Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum“Not Every Problem in the World Has a Military ‘Solution’”
Last week, Congressman Grayson joined the inaugural installment of Watching the Hawks, a new national cable news show. In a far-ranging interview, he discussed what is wrong with Congress, why even many Democrats are afraid to take on the military-industrial complex, whether military spending actually creates jobs, the division of authority between the President and Congress regarding military action, the likelihood of more infrastructure spending, and more. Enjoy:Tyrell Ventura: Whether you love him or hate him, the Representative from Floridas 9th District definitely isnt afraid to speak his mind. Congressman Grayson, thank you for joining us today, and stepping into the Hawks Nest, on our inaugural show. Thank you, sir.
Rep. Alan Grayson: Youre welcome. Im hoping that by the end of the show, youll all love me.
TV: Well, Congressman, recently weve see some pretty amazing stories of alleged corruption coming out of Congress, from the Wall Street Journal announcing today that federal investigators are possibly preparing criminal charges against [Sen.] Robert Menendez of New Jersey, to the wild tales of [Rep.] Aaron Schock, and his somewhat hilarious and, well, shocking political expenditures. You know, with congressional approval at this all-time low, and people looking at Congress and saying, You guys cant get along, and now youre using your campaign money and everything else for fraud, how can Congress start cleaning up these messes?
Rep. Alan Grayson: Lets look at the system. The system is that we have a lot of career politicians, who move up the ladder, one rung after another. If they get the nomination of their party, and they are in a district where 60 percent of the voters are from their party, theyre going to get to the next rung. Thats the system that we have. It doesnt bring us the best or the brightest. It brings us the hacks. And some of those hacks turn out to be corrupt hacks. Thats the fundamental problem. We have many, many districts that are not competitive. And we have many voters who dont have the time or the interest to learn about the candidates. They simply vote their party. The result of that, with the gerrymandering and the unlimited supply of money that the Republican Party has today, is what you see, which is a Republican-controlled Congress full of hacks.
Tabetha Wallace: [Discussing the military industrial complex, and referring to the fact that many liberals are afraid to take on the military industrial complex because they will be attacked as being weak on defense, what Congressman Grayson called the blood libel.] As a Democratic member of Congress, how prevalent is this fear, and how does it play into decision-making when it comes to the defense budget?
Rep. Alan Grayson: Its crucial. We have Democrats who have been running scared of the idea that their weak on defense since at least McGovern [running for President in 1972]. And you remember how hard President Kennedy had to overcome that stigma in the 1960 election. So its been a real problem for us, ever since the Communists lived under our beds each night, and came out each night around three oclock in the morning. This is a chronic problem, and we have to get past it by realizing that not every problem in the world has a military solution. Sometimes the military makes things worse. For instance, lets take Iraq. Thats a good example of that. Things are far worse today than they were under Saddam Husseins regime. Its not even a close question. Ordinary people are living lives of utter depredation and fear every day. We didnt solve that problem. And we just have to get over this idea that every time we see something in the world that we dont like, we bomb it.
TV: Some defend military spending, by justifying the jobs it produces. So how do separate job cuts from military spending?
Rep. Alan Grayson: Well, there is a simple answer to that, and Im speaking as a former economist. I was an economist for almost four years, and the only member of Congress who can actually say that. When you put people to work making bombs, what you end up with is bombs. When you put people to work making bridges, what you end up with is bridges. When you put people to work making schools, you end up with educated children. Military spending to create employment is an utter dead end. You might as well have half the population digging ditches, and the other half filling them in. The important thing is to unleash peoples work, their time, their creativity, what they have to offer, so that they can serve others.
Sean Stone: [Detailing misspent military spending on weaponry, and further questionable military actions.] Whats happening in Syria now? Is this being done with the oversight of Congress? [Asking what Congress can do to stop the presidents unilateral action there.]
Rep. Alan Grayson: Well at this level, frankly, the President often acts unilaterally. But we do have to authorize wars. And the President has been edging up into [Congressional constitutional] territory now for several years. Somehow or other people have gotten comfortable with the idea of drone strikes in areas where we are not at war, like a place like Yemen. We have not declared war against anyone in Yemen. And yet people seem to think that its okay for us not only for us to arm one side or the other, but actually to launch weapons of destruction from U.S. drone planes. We kill many people, including at this point a list of over 200 children, available on the Internet. So, in fact, a lot of these situations are ones where the President is going right up to the very edge of what he can call his constitutional power, and often making mistakes. Because, frankly, the rest of the world is playing chess and were playing checkers. I was one of the few people who recognized two years ago that if we went to war against Syria, and we destroyed the command and control structure of the chemical weapons being held by the Assad regime in Syria, they would fall into other hands. So if that had actually happened, that misguided misconception that by bombing wed make things better, if that had actually happened, then today we wouldnt be watching ISIS beheading people on our TVs, wed be watching them gas people.
TW: Is there any talk in Congress of addressing crumbling infrastructure needs with job creation?
Rep. Alan Grayson: Yes. In fact, this week you will see the Progressive Caucuss budget voted on, and it will draw its usual 100 votes, out of 435 of us. But the Progressive Caucus budget does exactly that: It puts people back to work in America not making bombs, or as Eisenhower said, robbing from children (thats what Eisenhower called military spending: robbing from children) but instead puts them to work meeting human needs. Whether its taking care of seniors, whether its rebuilding our bridges and our schools (the way we promised to do in Afghanistan), whatever it might be, whether its health needs, education needs whatever it might be. Its an honest budget that takes the unemployed and puts them back to work doing things that are useful and beneficial to all of us, meeting our human needs.
TW: What should the average American know about how their Congress works, and what they can do to make it work for them?
Rep. Alan Grayson: The answer is that the one or two people at the top determine the entire agenda. When Nancy Pelosi was in charge here in the House, every week we had a major bill that actually was going to pass the Senate, going to be signed by the President, and would make a difference in the lives of ordinary people. She always believed that if you improve peoples lives, youll get more votes. You do it on its own merit, but in fact, youll get more votes. Thats the way this place was organized by the people at the top then. Since John Boehner took over, its been one wasted week after another, putting out messaging bills. Whether its repealing Obamacare, whether its authorizing the Keystone Pipeline for the 35th time, whatever it might be, its basically just trying to placate the baying wolves of the right wing, rather than doing anything constructive or anything that might actually become law. Weve almost reached the point where we have forgotten that we are legislators, that were supposed legislate, we are supposed to make laws, not send messages.
SS: Why did so few lawmakers show up for the 2013 drone strike victim hearing? [Only five Members of Congress joined Rep. Grayson for his ad hoc hearing on drone strikes.]
Rep. Alan Grayson: I think people try to avoid the things that are unpleasant. In fact, a great deal of self-deception takes place in everyones lives, and not just people up here in Washington D.C. If its a bad thing, and we dont think we have a solution for it, we simply stop thinking about it unless of course its ISIS, and then we cant stop thinking about it. But the fact is that its sad. Its sad that I had to do that [myself], because every committee in Congress completely ignored all the drone wars that we were conducting in one country after another (some of which is classified and Im not even allowed to tell you about it). A high U.S. official said that for every single person whom we kill with a drone strike, all these intended victims, the ones who are these insurgents (or whatever theyre calling them these days), for every single one of them, we make 50 more enemies that join these forces against us. Think about that. Does that seem like a good ratio? Does that seem like a winning strategy?
[Hosts discuss this]
TV: One last question: Have you made a decision about running for the Senate?
Rep. Alan Grayson: No I havent. Im waiting to see what The People want.
TW: I think that The People would be very pleased to see you [in the Senate].
Rep. Alan Grayson: You move to Florida; I want your vote. [Smiling.] Its a great show, thank you very much.
To see the video, or contribute to Congressman Graysons campaign, click here and now.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1425 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Not Every Problem in the World Has a Military ‘Solution’” (Original Post)
Alan Grayson
Mar 2015
OP
liberal N proud
(60,344 posts)1. How do you expect to sell bombs and war planes and ships?
If there is no war, you don't need all those weapons of destruction.
think
(11,641 posts)2. Thank you Congressman Grayson. Please run for senate.
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)3. Thank you Mr. Grayson, the ONLY one that I respect.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)4. career politicians, "corrupt hacks", that IS the republican brand.
get a real job you gov money leech republicans.
Wounded Bear
(58,706 posts)5. But it sure seems that every military solution...
can find or create unlimited problems to be thrown at.