2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Hints At What A Sanders Administration Cabinet Could Look Like
Posted: 07/05/2015 10:50 am EDT Updated: 5 hours ago
Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) offered a first glimpse on Sunday of some of the people he might consider for his cabinet in a potential Sanders administration, and a few that he certainly won't.
"My cabinet would not be dominated by representatives of Wall Street," Sanders said on CNN's "State of the Union." "I think Wall Street's played a horrendous role in recent years, in negatively impacting our economy and in making the rich richer. There are a lot of great public servants out there, great economists who for years have been standing up for the middle class and the working families of this country."
Prompted by host Jake Tapper, Sanders went on to praise Paul Krugman, the New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist. Krugman is a vocal opponent of tax cuts for the rich, and he has warned readers for years about the dangers of income inequality. "Krugman does a great job," Sanders said.
Also doing a great job, Sanders said, is Columbia University economics professor and Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, whose recent work has focused on the perils of radical free markets, such as those espoused by some in the libertarian wing of the GOP.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/05/bernie-sanders-cabinet_n_7730208.html
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)the "My cabinet would not be dominated by representatives of Wall Street" part. Most folks won't really know Krugman or Stiglitz.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)but I am enthusiastically for HRC. I have wanted her to be president since the 90s.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)1. lets the party heavyweights (like Clinton, know they must move the country leftward economically)
2. makes the word socialism less bugaboo in the American lexicon.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I know you're not that stupid or ignorant of Bernie's actual nuanced record in re guns as to think that he's a Wayne LaPierre fan, so you're obviously just trolling with that comment.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's hard to come up with new smears when there is so little material to work with
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Also known as desperation.
stonecutter357
(12,698 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Of all the questions asked a canidate , no one ever asks, Who will you hire ? If we knew the President was going to hire Timmothy Geithner with the metamorphic face & Soul, would I have ran to vote for him in '08 ? NO .
arcane1
(38,613 posts)So at least one person asks.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)appalachiablue
(41,182 posts)among many economists who were well qualified and supported efforts for working families.
--------------
Does anyone know these people? I'm sure Americans would learn the names of Larry, Moe and Curly, if they were selected by the next president to direct US economic policy and influence their lives. Little people can learn.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,860 posts)I'd like for all the candidates to discuss their potential cabinets so we can see what they really want to do. Obama's cabinet has been a good bit different than I thought it was going to be when I voted for him in 2008. Bernie likes to discuss issues, and talking about his cabinet is an excellent idea to get his points across.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)cloudythescribbler
(2,586 posts)And it ALL totally misses the point
The point is what is the historical and political significance of Bernie Sanders' candidacy today. What difference can he make in bringing up otherwise ignored issues? Will he help Hillary Clinton get the nomination by foreclosing other competitors? What kinds of concessions at the end should or could he realistically bargain for? Is it ever worthwhile for Lefties to work in the Democratic Party or are only 3d party candidacies worthwhile? (I reject the latter position).
I support his candidacy because I think he will bring issues, including the urgency of climate change to the fore that would otherwise be ignored. It is an effort with potential that grassroots need to make him realize.
This endless sniping is truly irrelevant, as I have yet to find an issue where overall, today Bernie Sanders is LESS progressive than Hillary Clinton
Am I talking to the wall here? and NO this is not an effort to censor criticism
OnlyBernieBurnsBush
(63 posts)The only President who can restore Liberty to to the Union is Bernie.
Remember. Only Bernie burns Bush! Look how Vermonters split their votes in 2000 and 2004.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I do agree with you that his candidacy at this point in time is a means to ensure
a thriving democracy...his distinction has been clear..his objectives clear from the
others.
We'll see what he can do with our help.