2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumdigby: Are We About to See Another Stolen Presidential Election?
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/06/gop-vote-suppression-electionAre We About to See Another Stolen Presidential Election?
By Heather Digby Parton
| Fri Jun. 1, 2012 10:43 AM PDT
John Manoogian III/Flickr
snip//
I have long wondered why the Democrats haven't seemed to take this seriously. It's been happening in slow motion, but it's been happening in plain sight. It wasn't just the 2000 election, although that should have been enough for the Democratic party to launch a full scale defense against this sort of connivance. And it carried on throughout the following decade in elections throughout the country. You'll recall that even the US Attorney firing scandal was largely about their failure to flout election laws in favor of Republicans. Better late than never, the Democrats seemed to wake up this week:
And he followed through:
It's not that I care so much that the Democrats win. But I really care that Americans are allowed to vote and have their votes counted and I expect that most people care about that too. In this regard there is a big difference between the two parties: the Republicans have organized around suppressing the vote while the Democrats have organized around expanding it. The problem, as usual, is that the Democrats haven't been nearly as good at it.
Republican state governments around the country have been working overtime to manipulate the electoral laws and shut down the Democrats' organizing institutions, from ACORN to unions, and wealthy plutocrats have put huge money behind the effort. With the exception of Wisconsin, the Democrats have been behaving like potted plants in response. One would have thought the 2000 election would have been enough to energize them to protect the franchise, but it clearly wasn't. Let's hope it doesn't take another stolen election to convince them.
longship
(40,416 posts)Look! There is always voter fraud. But the one thing that the conspiracy theorists ignore is that it is a null sum game. Both sides do it. But every -- and I do mean every -- metric indicates that the fraud is tiny.
It can only influence a national election when a single state is thrust into the forefront by a confluence of events that cannot be foreseen. Hence, FL-2000.
There is little doubt that Al Gore should have taken FL, and the election. But the important thing to realize from those events is that close elections will always -- always -- give rise to such stories.
The only thing we can do is to realize that voter fraud is a small effect. It works both sides equally. There are poll watchers at many, if not all, polling places. (I often volunteer.)
Freaking Jimmie Carter was a volunteer during the recent Texas election!!!!
If you want to insure that elections are on the up and up, stop screaming about and do something. Volunteer as a poll watcher!
I am sick and tired of all this "They are going to steal the election" conspiracies when there is a suitable solution.
If you think that the Republicans will steal the election, volunteer to be a poll watcher. Don't just flap your gums. Put your money where your mouth (gums) is.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)disenfranchising people who are Americans and pegged as liberals; blacks, hispanics, etc. States are passing laws to do that, so no amount of volunteerism will counter it.
I know you've been paying attention, so hope you know that.
longship
(40,416 posts)there are so many others of us who will get down in the ditches and do the work to insure that elections are on the up and up.
Jimmie Carter volunteered in TX this past week. That is what it takes.
But by all means, do set your hair on fire if you want to. Don't expect those who are the poll observers to do the same.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)I'm not disputing the people who get in the trenches and laud them, but if the system is rigged, and no one does anything about it legally, no amount of hands-on will fix it.
Maybe now it's happening: I can hope.