Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue May 19, 2015, 02:25 PM May 2015

Hillary Clinton’s Hypocrisy

By Dana Milbank Opinion writer May 19 at 1:54 PM

In a private meeting last week with 200 of the Democratic Party’s top financiers, Hillary Clinton drew vigorous applause when she said any of her nominees to the Supreme Court would have to share her desire to overturn the Citizens United decision.

Clinton also, as reported by my Post colleagues Matea Gold and Anne Gearan, put in a plug with the fundraisers (all of whom had hauled in at least $27,000 for her) for a constitutional amendment overturning the ruling, which allows unlimited spending by super PACs.

Nice sentiments, to be sure, but the fact that she was unveiling her Citizens United litmus test with party fat cats at an exclusive soiree (four days later, she mentioned it to voters in Iowa) tells you all you need to know about Clinton’s awkward – and often hypocritical – relationship with campaign-finance reform.

Even as she denounces super PACs, she’s counting on two of them, Priorities USA Action and Correct the Record, to support her candidacy – a necessary evil, her campaign says. She’s also chin-deep in questionable financial activities, ranging from the soft-money scandals of her husband’s presidency to the current flap over contributions by foreigners and favor seekers to the Clinton Foundation. Then there’s the matter of her plans to continue President Obama’s policy of opting out of the public-finance system; Obama’s abandonment of the system did as much as the Citizens United ruling to destroy the post-Watergate fixes.

Her advisors claim campaign-finance reforms will be at the top of her agenda, a sensible choice because of the deep resentment in the populace toward a political system rigged in favor of the wealthy. But she gives supporters little evidence that she’s genuine. Asked by the Post last month about the role of the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, Clinton shrugged her shoulders and said, “I don’t know.”

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clintons-hypocrisy/2015/05/19/f8a7b194-fe48-11e4-8b6c-0dcce21e223d_story.html

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. So, if a manager in the American League opposes the DH rule, he should
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:49 PM
May 2015

have a pitcher hit in the DH spot?

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
8. Don't know if I compare baseball....
Tue May 19, 2015, 04:10 PM
May 2015

to our democracy, but yes.

If in his mind continuing to support the DH was detrimental to the welfare of the league and harmful to his players careers, then of course he should stand against it. I leave it to you to image the case where this would be so.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. Well, let's imagine that the only way to get rid of the DH rule is to win the American
Tue May 19, 2015, 04:30 PM
May 2015

league pennant.

Does it still make sense to bat a pitcher, knowing you can't win if you do so?

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
10. Your thinking of it as a single rule....
Tue May 19, 2015, 04:53 PM
May 2015

think of it as a flood, it doesn't matter how well you sandbag your front door if the water is pouring in the back door and the windows. If you let it, money will find a way.

Autumn

(45,098 posts)
2. This in the article is exactly what she can do if she's serious. Her talk on that is just that. Talk
Tue May 19, 2015, 02:34 PM
May 2015
If she really thinks money is corrupting politics, she can take concrete steps right now. She could pledge to return immediately to the public finance system and call on pro-Clinton super PACs to cease and desist – if her Republican opponents will do the same. The Republicans won’t, of course, but then Clinton would have gained the moral high ground she now lacks.
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
13. Hillary Toast
Wed May 20, 2015, 05:52 AM
May 2015

She could allow a Republican to win. If she has this many people ardently against her here how could she even hope to win. Contrary to what some sophomoric critics think, DU is not a hotbed of leftist radicals. It's very moderate but represents all wings.

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
3. I think I have this right.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:19 PM
May 2015

Dana thinks Hillary should play by Marquess of Queensberry Rules even though the Republicans are using Ultimate Wrestling's no-rules format.

Put another way - Hillary is the only candidate who must play by the girl's rules.


OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
4. Dripping with predictable Milbank sanctimony.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:30 PM
May 2015
She’s also chin-deep in questionable financial activities, ranging from the soft-money scandals of her husband’s presidency to the current flap over contributions by foreigners and favor seekers to the Clinton Foundation.

BTW, one can hate the rules yet play by them. That's not "hypocrisy", it's practicality.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Stopped reading after "Obama’s abandonment of the system did as much as the Citizens United ruling
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:48 PM
May 2015

to destroy the post-Watergate fixes."

Please.

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
15. Hypocrisy? There is no Hypocrisy here.
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:31 AM
May 2015

Mrs. Clinton wants to win and to win means to play by the rules as they are. There is nothing gained by trying to set an example in which no one else cares about. Get rid of Citizens United once you have the power of the presidency.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s Hypocri...