Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

red dog 1

(27,866 posts)
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 02:47 PM Apr 2015

Which 7 Democrats just voted to repeal the Estate Tax?

Daily Kos
April 16, 2015


Continuing the string of tax-related votes from yesterday, House Republicans brought up their bill to repeal the Estate tax entirely.

Barely anyone in the U.S. has to pay the estate tax.
In 2016, only 5400 estates in the whole country--the wealthiest 0.2 percent --would owe any estate tax.

The so-called "Death Tax Repeal Act" passed 240-179.
Only 3 Republicans voted against it:

David Jolly (R-FLA)
Walter Jones (R-NC)
Scott Rigell (R-VA)


Seven Democrats voted for this giveaway to the super-rich:

Brad Ashford (D-NE)
Sanford Bishop (D-GA)
Jim Costa (D-CA)
Henry Cuellar (D-TX)
Collin Peterson (D-MN)
Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD)
Krysten Sinema (D-AZ)

More;
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/04/16/1378170/-Which-7-Democrats-Just-Voted-to-Repeal-the-Estate-Tax#

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which 7 Democrats just voted to repeal the Estate Tax? (Original Post) red dog 1 Apr 2015 OP
They ALL need to be primaried next election.... cascadiance Apr 2015 #1
Right you are. Hope people will remember come Nov. 2016. Cal33 Apr 2015 #11
Most of them don't know about it Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2015 #39
+1 Scuba Apr 2015 #30
Absolutely! I'm closest to the CA-16 and Jim Costa BobSmith4152 Apr 2015 #33
Aw shit. How come Ron Kind didn't make the list? Jackpine Radical Apr 2015 #2
He was busy complaining about unions interferiing with job creators. Scuba Apr 2015 #29
Kicking for exposure, AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #3
This should be at the top of the Greatest. CrispyQ Apr 2015 #4
This money has already been taxed. EL34x4 Apr 2015 #5
My paycheck has federal, state, and city taxes taken out of it KansDem Apr 2015 #6
As has mine. As was my dad's. EL34x4 Apr 2015 #7
That is the point ! DURHAM D Apr 2015 #20
Income received from investments is taxed. 1939 Apr 2015 #38
You don't have to pay taxes on April 15 if you had enough withheld. former9thward Apr 2015 #41
So are you for the repeal of all sales, property, gas and other taxes? n2doc Apr 2015 #9
Capital gains tax often HASN'T been taxed... cascadiance Apr 2015 #12
^^^^ THIS ^^^^ eggplant Apr 2015 #15
i have always wondered who gets the 10% IRA penalty - Its your money in the first place. airplaneman Apr 2015 #22
Alternative Minimum Tax is another example of such a tax... cascadiance Apr 2015 #34
I look at it like this lakercub Apr 2015 #13
Because it is a transfer of money from the owner(and technically the earner) to someone else. Nay Apr 2015 #16
How come Home Depot and Walmart get to keep the state and local sales taxes they collect from Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #18
They do turn it over. former9thward Apr 2015 #42
Not it my community, they get to keep all the sales tax they collect. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #43
Then they are doing it legally. former9thward Apr 2015 #44
They are in effect stealing tax money from the local and state coffers. Small businesses don't have Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #45
all money quakerboy Apr 2015 #19
Great question! You've shown me the light. Mister Ed Apr 2015 #21
Yes the money was taxed once in 1776 it probably should never be taxed again right? airplaneman Apr 2015 #23
"Just asking," doesn't stick around for the answers Scootaloo Apr 2015 #26
Bad argument. Darb Apr 2015 #31
Right-wing weasel bastards GoneFishin Apr 2015 #8
+1 You nailed it. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #25
Cuellar is a long time DINO n2doc Apr 2015 #10
Most of them are from "safe" districts. Wilms Apr 2015 #14
if they're from safe districts that means they're successful and we have to move right MisterP Apr 2015 #17
Fake Democrats. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #24
"Semicrats" Scootaloo Apr 2015 #27
Hey! That could catch on. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #28
Make sure you whine about 7 Democrats, instead of 237 Repugnics. Darb Apr 2015 #32
We all know the Republicans are asshole sellouts. Seperating the real Democrats from the GoneFishin Apr 2015 #35
...and the game goes on. bvar22 Apr 2015 #36
I get that Brad Ashford is deep in enemy territory TheFarseer Apr 2015 #37
I'm surprised Blumenauer didn't vote for it davidpdx Apr 2015 #40
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
1. They ALL need to be primaried next election....
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 02:52 PM
Apr 2015

Vote for crap like this there should be a guaranteed primary response!

And we need to make sure that there are no more people like Rahm Emanuel in charge of the DCCC to try and keep this from happening in subsequent elections.

BobSmith4152

(75 posts)
33. Absolutely! I'm closest to the CA-16 and Jim Costa
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 01:33 PM
Apr 2015

Hey http://fresnocountydemocrats.org/ think there's a REAL Democrat in your district?

C'mon we need primary candidates NOW!

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
6. My paycheck has federal, state, and city taxes taken out of it
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 04:15 PM
Apr 2015

Then I have to pay taxes on April 15th. Why?

Why should Richie Rich pay less taxes?

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
41. You don't have to pay taxes on April 15 if you had enough withheld.
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 01:00 PM
Apr 2015

You are not being taxed twice. If you pay taxes at the end of the year you did not have enough withheld from your paycheck.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
9. So are you for the repeal of all sales, property, gas and other taxes?
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 04:26 PM
Apr 2015

If all we are going to do is tax money "once", why do only the ultra rich get to benefit when money changes hands?


Just Asking. Also asking- are you ready to have your Social Security and medicare cut (when the time comes, of course) to cover the loss of income from this perk? Just asking.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
12. Capital gains tax often HASN'T been taxed...
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 05:22 PM
Apr 2015

... which is why the wealthy structure their assets so that they put their assets with the biggest potential gains and taxation to themselves in to their retirement accounts dedicated to going towards their kids that they never intend to sell that would have them pay this large tax, because in most estate law provisions at the state levels, etc. even if the property is sold, the amount of value from the time it was initially acquired and what it has gained until the day it is inherited is IGNORED and that tax revenue is LOST to government entities, since the capital gains is only assessed based upon the value at the time it was inherited and subsequently sold, not when it was initially acquired.

The wealthy are able to control these investments being in trust funds whereas the non-wealthy can't afford to put aside those assets and not cash in on them at times when they need money, and THEY wind up paying capital gains that the wealthy don't.

I was feeling similar pain this week, when I had to pay the 10% penalty of IRAs I cashed in last year, because I wasn't over 59 1/2 and didn't have 3 CONSECUTIVE months of paying health insurance while being unemployed, even though I paid for health insurance for over 4 months of unemployment that weren't consecutive. Another example of how the less wealthy are forced to paying added taxes that the wealthy are able to avoid. There are so many taxes structured like this today by design that has contributed to our economic collapse and bigger wealth divide. a fancy way of redistribution to the top.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
34. Alternative Minimum Tax is another example of such a tax...
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 02:09 PM
Apr 2015

... that the wealthy can find ways around, but often the rest of us get screwed by it.

Back in the days of the dotcom boom/bust, many employees that worked for startups who exercised stock options when the public stock value was high after initial public offering, but their options price was low, were liable for huge amounts of AMT then, because of that difference in "value" of the stock. But of course due to the laddering schemes that were going on at the time, when only the insiders knew when to sell stock to maximize that initial value of the stock, and only many of them were able to sell stock in many instances that the employees were kept from selling stock because of "quiet periods", etc. When taxes came due, and the stock was in the toilet, many were forced to sell their stock because they couldn't wait for it to rebound (which in many cases it didn't), or they'd be liable for a huge amount of AMT tax to be paid on the presumed value of the stock that they would never see.

The wealthy could afford with their other assets to pay that high AMT tax, and could wait to see if the stock value would rebound later instead of being forced to sell it at a very low price to pay taxes. They could also be more careful when they exercised options to ensure that they did it when the public value of the stock was low to minimize that tax liability to.

I was liable for AMT and paying unemployment income tax the same year. How's that for a coincidence in those days.

lakercub

(659 posts)
13. I look at it like this
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 05:25 PM
Apr 2015

The rich person has indeed already been taxed, but the heir hasn't. To use the typical example, Paris Hilton's father has already paid his taxes on the money (although I actually doubt that given how well the rich dodge taxes ). However when he dies Paris will get the money and she will never have paid a cent of it in taxes. Therefore, in my mind, this a new source of one time income for her and should be taxed as such.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
16. Because it is a transfer of money from the owner(and technically the earner) to someone else.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 05:49 PM
Apr 2015

When the 'someone else' is an employee, we tax it as wages. Think of it as wages. That will make it easier on you.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
18. How come Home Depot and Walmart get to keep the state and local sales taxes they collect from
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 06:38 PM
Apr 2015

me and don't have to turn them over to the state and locality? Hmmm?

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
45. They are in effect stealing tax money from the local and state coffers. Small businesses don't have
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 05:09 PM
Apr 2015

that incentive, they are at a huge disadvantage. We, the citizens are at a disadvantage because masses of dollars are going to the big box stores instead of the fire, police, public works, roads etc.

quakerboy

(13,921 posts)
19. all money
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 06:57 PM
Apr 2015

has been taxed. Why should any of it ever be taxed again, after the first taxing when it leaves the mint?

Maybe because its income. And our nation, in theory, taxes income to individuals.

Mister Ed

(5,944 posts)
21. Great question! You've shown me the light.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 11:03 PM
Apr 2015

By golly, next time I go to the hardware store, I'm going to tell the cashier, "Uh, no sales tax, please. This money was already taxed when I earned it."

But wait! Better yet, next April 15th, I'll just send the IRS a note explaining that my income shouldn't be taxed, because my employers already paid taxes on that money when they earned it.

No,wait. My employers shouldn't have to pay taxes either. After all,their customers have already paid taxes on the money they used to buy our product.

Of course, I reckon the customers shouldn't have to pay taxes either, because...

Do you get it yet? Just asking.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
31. Bad argument.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:56 AM
Apr 2015

I could explain it but you wouldn't listen.

Now take your teabagger meme and go back from where you came.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
10. Cuellar is a long time DINO
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 04:27 PM
Apr 2015

Bastard will probably die in office since the people of his district vote name recognition only.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
17. if they're from safe districts that means they're successful and we have to move right
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 05:51 PM
Apr 2015

if they're from purple districts, we can't afford to dump them for someone popular and we have to move right

it's almost like they suggest "primary" them, and then torpedo any primaries repeatedly, as a distraction to keep us anesthetized! it's almost like they consider us cattle, using terms like "veal pen," and expect us to put in votes and money and be grateful that we're getting our livelihoods taken from us, like it's a party modeled on a sweatshop!

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
35. We all know the Republicans are asshole sellouts. Seperating the real Democrats from the
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 02:20 PM
Apr 2015

back-stabbing weasels who pretend to be Democrats so they can undermine the party principles is more important.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
36. ...and the game goes on.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 02:36 PM
Apr 2015

IF they had needed 8 or 10 votes to pass, they would have gotten 8 to 10 (or 12 or 15) votes to pass the 1% agenda. It ALWAYS works out that way.

Rotating Villain
http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/democrats_34/




TheFarseer

(9,326 posts)
37. I get that Brad Ashford is deep in enemy territory
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 04:49 PM
Apr 2015

But Christ man, this would be an easy vote to defend. Unless people are worried that Berkshire Hathaway would shut down to pay the taxes if Warren Buffet dies.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Which 7 Democrats just vo...