2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDid you know the State of Massachusetts outlawed Christmas in 1659?
Guess they figured out how Christians would subvert the idea of Religious Freedom.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Those Puitans/Pilgrams sure were leftist radicals!
marym625
(17,997 posts)66 dmhlt
(1,941 posts)Jeremiah 10:3-4 (KJV)
3 For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.
4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah+10%3A3-4&version=KJV
still_one
(92,422 posts)Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)I read this in a bathroom on I-95 South in a state serviced reststop. I assume it to be true. Could there be people trying to subvert the FoxNews interpretation of our history? Ask BillO...he might have been there.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Presumably it was put there for the edification of US Senators passing through.
marym625
(17,997 posts)still_one
(92,422 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Or can I call you Frank? Cuz you always speak the truth and you go very well with Sauerkraut?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)50% beans.
eShirl
(18,505 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,489 posts)Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)But I sill look for the appropriate source, so you won't feel outraged, Bill.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Yep, it happened....
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)It was a colony.
Yes, they had such a law.
No, they were not a "state".
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)You are obviously correct, there was no State in 1659, and Mass. was a colony. Next time I stop in I will fix this eggregious error. But damn, those colonists had their shit together when it came to colonist-sanctioned religious events. Next time I go there, I will take a pic and publish this on DU.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)With great anticipation.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)This was not some measure intended to avoid the public exercise of Christianity. It was intended to enforce the view of the Puritan sect.
The celebration of Christmas was something Catholics and other undesirables did.
It is the same reason why it used to be common, and still is in relation to alcohol in many places, to ban commercial activity on Sundays.
It was not some kind of progressive religious neutrality law. It was intended to enforce a particular Christian sect's point of view. The celebration of Christmas as some type of occasion for general merrymaking and good cheer has not always been a broadly held practice among various Christian groups. The Puritans frowned on it, and wanted to stop OTHER people from celebrating it.
Here, read this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_in_Puritan_New_England
Igel
(35,359 posts)It's where the obnoxious at opposite ends meet.
I've known atheists who rather wanted to ban public celebrations of Xmas. It's what the Puritans and some puritanical atheists have in common. One must avoid offending their delicate sensibilities.
Fortunately, both groups tend to be marginalized. Sadly, one can do no better than to use the word "tend."
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts). . . It was a theocracy in action!
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)And, yes, the Puritans disapproved of Christmas as a festival.
LiberalFighter
(51,104 posts)struggle4progress
(118,356 posts)H. L. Mencken
pinto
(106,886 posts)+1
yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)The current things we associate with Christmas - decorations, trees, gift giving, etc. were essentially adopted from pagan traditions and dressed up in religious tradition by the Catholic Church to try to keep people focused on church activities celebrating the birth of Christ. Many reformers objected to the way the Catholics incorporated pagan traditions. Even today, some groups do not have Christmas trees and Christmas parties, teaching kids about Santa Claus, etc. Even the "Merry Christmas" greeting was and is objectionable for many conservative Christian groups as it implies parties and drinking. And with all of the commercialization, it is clearly no longer mainly a religious holiday.
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts). . . This was a bunch of Puritans who believed that celebrations of Christmas were heretical and contrary to Scripture. This was no outbreak of zeal for religious freedom and tolerance: it was a fully theocratic government enforcing its beliefs on society.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Every time I drive by these damn churches in New Haven I am reminded of Jonathan Edwards speech "sinners in the hands of an angry God..." and I get all agitated again...
Yupster
(14,308 posts)and I got all angry again.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)sounds kinda creepy but it's very historic. The Green is nice in the summer. There are lots of concerts held there and of course political rallies and demonstrations of all sorts.