrowed, took the profits, shifted ownership, then dump them like a hot potato.
No he has no clue about the stock market.
denverbill
(11,489 posts)If GM succeeds long-term, the US makes money. If it goes bust, we lose $16 billion. That's 8 weeks of war spending. Whoop-de-do.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)If GM goes bust we would lose about 60 billion not 16. The price has drifted down since the "new" GM came out of bankruptcy.
babylonsister
(171,096 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Like most major Corporations he thinks about things in only short term gains with no thought into the long term impact. It has been evident in all of his activities.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That's what makes him unqualified for the position of POTUS, which requires long-term, and often, non-economic calculations with respect to the appropriate course of action.
ashling
(25,771 posts)He's not sure he really said that, but he'll stand behind it. Maybe he should stand behind one of his wife's Cadillacs. Better than being on the roof.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Does that mean your idea which you totally thought of was a failure?
Thrill
(19,178 posts)getting involved is what has saved GM?