Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun May 31, 2015, 10:09 AM May 2015

What We Now Know About The Men Who Led The Impeachment Of Clinton

BY JUDD LEGUM

On December 19, 1998, the House of Representatives impeached Bill Clinton on two charges related to his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky. (The charges were for perjury and obstruction of justice.) The historic vote, and subsequent trial in the Senate, involved the work of three men who were elected Speaker of the House Of Representatives by the Republican majority, Newt Gingrich, Bob Livingston and Dennis Hastert.

Almost 17 years later, with the federal indictment of Hastert for illegally concealing up to $3.5 million in hush-money, we finally have a more complete understanding of the men who led this effort.

Newt Gingrich

Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) led the push for Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Following a disappointing election in November 1998, he announced he was stepping down as Speaker and resigning from Congress.

Gingrich later admitted that, while he was pushing for Clinton’s impeachment, he was engaged in an affair with a Congressional aide. “There were times when I was praying and when I felt I was doing things that were wrong. But I was still doing them,” Gingrich said in 2007. He later said the situation was “complex and, obviously, I wasn’t doing things to be proud of.”

more

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/05/30/3664334/now-know-republican-speakers-helped-impeach-bill-clinton/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What We Now Know About The Men Who Led The Impeachment Of Clinton (Original Post) n2doc May 2015 OP
Clinton should have used that HassleCat May 2015 #1
That might have actually swayed some gullible Republicans. Enthusiast May 2015 #5
Already know they epitomize hypocracy Panich52 May 2015 #2
They did impeach for a blowjob Major Nikon May 2015 #4
They WANTED to impeach f/ bj, but settled f/ charging Clinton's lie about it Panich52 May 2015 #13
Which is even more ridiculous than impeaching him for a blowjob Major Nikon May 2015 #14
Republicans set the record for hypocrisy. But, no problem. Enthusiast May 2015 #3
And don't forget those wonderful parties in "Gentlemen's Quarters" in the C Street Center. erronis May 2015 #7
That sounds nice. Enthusiast May 2015 #8
Well, I'll tell ya... malthaussen May 2015 #6
Gingrich, Livingston, Hastert, and Clinton, all sexual preditors still_one May 2015 #9
And where, in the end did all the drama get Bill? SoapBox May 2015 #10
So.... VA_Jill May 2015 #11
It's all okay . . . OldRedneck May 2015 #12
yes Rosa Luxemburg May 2015 #15
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. Clinton should have used that
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:23 AM
May 2015

"Monica and I got down on our knees and prayed to Jesus. He told us we were doing a bad thing, but it might be OK if we didn't have actual intercourse."

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
2. Already know they epitomize hypocracy
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:40 AM
May 2015

Had blow jobs in White House been something they could impeach for, they would have. Major hypocracy. But their partisan hatred made Clinton think he had to lie. Mistake, since that's what led to impeachment.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
4. They did impeach for a blowjob
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:10 PM
May 2015

There was never any legal case against Clinton. He was never so much as indicted for any criminal charges.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
14. Which is even more ridiculous than impeaching him for a blowjob
Sun May 31, 2015, 02:27 PM
May 2015

Clinton was never so much as charged for lying.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
3. Republicans set the record for hypocrisy. But, no problem.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:09 PM
May 2015

Their constituents and Jesus absolve them of their sins. Forgive Clinton? Not so much. [URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

erronis

(15,355 posts)
7. And don't forget those wonderful parties in "Gentlemen's Quarters" in the C Street Center.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:39 PM
May 2015

Wonder how many very young and vulnerable people were invited there...

On April 8, 2010, Jeff Sharlet, a reporter who had lived as an intern at the
Fellowship, stated on The Rachel Maddow Show that C Street is a "luxury place" with a cook, dining room used for formal banquets, and common space "to hang out, to talk policy, to watch sports," adding that female interns act as unpaid maids and that male volunteers for the Fellowship, including himself when he was an intern, are expected to be a "servant for these congressmen."[21]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_Street_Center

malthaussen

(17,217 posts)
6. Well, I'll tell ya...
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:19 PM
May 2015

... whatever one may think about the authority of the Grand Jury system (and I think it is pretty bad, as it happens), I still become a little annoyed when an individual decides that he is not subject to the law as everyone else is. Of course, this is a trait in virtually every politician regardless of stripe, but I don't see that that makes it therefore okay. The smug, self-satisfied way our privileged classes evade and obfuscate any and all responsibility for just about anything really frosts my flakes. But hey, I'm an anarchist and a Leveller.

-- Mal

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
10. And where, in the end did all the drama get Bill?
Sun May 31, 2015, 01:02 PM
May 2015

More money, more fame and his wife running for President.

I want a refund of my tax dollars that the Pukes wasted!

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
15. yes
Sun May 31, 2015, 03:57 PM
May 2015

They seem to think that they are messengers of God. All their sins are washed away. However if some non Republican does something they are on it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What We Now Know About Th...